The two of the following that majorly inspired the American government are Athenian democracy and the British monarchy.
What is government?The government refers to the system or group of people that govern the organized community majorly a state.
The British monarchy and Athenian democracy are two of the following that majorly inspired the American government.
Therefore, B and C are the correct options.
Learn more about Government here:
https://brainly.com/question/4160287
#SPJ2
Giving brainliest for first right answer
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Periodization is the process or study of categorizing the past into discrete, quantified named blocks of time.[1] This is usually done in order to facilitate the study and analysis of history, understanding current and historical processes, and causality that might have linked those events.
plz mark me as brainlist...
3. Do you believe in the ideas and principles of the Declaration of Independence? If yes, which ones? If no, why not?
4. How can the Declaration of Independence impact future generations?
5. Predict: Which specific groups of people can benefit from the writings of the Declaration of Independence today?
Answer:
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
Answer:
Yes, the declaration of independence is a big thing
Explanation:
Hello, please help me! :D
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The whole idea behind Manifest Destiny was that it was the people's right to expand and grow the country. They saw it as something that would inevitably happen.
Answer: I think it's A
Explanation: All the others support Manifest Destiny
Which was NOT a cause of the War of 1812?
A) British impressment of American sailors
B) American support for the Native Americans
C) British interference in American shipping Americans
D) British support for the Native Americans
What was Washington’s foreign policy?
Answer: foreign policy of friendly neutrality that would avoid creating enemies or international friendships of dubios value
Explanation: this is what I have read
Answer:
Washington's address argued for a careful foreign policy of friendly neutrality that would avoid creating implacable enemies or international friendships of dubious value, nor entangle the United States in foreign alliances.
Explanation:
Who was the first astronaut?
Answer:
Yep, Alan Shepard
Explanation:
_____ restated many of the rights granted by the Magna Carta, such as the right to a trial by jury.
The English Parliament
The House of Lords
Habeas corpus
The English Bill of Rights
Answer: The English Bill of Rights
Explanation:
Please answer all and make sure your correct, tysvm! (Any jokes or anything not related that won't help will be reported.)
How can young people help fulfill Dr. Martin Luther King's dream for America?
Answer:
He wanted African-Americans to trust and work with white people, to be nonviolent, and to be persistent. ... King, then, wanted African Americans to fulfill his dream of racial equality through nonviolent protest that would preserve their own integrity and respect the humanity of those they opposed.
Explanation:
Answer:
Martin Luther King merged radical thinking, social we and oratory light. His speech I had a dream described a future of America that motivated millions of people to achieve racial equality. There was a mistake. King has been very successful in helping the African Americans to end their alienation and disenfranchisement.
Explanation:
John Wycliffe and Jan Hus .. WHAt did they do .. what facts
Answer:
add more details to the question it doesnt make sense
Explanation:
Brainliest
Which of the following statements is NOT true about merchant ships between the 1790s and 1800s?
Group of answer choices
While France and Britain were at war, they prevented Americans from trading with China.
While France and Britain were at war, they kept merchant ships at home so not to be captured by the enemy.
While France and Britain were at war, American shipping trade prospered throughout the world.
While France and Britain were at war, America increased to about 1,000 merchant ships within 15 years.
Answer:
i think C
plz correct me if im wrong
Explanation:
Answer:
n
Explanation:
Jeff is driving from Florida to Georgia and is pulled over by the Georgia Highway Patrol for speeding. The patrol officer searches Jeff’s car and finds 5 pounds of marijuana. He is tried and convicted for trafficking across state lines in a U.S. District Court. He appeals arguing it was an illegal search. Where should his case go next?
Answer: it would depend on the situation.
Explanation:
Unfortunately I don’t have enough info on this alone to make a good call but I can give you this...
The police officer doesn’t have the right to improper searches. That being said the officer may ask for consent to look in the car, but if he is not given permission than he cannot without reason. There are some exceptions however. Police dogs for instance are very good at smelling, and although this problem doesn’t specifically say our officer used a dog, a dog could very well have smelled the drugs. If the dog alerted the officer, then he has a right to search the car. Ultimately I can’t be sure but this is what I will say. The officer was in the wrong. What the man had in his car was plenty illegal (in most states, assuming he went to court would say it was illegal in this one) but regardless he shouldn’t have had his stuff browsed by the officer. The court case would most likely favor the man as he would probably win saying the officer didn’t ask for consent. He still would most likely end up in prison for possession of illegal narcotics and the officer could face a punishment like being fired. Hope it helps.
HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP its for a final
Answer:
False I hope it helps
Explanation:
Answer:
I am so so soooo sorry if this wrong bc its my first time answering a question but I am pretty sure it is: True. (Again sorry if wrong)
Explanation:
Think of this as a diary/journal entry about what happened at the US Capitol building yesterday. You can put anything you want in your "journal"...feelings, thoughts, questions, summary of events, opinions...unlimited possibilities.
I will give extra based on the amount of thought that went into the response. (Example: minimal writing, generic, non-specific, no personal thoughts/feelings will only get brainliest. Detailed, specific, thoughtful, full of personal opinions/thoughts/feelings/questions will get brainliest)
Answer:
Explanation:
So this is how it ends. The presidency of Donald John Trump, rooted from the beginning in anger, division and conspiracy-mongering, comes to a close with a violent mob storming the Capitol at the instigation of a defeated leader trying to hang onto power as if America were just another authoritarian nation.
The scenes in Washington would have once been unimaginable: A rampage through the citadel of American democracy. Police officers brandishing guns in an armed standoff to defend the House chamber. Tear gas deployed in the Rotunda. Lawmakers in hiding. Extremists standing in the vice president’s spot on the Senate dais and sitting at the desk of the speaker of the House.
The words used to describe it were equally alarming: Coup. Insurrection. Sedition. Suddenly the United States was being compared to a “banana republic” and receiving messages of concern from other capitals. “American carnage,” it turned out, was not what President Trump would stop, as he promised upon taking office, but what he wound up delivering four years later to the very building where he took the oath.
The convulsion in Washington capped 1,448 days of Twitter storms, provocations, race-baiting, busted norms, shock-jock governance and truth-bending from the Oval Office that have left the country more polarized than in generations. Those who warned of worst-case scenarios only to be dismissed as alarmists found some of their darkest fears realized. By day’s end, even some Republicans suggested removing Mr. Trump under the 25th Amendment rather than wait two weeks for the inauguration of President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.
The article continues:
While Washington has seen many protests over the years, including some that turned violent, the uprising on Wednesday was unlike anything that the capital has seen during a transition of power in modern times, literally interrupting the constitutional acceptance of Mr. Biden’s election victory. Mr. Trump all but egged them on during a “Save America March” on the Ellipse south of the White House just as Congress was convening to validate Mr. Biden’s election.
“We will never give up,” Mr. Trump had declared. “We will never concede. It doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved. Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore, and that’s what this is all about.”
It ends with this paragraph:
With Mr. Pence unwilling and unable to stop the count, the president’s supporters made it their mission to do it themselves. And for several hours, they succeeded. But after they were finally cleared out of the Capitol, lawmakers resumed the process of ending the Trump presidency, no matter how much he resists.
Answer:
the way i feel about the capital things happen is if i ere there i would fell terroriz and unconmterbal that people knew where i work and could easy to break in but way did they do it that way they could of march around the capital not break onto it they could of done some serious damage
What could a person do if they felt their trial was unfair to get their sentence reverse or lightened?
A.
Go before the Vizier
B
Go before the Nomarch
Explanation:
B. Go before the Nomarch
NEED HELP ASAP Will give brainlest
Who would be considered a citizen in ancient Athens?
any adult who had not been exiled from the city
a man who had been born in Athens to immigrants
an adult who had been born to citizens
any person born in the city to citizens of Athens
Giving brainliest!!!! Please help asap!!!
explain the principle of separation of powers.
Answer:
Separation of Powers means that the three branches of government are separated. The three branches are. the Legislative- the part that makes laws. the Executive - the part that carries out (executes) the laws, the Judicial Branch - the courts that decide if the law has been broken.
hope this was helpful! c:
Answer:
Separation of powers is a doctrine of constitutional law under which the three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) are kept separate. This is also known as the system of checks and balances, because each branch is given certain powers so as to check and balance the other branches.
Explanation:
I already learned about this.
PLZ ASAP, HELP!!!!!
This is from Ninth Ward
How is the author using Mama Yaya to reveal something about the plot? (Rising Action) Please use the CER response.
Answer:
Explanation:
But when Hurricane Katrina bears down on the city, it threatens to take away ... This lesson will focus on a summary of the novel Ninth Ward. ... Like Mama Ya-Ya, Lanesha can see spirits, most often the ghost of her own mother. ... Like Lanesha, TaShon is special and shunned by the other children...