What is Labor Law?
Labor laws are the idea that there should be limits to how long someone should work, this includes the concept of overtime. Conditions of work, Labor Unions, downsizing, and severance are all parts of Labor Law.
Child Labor laws are the idea that children should be focused on their education, and cannot work for more than 7 hours a day.
Labor Law is such a prominent part of our society that many lawyers actually specifically specialize in Labor Law, these tykes are called Labor Lawyers.
Labor Law was really first developed in the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi, the Hindu Laws of Manu, and the Laws of the Indies created by the Spaniards. None have been confirmed to have actually worked, though, As people were still very overworked all around the world.
Once things got bad in the 18th-century (Coal Mining), the French set a lot of modern ideas, including the first enforced Labor Laws. During the 20th Century, it was a widely grasped concept all around the world.
The first pinpointed date for Labor law was the British Health and Morals of Apprentices Act of 1802. Adoption of it in Zürich was in 1815, and France in 1841. The October Revolution in Russia marked their adoption. Japan had a 31-year waiting period for adoption from 1890 to 1911. Japan later had a revision for work hours in 1923. In India, (1881) Child Labor laws were in action, limiting 9 hours of work for a child per day. From the 1940s and on, Africa has been adopting these.
The Swiss had the first legal standards for working hours. Workers Comp and Health Insurance were adopted in Germany by 1884.
After the Great Depression Labor Laws were prominent in America. Henry Ford gave "slack" to his Employees, giving them a Saturday off, so they could have actual free time. He also shortened the day by 2 hours.
Courts of general jurisdiction can grant a new trial on review of a case from a court of limited jurisdiction. What is this known as?
1. Implicit bias
2. Writ of certiorari
3. Nolle prosequi
4. Trial de novo process
Answer:
What is 4. Trial de novo process
Explanation:
De novo review occurs when a court decides an issue without deference to a previous court's decision. Trial de novo occurs when a court decides all issues in a case, as if the case was being heard for the first time. For a recent consideration of the use of de novo review, see McLane Co.
Have a happy day <3MissHawaii
the rule of law and the one way it influenced the creation of the U.S. government.
The rule of law is the restriction of the arbitrary exercise of power by subordinating it to well-defined and established laws. It is the authority and influence of law in society, especially when viewed as a constraint on individual and institutional behavior. The rule of law influenced the creation of the US government because it created a framework for American government, establishing three separate branches so that each branch would be independent and balanced among the others. These branches were the legislative, judicial, and executive. The legislative branch of government contains the parliament - the body with the legislative power to make laws, the judicial branch is in charge of deciding the meaning of laws, how to apply them to real situations, and whether a law breaks the rules of the Constitution, and the executive branch carries out and enforces laws.
What evidence demonstrates that Canada has succeeded in fostering
multicultural acceptance?
Answer:
In Canada there are many examples of multiculturalism. For example, Canada lets in refugees and immigrants and does not care about their race, religion, or culture.
What are the potential negative consequences of having a nation full of citizens who are uninformed and/or apathetic voters?
Rule of Law: Criminal Law
Facts 1: Sophie is the president of Tasty Foods Corporation, a wholesale grocery company. An inspection by Uri, a government agent, uncovers unsanitary conditions caused by Vic, a Tasty Foods employee, in the company’s warehouse. Will, a Tasty Foods vice president, assures Uri that the situation will be corrected, but a later inspection reveals no such corrections. Sophie knows nothing about any of this.
Issue: Can Tasty Foods be convicted of a crime in these circumstances? Define, explain, and decide
Issue: Can Sophie be held personally liable? Define, explain and decide
Facts 2: Fred, a successful stockbroker, gives a lecture about investing. Some of the persons who attend the lecture form Gain & Profit, an investment club, and ask Fred to advise them. Gain & Profit allows Fred to set up an account for the club with a brokerage firm and gives Fred control of the account, but does not authorize Fred to withdraw funds for his own benefit. Fred uses the money in the Gain & Profit account to repay personal loans. Charged with embezzlement, Fred defends his actions on the ground that he intended to repay the club.
Issue: Is Fred guilty of embezzlement? Why or why not? Define, explain and decide.
Answer:
The answer to both questions is yes.
Explanation:
A corporation may be held liable for the crime of its employee if (1) the criminal act is within the scope of the employment and the purpose of the statute defining the act as a crime is to impose liability on the corporation, (2) the crime consists of a failure to perform a specific duty imposed on corporations by law, and (3) the crime was authorized by one of the corporation's "high managerial agents." Here, all of these elements exist. The unsanitary conditions in the warehouse are within the employee's scope of employment, the crime consists of a failure to keep the warehouse clean, and the crime was authorized by a company vice president. As for the president's personal liability, if she has the authority and the responsibility to deal with the situation, she can be held personally liable. A corporate officer must have the authority and the responsibility to deal with such situations. Personal liability is imposed in these circumstances, not because the corporate officer knew about the crime or intended it, but because the officer is in a "responsible relationship" to the corporation and has the power to prevent the crime. Under this "responsible corporate officer" doctrine, a corporate officer can be held liable for an employee's violations of the law. This liability may be imposed regardless of whether the officer participated in, directed, or knew about the violation.
can someone help me with this question please
Answer:
Law enforcement
courts
corrections
(i think its the 2nd one)
Family killings are most likely to occur in which type of location?
O a. Large cities
O b. Small cities
O c. Rural
O d. Suburban
O c. Rural areas, mostly bcos if poverty
alguien y vio el * JUEGO DEL CALAMAR * es muy bacana se las recomiendo esta en NEFLITX me la estoy viendo por parte aveses es muy violento , el juego del calamar se trata de :
En la trama, un grupo de 456 personas, desesperadas y ahogadas en deudas, son atraídas para participar en un juego sangriento de supervivencia en el que tienen la oportunidad de ganar cerca de US$39 millones si logran pasar seis desafíos.
veansela se las recomiendo :)
es muy buena
Answer:
Explanation:
Sehhh es muy buenaa, su trama siento que es original.
What are the four steps, in order, of active crime response
Answer:
Introduce yourself to victims by name and title. Briefly explain your role and purpose.
Reassure victims of their safety and your concern by paying close attention to your own words, posture, mannerisms, and tone of voice. Say to victims, “You're safe now” or “I'm here now.” Use body language to show concern, such as nodding your head, using natural eye contact, placing yourself at the victim's level rather than standing over seated victims, keeping an open stance rather than crossing your arms, and speaking in a calm, sympathetic voice.
Ask victims to tell you in just a sentence or two what happened. Ask if they have any physical injuries. Take care of their medical needs first.
Offer to contact a family member, friend, or crisis counselor for victims.
Ensure privacy during your interview. Conduct it in a place where victims feel secure.
Ask simple questions that allow victims to make decisions, assert themselves, and regain control over their lives. Examples: “Would you like anything to drink?”; “May I come inside and talk with you?”; and “How would you like me to address you, Ms. Jones?”
Assure victims of the confidentiality of their comments whenever possible.
Ask victims about any special concerns or needs they may have.
Provide a “safety net” for victims before leaving them. Make telephone calls and pull together personal or professional support for the victims. Give victims a pamphlet listing resources available for help or information. This pamphlet should include contact information for local crisis intervention centers and support groups; the prosecutor's office and the victim-witness assistance office; the State victim compensation/assistance office; and other nationwide services, including toll-free hotlines.
Give victim's—in writing—your name and information on how to reach you. Encourage them to contact you if they have any questions or if you can be of further help.
Explanation:
Describe 6 reasons why banks fail in Ghana and proffer solutions to redeem the banking sector from these 6 cancerous roots in your opinion
Based on banking analysis, the six reasons banks fail in Ghana include Undercapitalization and Lack of good credit risk management.
Other reasons why the banks fail in Ghana include the following:
Inadequacy of corporate governanceTerrible loans management.Ineffective regulatory processesFraudulent licenses operation.The solutions to redeem the banking sector from these six cancerous roots are the following:
The Central Bank of Ghana should make it a requirement for all banks in Ghana to have a certain amount of liquidity before embarking on operations.The bank's management should assess credit risks and the potentials of their customers before taking credit-related decisions.There should be standardized corporate practices in all banking practices.When it comes to loan management, banks should ensure they only offer loans to those that can afford them and make repayment accordingly.The Central Bank of Ghana should constantly regulate all the banks to check if their operations are by established corporate practices.All the banks should be monitored closely by the Central Bank of Ghana to check their authorization and, if found guilty, should be sanctioned with strong penalties.Hence, in this case, it is concluded that many banking operations in Ghana need supervision from the Central Bank of Ghana.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/24569908
Do you think that the dairy industry is an example of a purely competitive market? Why or why not? If not, what industry is?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
because it record everything
Texas law also requires children of certain ages, weights and heights to
Answer:
Texas law requires all children younger than 8 years old, unless taller than 4'9”, to be in the appropriate child safety seat system.
Texas law requires all children younger than 8 years old, unless taller than 4'9”, to be in the appropriate child safety seat system.
What is a law?In order to control conduct, social or political institutions make laws that are then enforced. However, the exact concept of law is still up for question. It has been called both science and the practice of justice in diverse contexts. There are two realms that make up the application of the law. Public law, which includes criminal law, administrative law,
In accordance with Texas law, all children under the age of eight must sit in a child safety seat unless they are taller than 4 feet 9 inches. Older kids who have outgrown a booster seat need to be belted in.
Therefore, By the law, it requires a child safety seat whenever they ride in a vehicle.
Learn more about the law here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ2
Chế độ thai sản trong luật
1. Lao động nữ sinh con được nghỉ việc hưởng chế độ thai sản trước và sau khi sinh con là 06 tháng. Trường hợp lao động nữ sinh đôi trở lên thì tính từ con thứ hai trở đi, cứ mỗi con, người mẹ được nghỉ thêm 01 tháng. Thời gian nghỉ hưởng chế độ thai sản trước khi sinh tối đa không quá 02 tháng.
When the defense and the prosecution work together in a spirit of cooperation to get the case over with rather than fighting it out, this is known as what?
The rule of four
The formal justice system
Community prosecution
The informal justice system
Answer:
community prosecution
If you were driving the blue Prius in the situation pictured above, explain why the red Mustang should be given right-of-way at this
intersection.
Your answer should be → I have to yield to the red mustang because it is on my right.
" If you have been arrested on suspicion of DUI you can only be released after A. " you have been held for a minimum of 8 hours B. you are no longer under the influence of drugs or alcohol C. your BAL is under .05, if you are over 21 years of age D. All of the above
Answer:
ALL OF THE ABOVE
Explanation:
What is the issue facing indigent criminal defendants in Luzerne County?
The public defender’s office is arguing against the Gideon v. Wainright decision.
The protections afforded to the indigent criminal defendants under the Fourth Amendment are being violated by the police.
The county attorney in Luzerne is refusing to plea bargain with the public defender’s office.
The overburdened public defender’s office is turning away clients.
here according to me option B is correct.
hope this answer helps you dear...take care and may u have a great day ahead!
The protections afforded to indigent criminal defendants under the Fourth Amendment are being violated by the police is the issue facing indigent criminal defendants in Luzerne County. Hence, option B is correct.
What is defendants?A person or thing that is the subject of a lawsuit or criminal investigation; if the defendant is found not guilty by the jury, one who is being sued.
A person who is being sued or who has been accused of a crime is a defendant. A defendant may be someone who has been accused of driving under the influence.
In legal proceedings, a defendant is a person or entity who is either the party who is being sued for some type of civil relief in a civil case or the party who is being prosecuted for a crime in a criminal case.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more information about defendants, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14167307
#SPJ2
Which of the following individuals may be required to undergo HIV testing? a) Employees of a small business with limited health insurance resources b) A technician at an HIV testing lab c) A convicted sex offender d) A nurse applying for a job at a hospital
Answer:
c) A convicted sex offender
Explanation:
What does it mean to “establish the principle”?
Answer: establish a principle (=make it accepted)Establish the principle that when your office door is shut you must not be disturbed. lay down a principle (=describe a principle and make it accepted)The report lays down general principles for the teaching of English.
can you please tell me what is brainly is about and what it does???
Which factor would Anti-Federalists most strongly support?
Answer:
Anti-Federalist strongly support the idea of stric Constitution witch means that whatever is not in the constitution is not going to be a law.
Homicide makes up % of all crimes known to law enforcement.
Answer:
75%
Explanation:
g
please reword this thesis into an conclusion
While Letting them vote will be extremely educational for them, people under eighteen would make a difference, and it'd be a good idea to allow them to state their opinion and vote because they will increase the voter turnout, they have a better knowledge in their community than adults, and if they're given the choice to vote it'll greatly affect everything.
4. What are the pros and cons of immunity?
Answer:
pros: protection from law suits, accusations, police officers randomly showing up at your house and asking bs
cons: could allow officials to get away with things, many say it's injust, officers can get sued/reported
List the qualifications of the president
Answer:
Requirements to Hold Office
According to Article II of the U.S. Constitution, the president must be a natural-born citizen of the United States, be at least 35 years old, and have been a resident of the United States for 14 years.
Explanation:
Which of the following individuals may be required to undergo HIV testing? a) Employees of a small business with limited health insurance resources b) A technician at an HIV testing lab c) A convicted sex offender d) A nurse applying for a job at a hospital
Answer:
The answer is B because they are exposed to HIV all the time.
Explanation:
Which source would be the MOST biased when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency, compared to past presidents?
Some of the sources that can be biassed when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents include current executive members
Other biased sources include the following:
Political party members of the President,Previous schools the current President attended,Family of the current President The political party the President belonged to,The special assistants to the current President, etc.
The sources that would be biased when evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents are those closest to the President or in support of the incumbent President.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that many sources supporting the current President will be biased towards his cause.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/20646239
7. When an officer has a reasonable basis for the belief that a person should be searched or
arrested, it is called
A a warrant
B an affidavit
C probable cause
D search and seize.
Answer:
C. PROBABLE CAUSE
Explanation:
Probable cause exists when an officer has a reasonable basis for the belief that a person should be searched or arrested.
11. Although he knew he was guilty of the crime, the mobster said he wouldn't answer questions
about it on the stand. Which amendment protected him?
a. 4th amendment
b. 5th amendment
6th amendment
d. 7th amendment
Answer:
5th amendment
Explanation:
The 5th amendment goes as follows "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
Answer:
5th
Explanation:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger..."
5th Amedment, U.S Constitution
Bacically the constitution allows you to not answer the police officer if he asks you what happened, it is similar to Meranda Rights
The "stand your ground" doctrine originated in which state?
a. Illinois
b. Colorado
c. Texas
O d. Florida