In today's society, it is difficult to pinpoint one person who best resembles Henry David Thoreau's ideas from his stay at Walden. Thoreau's philosophy emphasized the importance of living a simple and self-sufficient life, being in harmony with nature, and finding meaning in personal experiences rather than material possessions.
These ideas can be seen in various individuals and groups who prioritize sustainability, minimalism, and environmentalism.
For example, there are many individuals who have chosen to live off-grid, relying solely on renewable resources and reducing their carbon footprint. Some communities have also adopted a shared economy, where they share resources and live communally, similar to Thoreau's ideas of communal living. Additionally, there are groups who focus on conservation and protecting the environment, in line with Thoreau's love for nature.
Furthermore, there are individuals who have pursued a simple and mindful lifestyle, rejecting consumerism and materialism. They prioritize experiences and relationships over possessions and aim to live a fulfilling life without being burdened by excess. In many ways, these individuals embody Thoreau's ideas of finding meaning in personal experiences rather than material possessions.
In conclusion, while it is challenging to pinpoint one specific individual, there are many individuals and groups in today's society who embody Thoreau's ideas from his stay at Walden. These individuals and groups prioritize simplicity, sustainability, and a harmonious relationship with nature, in line with Thoreau's philosophy.
Know more about Henry David Thoreau here:
https://brainly.com/question/29093390
#SPJ11
Why did many find Martin Luther's ideas about salvation appealing?
Answer:
Many found Martin Luther's ideas about salvation appealing because he emphasized the importance of faith and grace over good works, which provided a sense of relief from the burden of trying to earn salvation through deeds alone. Additionally, Luther's teachings offered a direct relationship with God, without the need for intermediaries such as priests or the church hierarchy.
Explanation:
What do you think was the most lasting and impactful program from the New Deal?
Explain.
The most lasting and impactful program from the New Deal is
Social Security programWhat is the social security program?The Social Security program has had a remarkable effect on American society, and its long-lasting results have lasted for almost a century.
A significant factor contributing to the effectiveness of the New Deal is that Social Security provided retirees with a dependable source of income in their later years, enabling them to sustain a basic level of financial security throughout retirement. In turn, this measure efficiently diminished poverty amongst veteran citizens, while simultaneously providing an essential lifeline to those without supplementary sources of income.
Learn more about the New Deal at
https://brainly.com/question/936437
#SPJ1
Why did the union become more concerned with ending slavery during the civil war
Both the desire of slaves for their own liberation and the Union Army's proof that the Confederate government was unable to keep its pledge to defend the property rights that white people retained in slavery caused slavery to cease during and after the Civil War.
But the Civil War's objectives had now altered. Along with defending the Union, the North also fought to abolish slavery. Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which set all slaves in the Confederate states free, in late 1862 after coming to the conclusion that it was necessary to win the war.
After that, the conflict evolved into one to abolitionize slavery as well as to defend the Union. In addition to reunion, the Union's war effort also included abolition.
Learn more about slavery visit: brainly.com/question/28000673
#SPJ4
What are the advantages and disadvantages of
buying a home?
Answer:
One advantage of buying a home is that it can be a good investment in the long run. However, a disadvantage is that it requires a significant amount of upfront costs such as down payment, closing costs, and ongoing expenses like maintenance and property taxes.
Explanation:
Which of the following did Nikita Khrushchev do in 1961 in response to John F. Kennedy's decision to send members of the Army Reserve and National Guard to protect West BerlinHe erected the Berlin Wall to separate East and West BerlinHe declared as preference for nonviolent civil disobedienceHe was refreshingly candid but his call for the wholesale bombing of north Vietnam worried voters
Answer: B
Explanation:
Nikita Khrushchev erected the Berlin Wall to separate East and West Berlin in response to John F. Kennedy's decision to send members of the Army Reserve and National Guard to protect West Berlin in 1961. He did not declare a preference for nonviolent civil disobedience, and his call for the wholesale bombing of north Vietnam did not occur until later in the 1960s.
What are Army Reserve and National Guard?
The Army Reserve and the National Guard are both reserve components of the United States Army. They are composed of part-time soldiers who serve in the military while also pursuing civilian careers or attending school.
The Army Reserve is made up of soldiers who are trained to provide support and logistics functions for the active-duty Army, such as transportation, supply, and maintenance. They are typically called upon to serve during times of war or national emergencies, but can also be activated for other types of missions, such as disaster relief efforts.
The National Guard is a dual-status organization that serves both state and federal governments. National Guard soldiers are trained to provide both domestic support and military operations. They can be called upon by the governor of their state to assist with natural disasters or other emergencies, and they can also be called upon by the President of the United States to support federal military operations.
To know more about Army Reserve and National Guard:
https://brainly.com/question/6156922
#SPJ11
From where do we derive most anthropological data?
Answer: I believe It's fieldwork
why did frederick douglass think black americans should stay in the South
Answer:
Frederick Douglass did not believe that Black Americans should necessarily stay in the South.
In fact, he was a strong advocate for equal rights and opportunities for Black Americans, including the right to freely choose where to live and work. However, Douglass did believe that Black Americans should work to improve their conditions in the South, rather than simply fleeing to the North or West. He believed that by staying in the South and fighting for their rights, Black Americans could help to transform the region and create a more just and equitable society for all.
In what way did the United States help the Hungarian refugees after the Soviets invaded in 1956?
The United States help the Hungarian refugees by creating a special immigration quota after the Soviets invaded in 1956.
The Hungarian Revolution of 1956 started from 23 October to 4 November 1956 it was also known as the Hungarian Uprising. It was a countrywide revolution against the government of the Hungarian People's Republic and the policies caused by the government's subordination to the Soviet Union (USSR).
Due to the Revolution, the United States created a special immigration quota in 1956 for refugees from the communist crackdown, and more than 30,000 Hungarians resettled in the United States by May 1957 through that program and two hundred thousand Hungarians crossed into Austria. The main events of the Hungarian Revolution are,
Hungarian Revolution 1956Battle of Dien Bien Phu.Brezhnev Doctrine.Brezhnev Era.Cold War Alliances.Cominform.Cominform and Comecon.Cuban Missile Crisis.To learn more about The Hungarian Revolution of 1956:
https://brainly.com/question/30694776
#SPJ4
Colonial leaders based their calls for resistance to Britain on arguments about the rights of British subjects, the rights of the individual, local traditions of self-rule, and the ideas of the Enlightenment.
During the period leading up to the American Revolution, colonial leaders used a variety of arguments to rally support for resistance against British rule.
One of the key arguments they made was based on the idea of the rights of British subjects. Colonists believed that they were entitled to the same rights and protections as other British citizens, including the right to representation in government and protection from arbitrary rule.
In addition to these arguments, colonial leaders also appealed to the rights of the individual, arguing that every person had the right to life, liberty, and property. They also pointed to local traditions of self-rule, which they believed had been eroded by British policies such as the Proclamation of 1763 and the Stamp Act.
Finally, colonial leaders drew on the ideas of the Enlightenment, a philosophical and intellectual movement that emphasized reason, individualism, and freedom. They argued that the British government was violating these principles and that it was the duty of the colonists to resist and overthrow tyranny.
Together, these arguments helped to galvanize support for the American Revolution and laid the groundwork for the principles of democracy and individual rights that continue to shape American society today.
Visit here to learn more about American Revolution : https://brainly.com/question/9053584
#SPJ11
Yes, many colonial leaders during the American Revolution based their calls for resistance to British rule on various factors, including the rights of British subjects and individuals, local traditions of self-rule, and the ideas of the Enlightenment.
The Enlightenment was a period of intellectual and philosophical growth that emphasized reason, individualism, and the pursuit of knowledge and truth. These ideas were influential in shaping the beliefs of colonial leaders who argued for greater autonomy and independence from British rule, using Enlightenment principles to justify their actions. Overall, colonial leaders sought to assert their rights and freedoms as British citizens, while also drawing on broader intellectual and philosophical movements to support their cause.
To learn more about American Revolution, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/27833385
#SPJ11
What best explains why slavery had nearly disappeared in the North before the Civil War?
Slavery did not fit the economic interests of the North
O The Constitution required the end of slavery in the North
O Slaver ownership was too expensive for Northern farmers.
O Slave rebellions had forcd an end to sivery in the North.
Slave rebellions had forced an end to slavery in the North
list our all the military head of states of Nigeria
What made Gandhi’s nonviolent movement work? Please I need help this is for a essay
Why we're American writers of the 1920s referred to as the " Lost Generation"?
Answer:
This term was coined by Gertrude Stein to describe the disillusionment and aimlessness felt by many American writers who lived through World War I. They were called the Lost Generation because they struggled to find meaning and purpose in a world that had been shattered by war.
Explanation:
Please help!!!!!!! need the answer ASAP !!
Answer:
what the question?
Explanation:
you need to include a question.
Which has been more significant in shaping American Identity (1945-1990): Confidence or Fear?
Answer:
Confidence
Americans thrived on confidence throughout the time of 1945 and 1990
Historical Movie: Argo
When the United States led the coup against Prime Minister Mossadeg, they took on an enormous risk. IN PARAGRAPH form, what are some of the advantages of performing such a coup on a country's government?
Answer:
The 1953 coup d'état against Prime Minister Mossadegh in Iran was primarily driven by the US and UK governments' concerns about the nationalization of Iran's oil industry and the potential spread of communism in the region. Some of the advantages of performing such a coup on a country's government include:
Control over valuable resources: In Iran's case, the nationalization of oil threatened the profits and interests of foreign companies, which had previously controlled the country's oil industry. The coup ensured that these companies regained control and that the US and UK gained access to a valuable resource.
Political influence: The US and UK governments saw Mossadegh as a threat to their interests in the Middle East, and they sought to install a leader who would be more favorable to their interests. The coup allowed the US to establish a puppet government in Iran, which was more aligned with its political and economic interests.
Regional stability: At the time, the US and UK saw the spread of communism as a significant threat to regional stability in the Middle East. The coup was seen as a way to prevent the spread of communism and maintain the status quo in the region.
A demonstration of power: The successful coup in Iran demonstrated the US and UK's ability to project power and influence beyond their own borders. This sent a strong message to other countries in the region and around the world about the consequences of defying Western powers.
However, it's also important to note that such actions can have severe consequences, including long-term damage to relations with the affected country, the destabilization of the region, and human rights abuses.
Explanation:
the secretary of war, and the military commanders whom he may from time to time designate, whenever he or any designated commander deems such actions necessary or desirable, [is authorized] to prescribe military areas in such places and of such extent as he or the appropriate military commander may determine, from which any or all persons may be excluded, and with respect to which, the right of any person to enter, remain in, or leave shall be subject to whatever restrictions the secretary of war or the appropriate military commander may impose in his discretion.
The Secretary of War, and any military commanders he may designate, are authorized to designate military areas of any size in any location.
This authority gives them the ability to restrict who can enter, remain in, or leave these areas. The restrictions can be imposed by the Secretary of War or the Commander at their discretion.
This could be used to protect military personnel and assets, or to restrict access to areas due to dangers or security risks. It also gives the military the authority to remove or relocate civilians from areas that are deemed unsafe or a risk to national security.
Know more about security risks here
https://brainly.com/question/29477357#
#SPJ11
PLSS HELP ME DUE TODAY
The Title of my article will be: key Inventions and People of Modern Science.
What is the modern science about?In the above presentation, we discuss significant inventions/people of modern science: transportation, communication, and medicine/biology.
One invention/person will be highlighted in each category. Elon Musk's SpaceX and Tesla revolutionized transportation. SpaceX launches reusable rockets and Tesla develops high-performing electric cars for a more sustainable future.
Therefore, Musk's transportation work could transform our lives, work, and exploration of the universe.
Learn more about modern science from
https://brainly.com/question/30252960
#SPJ1
See text below
What Do I Have to Do?
After you read Lesson 6.03 and take notes from the Lesson to help you create this Assignment, you should now be familiar with the advances of modern science. For your assignment, you will create a presentation about inventions or people of modern science you think are most important!
Assignment Directions:
Think about all the advances of modern science that you studied. There were great changes in transportation as well as communication. There were also changes in medicine and biology. Which inventions or people of modern science do you think are most important?
Steps:
1. Choose three important inventions or people of modern science. Include at least one item or person from each category:
• Transportation (example: Elon Musk - SpaceX, Tesla) • Communication (example: Virtual Academies/Zoom) ⚫ Medicine and Biology -
2. Then, explain in 2-3 sentences why you think each item or person you chose is important. You will have at least 6-9 sentences in all.
⚫ at least one image each for transportation, communication, and medicine and biology
⚫ a 2-3 sentence explanation for each item about why it is an important invention or person of modern science
⚫ CITE YOUR SOURCES
⚫ TOTAL of 3 SLIDES (transportation, communication, medicine and biology)
***Make sure to use capitals and periods where they belong!***
Identify the cause of the naval conflict between the United States and France during Adams's presidency.
France was upset with the United States for signing the Jay Treaty
What was the immediate result of the heightened tensions between the France and the United States following the XYZ Affair?
Answer:
The Alien Acts lengthened the time to qualify for citizenship from 5 to 14 years and allowed the government to deport anyone deemed dangerous to the United States.
Explanation:
Which of these events occurred during the era of the Superpowers?
Responses
A US demographic shift from urban to rural
B a reduction in U.S. global intervention
C an elimination of trade barriers in the Western Hemisphere
D the presence of Communist governments in the Western Hemisphere
E attacks by Muslim extremists on the United States
Answer:
Option D. The presence of Communist governments in the Western Hemisphere occurred during the era of the Superpowers.
Explanation:
Which is better. Black or White Michael Jackson?
Answer: white michael is better bro 100%
Explanation:
welll bc white michael drop much better music such as
dirty dianna(spelled that wrong),smooth criminal, and much more
_______________ is the pioneering American anthropologist who did work among the Zuni and founded the Women's Anthropological Society in 1885.
Answer:
Her name was Matilda Coxe Stevenson and she also conducted research on the Hopi and Pueblo peoples of the American Southwest.
Explanation:
What settlement in Africa did the British establish for former slaves from the United States?
a. Liberia
b. Sierra Leone
c. Monrovia
d. Ghana
e. Benin
The settlement in Africa that the British established for former slaves from the United States is called Sierra Leone.
It was founded in 1787 as a home for black people who had been enslaved in America and fought for their freedom alongside the British in the Revolutionary War. The settlement was created through the efforts of the British abolitionist movement, which sought to end the slave trade and provide a place of refuge for those who had been enslaved. The name Sierra Leone was derived from the Portuguese words for "lion mountain" and referred to the mountainous landscape of the area. The capital of Sierra Leone, Freetown, was established as a home for the former slaves and continues to be a significant cultural center for the descendants of the original settlers. While Sierra Leone faced many challenges in its early years, including conflict with neighboring tribes and the difficulties of establishing a self-sufficient economy, it ultimately became a successful colony and played an important role in the abolitionist movement of the 19th century.
Learn more about War :
https://brainly.com/question/3445478
#SPJ11
39. The Computer __________ and Abuse Act of 1986 is the cornerstone of many computer-related federal laws and enforcement efforts.
a. Violence
b. Fraud
c. Theft
d. Usage
Should the Supreme Court have had the authority to end the national right to abortion that had existed for nearly 50 years? Explain why or why not.
Answer:
In explanation :)
Explanation:
The question of whether or not the Supreme Court should have the authority to end the national right to abortion is a complex one. On one hand, the Supreme Court is tasked with interpreting the Constitution, and determining what rights it protects. Some argue that the Constitution does not explicitly protect the right to an abortion, and that this is a matter that should be left up to the states to decide.
On the other hand, others argue that the right to an abortion is a fundamental right, and that the Supreme Court has a responsibility to protect it. They argue that ending the national right to abortion would have serious consequences for women's health and autonomy, and would undermine the principle of reproductive freedom.
Ultimately, the question of whether or not the Supreme Court should have the authority to end the national right to abortion is a matter of legal interpretation and political opinion. It is a highly charged and contentious issue, and different people will have different views on it.
The delegates to the First Continental Convention who gathered in September 1774 shared the following views EXCEPT
The delegates to the First Continental Convention who gathered in September 1774 particularly concerned about the British government's attempts to tax the colonies without their consent, and the restrictions on colonial trade and commerce. They also shared a strong commitment to protecting colonial rights and liberties, and a desire to assert greater autonomy for the colonies.
However, it is important to note that there were some differences of opinion among the delegates, particularly with regards to the appropriate response to these British policies. Some favored more conciliatory measures, while others advocated for more aggressive forms of resistance. Nonetheless, overall the delegates were united in their determination to defend colonial rights and liberties and to resist British encroachments on colonial autonomy.
In terms of the specific question of what views the delegates did not share, it is difficult to identify any clear examples. While there were certainly differences of opinion among the delegates, all were committed to the cause of colonial resistance and shared a fundamental belief in the importance of defending colonial rights and liberties. Thus, it is perhaps more accurate to say that the delegates shared a range of views and concerns, rather than that they held any views in common that were exceptions to the general consensus.
Learn more about First Continental Convention here:
https://brainly.com/question/30288806
#SPJ11
4. In a general sense, what do all of the bottles on the table represent? That is, their overall
meaning?
All the bottles on the table were programs that were put in place by the US Government in an attempt to stabilize and advance the economy and polity of the united states of America. Lets look at CWA and FACA.
How is this so?Take for instance the Clean Water Act of 11948, it was created to give structure to the way Americans disposed of pollutants into the water bodies of the United States.
The Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) on the other hand was enacted in the yhear 1972. The objective was to provide a framework with which the government of Americ would conduct her operations in an ethical way.
Learn more about FACA at:
https://brainly.com/question/15465739
#SPJ1
What important role did immigrants play in 1840s and 1850s for the United States to industrialize?
Answer:
Most immigrants settled in large cities and went to work in factories, having a big impact on industrialization. Industry now had an abundant labor supply to exploit. These millions of new Americans played a vital role in the rapid industrialization experienced in the United States.
Explanation:
Are legislative leaders in Texas too powerful? Why or why not?
The power of legislative leaders in Texas has been a topic of debate and discussion for many years. Some argue that legislative leaders in Texas are too powerful, while others believe that their power is necessary for effective governance.
On one hand, legislative leaders in Texas have significant power to shape the legislative agenda and control the flow of legislation through the process. The Speaker of the House and the Lieutenant Governor, for example, have the ability to appoint committee members and chairs, set the legislative calendar, and determine which bills come up for debate and vote. This concentration of power can lead to a lack of transparency and accountability, and can result in certain interests or groups having undue influence over the legislative process.
On the other hand, supporters of strong legislative leadership argue that it is necessary for efficient and effective governance. By centralizing power in the hands of a few key leaders, they are better able to set priorities, negotiate deals, and move legislation through the process in a timely manner. Additionally, legislative leaders are often elected by their colleagues and have experience and expertise in navigating the complexities of the legislative process.
In recent years, there have been efforts to reform the legislative process in Texas and redistribute power more evenly among lawmakers. For example, some have proposed changes to the rules governing committee assignments and the legislative calendar, or increasing the role of rank-and-file members in shaping the agenda. However, these efforts have met with mixed success and there remains a great deal of debate over the appropriate balance of power between legislative leaders and individual lawmakers.
In conclusion, whether legislative leaders in Texas are too powerful or not is a matter of perspective and there are valid arguments on both sides. Ultimately, the balance of power in the legislative process will continue to evolve and change over time as lawmakers and citizens grapple with the complexities of governance in a rapidly changing world.