Answer:
A confession of guilt by the accused shall be valid only if it is made without ... b. the Inter‑American Court of Human Rights, referred to as "The Court."
Hope this helps:)
someone to talk?!.............❤️☺️!!
Answer:
Hiiiiiii!!! :)))
Explanation:
How are you?
Answer:
hiiiiii hru wyd
Explanation:
How does the author show differing points of view between Jonas and The Giver in Chapter 20?
Answer:
wow
Explanation:
quitr tough even for my colleagues
An earthquake measuring ____ is a major one (1 Point) a.6.0 or less b. 2.0 or less c. 7.0 d. Between 2.0 and 6.0
Answer:
7.0 is crazy magnitude.
what did the south have to promise at the end of the war
Answer:
and south park
Explanation:
The diagram below illustrates the basic processes that have resulted in the Rocky Mountains. Image courtesy of the USGS Based on the diagram, which statement is most likely true? A. Subsurface processes can result in the building of mountain ranges. B. Only surface processes can result in the building of mountain ranges. C. Rock materials that are a part of the Rocky Mountains are not involved in the rock cycle. D. Weathering and erosion are the main processes that have generated the Rocky Mountains
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Plates pushing together to create a mountain range.
What were consequences of the stamp act in the colonies
Answer:
those accused of violating the Stamp Act could be prosecuted in Vice-Admiralty Courts, which had no juries and could be held anywhere in the British Empire.
Which failures were active failures and latent conditions/failures?
Answer:
Umm I can't understand your question
pls type it one more time
Don't mistake me
Which piece Of evidence best explains what helped the colonists win the war
Explanation:
do you have a text to go with it?
Almost every government exists in order to ?
Answer:yes
Explanation:
a governments or the same
Why did farming force humans to fight one another
Answer:
whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
What was the importance of food being used in slave culture?
Answer:
Food plays a significant role in enriching cultural identity and is a catalyst for Blacks to connect with their values of community and fellowship beyond bloodline relatives.
In your opinion why have the americano peoples beliefs about civil rights changed so much in the last 50 years
Which event led the US to join World War I?
Answer:
Germany's resumption of submarine attacks on passenger and merchant ships in 1917 became the primary motivation behind Wilson's decision to lead the United States into World War I.
Explanation: There was a lot of other causes but dat wus da main 1
Answer:
This was because of Germany's continuation of submarine attacks on passenger and merchant ships in the year 1917, this resulted in the US joining WWI.
I hope this helps! Please mark brainliest! :D
What is the bond of flour?
Answer:
Flour is a covalent bond
what aspects of urself do you think may be changed or would you like to change ?
What was a lasting effect of the Third Crusade--the conflict between Richard the Lionheart and Saladin? *
Answer:
Crusader military victory, resulting in a three-year truce. Recognition of the territorial status quo at the end of active campaigning, including continued Muslim control of Jerusalem and the restoration of the Levantine Crusader States.
Explanation:
brainliest pls
Answer:
Crusader military victory, resulting in a three-year truce. Recognition of the territorial status quo at the end of active campaigning, including continued Muslim control of Jerusalem and the restoration of the Levantine Crusader States.
Why were gas planets able to become so large and massive
What are five qualities or characteristics of the American Culture?
Answer:
independence, Privacy, Equality, Achievement, Timeliness
Explanation:
Correct Me if I'm wrong, Hope this helps! :)
a) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Shaw v. Reno and Easley v. Cromartie.
b) Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts elucidated in Easley v. Cromartie might have led to a different holding than the holding in Shaw v. Reno.
c) Describe an action that members of the public who disagree with the holding in Easley v. Cromartie could take to limit its impact.
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Answer: A.) Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act. While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings. Its goal is to impose significantly more constitutional limitations on the states than existed prior to the Civil War. Therefore, the Supreme Court ruled in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), that racial redistricting must be subject to strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause and that the bodies responsible for redistricting must be aware of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act. While the Supreme Court found that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in defining the 1997 borders was based on patently false conclusions in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001).
B.) Easley filed an appeal with the US Supreme Court in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, challenging the ruling in Hunt v. Cromartie. In the case of Hunt v. Cromartie, the court determined that the North Carolina legislature did not consider race when establishing the borders of the twelfth congressional district in 1992. The court ruled that there was no proof that the legislature had violated the equal protection article of the constitution or that it had drawn boundaries based on race rather than politics. In Easley v Cromartie the argument was that establishing the borders for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The United States Supreme Court ruled that the lower court's ruling was incorrect because it genuinely relied on racial issues, which is against the interests of the state. In Shaw v. Reno, the court found that North Carolina's voting strategy attempted to separate voters based on race.
c.) I think that a move that members of this court would disagree with the BLM (Black lives Matter) movement. This case, Easley v Cromartie has severe relations to the equal protection clause. This clause states, "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." This clause when then debunked when later furthering the case, which is almost exactly what the BLM movement was about. Both cases disagreed with the equality of particular groups of people.
Explanation: just submitted
What are two features of power in politics
what should be done to make foreign employment well managed by government host country and employees?
Answer:
47
Explanation:
Was Saratoga after Lexington in Conrad
To which house of Congress must an appropriations bill be first introduced?
-Senate
-House of Representatives
-Supreme court
-Executive
Answer:
Article I, Section 7, of the Constitution provides that all bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives but that the Senate may propose, or concur with, amendments. By tradition, general appropriation bills also originate in the House of Representatives.
Explanation:
Discuss the difference between Old regionalism and New regionalism
Answer:
New regionalism gave rise to regional organizations that had a wide-ranging set of stated policy objectives. ... Unlike old regionalism, which was oriented more toward interactions between states, new regionalism involved a variety of state and nonstate actors involved in a process of transformation of the world order.
Explanation:
Discuss the importance of individual differences in learners
Answer:
Thus, individual differences are important because they're associated with students' particular needs. These needs are related to learning pace, cognitive styles, and motivation levels, which teachers must take into account in the teaching and learning processes.
During the Progressive Era, muckrakers such as Jacob Riis exposed the harsh realities of
A
industrialization
В.
western settlements
с
interventionism
D
military life.
Answer:
a. indusditlization
Explanation:
The brutal realities of industrialization were exposed during the Progressive Era by muckrakers like Jacob Riis. Therefore, the correct answer is option a. industrialization.
American culture saw a great deal of change as a result of industrialization, but there were many unfavorable side consequences as well. Through their writing and photographs, muckrakers like Riis brought these issues to public light.
Child labor, dangerous working conditions, and poverty were all brought to light. For his work capturing the squalor that immigrants endured in the tenement dwellings of New York City, Riis was particularly well-known.
All things considered, the efforts of muckrakers throughout the Progressive Era contributed to the implementation of numerous significant reforms and changes in American society. Because of their efforts, all Americans now live in a more favorable and just society.
Therefore, the correct answer is option a. industrialization.
learn more about muckrakers here :
https://brainly.com/question/13379226
#SPJ3
The physical characteristics of an individual are inherited through the process of
Explanation:
Heredity, also called inheritance or biological inheritance, is the passing on of traits from parents to their offspring; either through asexual reproduction or sexual reproduction, the offspring cells or organisms acquire the genetic information of their parents.
here is ur answer
Although Maude is not physically handicapped, whenever she is in a hurry she parks her car in spaces reserved for the handicapped. Is she behav- ing unethically?
do you think it's okay to lie and spread fake news for political power
Answer:
no it not it creates a fake relation to the politcal person that u "so call yourself"
Explanation:
vận dụng qui luật phủ định của phủ định để phân tích nhận xét sau: thế hệ trẻ hiện nay sống không có hoài bão, mục đích và lý tưởng rõ ràng. quan điểm trên đúng hay sai ? vì sao ?
Answer:
UMMM
Explanation: