Answer:
Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111, is a United States Supreme Court decision that dramatically increased the regulatory power of the federal government. It remains as one of the most important and far-reaching cases concerning the New Deal, and it set a precedent for an expansive reading of the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Claus…
Wickard v. Filburn suggests that commerce jurisdiction can be used to restrict activities as long as they have a significant, financial consequences on interstate trade.
What is legal terms?A condition or activity is lawful if it is permitted or mandated by law. A biological or non-human organization that is considered as a people for specific legal reasons is referred as a legal adult. A juridical typical person has the right to be challenged and sued, possess possessions, and negotiate agreements.
The United States Supreme Court judgement in Result of ineffective v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111, significantly strengthened the federal administration's ability to regulate.
It continues to be among the most significant and very far issues involving the Stimulus Package, and it established a foundation for a broad interpretation of the Constitutional Provision of the U.S. Constitution.
Learn more about legal terms, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13283420
#SPJ2
According to Maryland law, how far does a
driver need to
be from a cyclist
T/F The Bail Reform Act of 1966 recommended the release of defendants ROR as primary bail condition
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Select ALL the correct answers.
Which two cases would the Supreme Court be most likely to review?
a case concerning a motor vehicle accident
✓
a case concerning presidential actions
a case involving two members of Congress
✓
a case in which a federal law is challenged
Answer is 2&4
Answer:
a case concerning presidential actions
Explanation:
A steady green traffic light means _____.
a. you may proceed to go forward
b. you may proceed forward or turn left
c. you may proceed, but only if the path is clear
d. no cross traffic will be in the intersection
will mark brainliest if your fast
Answer:
You may proceed, but only if the path is clear
Explanation:
C
Zwane died intestate on 26 November 2021 and is survived by his wife Dudu to whom he was married according to Customary Law in 2011. They did not enter into an antenuptial contract and were married in community of property. At the time of Zwane’s death, Dudu was seven months pregnant with Zwane’s child, who they planned to call Bongani. Zwane is also survived by the following relatives:
(i) His son Joshua who renounced his rights to inherit;
(ii) His father Solly;
(iii) His younger sister Rose.
The joint estate is worth R900 000.00 (Nine Hundred Thousand Rand). How will Zwane’s estate devolve?
The way and manner that Zwane's estate would devolve under the Community of Property are that Dudu has the right to dispose of the joint estate as she wished.
What is the community of property work in South Africa?in South Africa, when a couple is married in a community of property and did not enter into an antenuptial or prenuptial agreement to exclude the community of property clause regarding their joint estate, each spouse can dispose of the assets as they wished.
By the time that Zwane died intestate, and applying the Community of Property clause, Dudu has the exclusive right to the devolution of the estate.
Thus, the manner that Zwane's estate would devolve under the Community of Property is that Dudu has the right to dispose of the joint estate as she wished.
Learn more about the community of property in South Africa at https://brainly.com/question/3669648
Describe the impeachment process. Why are public officials impeached? What is the 25th Amendment? How is it used? Why is it used? To whom does it apply?
Answer:
1. As adopted by the framers of the Constitution, this congressional power is a fundamental component of the system of “checks and balances.” Through the impeachment process, Congress charges and then tries an official of the federal government for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
2. The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
3. The Twenty-fifth Amendment (Amendment XXV) to the United States Constitution says that if the President becomes unable to do his job, the Vice President becomes the President (Section 1) or Acting President (Sections 3 or 4)
4. Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.
5. It clarifies that the vice president becomes president if the president dies, resigns, or is removed from office, and establishes how a vacancy in the office of the vice president can be filled.
6. Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.
Explanation:
40. A contract which can either be refused or ratified is;
a) Formal Contract
b) Executed Contract
c) Unilateral Contract
d) Implied Contract
e) Voidable Contract
A Contract which can either be refused or ratified is called voidable contract.
Contract is defined as a legally enforceable agreement that creates and obligations among parties. A contract involves transfer of goods, services, money or promise to transfer any of those for future dates.
What are voidable contract?A voidable contract is a contract which can be either affirmed or rejected at the option of one of the parties. Once the contract is repudiated by one party, it becomes Void contract.
Grounds for voidable contract are - Coercion, Undue Influence, Mental Incompetence, Intoxication, Fraud or Misrepresentation.
When a contract is entered into without the free consent of the party, it is considered a voidable contract. A voidable contract may be considered valid if it is not cancelled by the aggrieved party within a reasonable time.
Under USA legal system, Contract law regulates the obligation established by agreement, whether expressed or implied, between the private parties. Law of contract varies from state to state but also there is a presence of nationwide federal contract law.
Under Indian Legal System, Contract is defined under Indian Contract Act 1872 under which Voidable Contract is defined under Section 2(i) of the Act.
There are certain difference between USA Contract Act and Indian Contract Act based on:
-Presence of statute of fraud in USA which is not present in India
-India does not have separate legislation for sale of goods or services.
-American common law has imposed a good faith dealing requirement on parties entering a contract with each other
-Monetary damages in the United States can be classified into three types- expectation interest, reliance interest, and restitution of interest
Neither the Indian courts nor the Contract Act have classified damages as is done in the USA
To learn more about the Voidable Contract here
https://brainly.com/question/4272013
#SPJ3
Which of the following is an example of the fourth step, implement controls, in the 5-step Risk management process?
Assessing risk control options for a summer time road march is example of Risk management process.
What is risk management?Risk management can be regarded as the process of identifying as well as monitoring and managing potential risks.
This is done to minimize the negative impact that risk may have on an organization, however the fourth step of risk control identifying heat stress as a hazard.
Learn more about risk management at;
https://brainly.com/question/26543359
What can a person face for refusing to help another if they caused the specific harm?
Answer:
The person will have
1:a guilty conscience
2:the person will be rejected
1. the theories and perspectives in this unit focus on the environmental and social
influence of crime. do you think that environmental and social conditions influence
crime? why or why not? between biological, psychological, and social factors,
which one do you think plays the biggest role in crime? why?--
Environmental and social factors do have an impact on crime. However, the factors that have the greatest influence are psychological.
What is crime?A crime is a term to refer to a voluntary wrongful or reprehensible action that according to the law must be reprimanded and prohibited.
When a person commits a crime many factors influence him to carry out this act, some of this influence is:
Environmental: It is the environmental factor that influences a person to commit a crime, generally refers to the influence of an environment on the behavior of a person to commit a crime.Social: This factor refers to the influence of social dynamics such as: stratification, segregation, discrimination, among others, that influence the behavior of one or more individuals to commit a crime.Psychological: This factor refers to the interpretation of reality and the autonomous thoughts of the individual to commit a crime.According to the above, it can be inferred that of the factors that influence a crime, the most important is the psychological factor because it has a greater impact on the individual's thinking.
Learn more about crime in: https://brainly.com/question/15691073
Which of the following would be an example of Civil Law?
A driver who was caught speeding
A divorcing couple arguing about child custody
A person who has not paid income taxes for 5 years
An illegal immigrant facing deportation
Civil law deals with behavior that constitutes an injury to an individual or other private party, such as a corporation. Examples are defamation (including libel and slander), breach of contract, negligence resulting in injury or death, and property damage.
What is the part of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that relates specifically to employee rights? A. Title Vu B. Title VIII C. Title V D. Title X
Answer:
the answer is B.
Explanation:
This is because it was under that title.
Which of the following would qualify as a transatlantic flight?
A from the United States of America to the United Kingdom
B from the United States of America to Canada
C From the United States of America to Mexico
The answers I'm seeing have now been all wrong!!!!
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Canada and Mexico are right next to USA in North America. The Atlantic Ocean is between us and uk.
Answer:
Option A) From US to UK.
Explanation:
Just did the test on T4L and got it right :) Hope this helps
what does Dooyeweerd, Van Zyl regard as the essence of education law
For Dooyeweerd Van Zyl, the essence of education law is to provide the required legal guide and framework to ensure that educational institutions are administered for the benefit of society as a whole.
What is education law?Education law is the legal framework followed by educational institutions to ensure:
Equal access to quality education for all learners.Educational institutions are devoid of social discrimination.Compulsory schooling for children under a certain age.The existence of independent and public schools.Education law deals with the legal problems and issues that confront school administrators and policymakers, especially about the rights of learners.
Who is Dooyeweerd, Van Zyl?Dooyeweerd Van Zyl was one of the South African legal philosophers who advocated that law should be regarded as science.
Thus, for Dooyeweerd Van Zyl, the essence of education law is to provide the required legal guide or framework that ensures that educational institutions are administered for the benefit of society as a whole.
Learn more about education laws at https://brainly.com/question/26904257
What have you done to prepare for a career in Law Enforcement?
I need help for a job application!!!! Please give me a Answer for this!
Okay,
I have completed a Bachelor of Arts in Criminology and Criminal Justice, and I am currently completing a Graduate Diploma in Legal Studies.
Many terrorism analysts believe terrorism can only exist in a democracy and cannot function in a totalitarian state. What do
you believe is the relationship between the conditions in the places where terrorist organizations usually take hold and the
conditions of democracy?
Answer:
it's a real life example of afganistan. The things which need to operate whole world is the knowledge of particular section and department. So if someone operate democracy without knowledge of democracy the country will suffer from different crises
1. What ethical guidelines will the soft drink
company need to follow to market a drink in
the UK (United Kingdom)?
One ethical guideline that soft drink companies follow to market in the United Kingdom is not to advertise to children under 16 years in some media.
What are ethical guidelines?Ethical guidelines are rules that must be observed in doing business to minimize breaking business ethical guidelines.
Ethical guidelines define actions that are morally right or wrong. The guidelines are provided to be followed to avoid violations and their consequences.
Thus, a soft drink company marketing a drink in the United Kingdom must follow ethical guidelines, including:
Ensuring proper labeling of their products. Indication of product contents, production and expiration dates, and other warnings.Learn more about ethical marketing at https://brainly.com/question/16025718
Are petitioners liable for the loss of the pawned jewelry ? why or why not?
Answer:
No. Unless they do not peacefully stand with what the petition.
Explanation:
Taking the BLM petiton for example, the petition was made for peace and equality, and that's what the owner of the petition intended.
There were people who took advantage of this protest and turned it into a way for burgulary and started stealing under the circumstances that there was a peaceful protest.
Which of the following is true in regards to alcohol abuse?
A. It is the result of just one bad experience.
B. It happens by accident
C. It involves intentional overuse.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
i took it it should be right
It involves intentional overuse is true in regard to alcohol abuse. Hence, option C is correct.
What is alcohol abuse?Alcohol abuse can be both psychological and physical.It is primarily caused by excessive alcohol consumption on a regular basis, which becomes the person's habit of consuming alcohol on a regular basis and becoming abusive to the other person.
Secondary alcohols are produced when alcohols interact with other atoms. These secondary alcohols include methanol, isopropanol, and ethanol, the three forms of alcohol that people regularly consume.
drinking more frequently or for a longer period of time than expected. persistent desire to reduce or control drinking, or one or more failed attempts to accomplish so. Significant social, professional, or recreational activities curtailed or discontinued as a result of drinking.
Thus, option C, intentional overuse, is correct.
For more information about alcohol abuse, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2526379
#SPJ2
Mark completes his due diligence on the house, obtains financing from a lender, and is now on his way to the closing. What is the ideal way to discharge the sales contract? on the house, obtains financing from a lender, and is now on his way to the closing. What is the ideal way to discharge the sales contract?
Answer:
The performance of a contract is the most common method of its discharge. Actual Performance: – When both parties make their promises, the contract is terminated. The performance must be complete, accurate and as per the terms of the agreement.
b. Mutual agreement of the parties. Both parties agree to terminate the contract.
Explanation:
a. Full performance. The two parties close on the house as per the sales contract.
b. Mutual agreement of the parties. Both parties agree to terminate the contract.
c. Operation of law. A judge requires specific performance from the seller.
d. Impossibility of performance.
1
If you decide to propose a new law in your state, what might be the first step you take?
O Send your idea to a committee to review it.
O Write a text of the law to submit to the legislature.
O Work with your state representative to write a new statute.
O Work with the governor to create a bill.
Answer:
Work with the governor to create a bill.
Explanation:
The legislative process in a nutshell
First, a Representative sponsors a bill.The bill is then assigned to a committee for study.If released by the committee, the bill is put on a calendar to be voted on, debated or amended.If the bill passes by simple majority (218 of 435), the bill moves to the Senate.Whom should Mrs. Hightower sue for damages? Mr.Grant Why?
Answer:
Money damages are awarded by the court to make defendants pay you money to make up for harm you suffered in the past. Punitive damages may be awarded to punish defendants for especially bad conduct.
An injunction is a court order that directs prison officials to make changes in your prison conditions and/or stop ongoing conduct that the court finds to be illegal.
A declaratory judgment is when a court makes a decision that explains your legal rights and the legal duties and obligations of the prison officials. However, the court doesn’t order the prison to do or stop doing anything. If you get a declaratory judgment and the prison doesn’t follow it, you can then ask the court for an injunction to make them do so.
In which situation would you be more likely to use the Rogerian model than the Toulmin model?
pick an answer
Your new job involves a lengthy commute. You call a family meeting in hopes to convince everyone that buying a hybrid car will save money.
Your friend believes the earth is flat so you aim to convince him that the earth is round.
Your company is under financial strain so each department must propose a potential solution. You analyze the solutions to determine the best approach, even if it means some departments might face cuts. To increase departmental investment in the solution you choose, you aim to bring everyone together through a shared value or goal.
Your department at work wants to reduce the number of employees. Fearing mass layoffs, you set up a petition for employees to sign in an attempt to remove the CEO with a vote of no confidence.
The situation in which you would be more likely to use the Rogerian model than the Toulmin model is Your friend believes the earth is flat so you aim to convince him that the earth is round.
What is the Toulmin Method?This refers to the use of pragmatic thinking in order to persuade or convince someone of something.
We must note that this differs from the Rogerian method which has to do with those who have similar ethics and also with those that oppose the ethic to get them to work together.
Hence, the correct answer is option B because you want to convince someone who has a different perspective.
Read more about Toulmin method here:
https://brainly.com/question/7214182
If no one wins the electoral college, who chooses the next president?.
Answer:
Under the 12th ademendment they have the vice president run it.
Explanation:
They put the vice president in charge of things.
Raudhah plan to set up an E-Games centre where she provides service for customer to play PlayStation 5 at the game centre. She entered into a contract with Adam to supply 50 sets of PlayStation 5. Raudhah promise to pay Adam upon approval of her loan application from Tiger Bank. However, after 2 weeks of waiting, Raudhah was informed that her loan application was rejected by Tiger Bank. Adam demand for payment from Raudhah as agreed in the contract, but Raudhah claim the contract was frustrated because her loan application was rejected by TIger Bank. Thus, she refused to pay the amount agreed to Adam as she claim the contract is now void due to frustration.
What is the issues . Explain?
The problem, in this case, was that Raudhah established a contract with Adam before he knew if the loan application would be approved.
What should be done in this case?Raudhah should have made the contract with Adam after the loan application was approved.Raudhah cannot keep Adam's products without paying for them.The contract between Raudhah and Adam must be in writing and accurately determine the payment date.Raudhah bought Adam's products not sure if he could afford them. This became an issue as Raudhah's funding was not approved.
Adam should have reviewed the contract and not agreed to deliver the goods without assurance of payment.
More information about contracts is in the link:
https://brainly.com/question/14315509
What are the pros and cons of truth in sentencing laws?
Explaination:
Mandatory minimum sentences are statutes included in criminal law. They require a convicted criminal to serve a sentence of specific length before being eligible for parole or release. These sentences are usually reserved for crimes that are considered violent or serious, but have been applied to drug possession, gun ownership, and moral vices.
In the United States, the jury is not typically informed of a mandatory minimum penalty because there is a fear that knowing the sentence may affect the determination of innocence or guilt.
The mandatory minim sentences pros and cons serve as a debate regarding the foundation of how criminal justice is applied within a society. Here are the key points of debate to look at.
The Pros of Mandatory Minimum Sentences
1. They can lead to a decrease in serious crime.
Up until the 1960s, capital punishment was a mandatory minimum sentence for murder. In the United States, it is still a mandatory minimum sentence for serious crimes, like treason. Because of the severe sentencing guidelines that are required by a mandatory sentence, it can reduce crime levels in all targeted categories. The goal of this type of sentence is to make the value of the crime be less than the value in following the law.
2. They stop unjust sentencing practices.
Many judges apply the law to the best of their ability in a professional manner. Then there are some judges that do not. One recent case in Montana involved a teacher who received a 30-day prison sentence for raping a 14-year-old student of his. Installing mandatory minimum sentences can reduce issues where a personal bias comes into play. The judge in Montana stated that the victim “looked older than her age” and that is why he issued such a light sentence.
3. They eliminate personal bias from all parties.
Prosecutors charge based on the actions of the individuals involved in an alleged crime. Judges sentence based on the recommendations of a jury, a plea agreement, or a bench trial. The process is simple and straightforward. Instead of dealing with personal bias, everyone has the same playing field in the justice system and can make decisions that they feel are best for themselves, their communities, or society in general.
4. They protect society for longer time periods.
Minimum mandatory sentencing laws are designed to maximize the safety aspect of prisons for a society. Those who decide to commit a crime are removed from society,so they can no longer do harm to it in their preferred way. Some crimes may offer an option for parole, allowing those who wish to rehabilitate themselves to have a second chance at safely joining the general population once again.
What might one do in an analysis section of a Rogerian argument?
Question 4 options:
Refute the opposition.
Rebut the counterclaims.
Qualify the claim.
Explore commonalities between multiple perspectives.
In analysis section of a Rogerian argument explore commonalities between multiple perspectives.
What is Rogerian argument?Rogerian argument is a method that is used to resolve conflict or disagreement among individual.
This strategy put the offender into consideration and also bring about mutual understanding among the people involved.
Therefore, In analysis section of a Rogerian argument explore commonalities between multiple perspectives.
Learn more on Rogerian argument here
https://brainly.com/question/24842546
4.) What is the difference between joyriding and larceny?
Answer:
- Joyriding refers to driving or riding in a stolen vehicle, most commonly a car
- Larceny is a crime involving the unlawful taking or theft of the personal property of another person or business.
The action of swimmers using their arms to propel themselves through the water is an example of what law?.
Answer:
The answer is Newtons third law
Explanation:
When you are accelerating you use your arms to push the water you can also accelerate by kicking.
What is the difference between being polite and being passive? Give some example
Answer:
- Polite Is having or showing behavior that is respectful and considerate of other people.
- Passive accepting or allowing what happens or what others do, without active response or resistance.
Example: Jack is liked by other for being respectful and considerate. Mark is a person who accepts everyone but also negative vibes.