Answer:
Explanation:0000000000000000000000000
Quiz Question 6.7
Homework Unanswered
There are two main worries with the following reasoning. What are they?
"New York state's roadways are a death trap; there were 966 traffic related deaths in 2015 alone.
Wyoming is a lot safer with only 190 such deaths in the same year!"
The two main worries are number of deaths from the accident and the number of accidents taking place in New York.
What causes road accidents?Other factors that contribute to deadly traffic accidents include driving in the wrong lane, making illegal turns or risky lane changes, having a defective car, tailgating and overtaking when it is not necessary, and running stop signs and red lights.
Without a question, distracted driving is the main factor in auto accidents. A distracted driver is not fully focused on the road; instead, they may be more preoccupied with passengers, a mobile device, or even a cheeseburger.
According to study, following too closely behind oncoming traffic increases the risk of an accident more than speeding does. If you drive too slowly, other drivers may have to brake and accelerate frequently to keep up with you. It might result in confusion, annoy other motorists, and perhaps an accident.
To learn more about road accidents visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1235714
#SPJ13
Which idea does this excerpt support?
the Anti-Federalist idea that dividing the government into branches will not stop abuses of power
the Federalist idea that lawmaking power should be divided among the different branches of government
the Anti-Federalist idea that lawmaking should be a matter for states, not the federal government
the Federalist idea that branches of government should overlap so they can check on each other’s activities
The correct option is B. The idea this excerpt support is the Federalist idea that lawmaking power should be divided among the different branches of government.
Why should there be a separation of power in the government?
The goal of the separation of powers is to prevent the accumulation of unrestrained power and to establish a system of checks and balances, whereby the authority of one body of government is constrained by that of another, preventing abuses of authority and a return to autocracy.
The U.S. Constitution established a system of checks and balances to prevent any one branch from gaining undue power and divided the federal government's authority among these three branches in accordance with the doctrine of the separation of powers.
Thus, B is the right answer. This passage supports the Federalist view that the several parts of government should each have a portion of the legislative authority.
Learn more about separation of power here:
brainly.com/question/20630947
#SPJ2
P.s hopes this helps
In Chapter 9 we learned about how and when the death penalty can be applied. Do you believe the United States should outlaw the death penalty? Why or why not? Explain your answer.
I believe that the death penalty should be prohibited in the United States because it is a sentence that does not repair the victims of a crime and instead benefits the accused. Additionally, it can be dangerous for some innocent people who are accused of crimes they did not commit.
What is the death penalty?The death penalty is a term that refers to a method of execution of a person who has been sentenced by the State, as punishment for committing a crime established by law. The crimes for which this penalty is usually applied are called capital crimes.
Should the death penalty be banned in the United States?The death penalty should be banned in the United States because it is an ineffective way to sentence a criminal. In the first place, this method does not repair the victims of the crime or their relatives. On the other hand, this form of execution benefits the condemned in a certain way because it frees him from the punishment of remaining in jail.
Therefore, we believe that this practice should be prohibited. Additionally, this practice is dangerous because sometimes some individuals who were innocent were sentenced to death and after their execution their innocence was proven.
Learn more about death penalty in: https://brainly.com/question/28605893
#SPJ1
Alastair Gray discusses the connection between counterfeit items, organized crime, and terrorism. What some things in our daily lives that could be connected to transnational organized crime? How influential has technology been in the rise of transnational organized crime? What are some ways we can combat these issues?
Elements of our daily lives that could be connected to international organized crime are our communications, technological devices, and identity.
What things in our daily lives could be connected to transnational organized crime?The objects in our daily lives that could be connected to international organized crime are our communications because international criminals intercept calls to investigate people's lives and profile them as possible victims of identity theft or other crimes.
Also, our objects such as technological devices and identification are elements that criminals want to steal because with them they have access to a lot of information about our lives that can facilitate their criminal action.
What influence has technology had on the emergence of transnational organized crime?The influence that technology has had on the emergence of transnational organized crime is great because criminals have taken advantage of technological tools to create links with criminal gangs from other countries. Additionally, their action has expanded to other countries because new technologies allow them to commit crimes in other countries without having to be there.
What are some ways we can combat these problems?The ways in which we can combat these problems are by taking care of our personal belongings, avoiding entering our personal information on unprotected computers or devices, and limiting the information we provide on different Internet sites.
Learn more about internet security in: https://brainly.com/question/14832099
#SPJ1
you run a local marathon, and it is very crowded. as you approach the first mile marker, you accidentally trip one of the other runners. she falls hard, hits her head on the pavement, and is taken away in an ambulance. she later sues you for negligence. what do you think would happen if you defend the lawsuit by saying that you did not intend to trip her?
The legislative branch of the federal government, Congress, is responsible for passing laws across the country.
When does federal law take precedence over state law? Pick two options for the answer?
When two laws conflict, when Congress officially or tacitly declares that one law supersedes the other, or when federal laws are so ubiquitous that they encompass the entire legal landscape, federal law preempts state law.
Which division of the government drafts statutes?
Every branch of government makes a particular kind of law. The legislative branch creates statutory law, which lays forth the public policy objectives that the elected legislators desire to achieve. Statutes frequently offer broad guidelines for how the executive branch should carry out statutory laws (public policy).
To learn more about federal law from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/25912245
#SPJ4
Proponents of the 2019 law that eliminated straight-ticket voting in texas made what argument in support of the law?.
The supporters of the 2019 Texas law that banned straight-ticket voting stated that it would boost voter understanding.
All judicial offices in Texas are currently elected on a partisan basis. For interim court vacancies, the Texas Constitution allows for appointment by the Governor or county leaders and confirmation by the Senate. According to the Texas constitution, district and appellate judges are chosen by public vote. Unless the candidate passes a severe independent campaign criterion, only a judicial candidate who has been proclaimed the victor of a party primary is permitted to compete on the official ballot in the general election.Thus this is what Proponents of the 2019 law that eliminated straight-ticket voting in Texas made argument in support of the law.
Learn more about Texas Law here: https://brainly.com/question/28996037
#SPJ4
According to the article, what has restricted the power of the popular majority even more than the Framers likely intended?
Answer:he Tenth Amendment's simple language—“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”—emphasizes that the inclusion of a bill of rights does not change the fundamental character of the national government.
Explanation:
Directions: Use the political cartoon above to explain the principle of separation of powers and checks and balances. (Make sure you explain each branch thoroughly)
1. Analyze and explain how this political cartoon conveys the principle of separation of powers and checks and balances. Explain what symbols or analogies are used to explain the powers of the branches and why these symbols are used.
There are six fully dressed football players lined up on one side of a line labeled "Legislative
A political cartoon is what?an illustration (typically a caricature) that expresses editorial commentary on politics, politicians, and current events.
Lions." The phrase "Spend Money, Make New Courts, Impeach Officials, Reject Appointments, Introduce Amendments, Override Veto" appears on each jersey. There is a lion on each helmet. With the ball is their team. Four players in full uniform are on the other side of the line marked "Executive Eagles." "Pardon Lawbreakers, Call Special Sessions, Recommend Officials, Veto Bills" is written on each jersey. On each of their helmets is an eagle. Three officials, identified as "JUDICIAL REFEREES," are
To learn more about A political cartoon refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27174550
#SPJ13
In what ways has 9/11 changed U.S. domestic policy?
Answer:9/11 has changed the policy by showing the world that we need more protection in the world and now the world and airports are a lot more alert than they were years ago
Explanation:
A plaintiff alleges the defendant committed a tort by acting negligent which caused monetary damages to the plaintiff. Where would this case be heard?.
A plaintiff claims that the defendant committed a tort by being negligent, resulting in monetary damages for the plaintiff. This case would be heard in Supreme court.
Contributory negligence is the legal term for activity that falls short of the standard of care that should be used for one's own well-being and resulting in one's own harm or loss. Contributory negligence is a typical defense to a negligence claim.A tort is a civil violation for which someone is legally liable. A tort is an act or omission that causes another person injury. In tort law, the phrases "injury" and "harm" refer to the breach of a person's legal rights, respectively, and the actual loss or pain that person suffers.Thus this is where the case would be heard.
Refer here to learn more about plaintiff: https://brainly.com/question/28960514
#SPJ4
When you read information on the Internet, you must _____
How can you be beneficial to others
Answer:
I think by helping them in what they love most
being there for them always as ur mom thus
Suppose you wanted to know about how many total magazine subscriptions 200 elementary school students would sell during
the magazine drive. Which data measure would be most helpful?
A. Median
B. Truncated mean
C. Standard deviation
D. Arithmetic
The correct answer is option (D) Arithmetic.
Suppose you wanted to know about how many total magazine subscriptions 200 elementary school students would sell during
the magazine drives. Arithmetic data measure would be most helpful.
What is Arithmetic?The area of mathematics known as arithmetic is concerned with the study of numbers and various operations on them. The fundamental mathematical operations are addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. The symbols provided indicate these operations.
Addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division are commonly regarded as the four basic mathematical operations.
Because the difference between two consecutive terms is always two, the sequence 3, 5, 7, and 9 is an example of arithmetic. Due to the fact that there is always a difference of minus five between consecutive terms, the sequence 21, 16, 11, 6,... is also arithmetic.
To learn more about arithmetic visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11559160
#SPJ13
I need help with this question but no one is helping me! Can someone please help me
The case of Pinkertons vs the U.S (1946) deals with the rule that the conspiracy and crime the conspirator agree to commit separate offenses.
What is conspiracy?A conspiracy, also known as a conspiracy, is a secret plan or agreement of persons (called conspirators) for an illegal or harmful purpose, such as murder or treason, especially politically motivated, to keep their agreement secret from the public or others. people affected by it. In political terms, a conspiracy refers to a group of people who have come together to usurp, change, or overthrow established political power. Depending on the circumstances, conspiracy can also be a felony or a civil offense The term usually refers to the offense or illegality of the perpetrators of the conspiracy, because people do not need a conspiracy to do actions that are legal and ethical or that no one would object to.
To learn more about conspiracy, refer;
https://brainly.com/question/14307903
#SPJ13
The death of James Byrd Jr. helped refocus the national spotlight on hate crimes against minorities?
Responses
True
False
This assertion is accurate. The passing of James Byrd Jr. assisted in bringing hate crimes against minorities back into the public spotlight.
How did James Byrd Jr.'s death affect things?The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, often known as the Matthew Shepard Act, was passed by Congress in 2009 as a result of Byrd's lynching-by-dragging in Texas in 2001, which prompted the state of Texas to enact a hate crimes law.
What exactly does the James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act do?The proposal, which was developed in reaction to the 1998 killings of Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr., broadens the scope of the 1969 federal hate-crime law in the United States to cover acts motivated by a victim's actual or perceived gender, se-xual orientation, gender identity, or disability.
Learn more about James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act: https://brainly.com/question/26111669
#SPJ13
Florida online traffic school section 2 review test
Prepaid cell phone services can protect privacy. One can buy a phone for cash and pay cash in advance for service. There are no billing records, and records of calls made on the phone are not linked to the owner. Cell phone carriers and governments in a few countries considered ending prepaid phone services because criminals use it; law enforcement agencies could not trace them. Should the decision about whether to provide prepaid cell phone service be left to the service providers or should government ban it? If left to the companies what policy do you think they should adopt?
Based on the Prepaid cell phone services
Prepaid billing should be established by cell phone carriers for each service. It should be against the law to purchase phones without billing and without providing the required documentation.Data should be supplied to government organizations on a regular basis so they may monitor for potential risks.This is further explained below.
What are Prepaid cell phone services?Generally, Since there are no billing records and no communications required, prepaid services may safeguard privacy.
As a result, it might pose a hazard since terrorists could utilize them to their advantage and they wouldn't be as easily traceable. Therefore, steps to bolster national security were required.
Now that prepaid services are prohibited, it will be extremely difficult for many individuals to pay cash every time they require a service, which would cause a lot of issues for the populace.
Since these technological advancements, individuals mostly choose prepaid services because it seems to save them time and effort.
Therefore, rather than forbidding, the government may implement certain crucial regulations that would improve security.
Several possible policies include:
I) Prepaid billing should be established by cell phone carriers for each service.
II) It should be against the law to purchase phones without billing and without providing the required documentation.
III) Data should be supplied to government organizations on a regular basis so they may monitor for potential risks.
Read more about Prepaid cell phone services
https://brainly.com/question/15852125
#SPJ1
1
Which statement best describes recent voter trends in the United States?
• A.
People living in the Midwest and the South mostly vote Democratic.
B.
Women since the 1950s mostly vote Republican.
C
People living on the US coasts mostly vote for conservative candidates.
D.
Cuban American families mostly vote Republican.
The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.
Why did Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican?The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.
While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.
To learn more about vote visit:
https://brainly.in/question/20481185
#SPJ13
Expert witnesses are paid for their testimony by either the prosecution or the defense. In your opinion, what ethical problems, if any, does this common practice raise? What role does cross-examination play in limiting any potential problems with partisan expert witnesses?
An expert witness most suitable found in countries with common law such as the United Kingdom, Australia, and the United States, is a person whose opinion by virtue of education, training, certification, skills or experience, is accepted by the judge as an expert.
Below you can read more about Ethical problems of expert witnesses.
Ethical problems of expert witnesses
Two major Ethical problems of expert witnesses include the following
Economically Induced FavoritismConflict of interests.Economically Induced Favoritism as an ethical problem in the use of Expert witnesses refers to the act of favoring either the prosecution or the defense due to monetary inducements. this occurs when the expert witness receives monetary inducement in exchange for a narrative that suits the person paying him.
Conflict of Interests occurs when the interests of the expert witness aligns with the interest of either the prosecution or the defense and hence this alters the testimony of the expert witness in such a way that it favors one of the parties involved.
Cross examination affords either party the chance to critically question an expert witness based on what he/she has said or based on any conclusion drawn from their statements. The process of cross examination helps in identifying if an expert witness has been compromised.
learn more about Expert witness at https://brainly.com/question/28308170
#SPJ1
Which would be an example of primary deviance?
O a pickpocket who just stole his first car
O a usually calm football player who hits another player in a moment of anger
O a seasoned con-artist who tricks an elderly lady into investing her savings
O a drug user who also begins to deal drugs
Answer:
A usually calm football player who hits another player in a moment of anger
Explanation:
I came here looking for the answer but that's what makes sense. The rest are examples of secondary deviance due to their history. This football player is usually calm, therefore it is primary deviance.
Which role does a president fulfill when pardoning
someone for a criminal offense?
O chief diplomat
O chief legislator
O chief executive
commander in chief
When a president pardons a person for a crime, they are acting in the capacity of chief executive.
What authority does forgiving have?A pardon is an act of clemency, mercy, and forgiveness. The idea of a pardon dates back to a time when an omnipotent king had the authority to punish or commute any punishment. In India, the Constitutional system includes the ability to grant pardons.
What does the executive's ability to grant pardons entail?Article 72 of the Indian Constitution grants the president the authority to pardon. In all circumstances when the punishment is for a violation of a law to which the executive power of the Union extends, it gives the President the authority to "grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment."
Learn more about chief executive: https://brainly.com/question/1402389
#SPJ13
Analyze the legal requirements of a law