they wanted to build a holiday resort here but the owners of those beach front cottage.( refused- denied-rejected) to play ball.​

Answer:

You can evaluate the authors diction and syntax

Answer:

through the type of words he or she uses

Explanation:

Answer:

A. Claim B, because it provides evidence that schools have to cover more subjects.

Explanation:

The evidence supports Claim B more than it does Claim A because logically since there are more subjects added to the graduation requirements, you would need more hours in the school day to go finish these subjects in addition to the pre-existing ones required to graduate. Although you may disagree, the claim is better supported. The other options don't really make much sense, nor give defensible reasons.

Answer:

Hers

Explanation:

Answer:

What is this? Are you doing this for a passage or like, making the story up or something. I need details please!

Answer:

Yeah, We can.

Explanation:

everyone can do so if he tries hard for anything.

Question;

The session delivered the information I expected to receive.

Answer;

C.Neutral

Why the answer is C.Neutral?

When you receive an information check it before you agree

That's my answer

Hope it helps

#brainlyeveryday

#carryonlearning

Answer:

ExplanEducation is the key to unlock the golden door of freedom.” (George Washington Carver). This quote means that Education gives us all the knowledge we need. It 's a key through which we can rule the world. If we are educated, then wherever we go, or whatever we do, we can do it with much confidence and exactness.ation:

Explanation:

a country that promotes diversity and participation by many groups

The above question wants to analyze your reading and writing ability, for that reason I cannot answer this question for you, but I will show you how to answer it.

First of all, you should know that this question refers to the book "Things Fall Apart," and you will need to read the book to be able to answer it.

To speed up this reading you can search for articles and abstracts that present the Okeke revelation and the full context behind it.

This context is what will be used for you to be able to continue the story and you can do it in the following way:

More information about "Things Fall Apart" at the link:

https://brainly.com/question/4003578

Answer:

Explanation:

There is a photo of Martin Luther King leading a peaceful protest (in Birmingham, I think). You can look it up. It is one of the most famous photographs to come out of the civil rights movement.

The point I'm trying to make is that everyone is well dressed. The men were clad in white shirts and ties and the women wore below the knee skits. It was done deliberately: this was not a wild mob throwing rocks at people or buildings they did not like.

This was a very civilized group that had a central message to give to anyone who saw the march. The message was "We are good people. We are law abiding citizens. We want only to be heard and we want (because we are citizens) to be granted the same rights as our white neighbors."

Their clothing was a symbol of the movement. It was part of what made the protest real. I found the photo for you.

Answer: Consider the reason for your community event (Homecoming, Stanley Cup Parade from a local NHL star, Grand Opening of a new facility

Explanation:

Answer:

Good dream

Explanation:

Because I have a nightmare once in a while but mostly good dreams

Answer:

I couldn't catch your question

Explanation:

The photo is too blurry

Answer:

The vertex and focus of parabola lie on its axis.

Points (4,−3) and (4,−1) lie on the line x=4

So, the axis of parabola is the line x=4

Focus of the parabola lies below the vertex. So, the parabola is downwards opening

So, the equation of parabola is (x−4)  

2

=−4a(y+1)

Distance between focus and vertex =−1−(−3)=2

∴a=2

Vertex of parabola is (4,−1)

So, the equation of parabola is (x−4)  

2

=−4(2)(y+1)

⟹x  

2

−8x+16+8y+8=0

⟹x  

2

−8x+8y+24=0

Explanation:

Answer:

░░░░░▐▀█▀▌░░░░▀█▄░░░

░░░░░▐█▄█▌░░░░░░▀█▄░░

░░░░░░▀▄▀░░░▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░

░░░░▄▄▄██▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░

░░░█▀▄▄▄█░▀▀░░

░░░▌░▄▄▄▐▌▀▀▀░░ This is Bob

▄░▐░░░▄▄░█░▀▀ ░░

▀█▌░░░▄░▀█▀░▀ ░░ Copy And Paste Him In Brainly Question,

░░░░░░░▄▄▐▌▄▄░░░ So, He Can Take

░░░░░░░▀███▀█░▄░░ Over Brainly

Explanation:

Charges of media bias have been flying like a bloody banner on the campaign trail. Newt Gingrich excoriated the “elite media” in a richly applauded moment during one of the Republican debates. Rick Santorum chewed out a New York Times reporter. Mitt Romney said this month that he faces “an uphill battle” against the press in the general election.

Meanwhile, just about every new poll of public sentiment shows that confidence in the news media has hit a new low. Seventy-seven percent of those surveyed by the Pew Research Center in the fall said the media “tend to favor one side” compared with 53 percent who said so in 1985.

But have the media really become more biased? Or is this a case of perception trumping reality?

In fact, there’s little to suggest that over the past few decades news reporting has become more favorable to one party. That’s not to say researchers haven’t found bias in reporting. They have, but they don’t agree that one side is consistently favored or that this favoritism has been growing like a pernicious weed.  

Style

How biased are the media, really?

By Paul FarhiApril 27, 2012

Charges of media bias have been flying like a bloody banner on the campaign trail. Newt Gingrich excoriated the “elite media” in a richly applauded moment during one of the Republican debates. Rick Santorum chewed out a New York Times reporter. Mitt Romney said this month that he faces “an uphill battle” against the press in the general election.

Meanwhile, just about every new poll of public sentiment shows that confidence in the news media has hit a new low. Seventy-seven percent of those surveyed by the Pew Research Center in the fall said the media “tend to favor one side” compared with 53 percent who said so in 1985.

But have the media really become more biased? Or is this a case of perception trumping reality?

In fact, there’s little to suggest that over the past few decades news reporting has become more favorable to one party. That’s not to say researchers haven’t found bias in reporting. They have, but they don’t agree that one side is consistently favored or that this favoritism has been growing like a pernicious weed.

On the conservative side, the strongest case might have been made by Tim Groseclose, a political science and economics professor at the University of California at Los Angeles. Groseclose used a three-pronged test to quantify the “slant quotient” of news stories reported by dozens of media sources. He compared these ratings with a statistical analysis of the voting records of various national politicians. In his 2011 book, “Left Turn: How Liberal Bias Distorts the American Mind,” Groseclose concluded that most media organizations aligned with the views of liberal politicians. (Groseclose determined that The Washington Post’s “slant quotient” was less liberal than news coverage in the New York Times and Wall Street Journal.)

Even with conservative-leaning sources such as the Drudge Report and the Washington Times factored in, “the aggregate slant is leftward,” said Groseclose, who describes himself as a conservative.

But that’s not the end of the story. A “meta-analysis” of bias studies — that is, a study of studies — shows something different: When all is said and done, left-leaning reporting is balanced by reporting more favorable to conservatives. “The net effect is zero,” said David D’Alessio, a communications sciences professor at the University of Connecticut at Stamford.

Answer:

a hula hoop

Explanation:

:))

Answer:

pee water and feet pics

Explanation:

The author's main purpose in the final paragraph of the text is: to encourage readers to think about the consequences of even seemingly harmless actions.

In the final paragraph of "How Small Fibs Lead to Big Lies," Tali Sharot tells NPR that the new findings about lying require that more work be done to find out how smaller actions lead to the escalation of negative behaviors.

So, the author's main purpose is to get readers to think of the effects that can arise from actions that do not seem harmless.

Learn more about the purpose of a text here:

https://brainly.com/question/11807917

Based on the excerpt, we can tell that Lady Bracknell  desires to change her social status.

Lady Brecknell expressed interested in what Jack was talking about only after he mentioned the name of the law firm involved in the case.

She was only interested because one of the partners in the law firm, attended some dinner parties which were a sign of high society. We can therefore infer that she wanted to improve her social status.

In conclusion, option C is correct.

Find out more on some types of social classes at https://brainly.com/question/789433

Answer: C

Explanation: Edge 2023

Answer:

Radio created a music industry, and by the 1920s people began enjoying music at home.

Explanation:

The excerpt seems to be focusing on this statement through, "People listened to music in their homes. They bought record players. They listened to music on the radio, too." Secoundly, the title of "Music Gets Personal" provides the idea that the rest of the excerpt may be about people being able to become closer to music.

Answer:

it's A ,jack learned a game and then he taught his freds

Answer:

food is in session for our body for a number of reasons. it gave us the energy needed for working playing and doing day-to-day activities.it help us to grow make a bone and muscle strong repair damaged bone cells and boost are immunity against external harmful elements like pathogens. it help us in various spheres of life. healthy food does not only impact our physical health but mental health too.

Answer:

the answer is a Stanza.

Explanation:

Answer:

In Chapter 28, Scout and Jem go to the Halloween pageant and are attacked on their walk home. While they are walking, they get the sense that they are being followed and think that it must be Cecil Jacobs. Their follower attacks them, but they manage to get away when their attacker gets attacked. Later, they find out that it was Bob Ewell who attacked them, and Boo Radley saved them by killing Bob Ewell.

Explanation:

To write this formal email to the head of the camp asking for several pieces of information, here are the steps:

A formal email is an official mail written to people in clerical positions or positions of authority.

A formal email should not use informal language rather it should use grammar and accurate tenses.

Using the format above, you can draft a formal letter directed to the head of the summer adventure camp in Switzerland.

Learn more about formal email here:

https://brainly.com/question/8240215

Answer:

On August 9, 2014, Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson shot and killed Michael Brown, an unarmed black 18-year-old. It will never be perfectly clear what happened on that day. But the grand jury and US Department of Justice didn’t believe there was enough evidence to file charges against Wilson for wrongdoing.

Wilson claimed Brown was violent throughout the encounter, even charging at the officer after gunshots were fired. But some eyewitness testimony, which is notoriously unreliable, said Brown was trying to flee from Wilson and attempted to surrender — by raising his hands up — before he was killed.

After Wilson made contact with Brown and told the 18-year-old to not walk in the middle of the road, the officer reportedly realized Brown was a robbery suspect who stole cigarillos from a nearby convenience store. Wilson attempted to stop Brown, and both men had a physical altercation at the officer’s SUV. Wilson then opened fire from his vehicle. Brown ran, turned around, and Wilson fired more shots, supposedly out of fear that Brown was charging at him.

Brown died about 150 feet from Wilson’s vehicle. He was shot six times. No gunshot was confirmed to hit Brown from behind, although two wounds had an undetermined trajectory.

Explanation:

HOPE THIS HELPS :)

Answer:

well i got an example from the rossela stone

Explanation:

well i heard a question that surpriced me is that if the germans lost of keeping the stolen stone because they did not

Answer:

No, I don't think they have the right because people should be able to have some freedom and they should be able to pick at least what they wear.

Explanation: