Strategic bombing is an aircraft bombardment technique intended to degrade a country's ability to wage war by demoralising citizens and concentrating on important enemy infrastructure.
Which nation suffered the greatest bombing during World War Two?Yet they also left the conflict in ruins: With 6,700 tonnes of bombs and 154 days and nights of continuous bombing, Malta retains the record for the greatest sustained bombing onslaught. The Brits were doubtful of their ability to adequately defend or maintain Malta. That was a great strategic spot, but it was also hard to protect.
Was it right to unleash the atomic bomb?In order to achieve a quicker victory and save the deaths of more Americans, the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as moral. But it was obviously immoral to employ this weapon knowing it would kill humans and devastate the urban environment.
To know more about strategic bombing visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4360983
#SPJ1
"Looking into the future" How would society change if the federal government did not provide school lunch programs for students from low-income families, or support research in education? Consider affects upon employment, crime, tax revenue, welfare, and the entertainment industry. Next, review and comment on one of your classmate's post. You may disagree, or add additional possibilities to your classmate's response
If the federal government stopped funding educational research or offering school lunch programs to students from low-income families, the consequences would probably be profound and widespread.
Without these programs, many children from low-income families would find it difficult to receive a good education and enough food, which could have serious repercussions for both their futures and society as a whole.
Increased crime rates could result from this, as kids who don't get the nutrition and education they need may be more likely to commit crimes as adults. Children may also have trouble finding employment in the future without access to high-quality education, which could have a negative effect on tax receipts and welfare programs.
To know more about federal government here
https://brainly.com/question/860014
#SPJ4
2. What party did scalawags join in order to advance politically?
Scalawags joined the Republican Party in order to advance politically.
Scalawags were white Southerners who supported the Republican Party during the Reconstruction era after the Civil War. They were often former Whigs who saw the Republican Party as a way to advance their political careers and gain power in the South.
They were often seen as traitors by other white Southerners who supported the Democratic Party and opposed Reconstruction policies.
However, scalawags played an important role in the Republican Party's success in the South during the Reconstruction era, and many of them held political office at the local and state level.
For more such questions on Scalawags, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/12075524
#SPJ11
Having had little to no say under the British monarchy the colonist from England wish to do which of the following in their own government
Answer:
The colonists from England wished to have a greater say and more control over their own government. They wanted to have representation and a voice in the decisions that affected their lives.
Explanation:
Under British rule, the colonists had very little say in the government. The British monarchy held all the power and made decisions without any input from the colonists. This lack of representation led to frustration and resentment among the colonists. When they established their own government, they sought to create a system that would give them more control and representation. The idea of popular sovereignty - the belief that the people are the ultimate source of power in government - became a central tenet of American democracy, and the right to vote and participate in government became a fundamental aspect of American political culture.
Imagine you are a Japanese military officer planning to speak to soldiers before a battle in the Pacific theater. Write the script of a speech motivating the soldiers to fight fiercely. Use what you have learned about Japanese attitudes during the war to motivate the soldiers.
An optional way you may start your speech is:
As you face the enemy, remember . . .
Answer:
money talk fr
Explanation:
Because of World War II, the United States became:
O A. a global superpower.
O B. more isolationist.
O C. overpopulated.
о D. economically unstable.
SUBMIT
Answer:
A. a global superpower.
Answer:
D. economically unstable
Explain the conflict between the Guomindang and the Chinese communist. What caused the two Groups to unite temporarily?
Answer:
The Guomindang (also known as the Nationalist Party) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) were the two main political parties in China in the early 20th century. They had fundamentally different ideologies, with the Guomindang being a right-wing party that advocated for democracy and nationalism, while the CCP was a left-wing party that advocated for socialism and communism. The conflict between the two parties began in the 1920s and lasted for several decades.
The main cause of the conflict was the struggle for political power and control over China's future. The Guomindang, led by Chiang Kai-shek, had the support of the military and the urban middle class, while the CCP had the support of the peasants and the workers. The Guomindang was wary of the CCP's revolutionary ideology and feared that the CCP would undermine its power and lead China down the path of communism. On the other hand, the CCP saw the Guomindang as a tool of the imperialist powers and accused it of being corrupt and oppressive.
The conflict between the two parties intensified in the 1930s, with the outbreak of the Chinese Civil War. The Guomindang and the CCP fought against each other for control of China, with each side receiving support from different foreign powers. The CCP was able to win the support of the peasants by promising to redistribute land and improve their lives, while the Guomindang struggled to maintain its legitimacy.
However, despite their differences, the Guomindang and the CCP united temporarily during World War II to fight against the Japanese invasion of China. The two parties put aside their ideological differences and worked together to defend China against a common enemy. However, after the end of the war, the truce between the two parties quickly broke down and the conflict resumed. Ultimately, the CCP was able to emerge victorious and establish the People's Republic of China in 1949, while the Guomindang fled to Taiwan.
Explanation:
Read the passage from a speech given by the Athenian leader Pericles. Our constitution does not copy the laws of neighboring states; we are rather a pattern to be imitated than imitators ourselves. Its administration favors the many instead of the few; this is why it is called democracy. If we look to the laws, they afford equal justice to all in their private differences. . . . [C]lass considerations [are not] allowed to interfere with merit; nor again does poverty bar the way, if a man is able to serve the state, he is not hindered by the obscurity of his condition. Pericles claimed that the Athenian government, unlike other Greek city-states, favored its wealthy citizens. kept poor people from serving the state. imitated the laws of its neighbors. treated all its people fairly regardless of class
"Pericles claimed that the Athenian government treated all its people fairly regardless of class. The administration favored the many instead of the few, and class considerations were not allowed to interfere with merit. Poverty did not bar a man from serving the state if he was able. The passage emphasizes Athenian democracy and its principles of equal justice and merit-based service." (ChatGPT, 2023)
What was “trickle-down economics?” How was this theory employed during the Great Depression, and to what extent was it successful?
Trickle-down economics is theory that suggests that economic benefits given to wealthy and businesses will trickle down to rest of population, creating economic growth and prosperity for all.
What is economic growth?Economic growth refers to the increase in the production of goods and services in an economy over time. It is typically measured by the growth rate of gross domestic product (GDP), which is the total value of all goods and services produced in a country during a specific period. Economic growth is often seen as a key indicator of a healthy economy, as it can lead to increased employment opportunities, higher wages, and improved standards of living for citizens. However, it can also have negative impacts, such as environmental degradation and income inequality. Policymakers often use various tools such as fiscal and monetary policies to promote economic growth and mitigate its negative effects.
To learn more about citizens, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/21029209
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP QUICK.
Why were the british eager to trade with India?
Answer:
The British were eager to trade with India for several reasons, including:
Wealth and resources: India was a country rich in resources such as spices, silk, cotton, and tea. The British saw an opportunity to obtain these valuable commodities at a relatively low cost and sell them for a profit in Europe and other parts of the world.
Market expansion: The British saw India as a vast market for their goods, especially textiles. The East India Company, a British trading company, began exporting large quantities of textiles to India and also imported raw materials such as cotton from India to be processed in Britain.
Political and strategic considerations: Control of trade with India was seen as a way to establish and maintain British influence in the region. The British East India Company eventually became the dominant power in India, and its control over trade and commerce allowed it to exert significant political power and influence over the Indian subcontinent.
Geopolitical competition: The British were in competition with other European powers, such as the Portuguese, Dutch, and French, for control of trade with India. The British saw trade with India as a way to gain an advantage over their rivals and strengthen their global economic and political position.
How did the U.S. entry into World War I connect to the social and political developments regarding the civil liberties of ordinary Americans?
The U.S. entry into World War I led to a crackdown on civil liberties, as the government sought to maintain public support for the war effort and suppress dissent. These measures led to a notable erosion of civil liberties, with freedom of speech, press, and assembly being curtailed in the name of national security.
How does the U.S. entry into World War I connect to its developments?The U.S. entry into World War I had a significant impact on the civil liberties of ordinary Americans, as the government adopted measures to suppress dissent and maintain public support for the war effort.
The Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918 were passed to prevent anti-war activists from expressing their opposition, with many individuals being arrested and imprisoned for speaking out against the war. The government also conducted widespread surveillance of suspected subversives, and the American Protective League was established to help identify and apprehend those deemed disloyal.
Read more about World War I
brainly.com/question/446364
#SPJ1
5. What does the following quote describe about the middle passage? "The
closeness of the place, and the heat of the climate, added to the number in
the ship, which was so crowded that each had scarcely room to turn
himself, almost suffocated us......The shrieks of the women, and the groans
of the dying, rendered the whole a scene of horror almost inconceivable."-
The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano
Answer:
The quote describes the horrific conditions of the middle passage, which was the voyage that enslaved Africans were forced to endure during the transatlantic slave trade. The quote highlights the extreme overcrowding of the slave ships, with people being packed so tightly that they could hardly move. This, combined with the heat and humidity of the climate, created an unbearable and suffocating atmosphere for the enslaved Africans. Additionally, the quote describes the sounds of suffering and agony that filled the ship, with women crying out and dying, creating a horrifying scene that was almost beyond imagination. Overall, the quote shows the inhumane and brutal conditions of the middle passage, where human beings were treated as nothing more than cargo to be transported across the ocean.
Explanation:
A student measures the mass of an 8 cm' block of brown sugar to be 12.9 g. What is the density the brown sugar?
Answer:
ρ
=
mass
volume
, here
ρ
≅
1.6
⋅
g
⋅
c
m
−
3
Explanation:
Density
,
ρ
, is mass per unit volume and is thus defined as the quotient,
mass
volume
, and typically chemists use units of
g
⋅
c
m
−
3
or
g
⋅
m
L
−
1
.
And here this quotient is...........
12.9
⋅
g
8
⋅
c
m
3
; does this give the required units?
Note that
1
⋅
c
m
3
≡
1
⋅
m
L
...
...
Answer link
Explanation:
What language did the babies that frederick ii, the holy roman emperor, ordered to be exposed to no language end up speaking naturally?
Question 9 of 10
The purpose of the Nuremberg trials was to:
OA. hold the United States accountable for its internment of Japanese
Americans during the war.
OB. require Italy to forfeit territories and severely limit the size of its
military.
OC. punish Nazi leaders for their crimes against humanity during the
Holocaust.
OD. extract reparations from the Axis powers for property destroyed
during the war.
SUBMIT
Answer:
OC. punish Nazi leaders for their crimes against humanity during the Holocaust.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Question 4 of 10
Who was a famous poet during the Harlem Renaissance?
A. Marcus Garvey
B. W. E. B. Du Bois
C. Langston Hughes
D. Duke Ellington
Answer: Langston Hughes.
Explanation:
The most well-known poet during the Harlem Renaissance was Langston Hughes.
1. What is the main purpose of the article?
A. to explain why James Madison wrote the Bill of Rights
B. to empower students to petition for change
C. to outline the freedoms protected by the 10 amendments in the Bill of Rights
D. to show the relevance of the First Amendment to students’ lives
2. What does “overstep its bounds” mean in “Madison drafted the Bill of Rights to ensure the government didn’t overstep its bounds”?
A. assume too much power
B. establish freedom of speech
C. give legal approval
D. protect individual freedoms
3. A school can limit students’ speech if it ____.
A. interrupts learning
B. is controversial
C. is political
D. is unpopular
4. Which detail best supports the political cartoon?
A. “[Mary Beth Tinker] sued the district, and the case made it to the Supreme Court.”
B. “The nation’s highest court ruled in Mary Beth’s favor, saying that she had a right to peacefully express her views.”
C. “In fact, hundreds of U.S. cities have instituted nightly curfews for teens to help reduce crime.”
D. “In general, your right to complain to the authorities isn’t up for debate.”
5. Which of the following is protected by freedom of assembly?
A. who can gather
B. where people assemble
C. when people gather
D. the manner of assembly
6. Which detail gives an example of how students are affected by freedom of religion?
A. “Millions of teens have been arrested for violating [curfews].”
B. “But whether you say the Pledge is up to you.”
C. “The principal pulled articles that he thought invaded some students’ privacy.”
D. “But you can’t encourage actions that would disrupt learning.”
7. Schools are allowed to censor ____.
A. students’ social media accounts
B. personal blog posts
C. school-sponsored publications
D. petitions from students
8. Which is an example of lobbying?
A. complaining to classmates about a test
B. trying to convince leaders to allow a pep rally
C. writing a blog post that insults administrators
D. writing an article in a newspaper
9. Which situation would a court be most likely to rule against because of the First Amendment?
A. a school that allows students to opt out of saying the Pledge of Allegiance
B. a student who complains about a school event
C. a student wearing a bracelet to protest a law
D. a curfew that doesn’t have exclusions for working teens
10. Which conclusion does the article best support?
A. The Bill of Rights is more important than the Declaration of Independence.
B. Students do not have the right to complain.
C. Students’ First Amendment rights are limited when they disrupt others.
D. Schools have little control over students.
Answer:
C. to outline the freedoms protected by the 10th amendments in the Bill of Rights
A. assume too much power
A. interrupts learning
B. “The nation’s highest court ruled in Mary Beth’s favor, saying that she had a right to peacefully express her views.”
D. the manner of assembly
B. “But whether you say the Pledge is up to you.”
C. school-sponsored publications
B. trying to convince leaders to allow a pep rally
D. a curfew that doesn’t have exclusions for working teens
C. Students’ First Amendment rights are limited when they disrupt others.
Explanation:
certain christian philosophers in the middle ages argued that the ptolemaic model agreed with the bible because
During the Middle Ages, some Christian philosophers argued that the Ptolemaic model of the universe agreed with the Bible because it placed Earth, the home of humans, at the center of the universe.
At that time, the Ptolemaic model was the dominant view of the universe, which placed Earth at the center, with the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars orbiting around it in concentric circles. This model was consistent with the biblical view of creation, which described the Earth as the center of the universe and the focus of God's creation.
These Christian philosophers believed that the Ptolemaic model reflected the order and harmony of God's creation and that it provided evidence for the divine nature of the universe. They also believed that the model supported the idea that humans were the most important and privileged beings in the universe.
However, with the advent of the scientific revolution and the development of new astronomical models, such as the heliocentric model proposed by Copernicus, the Ptolemaic model was eventually replaced as the prevailing scientific view of the universe.
Learn more about the scientific revolution:
https://brainly.com/question/14231443
#SPJ11
which revolution held truest to its cries for egalitarianism (equality)? american or bolivian
What aspects of the Treaty of Versailles did Hitler most play off of German hatred of to gain popularity? The reparations and the acceptance of war guilt The removal of Kaiser Wilhelm II and the League of Nations The unwanted imposition of democratic republicanism and Jewish refugees The loss of African colonies and the split with Austria
The impact of reparations on Germany's economy and its implications for the welfare of the people were prominent themes in Nazi propaganda during the 1920s.
What aspects of the Treaty of Versailles did Hitler exploit the most to gain popularity?Following World War I's devastation, the victorious powers imposed a series of treaties on the defeated powers. The 1919 Treaty of Versailles, for example, held Germany responsible for starting the war. Germany was held liable for massive material damages. The humiliation of defeat, as well as the 1919 peace treaty, played a significant role in the rise of Nazism in Germany and the outbreak of a second "world war" only 20 years later.
Almost ten million soldiers were killed. The The introduction of new weapons such as the machine gun and gas warfare resulted in massive losses on all sides. Military leaders failed to adapt their tactics to combat's increasingly mechanized nature. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers were killed as a result of an attrition policy, particularly on the Western Front.
To know more about Treaty of Versailles visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/2956924
#SPJ1
Answer:
The reparations and the acceptance of war guilt.
Explanation:
Got this right at FLVS. All the other answer choices are inconsistent with historical facts or just don't make sense. Good luck, everyone!
Ethnic separatism can be defined as the desire by a group of people to form their own country
to eliminate political unrest.
based upon a commonality.
based upon a source of pride.
to establish personal freedoms
Ethnic separatism can be defined as the desire by a group of people to form their own country based upon a commonality. The correct option is option B.
SeparatismSeparatism is the advocacy of cultural, ethnic, tribal, religious, racial, governmental, or gender separation from the larger group. With transfer of power, separatism conventionally refers to full political separation.
Ethnic SeparatismEthnic separatism is based more on differences in culture and language than religious or racial differences. It is culturally and tribally oriented. Armenian separatists of Nagorno-Karabakh in Azerbaijan is an example of ethnic Separatism.
Ethnic SeparatistEthnic separatist is someone who secedes or supports separation from an established group, such as a church or nation.
Learn more about ethnic separatism here
https://brainly.com/question/639528
#SPJ1
Answer: it’s B
Source : trust me bro
When Socrates retired what occupation did he take up
One of the first moral philosophers of the ethical school of thought, Socrates was a Greek philosopher who is recognized as the father of Western philosophy. His occupation was this.
As previously mentioned, Socrates was frequently the target of comedic satire while he was still living, but the majority of the plays that make mention of him have either been lost entirely or only exist in a fragmented form—Clouds being the main exception. Although Socrates is the main character in this play, Aristophanes used him to represent some intellectual trends in modern Athens, including the study of language and nature and, as Aristophanes implies, the amoralism and atheism that go along with these endeavors, rather than to provide a fair and accurate portrait of him (comedy never aspires to this). The fact that Socrates himself rejects the play as a valid source of information about him in Plato's Apology casts even more question on the play's value as a trustworthy source.
Learn more about socrates here:
https://brainly.com/question/20256015
#SPJ1
The Silk Road was significant because it led to which two things?
*
1 point
It enabled the Shang to expand Chinese territory
It brought Buddhism into China
Travel was made a lot easier between northern and southern China
It allowed the Chinese to learn to make silk
It increased the prosperity of Han merchants
The Silk Road was a vast trade network that linked Eurasia and North Africa by land and sea. The Silk Road was named after Chinese silk, a valuable commodity.
Which two things were made possible by the Silk Road?It is difficult to overestimate the Silk Road's historical significance. Religion and ideas spread as quickly as goods along the Silk Road. Along the route, towns grew into multicultural cities. Information exchange gave rise to new technologies and innovations that would change the world.
What was the Silk Road's main significance?The Silk Road, widely regarded as history's first global trade route, had a scope and significance far beyond the simple exchange of goods. Indeed, the network of interconnected routes facilitated the fruitful exchange of arts, religion, cultures, ideas, and technology.
To know more about Silk Road visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/28316892
#SPJ1
if sll the emigrants who traveled west had known in advance the difficulty of line on the trail, how might that have changed the great migration and manifedt destiny?
If emigrants had known in advance the true difficulty of life on the trail, it could have changed the course of westward expansion in significant ways.
How would it have change it?If all the emigrants who traveled west had known in advance the difficulty of life on the trail, it could have potentially changed the course of the Great Migration and Manifest Destiny in several ways:
It may have deterred some emigrants from making the journey altogether. The dangers and hardships of traveling west were widely known, but if the full extent of those challenges had been understood beforehand, it's possible that some people may have decided that the risks were not worth it.
Emigrants may have better prepared for the journey. If they knew the full extent of the challenges they would face, emigrants could have taken better precautions to ensure their safety and survival. This could include bringing more food and supplies, hiring experienced guides, and making sure they had adequate shelter and clothing.
It may have led to different routes being taken. If emigrants knew more about the challenges of specific trails, they may have chosen alternative routes that were less difficult or dangerous.
It could have led to more government support for westward expansion. If the challenges of westward expansion were better understood, there may have been greater pressure on the government to provide more support and resources for emigrants making the journey.
Overall, if emigrants had known in advance the true difficulty of life on the trail, it could have changed the course of westward expansion in significant ways. However, it's impossible to say exactly how things would have played out, as historical events are shaped by a complex web of factors and influences.
learn more about emigrants: https://brainly.com/question/27959789
#SPJ1
HELP! What are the similarities and differences of the Greek and Gupta empire?
Answer: because the Golden Ages in both Empires were VERY successful, economics and culture resulted in a prosperous, powerful nation that lasted many years. In Athens and the Gupta Empire, both governments had ways of dividing Gov. that were very similar.
Explanation:
Using the facts from above, create a compare and contrast writing
between The Lewis and Clark Expedition and The Dunbar and Hunter
Expedition. Hurry pls I don’t have much time
The Lewis and Clark Expedition and the Dunbar and Hunter Expedition were both important exploratory expeditions in the early history of the United States. However, there are several key differences between the two.
Firstly, the Lewis and Clark Expedition was commissioned by President Thomas Jefferson in 1803 to explore the newly acquired Louisiana Territory and to find a water route to the Pacific Ocean. The expedition was led by Meriwether Lewis and William Clark, and it lasted from 1804 to 1806. The Dunbar and Hunter Expedition, on the other hand, was a scientific expedition led by William Dunbar and George Hunter in 1804 to explore the natural resources of the Ouachita River Valley in what is now Arkansas and Louisiana.
Secondly, while both expeditions had scientific objectives, the Lewis and Clark Expedition was primarily focused on exploration and mapping of the newly acquired territory, while the Dunbar and Hunter Expedition was focused on collecting specimens of plants and animals, and studying the geology of the region. The Dunbar and Hunter Expedition also had a commercial objective, as it was funded by the Spanish government, which was interested in the natural resources of the region.
Thirdly, the Lewis and Clark Expedition was much larger than the Dunbar and Hunter Expedition. The Lewis and Clark Expedition had a crew of 33 people, including soldiers, interpreters, and support staff, while the Dunbar and Hunter Expedition had a crew of only 11 people, including the two leaders.
Finally, the Lewis and Clark Expedition is more famous and well-known than the Dunbar and Hunter Expedition, in part because of the extensive documentation and publishing of the expedition's findings by Lewis and Clark, as well as the fact that it was a government-funded expedition. The Dunbar and Hunter Expedition, on the other hand, had limited documentation and was privately funded, which contributed to its relative obscurity.
In conclusion, both the Lewis and Clark Expedition and the Dunbar and Hunter Expedition were important exploratory expeditions in the early history of the United States, but they had different objectives, scopes, and outcomes. The Lewis and Clark Expedition was larger, more famous, and more focused on exploration, while the Dunbar and Hunter Expedition was smaller, privately funded, and focused on scientific study and commercial interests.
Image #2:
1. What are some initial things you notice about the
clothing on the 6 people on the right in this image? Are
they rich/poor? What clues in the picture make you
think that? Your answer should be 3-4 sentences.
(Type your answer here)
2. What are some initial things you notice about the man
on the bottom left corner in this image? What clues in
the picture make you think that? Your answer should
be 3-4 sentences.
(Type your answer here)
3. What do you think this image says about the difference
between the upper class and lower class during this
time? Give at least two specific examples. Your answer
should be 3-4 sentences.
(Type your answer here)
The people on the right in the image are all dressed in very elaborate and expensive-looking clothing, indicating they likely come from a wealthy background.
What is wealthy background?Wealthy background is a term used to describe a person's family and/or social background. It is typically associated with a family of higher social and economic class. This often includes people who have inherited their wealth or become wealthy through their own success. Generally, wealthy background is characterized by a family that is well-educated, has access to quality healthcare, and is able to afford luxury goods. The family may be able to provide their children with the best education and other advantages, such as travel and cultural experiences.
They are wearing large, ornate hats and luxurious fabrics, suggesting they have access to a high level of wealth. The man on the bottom left corner, on the other hand, is wearing simpler clothing and a simple hat, suggesting he is from a lower class background.
To learn more about wealthy background
https://brainly.com/question/20662695
#SPJ9
Which statement best describes one legacy the New Deal had on the United
States?
OA. The New Deal created an unregulated stock market.
OB. The New Deal created a need for smaller, more efficient
government.
OC. The New Deal expanded the reach of the federal government.
OD. The New Deal had a major influence but no long-lasting programs.
SUBMIT
Answer:
c
Explanation:
The New Deal, which was a series of programs and policies implemented by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in response to the Great Depression, significantly expanded the role of the federal government in the economy and society. It created a number of government agencies and programs, such as the Social Security Administration and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which had long-lasting impacts on American society.
The New Deal also established new regulations and oversight in various industries, including banking, securities, and agriculture, and introduced labor protections and collective bargaining rights for workers. These changes helped to mitigate some of the worst effects of the Great Depression and laid the groundwork for a stronger, more regulated economy and society.
The "cradle of Chinese civilization" was an ancient river valley in northeastern China where there was a civilization around
4,000 BCE. Around what river, sometimes called "China's sorrow," did this ancient civilization form?
The ancient Chinese civilization formed around 4,000 BCE in the Yellow River Valley, located in northeastern China.
The Yellow River, also known as the Huang He, was a significant factor in the development of this civilization, as it provided fertile soil for agriculture and allowed for the growth of settlements. The river was also known for its devastating floods, which often caused widespread destruction and loss of life, leading to the nickname "China's sorrow." The civilization that emerged in this region was characterized by the development of agriculture, writing, social hierarchy, and early forms of government. It laid the foundation for Chinese culture and history, and its influence can still be seen today in modern China.
To know more about ancient click here:
brainly.com/question/29405005
#SPJ4
Have you ever been pulled into a situation or a problem you didn’t start how do you think this happens to people
Answer:
Explanation:
It's not uncommon for people to get pulled into a situation or a problem they didn't start. Sometimes, this can happen due to circumstances beyond their control, such as being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Other times, it can be because of the actions of others, such as being falsely accused of something or being caught up in someone else's problems.
In some cases, people may also get pulled into a situation or problem because they choose to get involved, either out of a sense of responsibility, a desire to help, or simply because they believe it's the right thing to do.
Regardless of how it happens, being pulled into a situation or problem that you didn't start can be challenging and stressful. It's important to remain calm, assess the situation, and seek help or support as needed to find a solution or resolution.
Evaluate the cultural impact of the Cold War on two countries, each chosen from a different region.
Answer:
The Cold War had a profound impact on many countries across the world, with both positive and negative consequences. Two countries that experienced significant cultural changes as a result of the Cold War were the United States and Cuba.
In the United States, the Cold War led to a heightened sense of patriotism and nationalism, as the country became deeply invested in the struggle against communism. This led to a cultural emphasis on American exceptionalism, with a renewed focus on the values of democracy, freedom, and capitalism. At the same time, the Cold War also fueled anxiety and fear about the threat of communism, leading to increased censorship and a focus on conformity in American culture.
In Cuba, the Cold War had a more direct impact, as the country became a key battleground in the struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union. The Cuban Revolution of 1959, led by Fidel Castro, established a communist government and aligned the country with the Soviet Union, leading to a significant shift in Cuban culture. The new government emphasized socialist values, including equality, education, and healthcare, and implemented sweeping social and economic reforms. However, the close relationship with the Soviet Union also led to increased political repression and censorship, particularly during the 1970s and 1980s.
Overall, the Cold War had a profound cultural impact on countries across the world, shaping national identities and values, fueling anxiety and fear, and spurring significant social and political changes.