According to the section "First African American Astronaut," how did space travel affect Guion Bluford?
A. It allowed him to view the world and how people treat others differently.
B. It encouraged him to return home and treat others more kindly.
C. It inspired him to help more Black Americans become astronauts.
D. It gave him hope for the future of the world and its people.
The right solution for this question is option A. It allowed him to view the world and how people treat others differently.
what is space travel?
Space travel refers to the act of traveling beyond the Earth's atmosphere into space. It includes the use of various spacecraft, such as rockets, shuttles, and space probes, to explore and study the universe beyond our planet. Space travel has been a major milestone in human history and has enabled us to learn more about our solar system, the universe, and the potential for human exploration and colonization of other planets.
Space travel involves a range of activities, including launching spacecraft into orbit, docking with space stations, conducting experiments in microgravity environments, and exploring celestial bodies such as the Moon, Mars, and other planets. It also involves extensive research and development in fields such as engineering, physics, biology, and medicine to address the unique challenges of space travel and to improve our understanding of the universe.
Space travel has played a critical role in advancing scientific knowledge and technological innovation and has inspired generations of people to explore and learn about the world beyond our own.
To know more about Space travel visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28682228
#SPJ1
Differentiate between white man's burden and nationalism.
a. Nationalism is when you hate your country but white man's burden is when you love your country
b. White man's burden is when white people think it is their job or duty to "ducate" the other races but nationalism is when you think your country is the best
c. White man's burden is when you hate your country but nationalism is when you love your country
d. Nationalism is when white people think it is their job or duty to
"educate" the other races but white man's burden is when you think your country is the best
Nationalism is when a person believes their country is the best, whereas the "white man's burden" is when white people believe it is their responsibility to "educate" other races.
Which definition of nationalism is the most accurate?An ideology known as nationalism places a strong emphasis on loyalty and claims that allegiances to a nation or nation-state are more essential than those to other people or groups, devotion, or allegiance to that entity.
How do nationalism and patriotism differ?But patriotism and nationalism are very different from one another. Whereas nationalism emphasises a unity of the past, including the language and legacy, patriotism is based on love of people and places a greater focus on ideas and ideals.
To know more about Nationalism visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1018147
#SPJ1
What is inclusiveness?
the quality of covering or dealing with a range of subjects or areas.
OR
The practice or policy of providing equal access to opportunities and resources for people who might otherwise be excluded or marginalized, such as those having physical or intellectual disabilities or belonging to other minority groups.
Social inclusion is the process of improving the terms on which individuals and groups take part in society—improving the ability, opportunity, and dignity of those disadvantaged on the basis of their identity. It means giving the marginalized more resources so that they can all have the same amount of opportunity to do well, and is a method to create fairness and equality.
Social contract theorists say that morality consists of a set of rules governing how people should treat one another that rational beings will agree to accept for their mutual benefit on the condition that others agree to follow these rules as well.
Thomas Hobbes looked to the distant past to observe a primitive "state of nature" in which there was no such thing as morality. He found that this self-interested way of being was "nasty, brutish, and short," that is, a perpetual state of warfare. He outlined the civilized solution to this problem in the form of a logical syllogism.
We are all self-interested.
Each of us needs to have a peaceful and cooperative social order to pursue our interests.
We need moral rules in order to establish and maintain a cooperative social order.
Therefore, self-interest motivates us to establish moral rules.
John Locke disagreed. He refuted Hobbes' claim that early civilizations were always "at war" by pointing to historical examples of people in that "state of nature" and praising their efforts to maintain both their individuality and a fair society.
Locke set forth the view that the state exists to preserve the natural rights of its citizens. He found that when governments fail in that task, citizens have the right and sometimes the duty to withdraw their support and even to rebel.
So, which philosophy is most like your own? Is human nature animalistic or noble? How can you tell?
Let's consider an example that many of us can relate to. In December of 2001, just months after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Richard Reid attempted to detonate a shoe bomb while on board a passenger airplane bound from Paris to Miami. Fortunately, some quick thinking and brave flight attendants and passengers were able to stop him. As a result of that single incident, millions of passengers have been obliged to take off their shoes while going through the airport security check. Some consider this to be a reasonable precaution, while others feel it is an overreaction that inconveniences everyone without increasing safety.
For your initial post, discuss an example of something most of us are routinely required to do that limits our personal freedom. In your opinion, is the loss of freedom justified by some gain in social order or safety? Why or why not?
An example of something most of us are routinely required to do that limits our personal freedom is wearing a seatbelt while driving a car.
While seatbelts can be uncomfortable and restrict movement, they have been proven to significantly increase safety and save lives in the event of an accident. In this case, the loss of personal freedom is justified by the gain in safety.However, it is important to consider the balance between personal freedom and social order/safety in each situation. Some may argue that certain restrictions, such as mandatory vaccination, go too far in limiting personal freedom, while others argue that they are necessary for the greater good. It is up to individuals and society as a whole to weigh the benefits and drawbacks of such restrictions and come to a collective decision.
To learn more about freedom click the link below:
brainly.com/question/30621656
#SPJ1
Provide three examples of how you could show that you embrace diversity
Answer:
1. Attend cultural events: Attending cultural events such as festivals, concerts, and exhibitions is a great way to learn about different cultures and show that you embrace diversity. By immersing yourself in different cultural experiences, you can gain a better understanding and appreciation of different customs, traditions, and ways of life.
2. Volunteer for diversity-related causes: Volunteering for diversity-related causes such as refugee support organizations, LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, or racial justice initiatives is another way to show that you embrace diversity. By actively supporting and advocating for marginalized communities, you can demonstrate your commitment to promoting equality and inclusivity.
3. Educate yourself: Educating yourself about different cultures, religions, and lifestyles is an important step in embracing diversity. Reading books, watching documentaries, and taking online courses are all great ways to expand your knowledge and understanding of different cultures and perspectives. By educating yourself, you can become a more informed and empathetic individual, which can help you better connect with people from diverse backgrounds.
In 1938, Kristallnacht was the night when
Group of answer choices
Nazi mobs attacked Jewish businesses, homes, and schools.
Jewish communities organized protests against the Nazi Party.
Jewish people were freed from Nazi concentration camps.
Nazis gathered Jewish people and forced them to move to ghettos.
Answer:
Kristallnacht was the night when Nazi mobs attacked Jewish businesses, homes, and schools.
Explanation:
SOS !! somebody helpp
Answer:
The answer is C!
Explanation:
In Egypt, the majority of the society is Muslim, and the minority group is Christian.
(Hope this helps)
HELP HELP HELPP PLSSS The Persian Gulf is indicated by which roman numeral on the map?
I
II
III
IV
Answer:
The Persian Gulf is indicated by the roman numeral III.
Explanation:
Date:.. Page: 8. Write about legislative formation of Nepal
The formation of Nepal legislative reflects its commitment to a democratic and representative government. The two houses of the legislature provide a platform for the representation of diverse interests and viewpoints which enables the country to develop and implement policies and law.
What should we know about legislative formation of Nepal?The legislative formation of Nepal is bicameral, consisting of two houses: the House of Representatives and the National Assembly. The House of Representatives has 275 members, elected for a five-year term through a mixed electoral system. The National Assembly has 59 members, with eight members elected from each of the seven provinces by an electoral college consisting of provincial assembly members and chairpersons and vice-chairpersons of rural municipalities and municipalities.
The House of Representatives has the power to initiate and pass bills related to budget, taxation, and other legislative matters. The National Assembly has the power to review and revise bills passed by the House of Representatives and to propose amendments to bills.
Read more about legislative formation
brainly.com/question/3120331
#SPJ1
THEO: According to Rosemary Ruether, what are the positive attributes or applications of an androgynous Jesus Christ? How is this a positive theology for women?
Rosemary Ruether, a feminist theologian, argues that an androgynous Jesus Christ has several positive attributes and applications, particularly for women.
What is liberation?Liberation since it challenges the patriarchal systems that have historically oppressed and marginalized women, an androgynous Jesus might be interpreted as a symbol of freedom for women.
An androgynous Jesus is a theological concept that sees Jesus as embodying both male and female characteristics, rather than being exclusively masculine.
An androgynous Jesus is a theological concept that sees Jesus as embodying both male and female characteristics, rather than being exclusively masculine.
Learn more about Feminist theology here:
https://brainly.com/question/29526642
#SPJ1
Ruether says that a Jesus Christ who was androgynous would have a few good qualities or uses: a focus on gender parity.
Because Jesus embodies both masculine and feminine characteristics, Christianity would also acknowledge the experiences of women.
What did Rosemary Radford Ruether accept?Ruether was of the opinion that the traditions of classical theology don't include women's experiences, which keeps the idea that women are less important than men alive. Feminist theology, in Ruether's opinion, had the potential to reveal and alter theological systems that were inherently discriminatory.
What has Rosemary Ruether contributed to the field of feminism?Church historian, theologian, author, and educator Rosemary Radford Ruether was well-known all over the world for her work on women and religion. She was a major proponent of a feminist critique of Christian theology, a traditionally male field.
Learn more about Jesus Christ:
brainly.com/question/29025154
#SPJ1