Answer:
During the Vietnam War, the US government and military may have used the term "communist insurgents" to make the war seem like a fight against an outside communist threat to the free world rather than a fight by the Vietnamese people for their own freedom. This helped to explain why the US military had to get involved and gave the impression that the US was fighting for democracy and freedom against communism. Also, the word "insurgents" makes it sound like the Vietnamese were fighting against an established government instead of for their own freedom. This makes it harder to understand how complicated the conflict was and why the Vietnamese didn't want to support the US-backed government.
who was declared president of the philippines in 1986 following the protests of the people power revolution
Corazon Aquino became the President of the Philippines in 1986 following the People Power Revolution which ended Ferdinand Marcos' regime.
Explanation:In 1986, after the People Power Revolution in the Philippines, Corazon Aquino was declared the president. This historic event marked the end of President Ferdinand E. Marcos' regime. The People Power Revolution was a non-violent, civilian-led demonstration against Marcos' regime. It is also considered a testament to the power of democracy and the will of the Filipino people. As the president, Aquino faced many challenges including several coup attempts, economic problems, and natural disasters. Despite these, she implemented economic reform policies and paved the way for a democratic constitution in the Philippines.
Learn more about Corazon Aquino here:https://brainly.com/question/26249227
#SPJ2
Congress and Foreign Policy
9. Draw Inferences Read the first paragraph of "Congress and Foreign Policy."
How might the foreign policy of the United States be different if the Constitution
had not forbidden the individual States from making treaties or alliances with
foreign powers?
Answer:
The United States' foreign policy would probably be more disjointed and less cohesive if the Constitution had allowed individual states to enter into treaties or alliances with other countries. Each state would be free to pursue its own foreign policy goals, which might result in rival alliances and agreements with other countries. Due to its lack of an united foreign policy strategy, this could leave the United States in a weaker and less significant position on the global arena. Because different states could have different interests and agendas when it comes to foreign affairs, it might also potentially result in more instability and conflict within the nation.:
The foreign policy of the United States would be different if individual states were allowed to make treaties or alliances with foreign powers. It could lead to conflicting interests and diplomatic disputes.
The foreign policy of the United States would be different if the Constitution had not forbidden the individual states from making treaties or alliances with foreign powers. Without this restriction, individual states might pursue their own foreign policy agenda, leading to a lack of unified and cohesive national foreign policy. This could result in conflicting alliances, diplomatic disputes, and possibly even international conflicts.
For example, imagine if one state decided to ally with a country that the federal government deemed as a threat. This could strain diplomatic relations between the United States and that particular country. It could also create tensions within the country itself, as different states might have conflicting alliances and interests.
Overall, the Constitution's prohibition on states making treaties or alliances with foreign powers helps to establish a unified foreign policy for the United States, ensuring that national interests and objectives are prioritized over state-level interests.
Learn more about Congress and Foreign Policy here:https://brainly.com/question/34378108
#SPJ2
How did McCarthyism affect American society?
It increased church attendance.
It caused many Americans to refuse to give up any civil liberties.
It kept the FBI from monitoring the activities of Americans.
It led to more people being allowed to attend Communist Party meetings.
Answer:It kept the FBI from monitoring the activities of Americans.
Explanation: 5 minutes of my surfing the web and the process of elimination-- trust me on this (:
Which statement is accurate about business owners in California during the gold rush?
A. They provided products for miners at fair prices.
B. Many became wealthier than miners because they sold items at inflated prices.
C. They were unable to keep up with the demand from miners.
D. They lost money during the gold rush because they sold items at such cheap prices.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
com/public/activity/5004002/assessment
O
5.4.2 Test (CST): Citizen Connections
Question 11 of 20
Which category is not one of the major responsibilities of state government?
A. Education
B. Public aid
C. Libraries
D. Corrections
SUBMIT
All of the options listed (Education, Public aid, Libraries, and Corrections) are major responsibilities of state governments. Therefore, there is no option that is not one of the major responsibilities of state government.
State governments are responsible for a wide range of functions and services, including but not limited to:
Education: State governments are responsible for providing and funding public K-12 schools, as well as overseeing higher education institutions within their state.
Public aid: State governments provide a range of public assistance programs, such as Medicaid, food stamps, and cash assistance for low-income families.
Libraries: State governments may fund and operate public libraries within their state.
Corrections: State governments are responsible for maintaining and operating correctional facilities, such as prisons and jails, and overseeing probation and parole programs for those who have been convicted of crimes.
These functions are just a few examples of the many responsibilities that state governments have in providing services to their citizens.
Harry potter fans, answer this question
Answer. Keeper
Explanation:
1. Briefly explain the various African American movements to migrate from the South. What
were African Americans motivated by? Who were the major leaders, and where did they
want African Americans to resettle?
It has to be a paragraph
Answer:
The driving force behind the movement was to escape racial violence purse economic, educational opportunities and freedom from oppression of home Crow
Which factor best completes the graphic organizer to explain the economic
elements of the Great Depression?
Economic Elements of the Great Depression:
Steep drop in production
?
Deflation
A. Low unemployment
B. Low prices
C. High consumer savings
D. High unemployment
According to Roosevelt, why is striving for material prosperity and economic development not sufficient to keep a nation strong?
According to Roosevelt, leading an active lifestyle may be beneficial for both the person and the nation as a whole. He promotes imperialism as a continuation of the demanding lifestyle. America must engage in world affairs if it is not to suffer as a country.
Theodore Roosevelt became president of the United States on September 14, 1901, following the death of President William McKinley. Although his term in office didn't end till March 4, 1909, it did. Roosevelt had only been vice president just 194 days when he was elected president. In 1904, he ran as a Republican and won easily a four-year term. His hand-picked successor and protégé, William Howard Taft, took his seat.
His strong foreign policy and labor protections. The "Square Deal," Roosevelt's domestic policy, offered safeguards for customers, employees, and the environment. Roosevelt aimed to elevate American stature abroad.
To learn more about Theodore Roosevelt, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29359038
#SPJ4
confucianism is a belief system that focuses on
Click and drag each answer choice to its correct place in the passage about the end of the Civil War. Not all choices will be used.
As the Civil War came to an end in 1865, President Abraham Lincoln wanted to see the country heal quickly from the four years of fighting. His proposal
to bring the South back into the country became known as "
Reconstruction." He wanted all former Confederate states to be
admitted back into the Union after
of the population promised loyalty to the United States. Also, the states would have to
agree to abolish
However, he did not live to see that happen. Instead, Reconstruction was controlled by Congress. Their plan was known as "Congressional
Reconstruction, but sometimes it is referred to as
Reconstruction, Politicians such as
Charles Sumner wanted to punish the South for starting the war. Though they required states to pass amendments 13th, 14th, and 15th, they also place
the South under military rule. Southern states were also required to end all
laws that denied basic rights to former slaves.
Reconstruction would end in 1877, but the wounds of the previous years would be a long time healing.
:: Black Codes :: Presidential Thaddeus Stevens : 50%
and
:: Radical :: 10%
:: Andrew Johnson #: slavery
Next >
Answer:how do i drag
Explanation:?
Was LIFE Magazine's coverage of the atomic bomb truthful? Identify textual evidence to support your claim.
The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings were precisely depicted in LIFE Magazine's inclusion of the nuclear bomb.
Which arguments were presented by those in favor of using the atomic bomb?Most people who support the bombings believe that they saved more lives than they cost by stopping an invasion of the Japanese mainland. Among their arguments are that the bombings were unnecessary to win the war, that they were a war crime, or that they were a genocide. Truman at the conference in Potsdam. The letter makes it clear that Marshall and Secretary of War Henry Stimson approved this order. Naturally, Truman gave the final go-ahead for dropping the bomb. The bombings, according to those who oppose them, were a war crime, inherently immoral, militarily unnecessary, or a form of state terrorism. A naval blockade and conventional bombing, according to critics, would have compelled Japan to surrender without condition.
To learn more about Hiroshima visit :
https://brainly.com/question/29327952
#SPJ1
please will someone to use all these documents in this website and make a first person journal entry of the great migration minimum 5 paragraphs cite everything please help me here.
It is important to understand that the event "great migration" was when large number of African-American families moved from the south to the North in search of jobs and less terrorist attacks on their families so as to gain a sense freedom from overt oppression.
First person journal entry of the Great Migration:Dear Journal,
Today marks the first day of our journey as we leave the South for the North. It's hard to leave the place I called home for so long, but I know it's for the best. I am one of many African Americans who have decided to leave the South due to the racial discrimination and lack of opportunities. The Great Migration is not an easy journey, but we are all hopeful for a better future.
The train ride has been long and uncomfortable, but we finally made it to our destination in Chicago. It's a big change from the small town in Georgia that I grew up in, but I'm excited to start this new chapter of my life. I've heard that there are more job opportunities and better living conditions in the North, but I know it won't be easy. It's hard to leave behind everything I know, but I'm willing to work hard and make a new life for myself. I hope that this journey will be worth it in the end.
Read more about great migration
brainly.com/question/21201
#SPJ1
The Pacific Railroad _______
a. was something most territories did not want on their land.
b.helped small, isolated communities stay isolated
c.opened up frontiers and changed economic life
d. did not threatens the Native American way of life.
Answer:
c) opened up frontiers and changed economic life
Explanation:
Hope it helps!
Note one reason the United States backed military rule in Guatemala
It prompted the U.S. to give the Guatemalan government substantial military and financial support while it was under military authority.
The reason United States backed military rule in GuatemalaOne reason the United States backed military rule in Guatemala was to protect American business interests, particularly the United Fruit Company.
The company had significant investments in Guatemala, and the military government was seen as more favorable to American business interests than the democratically elected government that it replaced. The U.S. government also saw the military government as a bulwark against communism in the region.
This prompted the U.S. to give the Guatemalan government substantial military and financial support while it was under military authority.
Learn more on military rule in Guatemala here: https://brainly.com/question/11618721
#SPJ1
What is one lasting "invention" in the US by German immigrants?
Answer:
One lasting "invention" in the US by German immigrants is the Christmas tree tradition. German immigrants introduced the tradition of decorating evergreen trees during the Christmas season in the 18th century, and it became popular throughout the United States in the 19th century.
Explanation:
For each term or name below, write a sentence explaining its significance in the rise of
democratic ideas.
Answer:
1. aristocracy: ruled by a small group of noble, land owning families
2. monarchy: ruled by a king/queen
3. direct democracy: a form of government in which citizens rule and make laws directly rather then through representatives
4. republic: a form of government in which power rests with citizens who have the right to elect leaders who make governmental decisions
5. due process of law: that a person had the right to a jury trial and to the protection of the law... this right- to have the law work in known orderly ways. (the king could not will fully punish the subjects)
6. divine right: the idea that monarchs are God's representatives on earth and are therefore answerable to only God.
7. social contract: the agreement by which people define and limit their individual rights, thus creating an an organised society or government
Explanation:
i am sorry i don't know the last one
hope it helps u
The terms likely refer to key individuals, events, or concepts that helped foster and spread democratic ideas, such as the Magna Carta, philosopher John Locke, or the American and French Revolutions.
Explanation:The terms in question likely refer to significant individuals, concepts, or events that fostered the development and dissemination of democratic ideas.
An example might be the Magna Carta in 1215, which significantly influenced the rise of democracy by establishing the principle that everyone is subject to the law, including the king.
This document is considered a cornerstone of liberty and an important part of the democratic tradition. Terms could also refer to influential philosophers, such as John Locke, whose ideas on individual rights and government heavily influenced democratic thought.
Lastly, significant events like the American or French Revolution played pivotal roles in spreading democratic ideals, as these revolutions largely revolved around the demand for greater political representation and rights.
Learn more about Rise of Democratic Ideas here:https://brainly.com/question/32829561
#SPJ2
the Industrialized North cause and effect
The Industrialized North refers to the region of the United States that experienced rapid industrialization and urbanization during the 19th century. This transformation had a significant impact on the country as a whole, with far-reaching social, economic, and political consequences.
Cause: The availability of natural resources and transportation infrastructure allowed for industrial growth in the North.
Effect: This led to the creation of new manufacturing centers, such as textile mills, iron foundries, and steel mills, which provided jobs and drew workers from rural areas.
Cause: The development of new technologies, such as the steam engine and the telegraph, made production more efficient and communication faster.
Effect: This facilitated the growth of industries and made it easier for businesses to operate across long distances.
Cause: The increase in industrial production led to the growth of urban areas, as workers migrated to cities in search of employment opportunities.
Effect: This created a new social and economic order, with the emergence of a new middle class and the formation of labor unions and other worker organizations.
Cause: The North's industrial growth created new economic opportunities for the United States, with new markets opening up for domestic goods and exports.
Effect: This helped to establish the United States as a major economic power on the world stage and contributed to the growth of capitalism as a dominant economic system.
:
Answer: Northern industrialization expanded rapidly following the War of 1812. Industrialized manufacturing began in New England, where wealthy merchants built water-powered textile mills (and mill towns to support them) along the rivers of the Northeast.
Industrialization can be driven by a combination of factors including the government policy, labor-saving inventions, entrepreneurial ambitions, and a demand for goods and services. It has profound implications for the population, causing a wave of migration from small farms to cities and towns where jobs can be found.
How did war mobilization affect the housing market in the United States?
OA. War mobilization shut down much of the housing market and led
to housing shortages.
B. War mobilization helped the housing market because there was an
increase in supplies used to build houses.
O C. War mobilization led to the growth of the housing market as more
people were able to afford homes.
OD. War mobilization didn't affect the housing market as many
industries continued normal production during the war.
SUBMIT
Answer:
A is the right answer. The war shut down a lot of the housing market, which made it hard to find a place to live.
Explanation:
During World War II, the U.S. government did a number of things to get the economy ready for war. These included rationing key materials, putting limits on construction that wasn't necessary, and turning factories into wartime factories. The housing market changed a lot because of these policies.
Rationing of steel, copper, and lumber made it hard to build new homes, and rules about building things that weren't necessary cut down on the number of new homes that could be built. Also, turning factories into wartime industries cut down on the supply of building materials and increased the need for housing as people moved to cities to work in wartime industries.
Because of this, there was a big lack of housing during the war, especially in cities. This shortage led to overcrowding, living conditions that weren't up to par, and more competition for the few homes that were available. In response, the government came up with a number of plans to deal with the lack of housing, such as building temporary housing for war workers and making public housing programs bigger.
Option B is wrong because there weren't as many new homes being built because there weren't enough building materials because of the war. Choice C is wrong because, even though the expansion of public housing programs gave more people access to affordable housing, the housing market as a whole was marked by shortages and limits. Choice D is wrong because, as explained above, the war mobilization policies did have a big effect on the housing market.
Both Ancient Athens and Rome had a form of democracy we could recognize today. In a five paragraph essay, describe the forms of democracy present
in both, and analyze how they may have influenced modern American democracy. Be sure to include the benefits and possible drawbacks present in
each system.
40 points! :)
Top awnser gets brainliest!
Ancient Athens and Rome both had a form of democracy that served as the foundation for modern American democracy. Athens was known for its direct or pure democracy, where citizens gathered in an assembly to vote on laws and policies.
Democracy in Ancient Athens and Rome -All male citizens over the age of 18 were allowed to participate, and decisions were made based on a majority vote. On the other hand, Rome practiced a representative democracy, where citizens elected representatives to make decisions on their behalf. The Roman Republic was comprised of two consuls and a senate, and decisions were made through a system of checks and balances.
One of the benefits of the Athenian democracy was that it allowed for greater citizen participation in government. Citizens had a direct say in the laws and policies that affected their daily lives, and this helped to foster a sense of community and shared responsibility.
However, the Athenian democracy was limited to male citizens only, and women, slaves, and foreigners were excluded from participation. This exclusion undermined the democratic ideal of equal rights and representation for all citizens.
Similarly, the Roman Republic allowed for greater citizen participation through the election of representatives. This system helped to ensure that government decisions were made by individuals with experience and expertise in the relevant areas.
However, the Roman Republic was also limited to a small group of wealthy citizens, and the poor and marginalized were often excluded from the political process. In addition, the system of checks and balances that was meant to prevent abuse of power was sometimes undermined by corruption and political maneuvering.
To know more about Ancient Athens and Rome -
https://brainly.com/question/17686059
#SPJ1
Which paragraphs from the excerpt best support the conclusion that the author’s primary purpose is to teach a lesson?
Answer:
Read the excerpt from "The Three Questions" by Leo Tolstoy.
All the answers being different, the King agreed with none of them, and gave the reward to none. But still wishing to find the right answers to his questions, he decided to consult a hermit, widely renowned for his wisdom.
The hermit lived in a wood which he never quitted, and he received none but common folk. So the King put on simple clothes, and before reaching the hermit's cell dismounted from his horse, and, leaving his body-guard behind, went on alone.
When the King approached, the hermit was digging the ground in front of his hut. Seeing the King, he greeted him and went on digging. The hermit was frail and weak, and each time he stuck his spade into the ground and turned a little earth, he breathed heavily.
The King went up to him and said: "I have come to you, wise hermit, to ask you to answer three questions: How can I learn to do the right thing at the right time? Who are the people I most need, and to whom should I, therefore, pay more attention than to the rest? And, what affairs are the most important, and need my first attention?"
The hermit listened to the King, but answered nothing. He just spat on his hand and recommenced digging.
"You are tired," said the King, "let me take the spade and work awhile for you."
Which paragraphs from the excerpt best support the conclusion that the author’s primary purpose is to teach a lesson? Select two options.
A)“All the answers being different, the King agreed with none of them, and gave the reward to none. But still wishing to find the right answers to his questions, he decided to consult a hermit, widely renowned for his wisdom.”
B)“The hermit lived in a wood which he never quitted, and he received none but common folk. So the King put on simple clothes, and before reaching the hermit's cell dismounted from his horse, and, leaving his body-guard behind, went on alone.”
C)“When the King approached, the hermit was digging the ground in front of his hut. Seeing the King, he greeted him and went on digging. The hermit was frail and weak, and each time he stuck his spade into the ground and turned a little earth, he breathed heavily.”
D)“The King went up to him and said: ‘I have come to you, wise hermit, to ask you to answer three questions: How can I learn to do the right thing at the right time? Who are the people I most need, and to whom should I, therefore, pay more attention than to the rest? And, what affairs are the most important, and need my first attention?’”
E)“The hermit listened to the King, but answered nothing. He just spat on his hand and recommenced digging.”
F)“’You are tired,’ said the King, ‘let me take the spade and work awhile for you.’”
“All the answers being different, the King agreed with none of them, and gave the reward to none. But still wishing to find the right answers to his questions, he decided to consult a hermit, widely renowned for his wisdom.”
“The King went up to him and said: ‘I have come to you, wise hermit, to ask you to answer three questions: How can I learn to do the right thing at the right time? Who are the people I most need, and to whom should I, therefore, pay more attention than to the rest? And, what affairs are the most important, and need my first attention?’”
Answer: Options A and D.
Explanation:
Paragraph A sets up the state of mind for the story, telling you the lord is both unsatisfied and ready to go further to get this subtle data he looks for. This sets up a book that will for sure give you some data, in all likelihood as an exercise.
Paragraph option D also helps to understand this purpose of the author that the purpose was to teach. In that option the author shows that the king asks the hermit that what can he do for the welfare and the betterment of the people, what can he teach them.
Explanation:
brainlist
Tema a debatir : El papel de Pancho Villa en la revolución mexicana
controversia o polemica: Pancho Villa ¿bandido o héroe?
¿ cual serian las 2 posturas?
!!!ayuda rápido plis!!!!!
En conclusión, el papel de Pancho Villa en la Revolución Mexicana sigue siendo objeto de controversia y polarización en la sociedad mexican.
El papel de Pancho Villa en la Revolución Mexicana ha sido objeto de controversia. Por un lado, algunos lo consideran un héroe popular que luchó contra la opresión y la injusticia, y que logró importantes victorias en el campo de batalla. Otros, sin embargo, lo ven como un bandido violento que sembró el caos y la destrucción en su afán de poder.
Los partidarios de la primera postura destacan el valor y la determinación de Villa en su lucha contra las fuerzas federales y la defensa de los derechos de los campesinos y trabajadores. Además, señalan que sus tácticas guerrilleras fueron efectivas en la obtención de victorias militares importantes.
Por otro lado, quienes lo ven como un bandido argumentan que sus acciones violentas, incluyendo asesinatos y saqueos, no pueden ser justificadas en ningún caso. También se critica su falta de compromiso con la causa revolucionaria y su afán de poder personal.
For such more question on mexican
https://brainly.com/question/28348825
#SPJ4
What do the systematic reading, topical, and comparison methods of studying Proverbs require?
Answer:
Pray for Focus: there is a lot of information packed into very few words. ...
Ponder: Let the proverb linger: don't rush; pray that God will speak to you through his Holy Spirit in allowing you to ponder, to breathe in important nuggets for you in your life.
Explanation:
Answer: The systematic reading method of studying Proverbs involves reading the book in its entirety and examining each individual proverb, while the topical method involves categorizing the proverbs according to specific themes or topics. The comparison method involves comparing and contrasting similar or contrasting proverbs to gain a deeper understanding of their meaning. All three methods require careful observation and analysis of the language and context of the proverbs in order to understand their intended message and practical application.
Your welcome and bralinest is much appreciated. (:
Explanation:
How did the posting of the “twelve theses” by students reflect Nazi policy?
by demanding education rights for German students
by supporting only German professors
by condemning communist activities
by limiting the rights of women
B) by supporting only German professors, the "twelve theses" posted by students reflect Nazi policy.
What is Nazi policy?The initial goal of Nazi racial policies was to exclude Jews from important white-collar jobs. The Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service abolished non-Aryan employment in government positions in April 1933. Jews were unable to serve as judges, physicians in state-run hospitals, lawyers in government departments, or educators in public schools as a result of this.
President Hindenburg opposed this law because he was concerned about how Jewish World War I veterans were treated. The law was later changed by Hitler to get Hindenburg's approval.
To learn more about Nazi visit :
https://brainly.com/question/2515107
#SPJ1
13. Which of the following accurately describes the Greek Dark Ages?
A. It lasted from 800 BC to 400 AD.
B. It was time of decline, famine, and population decrease.
C. The Mycenaean civilization remained in power.
D. It marked the start of the Greek Archaic Period.
Answer:
B. It was time of decline, famine, and population decrease.
The Greek Dark Ages is a period in Greek history that lasted from around 1100 BC to 800 BC. It followed the collapse of the Mycenaean civilization and was marked by a decline in population, trade, and cultural achievements. It was a time of poverty and hardship, characterized by a lack of written records and archaeological evidence. The Greek Dark Ages came to an end with the rise of the Greek city-states and the beginning of the Greek Archaic Period.
What was a direct result of African Americans gaining political power?
Answer:pooop
Explanation:
Poop is brown, african americans are brown.
What obstacles or problems would have to be dealt with for D’Arcy’s vision to become a reality?
Do you agree ir disagree with the following qouation from life magazine on american culture in 1954: "never before so much for so few"
Yes, I agree because the quotation reveals that Life magazine was promoting a particular view of American culture in the 1950s that celebrated the excesses of the wealthy while excluding other perspectives and experiences.
Life magazine popularized the phrase "never before so much for so few" in 1954 to advertise its coverage of the opulent lifestyle of America's rich and famous. The statement signifies that Life magazine thought it had achieved a huge cultural milestone by giving its readers access to the lives of the affluent in a way that had never before been possible.
But, the use of this statement also displays a predisposition or viewpoint regarding 1950s American culture. Life magazine may have been promoting the notion that material achievement was the ultimate objective in life and that pursuing wealth and luxury was something to be praised by highlighting the excess and extravagance of the wealthy.
To know more about American culture
brainly.com/question/12891255
#SPJ4
Describe how a capitalist, socialist, and communist would each respond to the idea of a company paying unfairly low wages:
PLEASE HELP!!!! will mark BRAINLIEST!!!
Answer:
Capitalist:
A capitalist would likely argue that the company has the right to pay whatever wages it sees fit, based on the principles of supply and demand. They may argue that if workers are unhappy with their wages, they are free to seek employment elsewhere, or they could improve their skills to become more valuable to the company. A capitalist may also argue that if the company pays wages that are too low, it may have trouble attracting and retaining workers, which could hurt its profitability in the long run.
Socialist:
A socialist would likely argue that the government should intervene to ensure that workers are paid a fair wage. They may argue that workers have a right to a living wage and that companies have a responsibility to provide it. A socialist may also argue that if companies are allowed to pay unfairly low wages, it could lead to social unrest and inequality. They may advocate for the government to set minimum wage laws or to establish policies that promote collective bargaining to ensure that workers have a voice in setting wages.
Communist:
A communist would likely argue that the problem of unfairly low wages is inherent in capitalism, which they see as a system that benefits the owners of capital at the expense of workers. They may argue that the only way to solve the problem is to abolish capitalism and establish a system where the means of production are collectively owned and controlled. In a communist system, workers would be paid according to their contribution to society, and there would be no exploitation of labor. They may see the problem of unfairly low wages as symptomatic of a broader issue of inequality and exploitation in capitalist societies.
Answer:
A capitalist would argue that the market should determine wages, and that if a company is paying unfairly low wages, workers are free to seek employment elsewhere. They would argue that the company is simply responding to market forces and trying to maximize profits, which is the goal of any business in a capitalist system.
A socialist would argue that workers have a right to fair wages and that the government should intervene to ensure that companies are paying their workers fairly. They would argue that the company is exploiting its workers and that this is a symptom of a larger problem with capitalism, which prioritizes profits over people.
A communist would argue that the entire concept of wages is inherently unfair and that workers should be paid according to their needs, not their labor. They would argue that the company is exploiting its workers and that this is a symptom of a larger problem with capitalism, which they believe is inherently exploitative. They would advocate for the abolition of private property and the establishment of a classless society in which everyone is equal.
If you borrow $800 at 18% for 11 month, how much total intrest will you pay
Answer: The total interest paid on borrowing $800 at 18% for 11 months is $1,584.
Explanation:
To calculate the total interest paid, we need to multiply the principal amount borrowed by the interest rate and the time for which it is borrowed. Here, the principal amount is $800, the interest rate is 18%, and the time is 11 months.
The formula to calculate the simple interest is:
Simple Interest = (Principal x Rate x Time) / 100
Substituting the values in the formula, we get:
Simple Interest = (800 x 18 x 11) / 100
Simple Interest = 1584
Therefore, the total interest paid on borrowing $800 at 18% for 11 months is $1,584.
1,584.00$ in interest well be payed after ll months I believe 2,384.00$ if you add in the 800$ originally