1. What do you remeber about slavery? What do you remeber about the industrial revolution
2. Why do you think slave states wanted to keep their slaves from becoming free
3. What new technology came from the late 1800s to early 1900s? How has that shaped our economy

Answer:

a. indusditlization

Explanation:

The brutal realities of industrialization were exposed during the Progressive Era by muckrakers like Jacob Riis. Therefore, the correct answer is option a. industrialization.

American culture saw a great deal of change as a result of industrialization, but there were many unfavorable side consequences as well. Through their writing and photographs, muckrakers like Riis brought these issues to public light.

Child labor, dangerous working conditions, and poverty were all brought to light. For his work capturing the squalor that immigrants endured in the tenement dwellings of New York City, Riis was particularly well-known.

All things considered, the efforts of muckrakers throughout the Progressive Era contributed to the implementation of numerous significant reforms and changes in American society. Because of their efforts, all Americans now live in a more favorable and just society.

Therefore, the correct answer is option a. industrialization.

learn more about muckrakers here :

https://brainly.com/question/13379226

#SPJ3

The Ninth Amendment says, "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

The Tenth Amendment says, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States ...

Answer:

the answer is a.Germanic

Explanation:

people all over the country speak languges of all kind and they do so accordinly and i looked it up

Answer:

Thus, individual differences are important because they're associated with students' particular needs. These needs are related to learning pace, cognitive styles, and motivation levels, which teachers must take into account in the teaching and learning processes.

Answer:

47

Explanation:

Answer:

C.) Stadium should be your answer here.

Answer:

the process of changing or causing something to change from one form to another

Answer:

which chapter is this ???

Explanation:

___________________

Intellectual property right (IP) gives a person the right to sole ownership or exclusiveness to their own innovation or any innovation they want to protect over a period of time.

Learn more about IP right at https://brainly.com/question/1078532

Answer:

32 pieces of pipe

Explanation:

In order to find the answer to this question you need to divide the length of the pipe by the length of the pieces using KCF. (Keep, Change, Flip)

[tex]8 \div \frac{1}{4}[/tex]

All whole numbers have a invisible denominator of one, make sure to remember that when dividing fractions and whole numbers.

[tex]8=\frac{8}{1}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{8}{1} \div\frac{1}{4}[/tex]

Use KCF

[tex]\frac{8}{1}\times\frac{4}{1}[/tex]

Multiply

[tex]8\times4=32[/tex]

[tex]1\times1=1[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{32}{1} =32[/tex]

=32 pieces of pipe

Hope this helps

Answer:

a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".

Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.

While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.

b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.

 In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.

In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.

Answer: A.) Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act. While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings. Its goal is to impose significantly more constitutional limitations on the states than existed prior to the Civil War. Therefore, the Supreme Court ruled in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), that racial redistricting must be subject to strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause and that the bodies responsible for redistricting must be aware of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act. While the Supreme Court found that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in defining the 1997 borders was based on patently false conclusions in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001).

B.) Easley filed an appeal with the US Supreme Court in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, challenging the ruling in Hunt v. Cromartie. In the case of Hunt v. Cromartie, the court determined that the North Carolina legislature did not consider race when establishing the borders of the twelfth congressional district in 1992. The court ruled that there was no proof that the legislature had violated the equal protection article of the constitution or that it had drawn boundaries based on race rather than politics. In Easley v Cromartie the argument was that establishing the borders for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The United States Supreme Court ruled that the lower court's ruling was incorrect because it genuinely relied on racial issues, which is against the interests of the state. In Shaw v. Reno, the court found that North Carolina's voting strategy attempted to separate voters based on race.

c.) I think that a move that members of this court would disagree with the BLM (Black lives Matter) movement. This case, Easley v Cromartie has severe relations to the equal protection clause. This clause states, "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." This clause when then debunked when later furthering the case, which is almost exactly what the BLM movement was about. Both cases disagreed with the equality of particular groups of people. 

Explanation: just submitted

Answer:

Article I, Section 7, of the Constitution provides that all bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives but that the Senate may propose, or concur with, amendments. By tradition, general appropriation bills also originate in the House of Representatives.

Explanation:

Answer:

think the more compelling argument winner has to go to Jimmy Carter. Lots of facts stated, not just opinions and assumptions. For example; when he stated written facts from the CPI that his plan to bring inflation down has worked for him during is presidency.

With that being said I have to give credit where credit is due, Ronald Regan definitely had some powerful comebacks. Like for when he was showing that his governing in the state of California has worked in the past so why would it not work while running the country.

Explanation:

*not my answer*

marcelovarelaquintan- owner of this answer

Answer:

Fire

Explanation:

Not much to explain, it's just fire.

Answer:

no it not it creates a fake relation to the politcal person that u "so call yourself"

Explanation:

El liberalismo es un movimiento político-social que se originó en la Ilustración del siglo XVIII, en el que la libertad es el pilar central de la organización política y social de las naciones.  

El liberalismo tiene como punto de partida la mayor libertad posible para el individuo siempre que no restrinja la libertad de los demás. Los liberales luchan por una sociedad en la que los ciudadanos disfruten de grandes libertades, como los derechos civiles que protegen al individuo y limitan el poder del estado y la iglesia.

El liberalismo también lucha por un mercado libre en el que el gobierno adopte una postura cautelosa. Otra punta de lanza del liberalismo es la separación de la iglesia y el estado (entre otras cosas como condición para la tolerancia religiosa).

El gobierno solo está obligado a ocuparse de aquellas áreas del gobierno que son imposibles de cuidar para el individuo, como las funciones públicas, las obras públicas y la defensa nacional.

Las dos corrientes principales del liberalismo que han tenido lugar en nuestro país han sido:  

Aprende más en https://brainly.com/question/15696042

Answer:

UMMM

Explanation:

Answer:

wow

Explanation:

quitr tough even for my colleagues

Answer:

He had just eaten, He was shot in the back, and lastly, the arrow went under his left armpit

Explanation:

this has to do with logic... read it carefully.. whatever is in the multiple choice that repeats the paragraph, choose that.

Answer:

A,B,E

Explanation:

A because in the beginning it says " half an hour after Otzi dined" which implies that he had just eaten. B because he was shot near/close to the back and E because it states in the paragraph that the arrow went under his left armpit.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Answer:

New regionalism gave rise to regional organizations that had a wide-ranging set of stated policy objectives. ... Unlike old regionalism, which was oriented more toward interactions between states, new regionalism involved a variety of state and nonstate actors involved in a process of transformation of the world order.

Explanation:

Answer:

Germany's resumption of submarine attacks on passenger and merchant ships in 1917 became the primary motivation behind Wilson's decision to lead the United States into World War I.

Explanation: There was a lot of other causes but dat wus da main 1

Answer:

This was because of Germany's continuation of submarine attacks on passenger and merchant ships in the year 1917, this resulted in the US joining WWI.

I hope this helps! Please mark brainliest! :D

The only Candice I know is Candice King. If that is who you are talking about here are some facts about her.

Answer:

Yeah, from Phineas and Ferb

Answer:

US Constitution

Explanation:

The answer is the free exercise clause, which is from Amendment 1 of the US Constitution.