Write an informal letter saying that you miss your brother​

Although they directly appeal for the readers' agreement and frequently highlight well-known facts, rhetorical questions are frequently utilized in persuasive literature.

Rhetorical questions can be an effective communication tactic during a speech. With the aforementioned questions, you can influence the sentiment and thinking of the audience. They are quite useful for capturing the attention of the crowd and converting people to your point of view.

A rhetorical question is used to convince or subtly affect an audience. It's a question that is asked more for impact than for a specific response. A rhetorical question is frequently used to draw attention to an issue or simply to get the audience to think.

To know more about rhetorical questions visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/3997185

#SPJ1

Answer:

the third one

Explanation:

because it gives a backstory and explanation to the topic

Answer:

The statement "Popular myth typically traces the modern circus back to the ancient Romans" suggests that many people believe that the modern circus has its roots in ancient Roman times. Therefore, the idea best supported by this statement is A. Some people think that the idea for the circus came from ancient times.

Explanation:

Answer:

Based on the word endings and the context given, "gruffness" most likely means "how gruff someone sounded." The "-ness" ending in "gruffness" indicates a quality or state of being, so it refers to the attribute of sounding gruff.

Explanation:

Answer: Interdependent combinations

Explanation:  Interdependent combinations are when  words and pictures go hand in hand to convey an idea that neither could convey alone

For Question 1, the relevant companies that would be useful for the project and fit the briefing are EasyJet, Ryanair, Wizz Air, Air France, and TAP Portugal.

Question 2 is about identifying relevant companies to speak with for a project that aims to explore the market environment in the low-cost airline sector in Europe after the COVID1 9 pandemic.

Therefore, these companies are headquartered in Europe and operate in the low-cost airline sector, which is the focus of the project. British Airways and Australia are not relevant to this search as they are not low-cost airlines. American Airlines, United Airlines, Emirates, Nepal Airlines, Singapore Airlines, and Japan Airlines are also not relevant as they are not headquartered in Europe.

Learn more about experience on:

https://brainly.com/question/11659506

#SPJ1

If the defendants had been young white boys, they may have been less likely to be arrested in the first place and may have received more lenient treatment throughout the legal process.

Their trials may have been less sensationalized in the media, and they may have been less likely to be vilified by the public.

In contrast, if the jogger had been a woman of color, the trial, media coverage, and public opinion may have been even more biased against the accused individuals, particularly if they were people of color. T

he case may have received less attention in the media and may have been viewed as less significant by the public.

Read more about Central Park Five here:

https://brainly.com/question/2141088

#SPJ1

By slowing the story's pace with commas and hyphens, he builds tension.

How does Poe employ terror in his writing?

The frequent use of terror in Edgar Allan Poe's works is perhaps his most well-known quality. To frighten his audience, he employed both words and visuals. He put together scenarios that occur to his characters that capture genuine anxieties a reader would have.

What method does Poe employ to increase the speed of the excerpt's suspense?

Poe creates tension and dread through descriptions of the eye. The narrator compares the old man's eye to a vulture's eye and discusses his preoccupation with it. He calls it "a pale blue eye with a film over it."

To know more about Poe visit:

https://brainly.com/question/20487830

#SPJ1

We can classify each word according to the final sound represent by the past-tense marker -ed, depending on whether it sounds like a "d," a "t," or an "ed".

Final sound /d/

Final sound /t/

Final sound /ed/

As we know, regular verbs in the simple past are formed by the addition of the marker -ed. However, that -ed will not always have the same sound. Take a look below:

With that in mind, we can conclude we have correct answered this question by classifying the verbs in the simple past according to their final sounds.

Learn more about the simple past here:

https://brainly.com/question/24289610

#SPJ1

Explanation:

No sooner had I reached home than I realized that I had left my keys in the office. I searched all my pockets and bags, but the keys were nowhere to be found. Panic set in as I thought of spending the night outside. I decided to go back to the office and see if I could find a way in.

As I was about to leave, I noticed a small note on my front door. It read, "I have your keys. Meet me at the park by the river at 7 pm sharp. Come alone." There was no signature or clue as to who had taken my keys. I had no choice but to follow the instructions on the note.

As I walked towards the park, my mind was filled with all sorts of possibilities. Who had taken my keys, and why did they want to meet me in the park? My heart was racing as I approached the meeting point.

Suddenly, a figure emerged from the shadows. It was a woman, and she was holding my keys. She handed them to me and said, "I am sorry for taking your keys. My son is very sick, and we needed money for his treatment. We saw your address on the keychain and thought you might be able to help."

I was taken aback by her honesty and vulnerability. I asked her to wait while I went to the nearby ATM and withdrew some money to give her. As I handed her the cash, I wished her and her son well, and we parted ways.

That night, as I sat in my living room, I realized how fortunate I was to have my home and all the things that came with it. I made a mental note to always be grateful for what I had and to never take anything for granted.

Answer:

In the United States, what is the paper used for money made from?

O wood

O animal skin

O recycled paper

Explanation:

You're welcome.

Answer: The paper used for money in the United States is made from a blend of 75% cotton and 25% linen.

Your welcome (:

Answer:

There are several similarities and differences between prehistoric African families and prehistoric indigenous American families. Both cultures valued communal living and placed importance on the extended family unit. In prehistoric African families, Sudarkasa notes that the extended family unit included not just blood relatives but also individuals who were adopted into the family or had formed bonds through other means. Similarly, in prehistoric indigenous American families, Engels notes that the extended family unit was important, with multiple generations often living together.

One distinction between the two cultures is that prehistoric African families placed greater emphasis on the role of women within the family unit. Women were often responsible for childcare, cooking, and other domestic duties, while men were responsible for hunting and other forms of subsistence. In prehistoric indigenous American families, there was often more gender equality, with both men and women playing important roles in the family and community.

In contemporary Black/African American families, there are many notable attributes, including the importance of family and community. Despite historical and systemic challenges, many Black families have continued to value and prioritize communal living and support systems. There is often a strong sense of intergenerational support and respect, with elders playing an important role in the family unit. Additionally, many Black families have developed unique cultural traditions and practices that reflect their experiences and history.

However, it is also important to acknowledge the diversity within the Black/African American community, and the ways in which individual families may differ in their values, beliefs, and practices. While there may be some commonalities across families, it is important to approach any discussion of Black families with a nuanced and intersectional understanding of the many factors that shape their experiences and identities.

Answer:

If you were sent into exile, you would not expect to be living in the same country because exile means being forced to leave your own country or homeland, usually as a punishment or due to political reasons. So, being exiled means you would have to go and live in a foreign country or place.

Lon is not facing banishment because banishment refers to being forced to leave a place or country as a punishment for a crime or other offense. In Lon's case, he is being sent to a penitentiary, which is a prison, within the same state where he was caught.

Yes, Lon should expect to be freed from prison if he is being granted a pardon. A pardon is an official forgiveness for a crime that removes the punishment or sentence given for the crime. So, if Lon is being pardoned, it means that he will be freed from prison and will not have to serve the remainder of his sentence.

Answer: We have put a lot of work into ensuring our facility is accessible to all of our wheelchair-bound patrons.

Explanation:

Wheelchair and bound can be joined together and serve as an adjective to describe the noun patrons. Hence, a hyphen should be used.

We can identify the rhetorical devices used in each of the sentences by paying attention to what they appeal to, as seen below:

Pathos, logos, and kairos are three different types of rhetoric used to persuade an audience. Pathos refers to the use of emotional appeals to persuade an audience. This can involve creating an emotional connection with the audience, using vivid language and storytelling, or evoking strong feelings such as empathy, anger, or fear.

Logos, on the other hand, is the use of logical appeals to persuade an audience. This can involve using data, statistics, and evidence to support an argument, presenting a clear and logical sequence of ideas, or using reason and common sense to convince an audience.

Kairos is a type of rhetoric that is focused on the timing and context of an argument. This involves taking into consideration the specific situation, audience, and cultural moment in which the argument is being presented.

Learn more about pathos here:

https://brainly.com/question/24193390

#SPJ1

Answer:

The struggles of indigenous peoples against colonisation and forced assimilation are highlighted in Toypurina's story, which may be pertinent to other communities besides Gabriel Mission. Her experience emphasises the value of protecting one's cultural identity and fending off attempts to do so. This is a global issue that can connect with other societies who have faced comparable difficulties in the past. Her tale also demonstrates how people can stand up for what they believe in despite overwhelming obstacles and make a difference. Hence, other groups battling for their rights and cultural identity might draw inspiration from and learn a valuable lesson from Toypurina's tale.

In Pericle’s funeral oration, the detail which best supports the purpose of persuading the audience is that their freedom is connected to their generosity is that:

The Funeral Oration is a speech intended to persuade its audience. Pericles praises Athens in order for people to continue fighting; he praises the sacrifices of the dead in order for others to imitate them.

His words are a powerful expression of every citizen's duty to fight for democracy and freedom - but if, like Thucydides, you have some doubts about the justice or wisdom of the war, then this becomes dangerous propaganda. Thucydides, as usual, does not give us simple lessons or instructions, but instead asks us to think about difficult issues.

Read more about Pericles

brainly.com/question/894806

#SPJ1

Answer:

If you could travel anywhere in the world, where would you go?

If I could travel anywhere in the world, I would go to Japan. (First Conditional)

If you won the lottery, what would you do with the money?

If I won the lottery, I would buy a house and invest in stocks. (First Conditional)

If you could have any job in the world, what would it be?

If I could have any job in the world, I would be a professional athlete. (Second Conditional)

If you could go back in time, what historical event would you like to witness?

If I could go back in time, I would like to witness the signing of the Declaration of Independence. (Second Conditional)

If you could have any superpower, what would it be?

If I could have any superpower, I would choose the ability to fly. (Second Conditional)

Explanation:

I need more context your summaries aren't filled with enough content to answer this. Explain some more and I'll happily help you out! Thanks

We can see here that the version that best uses a variety of sentence structures to enhance the flow and writing style of a story is: C. Juan looked at his project, feeling proud, knowing he'd worked hard to make the model solar system look beautiful and had done a good job. He knew he would have competition in the science fair. But he felt confident that he had a good chance of winning.

A story is a narrative, either true or fictitious, that tells about a series of events and experiences, often involving characters and a plot with a beginning, middle, and end. Stories can be written or told orally and can be found in various forms such as novels, short stories, myths, legends, folktales, fables, etc.

We can see that the selected version uses a variety of sentence structures, including a participial phrase, an appositive, and a compound sentence, which enhances the flow and writing style of the story.

It also uses descriptive language and specific details to create a vivid picture of the scene and the character's feelings.

Learn more about story on https://brainly.com/question/29033237

#SPJ1

In T.S. Eliot's "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock," the narrator's internal monologue reflects the fragmentation and disorientation of modern life.

Master narratives are the overarching stories or beliefs that shape and define the way people think and act. They are often taken for granted and treated as natural or universal, but they can be challenged and deconstructed to reveal their underlying assumptions and power structures.

Deconstruction, on the other hand, is a method of analysis that aims to expose the hidden contradictions and hierarchies within texts and discourses. By dismantling the dominant narratives and uncovering their underlying biases, deconstruction seeks to open up new possibilities for interpretation and meaning.

In T.S. Eliot's "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock," the narrator's internal monologue reflects the fragmentation and disorientation of modern life. The poem challenges the master narrative of masculinity by portraying the protagonist as an insecure and indecisive figure who is unable to assert himself or connect with others. The repeated refrain of "Do I dare?" highlights Prufrock's anxiety and self-doubt, as he navigates the social expectations and cultural norms that define his identity. The poem also deconstructs the traditional poetic form, using fragmented syntax and free verse to disrupt the reader's expectations and create a sense of dislocation. By challenging the dominant narratives of masculinity and poetic form, Eliot's poem invites the reader to question their own assumptions and explore new ways of understanding the world.

Joy Harjo's "How to Write a Poem in a Time of War" also challenges master narratives by foregrounding the experiences and perspectives of marginalized communities. The poem celebrates the power of poetry to transcend borders and connect people across cultures and histories. Harjo's use of repetition and imagery creates a sense of unity and continuity, as she weaves together diverse voices and traditions.

Learn more about poem on

https://brainly.com/question/9861

#SPJ1

Answer:

Yummy yum saucey

Explanation:

woah yay okay yum what okay yes

Answer:

The detail from the text that best shows a parallel to authoritarian governments is the abolishment of a song from the rebellion.

Explanation:

The detail that shows a parallel to authoritarian governments is the abolishment of a song from the rebellion. This is because one common tactic used by authoritarian governments is to control or censor the media and the arts, including music, in order to control the narrative and prevent dissent or opposition. In the case of Animal Farm, the abolition of "Beasts of England" is a way for the pigs to control the animals' thoughts and memories of the rebellion, and to prevent them from questioning the current state of the farm under the pigs' leadership. This parallels the way authoritarian governments often suppress or censor music, literature, and other forms of expression that do not conform to their ideology or agenda.

Answer:

its correct

Explanation:

Explanation:

The phrase "his only fully developed exposition in 1941 of the strategic threat" means that Roosevelt's May 27 speech was the most comprehensive and detailed explanation he gave during that year about the threat facing the United States and his plans to address it. The speech was an important statement of policy, reflecting Roosevelt's understanding of the problem and the steps being taken to protect American interests in the Atlantic. Although he did not refer to specific cases, his speech made clear that the chosen course of action carried the risk of war, and he warned the American people accordingly. The speech was well-received by the press and public, and it helped to increase Roosevelt's popularity during that period.

Explanation:

Dear [Lecturer's Name],

I am writing to express my sincere apologies for failing to submit the assignment that was due yesterday. Unfortunately, I completely forgot about the deadline and failed to submit it on time. I understand the importance of submitting assignments on time and I am truly sorry for any inconvenience that my late submission may have caused.

In regards to Grice's maxims, there are four maxims that were developed by philosopher H. Paul Grice to govern effective communication. These maxims are the maxim of quantity, the maxim of quality, the maxim of relevance, and the maxim of manner. Let's take a look at each maxim and determine whether or not it was flouted in the email.

Maxim of Quantity: This maxim requires that we provide the right amount of information to effectively communicate our message. In the email, I have not flouted this maxim because I have provided all the necessary information that my lecturer needs to understand the situation.

Maxim of Quality: This maxim requires that we be truthful in our communication. In the email, I have not flouted this maxim because I have been honest about the reason why I failed to submit the assignment on time.

Maxim of Relevance: This maxim requires that we stay on topic and provide information that is relevant to the conversation. In the email, I have not flouted this maxim because I have stayed on topic and provided information that is relevant to the assignment that was due.

Maxim of Manner: This maxim requires that we communicate in a clear and concise manner. In the email, I may have flouted this maxim because I could have been more clear about the reason why I forgot to submit the assignment. However, I have tried my best to be as clear as possible and have apologized for any inconvenience caused.

In conclusion, while I may have flouted the maxim of manner to some degree, I have done my best to communicate effectively with my lecturer and apologize for my mistake. I hope that my sincere apologies and explanation will be taken into consideration and I appreciate your understanding in this matter.

Sincerely, [Your Name]