Lawyer/Attorney: A person who practices law and is fully licensed to practice law. A lawyer may conduct legal research, oversee paralegals, represent clients in court, draw up wills or contracts etc.
How did Greek scientists change the way people viewed and understood the natural world around them??
help
Answer:
Greek scientists – mostly mathematicians, philosofers, biologist, physicists –changed the way people viewed and understood the natural world around them starting from the simple observation and measurement of the objetcts around them. After that, their observations arrived to experimentation and analysis.
Explanation:
which option best completes the diagram
Answer:
I do believe it's B
Explanation:
if you look at the other options they wouldn't fit into what is already in the boxes.
What does John Locke say is the cause of tyranny?
Answer:
Tyranny is caused when the leader has the ability to use power beyond what is given to the leader by law. It is induced by the leader's selfish ambitions.
Explanation:
Buoyant force in a sentence .
you seem very buoyant today! (happy)
or
you are very good at being buoyant in the water (floating)
Which is the correct order of processes a suspected criminal would encounter?
Answer: Chandler, Fletcher, and Volkow (2009) identified the criminal justice stages of entry, prosecution, adjudication, sentencing, corrections, and reentry. These stages trace offenders' movement through the criminal justice components from arrest, through court, to incarceration or community-supervision.
Explanation:
1. Imagine that you are responsible for filling roles for a mock criminal trial. What parts would need to be represented? What types of responsibilities would each position have? Make a list.
2. During the pre-trial phase, witnesses are summoned to the courtroom in which they will testify to the facts of a case. During the trial, both fact witnesses and expert witnesses give testimony. Write a response comparing and contrasting what happens with an expert witness versus a fact witness.
3. The Constitution grants all US citizens the right to bail, even when they are facing serious crimes such as murder. Do you agree with this? Why or why not?
4. In most states, the post-trial phase requires judges to sentence the convicted using a sentencing table. This means that they cannot go over or under the recommended sentence for that particular crime. Do you think the law should dictate what the sentence for a particular crime should be, or should this be solely at the discretion of the judge? Explain.
5. Serving a defendant or witness with court documents is an important part of the pre-trial process. Do you think service should always happen in person or is dropping off the paperwork okay? What should happen to those who refuse to receive a summons? Defend your stance.
Please help me out!!
Answer:
1. The parts that would need to be represented are Pretrial Motions, Jury selection, Opening statements, Prosecution's case. The responsibilities for pretrial motions is to Help ensure that defendants released to the community before trial commit no crime while awaiting trial and return to court as required. Jury selection or "jury" they look at evidence and determine if someone should even be charged with crime in the first place.
2. Fact witnesses provide details about specific circumstances in a case, expert witnesses provide insight in a case by sharing their expert knowledge of a subject based on their training and experience.
3. I personally don't agree with it, it takes away the justice available for the victim and gives the murderer another chance to do the crime again if they are really delusional. For some, it's okay to bail if the crime wasn't too serious. But for high crimes I believe they should not be an option for bail. For example the murderer of your mother had a right to bail, so he requested a bail, or was offered and he had the money to do so and got away with his crime, its unfair.
4. The law should not dictate the sentence for a particular crime, it makes much more sense solely for the judge to make that decision in a certain sense for a crime. A judge interprets the law, imposing sentences, issuing subpoenas etc. It would be better for a judge to make the decision.
5. Service should always happen in person to get a better understanding of them just reading them off a piece of paper, dropping off paper is okay too and it would be a faster process for the defendant/witness to access the documents. In person it makes much more sense. If a person refuses a summons, what I believe would happen to them according to my notes is that in most cases they are legally allowed to, but it doesn't stop them from having a lawsuit against them. A judge is most likely also to have a bench warrant for their arrest.
Explanation
trust
For a mock criminal trial; the most important part that would need to be represented by the core team including county coordinator of hypothetical court room and their major responsibilities.
What is mock trail?Mock Trails help students to learn and explore the judicial system through hypothetical civil or criminal case, which simulate genuine trials. They are introduced to the core of the legal system through mock trials. They investigate a fictitious case, perform legal research, and act out the trial.
A core team of minimum 8 students has following primary responsibility:
Develops critical-thinking abilities.Thorough understanding of our judicial system.Prepare witness testimonies, legal arguments, Trial instructions, and procedure rules are all included in each mock trial packet. Make a pretrial motion which includes a better comprehension about the constitutional concerns raised by criminal trials.Other participants are County Coordinator, Teacher Sponsor, Attorney Coach, Pretrial attorney, Trial attorneys, Witnesses, Bailiff, Clerk, Courtroom Artists, Alternates.
To know more about mock trail refer:
https://brainly.com/question/26874092
#SPJ2
How does this quote relate to the concept of social contract
What is the final step of any historical research project?
O
create a hypothesis about an important question
O
triangulate the data from all primary and secondary sources
O
find a way to share the results of the research with others
O
attempt to validate or invalidate the working hypothesis
Answer:
find a way to share the results of the research with others
Explanation:
Whose human rights are more important in this situation? Explain.
What options might Mr. Zimmerman have for addressing the problem of shoplifting in his store?
Mr. Zimmerman's human rights are important in this situation.
What are Human Rights?Human rights are the basic rights and freedoms that belong to each and every person in the world, from birth until his/her death.
The parents believe that in this situation teens' human rights have been violated. Mr. Zimmerman says he is just trying to protect his own human rights and those of his other customers. Mr. Zimmerman says the increase in shoplifting has decreased his profits and that he may have to close the store if shoplifting continues at the same rate.
Therefore, Mr. Zimmerman's human rights are important in this situation.
Learn more about Human Rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/3444313
#SPJ1
What characteristics should police officers have to be able to fulfill these different roles: law enforcers, service providers, and crime preventers. Explain why.
Some of the most important characteristics that a police officer must possess include:
Physical fitness.Critical thinking.Sound judgment.Problem-solving skills.Communication skills.Interpersonal skills.Strong moral character.Sense of ethics.However maximum officers under pressure are extremely good people with solid training and obsessed with serving their groups. These people may be recognized for their character trends and qualities which include professionalism, bravery, strong ethics, and deep admiration and understanding of legal guidelines.
Effective regulation Enforcement specializes in educating the public, police, and civic leaders on first-class practices for public safety-centered policing practices.
Both researchers and law enforcement officials have defined the traits critical for the right police overall performance. These encompass not unusual sense, mature judgment, and the capability to react quickly and correctly to hassle situations.
Learn more about officers here https://brainly.com/question/879746
#SPJ1
What is mean by “But if a government ever fails in its tasks to protect individual rights to alter or abolish it and create a new government based on whatever principles they think best”?
it's from the
declaration of independence
if the government doesnt act right
the people that created it
can change or get rid of it
government may not be acting right
if it tries to destroy
the peoples
life liberty happiness equality
its the original meaning behind the second amendment & other rights
ironically its such flexibility that has allowed
US Constitution to remain in place
where as in other countries
their Constitutions have been changed or destroyed many times
Due to how the amendment process is set-up, and need to votes in order to pass amendments, what must occur?
A) Congress and the states have to work together.
B) Congress and the states have to work separately.
C) Congress and the states need to recognize people's rights.
D) Congress and the states need to respect legal records.
The amendment process in the US requires a cooperative exertion among Congress and the states. Subsequently, choice (A) is exact.
To propose a revision, either a 66% larger part vote in both the Place of Delegates and the Senate or a public show called by 66% of the state governing bodies is vital. When proposed, the revision should be endorsed, requiring endorsement by three-fourths of the state assemblies or by shows in three-fourths of the states.
This process guarantees that both the bureaucratic and state legislatures are associated with forming the Constitution. It accentuates the significance of collaboration and coordination among Congress and the states to correct the essential tradition that must be adhered to.
Thusly, choice (A) is precise.
Learn more about Congress, from:
brainly.com/question/31333444
#SPJ7
Document A: Excerpts from Founding Documents
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” Declaration of Independence 1776
“The ordaining of laws in favor of one part of the nation, to the prejudice and oppression of another, is certainly the most erroneous and mistaken policy. An equal dispensation of protection, rights, privileges, and advantages, is what every part is entitled to, and ought to enjoy.” – Benjamin Franklin, Emblematical Representations, ca. 1774
Sourcing: Why might it be important for historians or researchers to notice who wrote these sources?
Fourth of July 1776 in Congress
The collective statement of the thirteen American states, When it becomes necessary, in the course of human events, for one people to sever the political ties that have bound them to another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect for mankind's opinions demands that they should declare the reasons that motivate the separation.
Prudence, after all, will suggest that long-established governments shouldn't be altered for trivial reasons. However, history has shown that people are more likely to put up with injustices while they still exist than to change their ways and institute new ones. However, when a lengthy history of wrongdoings and usurpations pursuing consistently the same goal indicates a desire to subject them to total despotism, it is their right and responsibility to overthrow such a government and to install new Guards for their continued security. — Such has been their patient suffering, and such is the current constraint forcing them to change their prior systems of government.
Learn more about Government, here
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ9
Which element is a building block of polymers?
O A. atoms
O B. electricity
O C. binders
O D. string
Answer:
Monomers
Explanation:
the answer is not there but the real answer is monomers
Essentially, monomers are the building blocks of polymers , which are more complex of molecules
Answer: D strings
Explanation:
All synthetic strings are made from polymers
Why is Unitarian better than Federal and Confederate power structures
Answer:
One central government controls weaker states.does that help?
How does this quote relate to the concept of the "rule of law"?
Answer:
The power of the people is limited by law. No can do anything outside of their rights/power which is against the law and can induce harm in others. If people abuse their power, they deserve to be opposed.
Explanation:
All of the Special Agent Entry Programs of the FBI require that an applicant have at least
O a bachelor's degree and experience
O a high-school diploma and proficiency in a foreign language
O a graduate degree
O a high-school diploma and experience
All of the Special Agent Entry Programs of the FBI require that an applicant have at least have bachelor's degree and experience. The FBI has five admission programs law, accounting, science, language, and diverse, each with its unique set of academic requirements. The application process is known for its thoroughness.
Candidates must have two years of full-time professional job experience. Candidates with a master's degree or above can apply with as little as one year of professional experience. All special agents start their careers at the FBI Academy in Quantico, where they get 20 weeks of intensive training at one of the world's best law enforcement training institutions.
To learn more about FBI, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/22974868
Why is Capitalism better than Socialism and Communism?
Answer:
capitalism rewards individuals for success and progress by allowing them to grow that wealth through investment and other actions within the market.does that help?
Which activity would an organization focused on law reform conduct?
Answer:
When the lawyer knows that the interests of a client may be materially benefitted by a decision in which the lawyer participates
Explanation:
Answer: When the lawyer knows that the interests of a client may be materially benefitted by a decision in which the lawyer participates
Explanation: hope this helps!!!
What is the Mosaic Code of the Israelites? How did it influence the foundation of the U.S. legal system?
Answer:
The Mosaic Code is a set of laws found in the Hebrew Bible. It is also known as the Law of Moses or the Pentateuch. The Code includes laws governing many aspects of life, including morality, family life, criminal law, and civil law. The Code has been influential in the development of the U.S. legal system, particularly in the areas of property law and contract law, because, like the Code, the U.S. legal system is based on common law which, in turn, is based on court decisions.
In the communication model discussed in the segment, the _____________ is the intended target of the message.
Answer:
Receiver
Explanation:
In the communication model discussed in the segment, the ___Receiver__ is the intended target of the message.
In a criminal trial process, the jury informs the
after arriving at a verdict.
Which of the following is NOT a goal for research and investigation careers?
A. To collect accurate information
B. To increase officer safety
C. To collect precise details
D. To collect consistent evidence
(25 points) View the Political Cartoon image attached (title: Gov Types
Cartoon). Describe what it is depicting and its meaning.
Answer: it's meaning is to represent by or as if by a picture
Explanation:
HAVE A NICE DAY!^^
7. What is the most important civil right to you.
Explain your reasoning.
The most important civil right is Ultimate, on July 2, 1964, that intention turned into realized, as President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The law become meant to quit discrimination primarily based on race, color, faith, or national beginning and has often been called the maximum crucial U.S. law on civil rights considering Reconstruction (1865–seventy-seven).
A civil rights violation is any offense that happens as an end result or hazard of force against a victim via the offender on the idea of being a member of a covered class. as an example, a victim who's assaulted because of their race or sexual orientation. Violations can consist of injuries or even demise.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the idea of race, color, faith, or countrywide origin. Provisions of this civil rights act forbade discrimination on the basis of intercourse, in addition to, race in hiring, promoting, and firing.
Civil liberties shield us from government strength. they're rooted inside the invoice of Rights, which limits the powers of the federal government. The government can not dispose of the freedoms mentioned inside the invoice of Rights, and any movement that encroaches on those liberties is illegal.
Learn more about civil right here https://brainly.com/question/131269
#SPJ9
What are you required to show before your vehicle will be registered
What are the three rights are people guaranteed according to the preamble?
Answer:
right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Explanation:
All the following are roles of Congress except:
a. Make laws
c. Try to get reelected
b. Propose bills
d. Choose the Secretary of State
Examine the history of labor unions and answer the question "Are labor unions good for business?"Answer in 500 words
Answer:
Businesses and labor unions both aim to profit from their operations. I believe that the best way for business and labor to accomplish their objectives is through mutual concessions that result in a settlement that both parties deem just. Budget reductions and efforts to identify a solution that would be advantageous to both business and labor could be examples of these compromises. By putting aside their own interests and making sure they don't do anything that would harm the other, business and labor could reach a compromise. Having an advantage over one or the other, though, does nothing but cause more issues. Both businesses and labor unions suffer when they act in their own self-interest without considering what the other might benefit from. This has the exact opposite effect—it makes neither group look better than the other in the end. Businesses may use the additional 20% to support labor unions or the business, which would subsequently benefit the employees, if labor unions agreed to a compromise of splitting the cost of fringe benefits 50/50. Negative circumstances like sit-ins or strikes only result if people don't cooperate and try to find a solution. However, as a result of government regulations safeguarding American workers, incidents like that have decreased. Similar to how unions are starting to decline as a result of government policies. Government acts as a sort of mediator between industry and labor. Without these laws defending business and labor, there would be a rise in labor unions and more stringent, discriminatory regulations for corporations. That was demonstrated by time in the 1800s during the Industrial Revolution, when certain rules were nonexistent. For instance, robber barons or employers would exploit people by paying outrageously unfair wages or putting them in hazardous conditions at work. But since then, both the business and labor union movements in America have advanced significantly.
Explanation:
In the case Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the Supreme Court overruled Wolf. V. Colorado, when it ruled that
evidence gathered illegally, could not be presented in a state court. Based on the court's ruling, In
Mapp v. Ohio, which of the following did the judges go against in their ruling?
Based on the court's ruling, In Mapp v. Ohio Judges went against in their ruling of Judicial Review.
By a vote of 5-3, the United States Supreme Court decided in Mapp's favor. According to the supreme court, state courts cannot utilize evidence that was illegally obtained without a search order in criminal trials.
What's a Judicial Review?
A judge analyzes the legality of a public body's decision or action in a court case called judicial review. To put it another way, court reviews focus more on the process of decision-making than the merits or shortcomings of the outcome.To Learn more about Judicial Review, Click the links.
https://brainly.com/question/966716
https://brainly.com/question/28179489
#SPJ9
Answer: Free Expression
Explanation:
Colorado was a United States Supreme Court decision. The Court ruled 6–3 that the First Amendment right to free speech was not violated by a Colorado law limiting protest, education, distribution of literature, or counseling within eight feet of a person entering a healthcare facility.