In a suit against Karen, Luke obtained an injunction, which is an order to do or refrain from doing a certain act . An order is an instruction that requires either doing a certain act or refraining from doing it.
Such an order has to be followed strictly in order to comply with the law and avoid any legal complications. Furthermore, it is essential to be aware of the consequences of not following the order, which could include fines, imprisonment or both. Therefore, it is important to take such orders seriously and adhere to them both timely and responsibly. Injunctions are legal orders issued by a court of law, requiring someone to do or refrain from doing a specific act. These orders are generally used to prevent an individual from causing another person harm, or from committing a particular act. Injunctions can be either temporary or permanent, depending on the circumstances of the case. Furthermore, they are often used to prevent harassment, threats, or other abuse. Ultimately, injunctions are an important part of the legal system, helping to protect the rights of individuals and ensure that justice is served.
Learn more about injunction here
https://brainly.com/question/15089489
#SPJ4
which of the following legal entity types does not require the owners to formally organize the entity with the state?
General Partnership, A general partnership is nothing but an arrangement of business between two or more shareholders, they share the responsibilities and profits, and they are partners who agree to be personally responsible for being liable to the company.
General partnerships are non-designated businesses. The group of people who form a general partnership does not need to register their business with the State to function. It is more flexible and provides each partner the ability to control and operate an entity.
This will allow more easy management; a person doesn't need to pass so many levels of bureaucracy which slows down the process.
To know more about legal entity types
brainly.com/question/28333410
#SPJ4
Lit and dicu at leat three reaon a preented in the textbook, a to why incarcerating delinquent may not reduce their crime rate. Do you agree or diagree with the author? What other reaon can you think of that might influence delinquent incarceration? What other alternative might you ugget?
Utilize scientific data on human behavior and perceptions of the costs, dangers, and rewards of crime to deter potential offenders.
The likelihood of being caught is a much more powerful deterrent than even the most severe punishment, according to research.
Prisons are effective at punishing offenders and keeping them off the streets, but lengthy prison terms are not likely to prevent further crime. In fact, prisons might have the opposite effect: Prisoners acquire knowledge
Time spent inside bars may make many people less fearful of potential future imprisonment, and criminals may learn more efficient criminal tactics from one another.
Learn more about human behavior here brainly.com/question/12174217
#SPJ4
Explain the different types of sentencing and provide examples of when they might apply.
Fines: A sentence that involves paying a monetary penalty, often as a way to compensate for damages caused by the crime.
Restitution: A sentence that requires the offender to repay the victim for any financial losses incurred as a result of the crime.
What is sentencing?Generally, There are several different types of sentencing, including:
Probation: A sentence that allows the offender to live in the community under the supervision of a probation officer. Probation is often given as an alternative to a prison sentence, and conditions of probation may include regular check-ins with the probation officer, community service, and drug testing.
Incarceration: A sentence that involves serving time in a prison or jail. Incarceration is typically given for more serious crimes and can range from a few months to life imprisonment.
Community service: A sentence that requires the offender to perform a specific number of hours of unpaid work, often as a way to give back to the community.
Split Sentencing: A sentence that combines a period of incarceration and probation. An example of this is a sentence where an offender serves a period of time in jail and then is released on probation to complete the remainder of their sentence in the community.
Read more about sentencing
at https://brainly.com/question/18728726
#SPJ1
democrat introduces legislation to make white people criticizing minorities a federal crime
Legislation passed by a legislature results in statutes, also known as acts. Federal statutes are the laws passed by Congress, typically with the President's blessing.
Describe a federal statute using an example?Both the public law, as modified, version and the United States Code contain the most recent versions of numerous legislation, including the Social Security Act and the Clean Air Act.Legislation passed by a legislature results in statutes, also known as acts. Federal statutes are the laws passed by Congress, typically with the President's blessing.As well as summaries from the 93rd Congress to the current Congress, Congress.gov offers the complete text of laws from the 103rd Congress (1993–1994) to the current Congress. A link to the Public Law can be found on the GPO govinfo website for legislation passed from the 103rd Congress (1993–1994) through the current Congress.To learn more about Legislation refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27893557
#SPJ1
when a printed form is used, the typewritten material takes precedence over the handwritten material.
This is because typewritten material is easier to read and verify for accuracy. Handwritten material is more prone to errors, as handwriting can be difficult to read and interpret.
In cases where there are discrepancies between the two, the typewritten material is the preferred format. This is because typewritten material can be more easily edited if there is an error, whereas handwritten material would need to be completely rewritten.
Furthermore, typewritten material is seen as more reputable, as it is seen as more professional and precise. All in all, typewritten material is given preference over handwritten material in cases of discrepancy due to its accuracy, ease of verification, and editability.
To know more about typewritten refer to the link brainly.com/question/29979684
#SPJ4
Ohm's Law can only be applied to series and parallel circuits; to solve for combination circuits, Kirchhoff's Law must be applied. True or False?
Ohm's Law only applies to series and parallel circuits; to solve for combination circuits, use Kirchhoff's Law. This Statement is false.
The same caveat applies to Ohm's law as it does to series circuits: values for voltage, current, and resistance must be in the same context for the calculations to work correctly. The first principle to grasp about parallel circuits is that the voltage across each parallel component is equal. This is because a parallel circuit has only two sets of electrically common points, and the voltage measured between those points must always be the same at any given time.
As a result, the voltage across R1 equals the voltage across R2, which equals the voltage across R3, which equals the voltage across the battery (9 V).
Using Ohm's Law to Design Parallel Circuits Determine the Present
The same caveat applies to Ohm's law as it does to series circuits: values for voltage, current, and resistance must be in the same context for the calculations to work correctly.
We can immediately apply Ohm's Law to each resistor to find its current because we know the voltage across each resistor (9 V) and its resistance.
I R 1 = V R 1 R 1 = 9 V 10 k = 0.9 mA
I R 2 = V R 2 R 2 = 9 V 2 k = 4.5 mA
I R 3 = V R 3 R 3 = 9 V
1\s k\sΩ\s=\s9.0\s mA
However, we do not yet know the total current or total resistance of this parallel circuit. Despite Regardless, if we carefully consider what is happening, it should become clear that the total current must equal the sum of all individual resistors.
Learn more about Law from here;
https://brainly.com/question/25368237
#SPJ4
T/F The courts can decide whether the other branches of government have acted within the scope of their constitutional authority
True, the courts have the authority to determine whether the other parts of government have behaved in accordance with their constitutional powers.
According to the Constitution, only Congress has the power to pass laws and declare war, as well as the authority to approve or reject a large number of presidential appointments and conduct extensive investigations. The U.S. Federal Government has three branches: legislative, executive, and judiciary, in order to preserve a separation of powers. These included: levying and collecting taxes; paying off debts and borrowing money; regulating commerce; minting money; establishing post offices; safeguarding patents and copyrights; setting up lower courts; declaring war; and assembling and funding an Army and Navy. The Constitution identifies four main categories of power: enumerated, implied, inherent, and forbidden. The safeguards and privileges provided by the U.S. Constitution to its citizens are known as constitutional rights. In the Bill of Rights, several of these rights are spelled forth.
Learn more about constitutional powers here
https://brainly.com/question/29091219
#SPJ4
when the unsuccessful party challenges the verdict and the judge in a jury trial decides that the evidence is so clear that reasonable people could not differ as to the outcome of the case, the judge grants a:
The judge in a jury trial will grant a petition for judgement notwithstanding the verdict where the losing party disputes the result and the court determines that the evidence is so conclusive that no reasonable person could have a different opinion as to the outcome of the case.
The counterpart of a motion in arrest of judgement in civil matters is a request for judgement notwithstanding the verdict. It could be submitted following the jury's verdict but prior to the entry of judgement. In spite of the jury's verdict, this motion asks the judge to grant the unsuccessful party a judgement.
A jury trial, often known as a trial by jury, is a court case in which the jury renders a verdict or factual findings. It differs from a bench trial where all judgements are made by a judge or panel of judges.
To learn more about jury trial here
brainly.com/question/12085109
#SPJ4
classify each description as a hypothesis, theory, or law.
Hypothesis: a conjecture based on observation or accepted knowledge. Theory: a justification that has been tried and true. Law: A statement that foretells what will occur but does not specify how.
An explanation for a phenomenon is offered in the form of a hypothesis, or hypotheses. According to the scientific method, a hypothesis must be testable in order to qualify as a scientific hypothesis. Typically, scientists base their hypotheses on prior observations that leave room for doubt on the validity of the existing body of knowledge. A scientific theory is different from a scientific hypothesis, despite the fact that the terms "hypothesis" and "theory" are frequently used interchangeably. An educated guess or a notion is the starting point for a working hypothesis, which is an acknowledged hypothesis that is offered for further study. The word "hypothesis" has a different meaning in formal logic, where it refers to a proposition's antecedent.
Learn more about Hypothesis here
https://brainly.com/question/606806
#SPJ4
does an attorney-client relationship exist in these circumstances, even though the pro se litigant signed a form acknowledging that no legal representation will follow?
An attorney-client relationship will not exist when the pro se litigant signed a form acknowledging that no legal representation will follow.
The earliest privilege recognized by Anglo-American law is the attorney-client privilege.
Numerous policy justifications have contributed to the privilege's evolution as it has grown.
The privilege's most fundamental guarantee is "that one seeking counsel or assistance from a lawyer should be absolutely free of any concern that his secrets may be discovered." Thus, "good legal counsel" and "advocacy" is the fundamental tenet of the privilege.
The client can communicate openly and honestly with legal advice while feeling secure in the protection of the privilege, providing the lawyer with all pertinent information and establishing a "zone of seclusion."
To know more about attorney-client privilege, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29520183
#SPJ4
true/false. officers may create different sets of rules to apply to groups of citizens as they please. officers must inform people of their rights before questioning them in custody. officers can pressure a person to confess to a crime. officers can inform suspects of their rights at any point in the questioning process.
False the statement Officers can make up their own sets of rules to apply to different groups of citizens. Before questioning someone in custody, officers must inform them of their rights. Officers can put someone under duress to confess to a crime.
Officers can inform suspects of their rights at any time during the interrogation process. An accused cannot be compelled to testify against himself under Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution. Again, a confessional statement given by an accused before a police officer is inadmissible as evidence under Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872," the bench observed. A confession to a Police officer is inadmissible in evidence under Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act, so when an accused person confesses during the Police investigation, the Police frequently have it recorded by a Magistrate under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Learn more about Criminal Procedure Code from here ;
https://brainly.com/question/24706076
#SPJ4
which nims command and coordination structures are offsite locations
One of the four NIMS Command and Coordination structures are emergency operations centers.
EOCs are off-site sites where workers from many agencies get together to: Address immediate threats and dangers. ICS is used to oversee on-scene, tactical-level reaction. The National Incident Management System (NIMS) provides direction for collaboration among all tiers of government, nongovernmental groups, and the corporate sector in order to avoid, defend against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from incidents. By balancing flexibility and standardization, NIMS provides a framework for interoperability and compatibility. In order to manage domestic incidents, the government and the private sector can collaborate through the flexible framework offered by NIMS. The organizational structure of the State Operational Center (SOC) under NIMS corresponds to the fundamental ICS functions. ICS, on the other hand, is a tactical communications system that is field-based, whereas NIMS offers a framework for controlling the event at the local, operating area, region, and state levels.
Learn more about NIMS here
https://brainly.com/question/11121182
#SPJ4
What is the last stop for a typical new law before it becomes “official?”
A. president
B. congress
C. senate
D. supreme court
DESCRIPTION -
After a bill passes in the House, it goes to the Senate for consideration, similar to the path of a bill in the House (passed in US.)
Answer:B. Senate I hope this helps
Explanation:
The bill is sent to the President for review. A bill becomes law if signed by the President or if not signed within 10 days and Congress is in session. If Congress adjourns before the 10 days and the President has not signed the bill then it does not become law ("Pocket Veto.")After a measure has been passed in identical form by both the House and Senate, it is considered “enrolled.” The enrolled bill is sent to the President who may sign the measure into law, veto it and return it to Congress, let it become law without signature, or at the end of a session, pocket-veto it.The Senate has the sole power to conduct impeachment trials, essentially serving as jury and judge. Since 1789 the Senate has tried 20 federal officials, including three presidents. Congress has conducted investigations of malfeasance in the executive branch—and elsewhere in American society—since 1792.
Plaintiff sued Defendant for illegal discrimination, claiming that Defendant fired him because of his race. At trial, Plaintiff called Witness, expecting him to testify that Defendant had admitted the racial motivation. Instead, Witness testified that Defendant said that he had fired Plaintiff because of his frequent absenteeism. While Witness is still on the stand, Plaintiff offers a properly authenticated secret tape recording he had made at a meeting with Witness in which Witness related Defendant's admissions of racial motivation.
The tape recording is:
(A) admissible as evidence of Defendant's racial motivation and to impeach Witness's testimony.
(B) admissible only to impeach Witness's testimony.
(C) inadmissible, because it is hearsay not within any exception.
(D) inadmissible, because a secret recording is an invasion of Witness's right of privacy under the U.S. Constitution.
The correct option of this question is: (B) admissible only to impeach Witness's testimony.
At trial, impeachment is the method involved with going after the exactness of witnesses' declaration. For instance, in the event that an observer's declaration at trial goes against their previous sworn statements, one or the two players could raise the sworn statement to denounce their declaration
A prior inconsistent statement by an observer, not committed after swearing to tell the truth, can be utilized to impugn that observer (just - it can't come in for its reality, as examined previously). The D>W statement is a confirmation by a party-rival, as examined above, so that is dealt with as a noise issue. The W>P statement stays noise, not expose to a special case, but rather since it was made by Witness, it can come in for impeachment purposes (as it were).
to know more about impeachment click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1373560
#SPJ4
As a result of checks and balances when the president nominates a Supreme Court Justice the _____ must confirm them before they take office.
As a result of checks and balances, when the president nominates a Supreme Court Justice, the Senate must confirm them before they take office; thus, ensuring that the candidate is suitable for the position and upholding the rule of law.
The Supreme Court Justice and the Senate are two distinct branches of the United States government that work together to uphold the rule of law. The Supreme Court is responsible for interpreting the Constitution and determining the constitutionality of laws. The Senate is responsible for confirming Supreme Court Justices, confirming presidential appointments, and approving treaties. Both branches are integral in ensuring that the nation's laws are followed and justice is maintained. Furthermore, these two branches of government work in tandem to ensure the laws of the United States are upheld and justice is served. Once the nominee is confirmed, the Supreme Court Justice can then begin their duties as a Justice on the highest court in the United States.
Learn more about Supreme Court Justice here
https://brainly.com/question/25287186
#SPJ4
true/false. a federal covered adviser (fca) located in state a advertises in state b. the administrator of state b can: require the fca to submit its advertising to the state b administrator before use do nothing only require the adviser to meet federal guidelines for advertising require the fca to submit its advertising to the state b administrator 10 days prior to use
It is False that The administrator of State B cannot require the FCA to submit its advertising to the State B administrator before use. Only federal guidelines for advertising need to be met.
However, the administrator of State B can require the FCA to submit its advertising to the State B administrator 10 days before use. This is because the FCA is still subject to the laws and regulations of the state in which it is advertising, even if it is located in another state. The state's administrator can require the FCA to provide proof that the advertisement meets applicable federal regulations. This helps ensure that the advertising is fair and accurate and does not mislead investors.
To know more about federal regulations refer to the link brainly.com/question/29641289
#SPJ4
discuss the good points and bad points of each scenario in the chart below. what are the moral, ethical and political problems created by each of the three scenarios? scenarios a.you try to greatly reduce population growth through more education and by making birth control devices available for free to everyone who wants them. you would encourage women to use birth control pills. you might even take severe measures, such as china did, and make it illegal for women to have more than one child.
Estrogen is a female hormone. Because there are more frog deaths than births, lower fertility causes the population to begin to shrink.
Women typically use birth control pills to avoid getting pregnant. The frog population is severely harmed by these pills, which are actual estrogen capsules. Women who use contraceptives frequently have high levels of estrogen in their urine. This pee ultimately becomes a component of the sewage that needs to be processed in the wastewater treatment facilities. Unfortunately, these facilities do not remove the estrogen from the water, which causes it to contaminate rivers and lakes. Male frogs eventually take in estrogen-contaminated water. Males that take estrogen become more feminized and have lower fertility. Estrogen is a female hormone. Because there are more frog deaths than births, lower fertility causes the population to begin to shrink.
Learn more about Birth control pills here:
https://brainly.com/question/14994941
#SPJ4
4c. The apartheid government in South Africa mandated segregation…The apartheid government in South Africa mandated segregation between whites and nonwhites and prohibited Black people from being placed in positions where they would manage whites. The approach to business ethics that would encourage Western businesses to question the ethics of continuing to operate within this environment isMultiple ChoiceA. justice theories.B. Utilitarian ethics.C. the Friedman Doctrine.D. rights theories.E. Kantian ethics.
The correct response is B. Utilitarian ethics. The approach to business ethics that would encourage Western businesses to question the ethics of continuing to operate within this environment is Utilitarian ethics.
The utilitarian ethical theory contends that prioritizing outcomes determines morality. Here, consequentialism of this kind is present. A choice should be chosen if it would have the greatest positive impact on the greatest number of people, according to utilitarianism. According to the utilitarian viewpoint, you should pick the flavour of ice cream that will make you feel the happiest if you are picking it for yourself. If you like chocolate but detest vanilla, go with the pleasure that chocolate will bring and stay away from the pain that vanilla will cause. Utilitarianism as a philosophy encourages us to think about both the immediate and long-term effects of our actions.
Learn more about Utilitarian ethics here
https://brainly.com/question/14567028
#SPJ4
The Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education overturned which long-standing public policy?
O the policy that allowed for segregated schools and other public services, as long as the services and buildings serving black patrons were equal to those serving white patrons
O the policy that public education should be provided at no cost
O the policy that allowed black students to attend school
O the policy that allowed history textbooks to remove any reference to the Civil War and slavery
The policy permitted segregated schools and other public facilities as long as the services and buildings serving black clients were equivalent to those serving white patrons. Thus option A is the correct answer.
The long-standing principle of "separate but equal" in public education was abolished by the Supreme Court's ruling in the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education (1954).
As long as the facilities and services used by black and white customers were equal, the policy permitted segregated schools and other public facilities.
The U.S. Supreme Court determined that segregation in public schools violated the 14th Amendment because it was fundamentally unfair.
To learn more about the Supreme court,
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Solange attended her political party's precinct meeting to discuss the top presidential nominees of her party and select delegates for upcoming district and state conventions. After some intense lobbying, the registered party members separated to different sides of the room to designate and count how many supporters each candidate had.
Which of the following accurately describes the term for this political activity?
A) top-two primary
B) open primary
C) presidential caucus
D) presidential rally
This activity is referred to as a Presidential Caucus. A presidential caucus is a gathering of representatives from a political party to choose a candidate to represent them in the upcoming election.
Solange attended her political party's precinct meeting to discuss the top presidential nominees of her party and select delegates for upcoming district and state conventions. After some passionate debates, the registered party members split into different sides of the room to designate and count how many supporters each candidate had. Everyone was eager to make their voices heard, and it quickly became clear that this would be a heated discussion. In the end, Solange was proud to have been part of such an important decision-making process for her party. Political activity can take many forms, from attending a presidential rally to participating in a presidential caucus. In some states, citizens can vote in an open primary, which allows them to choose candidates from any party. Other states have top-two primaries, where only the two highest vote-getters will advance to the general election. No matter what type of political activity you choose to participate in, it's important to make your voice heard and exercise your right to vote!
Learn more about Presidential Caucus here
https://brainly.com/question/29910142
#SPJ4
Revenge. Jane, a first-year law student, while walking to school in inclement weather, accidentally slipped on ice knocking down Greg, another first-year law student, breaking his glasses. He was very angry with Jane and let the air out of one of her car tires. Greg also decided to sue Jane for negligence, claiming as damages $300 for his broken glasses. He decided that he already knew all about the law and did not need a lawyer. Greg sued Jane in state court. Jane, in the same lawsuit, brought an action against Greg for letting the air out of her tire. At trial in state court, Jane told the judge that a friend, Susie, told her that she saw Greg let the air out of Jane's tire. The judge disallowed Jane's testimony on that issue. Susie, however, who was in the courtroom also came and testified to that effect. The state court judge ruled in favor of Jane. Greg said that he was not giving up and that he would seek double damages on appeal in federal court. Jane and Greg live in different states when not attending school. After trial, Jane reported Greg's actions in letting the air out of her tire to the police who said that they would proceed with a criminal action against Greg. Jane's action against Greg for the tire is called a(n)
After trial, Jane reported Greg's actions in letting the air out of her tire to the police who said that they would proceed with a criminal action against Greg. Jane's action against Greg for the tire is called a testimony.
What does testimony mean in court of law?Someone's testimony in a court of law is a formal statement they make about what they saw someone do or what they know about a situation after promising to tell the truth.
Oral or written evidence given by a witness under oath, affidavit, or deposition during a trial or other legal procedures is referred to as testimony. Testimony should be taken in open court, according to Rule 43 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless other federal rules, such as the Federal Rules of Evidence, apply.
Read more about testimony
brainly.com/question/661267
#SPJ1
A process by which a government agency authorizes individuals to work in a given occupation after the persom has completed an approved education program and oassea a state board test
Licensure is a process by which a government agency authorizes individuals to work in a given occupation after the person has completed an approved education program and oassea a state board test.
Licensure is a necessary step in many occupations, and it serves an important purpose in protecting the public from untrained practitioners. The licensure process is designed to ensure that individuals have completed the necessary education and training to provide quality service in their chosen field.
This process usually includes a state board exam that tests a person's knowledge and expertise in their field. In order to be authorized to work in an occupation, individuals must complete all of the licensure requirements and obtain the appropriate license from the relevant government agency.
To know more about agency, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/15129864
#SPJ4
california consumer privacy act notice to applicants and employees, what is the impact?
The impact is that California Consumer insulation Act( CCPA) is a law that provides California dwellers with lower control over their particular information.
It affects businesses that collect, store, and use particular information of California dwellers. For applicants and workers, the CCPA grants them the right to pierce and cancel their particular information, request that their information not be shared, and conclude out of trade of their information.
It also requires employers to expose to applicants and workers what orders of particular information they collect and how they use it. Employers must also give a way for applicants and workers to pierce and cancel their information. also, the CCPA requires employers to give notice to applicants and workers about their insulation rights.
To know more about CCPA visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30160637
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements characterizes the congressional impeachment of Andrew Johnson?
a. Johnson was the only president ever to be impeached and removed from office in American history.
b. Radical Republicans failed to remove Johnson from office, but they damaged his power and authority.
c. Moderate Republicans joined with the Radicals to impeach Johnson, but the Supreme Court overturned his impeachment on appeal.
d. In return for Johnson's promise not to oppose the Radical Republicans' plans, the Senate acquitted him.
The correct answer for this question here is option b. Radical Republicans failed to remove Johnson from office, but they damaged his power and authority.
One of the two main modern political parties in the United States is the Republican Party, usually known as the GOP. The GOP was established in 1854 by abolitionists who opposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which could have permitted chattel slavery to spread into the western territories.
The Republican Party is well recognized for promoting right-leaning beliefs such as libertarianism, social conservatism, and economic conservatism. Republicans therefore typically embrace traditional values, little government meddling, and strong support for business.
Learn more about Republican Party here brainly.com/question/1204107
#SPJ4
what was a consequence of establishing the lend-lease act?
By joining the Axis Powers, the Soviet Union. Roosevelt now had the POWER to wage a war around the globe without American combatants on the front lines.
Between 1922 and 1991, the Soviet Union, formally known as the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, was a transcontinental state that covered most of Eurasia. It was a model communist state that was ostensibly composed of fifteen national republics. However, in reality, both its government and economy were heavily centralized up until the last few years. The Communist Party of the Soviet Union ruled it as a one-party state, and the Russian SFSR, its largest and most populous country, also had Moscow as its capital. Other significant cities included Kiev, Minsk, Tashkent, Alma-Ata, and Novosibirsk (Russian SFSR), Leningrad (Ukrainian SFSR), and Minsk (Russian SFSR). With a land area of nearly 22,402,200 square kilometres (8,649,500 sq mi) and a geographic distribution throughout eleven time zones, it was the largest country in the world.
Learn more about Soviet Union here
https://brainly.com/question/1310325
#SPJ4
notwithstanding the verdict (judgment non obstante verdicto), a judge must, as a matter of law, determine that the trial did not produce sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict.
A judge must find that the trial did not yield enough evidence to support the jury's verdict in order to grant an application for a judgment. A judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) is one in which the trial judge rules against the jury's decision after it has been reached and grants the losing party a judgment without ordering a new trial.
Except for the timing of a trial, a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and a directed verdict is extremely similar. If the judge believes that the jury misapplied the law in reaching its decision or that no reasonable jury could have reached the jury's verdict based on the facts offered at trial, the judge will issue a JNOV.
To learn more about judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV), please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/29223053
#SPJ4
Read Griffin v. State 279 So. 2d 609 (Miss. 1973) and draft a brief using the "IRAC" method. You can use the sample brief on Canvas as a guide.
IRAC stands for the “Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion” structure of legal analysis.
What is the meaning of IRAC?IRAC stands for the legal analysis framework "Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion." An effective essay adheres to some variation of the IRAC format, where each issue and sub-issue identified as a legal problem is grouped around an "issue," a "rule," a "application," and a "conclusion."
The most common organizational style is IRAC since it typically makes it the easiest for the reader to follow the analysis. It will be simpler to compose your discussion if you use the IRAC structure as a guide to organizing your writing.
Learn more about IRAC here:
https://brainly.com/question/30276116
#SPJ1
Under Fair Use, which of the following purposes does not qualify for use or copy of any copyrighted work without permission?
Criticism
News Reporting
Commercial Use (something to be sold)
Teaching
Scholarship Research
is it illegal to take pigeons from the park for free
The statement is true, it is illegal to take pigeons from the park for free and keep them at home.
Nevertheless, if the animal were hurt and required long-term care, you would have to apply for a wildlife rehabilitator licence from the state. The state's Department of Environmental Conservation explicitly prohibits the general population from trying to take any animal or bird like a pigeon from the wild and keeping it as a pet.
It is prohibited to keep local birds as pets. However, exotic birds like cockatoos and budgerigars are permitted to be kept as pets. The common practise of keeping parrots as pets is illegal, as is the keeping of mynas and finches that have been captured in the wild and sold as market items.
To learn more about pigeon here
brainly.com/question/12119084
#SPJ4
police brutality is defined as the use of excessive and unnecessary force by law enforcement officers. this can take many forms, including physical violence, psychological abuse, and discriminatory practices. the issue of police brutality has been a source of concern and controversy for many years, and has recently gained increased attention due to the widespread use of technology which have made it easier to document and share instances of abuse.
Police brutality is a long-standing and increasingly pressing issue, defined as the use of excessive and unnecessary force by law enforcement officers. It can take many forms, including physical violence, psychological abuse, and discriminatory practices.
Technology has recently made it easier to document and share instances of abuse, further highlighting the need to address this issue. Consequently, police brutality has become a source of heightened concern and controversy. Police brutality is an unfortunate reality in our society, yet it remains a pervasive issue. Despite numerous efforts to address this issue, reports of excessive police force continue to surface. This is due to a lack of accountability, training, and oversight, as well as implicit biases, systemic racism, and an overall lack of funding for police departments. Furthermore, many police departments have engaged in a policy of “zero tolerance”, which has led to an escalation of violence and an increase in the use of excessive force. Consequently, it is essential that we take a hard look at the causes of police brutality and take steps to address this issue, both in terms of policy and in terms of culture.
Learn more about police brutality here
https://brainly.com/question/19598900
#SPJ4