Answer:
Federalists give more power.
Explanation:
Hope it helps:)
What is the central question of "Harlem" by Langston Hughes?
A. "What happens when hope is lost?
B. "What happens to a dream deferred?
C. "Where do dreams go?"
D. "When will my people be free?"
Can yall help me fasttt
B. What happens to a postponed dream?
In his poem "Harlem," Langston Hughes examines the issue of abandoned hopes and its repercussions. The poem's fundamental theme, is a metaphor for the ambitions and aspirations of the residents of the Harlem neighborhood.
Who was Langston Hughes?
American poet, writer, and playwright Langston Hughes is best recognized for his contributions to the Harlem Renaissance. He was one of the first creators of jazz poetry, a then-emerging literary genre. The poem expresses the frustration, disappointment, and sorrow that come with postponed dreams via vivid imagery and strong words
To learn more about genre, click here: -
https://brainly.com/question/11876597
#SPJ4
Would German and Japanese civilians have the same "rights" to claims against the Americans and British as victims of the Nazis and Japanese do for supposed war crimes? Why or why not?
Nevertheless, from May 3, 1946, to November 12, 1948, the United States was the one who ordered the arrest of 28 Japanese officials and oversaw the subsequent trials.
Why did Japan commit war crimes during World War Two?The very authoritarian and militaristic nature of pre-World War II Japanese society, as well as the 1930s-era purposeful promotion of racism, fanaticism, and excessive violence in the Japanese military, are virtually certainly to blame.Nevertheless, from May 3, 1946, to November 12, 1948, the United States was the one who ordered the arrest of 28 Japanese officials and oversaw the subsequent trials. War crimes, crimes against prisoners of war, and crimes against humanity were all alleged against the arrested Japanese commanders.Nevertheless, from May 3, 1946, to November 12, 1948, the United States was the one who ordered the arrest of 28 Japanese officials and oversaw the subsequent trials.To learn more about Japanese officials refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/24130608
#SPJ1
what were among the reasons for the failure of the british strategy to focus on the south during the third phase of the revolutionary war?
The reasons for the failure of the British strategy to focus on the South during the third phase of the Revolutionary War are:
The British overestimated the extent of Loyalist sentiment. The British could not identify their enemies, who blended in with the civilians The British offered refuge to slaves, which galvanized white southern dedication to the RevolutionAbout American Revolutionary WarThe American Revolutionary War (April 19, 1775 – September 3, 1783), also known as the Revolutionary War or American War of Independence, was a major war of the American Revolution. Widely considered as the war that secured the independence of the United States, fighting began on April 19, 1775, followed by the Lee Resolution on July 2, 1776, and the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. The American Patriots were supported by the Kingdom of France and, to a lesser extent, the Kingdom of Spain and the Dutch Republic, in a conflict taking place in North America, the Caribbean, and the Atlantic Ocean.
Established by Royal charter in the 17th and 18th centuries, the American colonies were largely autonomous in domestic affairs and commercially prosperous, trading with Britain and its Caribbean colonies, as well as other European powers via their Caribbean entrepôts. After British victory over the French in the Seven Years' War in 1763, tensions between the motherland and her 13 colonies arose over trade, policy in the Northwest Territory, and taxation measures, including the Stamp Act and Townshend Acts
Learn more about revolutionary War at https://brainly.com/question/1466912.
#SPJ4
located in modern day peru they built cities at high elevations in the mountains that they also terraced for the main crop of potatoes
What civilization was located in modern day Peru?
Which word fits in both sentences?
When we go fishing, we __dez nutts____ our boat.
TV viewers listened as the __15____ told the news.
Attach, anchor, announcer, fasten
The correct answer is option (B) Anchor. It can be used as- When we go fishing, we anchor our boat; TV viewers listened as the anchor told the news.
Anchor usually is a typical metal object that is connected to a boat or ship by a cable and, when thrown overboard, digs into the ground to stabilize the boat or ship. something that provides a sense of stability or serves to firmly retain an object.
TV Anchor- For print, broadcast, or other communications medium like newspapers, magazines, radio, or television, news anchors narrate or write news reports, reviews, or commentary.
The question is-
Which word fits in both sentences?
When we go fishing, we ______ our boat.
TV viewers listened as the ______ told the news.
Attach, anchor, announcer, fasten
To know more about television, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/16925988
#SPJ4
how does a military court differ from a normal court
I am glad you asked!
First, we have to identify the purpose of military court.
Military tribunals in the United States are military courts designed to judicially try members of enemy forces during wartime, operating outside the scope of conventional criminal and civil proceedings. The judges are military officers and fulfill the role of jurors. Military tribunals are distinct from a court-martial.
What Cases Are Heard In MIlitary Court?
The Uniform Code of Military Justice deals with criminal charges and violations. It lists the court procedures and maximum punishments for each offense. Crimes include DUI, desertion, fraud, insubordination, property destruction, mutiny, etc. in addition to trying members of the military, military courts can also try civilians who are accused of serious offenses, such as terrorism or espionage. These civilians are tried in military courts because their crimes are a threat to national security.
How Does Military Court Differ?
General courts-martial are for more serious, felony-level crimes. A military judge presides, and five or more enlisted members determine the final verdict. Punishments may include confinement, forfeiture of pay, and a dishonorable discharge.
I hope this helps!
If you have any more questions, please feel welcome to comment on this answer and I will be pleased to reply with a helpful answer in a 24-hour timeframe!
is that 90s show filmed in front of a live audience
Between February 7 and July 21, 2022, a live studio audience was used to record the show at Sunset Bronson Studios in Los Angeles.
In February 2022, the cast was expanded to include Callie Haverda, Ashley Aufderheide, Mace Coronel, Maxwell Acee Donovan, Reyn Doi, and Sam Morelos as series regulars. Shows like Saturday Night Live and dialogue programs like The Talk and The View can be seen live. In addition to including a few Packers references, the 10-episode Netflix prequel to the popular sitcom "That 70s Show," "That '90s Show," also accurately pinpointed the location of the fictional Wisconsin town of Point Place, where the show's events take place in the summer of 1995. A writer should always be conscious of his audience, or the types of people who will read his writings and how they will be received by the general public, whether the writer hopes to influence his time and society or simply gain celebrity.
Learn more about Live studio audience here:
https://brainly.com/question/30370462
#SPJ4
What was the primary focus on managerial skills in the 1970s.?
a. Focused on strategy b. Focused on negotiation c. Focused on complex problem solving d. Focused on execution
One of the political tactics used by managers to gain and keep power is the control of uncertainty.
The term "economic uncertainty" refers to a lack of clarity on the economy's future prospects. People usually indicate that there is a good likelihood that unfavorable economic developments will occur while talking about economic uncertainty. Why is uncertainty crucial to economic theory? This uncertainty affects their financial decisions: households that are more cautious are more likely to cut back on spending, qualify for loans more easily, and participate less in equity markets. Uncertainty arises from ignorance of a circumstance or event, which makes it impossible to prepare for or predict a future outcome and is frequently upsetting. The vast majority of people like having a plan or routine in place since they are creatures of habit. One of the political tactics that helps managers boost and maintain productivity is controlling uncertainty.
Learn more about Economic uncertainty here:
https://brainly.com/question/29774212
#SPJ4
Which two sentences taken together provide the best evidence to support the idea that greenwood was a prosperous black community in the early 1900s
"Successful black-owned enterprises and wealthy residents may be found in Greenwood. Due of its success and affluence, it was referred to as "Black Wall Street."" Together, these two phrases show that Greenwood was a successful black neighbourhood in the early 1900s.
The town is described in the opening sentence as having prosperous black inhabitants and successful black-owned enterprises, which raises the possibility of significant economic prosperity. The second phrase, which calls Greenwood "Black Wall Street," stresses the extent of the community's success and riches and provides it a moniker that serves as a reminder of how affluent it was in the early 1900s.
To learn more about Greenwood, click here: -
https://brainly.com/question/19654455
#SPJ4
Who led the first journey to sail all the way around the world but died before his crew went on to complete it?
Ferdinand Magellan set sail with five ships from Spain in 1519 to discover a western route to the Moluccas. Magellan died before he could get to his destination, despite battling storms, mutinies, and the unknown. After circumnavigating the globe, one ship ultimately returned to Spain.
Ferdinand Magellan started a historic journey to circumnavigate the globe five hundred years ago. Isn't it easy? Actually, there is a contradiction between the explorer and his journey. Despite being Portuguese, Magellan sailed for Spain. Despite being a formidable captain, he was despised by his crew. Although his expedition was the first to sail around the world, he did not complete the task on his own. Even Magellan was not his name. a beaded man with a dark red hat. Like Christopher Columbus before him, the Portuguese navigator Ferdinand Magellan proposed reaching Asia and the Moluccas. Despite this, it is clear that the 1519 expedition led by Ferdinand Magellan changed the course of history. In his book Over the Edge of the World, historian Laurence Bergreen describes his journey as "the greatest sea voyage ever undertaken, and the most significant." Magellan's terrifying global circumnavigation. That is not exaggeration. Magellan, brutal, belligerent, and brave, transformed a business trip into a nerve-wracking showdown with a vast world that few Europeans could have imagined. His fellow travelers had the hunch at the outset of his journey that it was
To know more about Ferdinand Magellan visit
brainly.com/question/6568457
#SPJ4
How did the women's march to Versailles contribute to the revolution?
The Women's March on Versailles was a pivotal moment in the French Revolution. It instilled confidence in the revolutionaries in the power of the people over the king.
A big gathering of women in a Paris marketplace revolted on the morning of October 5, 1789. They needed bread for their family. They began marching across Paris, demanding fair prices for bread. As the march progressed, more people joined the group, and there were soon thousands of marchers.
The crowd first took over the Hotel de Ville in Paris (similar to a city hall), where they obtained bread as well as firearms. Revolutionaries in the crowd proposed going to Versailles and confronting King Louis XVI. They referred to the king as "Baker," and the queen as "Baker's wife."
To learn more about Versailles, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29672303
#SPJ4
Chicken George wants to be close to Tom Lea throughout his life. What faults did he see in Tom
Lea, and why do you think he wanted to please him despite Tom Lea's faults?
However, Kizzy abruptly admitted in the book that Tom Lea was his father after being irritated because George, who was thirteen at the time, had left their cabin to train at the game pen under Master Lea.
Does Chicken George win his release?Chicken George lives in England for 20 years before being freed and returning to America. He finds out that his wife and children were sold off as well as the passing of his mother, Kizzy.
What did the climax of Roots look like?George unites with his boys after a happy reunion with Matilda, who Frederick made wait all day before she could see her husband, before meeting their partners and offspring. He learns that three of his children were sold within a few weeks after being deported to England. He makes a commitment to always be by his side.
Chicken George: How real is he?An endearing people-pleaser who can captivate an audience with a compelling yarn but who is unaware of his good fortune until it is too late. He tries to follow family traditions up until his true father, slave owner Tom Lea, deserts him.
Learn more about slave owner : https://brainly.com/question/1704412
#SPJ1
The Tang Dynasty implemented a system where promotion in government was
determined by one's ability and efforts. This is an example of ...
a. nationalism
b. meritocracy
c. absolutism
d. democracy
The Tang Dynasty implemented a system where promotion in government was determined by one's ability and efforts. This is an example of meritocracy. Option B
What is meritocracy?Generally, The term "meritocracy" refers to a social system in which employment and salaries are determined not by an individual's social standing but rather by their abilities and accomplishments.
A "meritocracy" is a system that is used in governmental and other administrative systems in which development within the system is contingent on "merits," such as performance, intellect, credentials, and education. The term "meritocracy" was used in the 19th century. Evaluations and exams are often used as methods for determining this.
Read more about meritocracy
https://brainly.com/question/29424384
#SPJ1
which generation is the most racially and ethnically diverse in u.s. history?
Gen-Z is the most racially and ethnically different age in U.S. history. Over 48% are non-white. Generation Z, those brought into the world around the mid-late 1990s, is projected to be the most assorted age in U.S. history, as the principal larger part is non-white age.
As quite possibly of the most populated age, Gen Z is likewise viewed as the country's most different age yet. The age is the most racially and ethnically different, and individuals from the age are pioneers in sexuality, religion, and orientation variety.
As an age, Gen Z has shown to be more socially cognizant and politically dynamic than in past ages. They are utilizing their voices and virtual entertainment impact to focus on significant issues, for example, environmental change, weapon control, and balance.
Learn more about u.s. history:
https://brainly.com/question/28217341
#SPJ4
What is the process of exaggerating news stories in order to appeal to the emotions of readers?A) yellow journalism B) photojournalism C) investigative journalism D) liable reporting
yellow journalism
Yellow journalism is a kind of reporting that focuses on stirring readers' emotions by using sensational headlines, hyperbole, and fact-checking errors. The "Yellow Kid" comic strip, which was used to advertise the newspaper in the late 1800s, is where the phrase "yellow journalism" originates.
Instead of offering factual and trustworthy information, this sort of journalism was created to appeal to readers' emotions and boost circulation. Because it may mislead the public and incite unwarranted panic, fear, or bias, this kind of journalism is typically seen as unethical.
To learn more about yellow journalism, click here: -https://brainly.com/question/29447183
#SPJ4
Which were included among the "Three Principles of the People”?
does waste management observe martin luther king day?
Birthday of Martin Luther King Jr. On Tuesday, January 17, 2023, all facilities will reopen. This holiday will not have any impact on curbside trash, recycling, and yard waste pickups.
(January 13, 2023) Annapolis In observance of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday, the Department of Public Works, Waste Management Services, will adhere to the following curbside collection schedule and facility operating schedule at the Millersville Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility and the Northern, Central, and Southern Recycling Centers.
Jan. 16 - Monday's customer received a NORMAL curbside collection. Closed in all WMS Facilities Depending on the city, county, or state where you are located, the answer is both yes and no. There won't be any garbage or recycling pickup in 2023 in some counties and states because of the Martin Luther King Day observance.
Several county offices have acknowledged that some US citizens won't receive garbage, recycling, or yard waste services because of the national holiday.
To know more about Martin Luther King:
brainly.com/question/86322
#SPJ4
initially set up as a spanish military post in 1776, what army base was the oldest continuously operating base in the u.s. before being closed in 1994?
The Presidio of San Francisco, California, has been a military reservation since its founding in 1776 as Spain's northernmost colonial stronghold in the New World.
The Presidio of San Francisco, also known as El Presidio Real de San Francisco or The Royal Fortress of Saint Francis, is a park and former United States Army post in San Francisco, California.
The Golden Gate National Recreation Area includes it. Since September 17, 1776, when New Spain erected the presidio to seek a footing in Alta California and the San Francisco Bay, it had been a fortified location.
It was transferred to Mexico in 1820, which later gave it to the United States in 1848. Congress voted in 1989 to discontinue the Presidio's status as an active U.S. Army military facility, in accordance with the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) process.
On October 1, 1994, it was turned over to the National Park Service, completing its 219-year military career and ushering in its next era of mixed commercial and public use.
To know more about Presidio, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13374658
#SPJ4
During the 1830s public servants and officials were widely perceived to be unqualified. what practice reinforced that perception? question 2 options: a. the public voting for candidates based on religious affiliationsb. the president rewarding political supporters with appointments to desirable positions c. the president recruiting volunteers to serve abroad as ambassadors d. legislators awarding government contracts to the lowest bidder
In the 1830s, it was widely believed that government employees and officials were unqualified. Due to the president's tendency of appointing political allies to desired positions, this notion was reinforced. So, option B is correct.
The first party-based traditions in the Senate were progressively embraced by the Democrats and Whigs. For instance, in the 1830s, senators from the two parties started to sit in the Senate Chamber on the opposing sides, with the Democrats congregating to the right of the presiding officer and the Whigs to the left. The majority party held control of most, if not all, of the standing committee chairmanships as well as a majority of the seats on those committees.
The Whig Party was a significant political movement in the USA in the middle of the 19th century. During the late 1830s and the early 1850s, it coexisted with the somewhat larger Democratic Party as one of the two major parties in the United States as a member of the Second Party System.
To know more about Whig Party
brainly.com/question/15439055
#SPJ4
What did the Supreme Court determine in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia?
A. The Supreme Court determined that it was a matter best decided
in state courts.
B. The Supreme Court determined that the Cherokee peoples were
not subject to the Indian Removal Act of 1830.
sub
C. The Supreme Court determined that the federal government had
no authority to negotiate trades and cash deals with Indigenous
peoples.
OD. The Supreme Court determined that the Indian Removal Act of
1830 was unconstitutional.
In Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, the Supreme Court determined that that the Cherokee peoples were not subject to the Indian Removal Act of 1830. The Option B is correct.
What is significance of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia?The United States Supreme Court considered its powers to enforce the rights of Native American "nations" against the states in the cases Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) and Worcester v. Georgia (1832).
The Cherokee Nation was declared sovereign by the United States Supreme Court in Georgia. According to the decision of Chief Justice John Marshall, Georgia had no right to enforce state laws on its territory.
Read more about Cherokee
brainly.com/question/23601626
#SPJ1
Diego de Landa thought the writings of the Maya were tools of the Devil. True or false
Diego de Landa was a Spanish Franciscan priest and the bishop of Yucatán who was born in Cifuentes, Spain, in 1524 and died in Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico, in 1579. He is most known for his classic account of Mayan culture and language, much of which he also destroyed.
After the Spanish invasion of Yucatán, Landa was in charge of converting the Maya people to Catholicism. He vigorously defended the Catholic Franciscan order's dominance and converted the native Maya while presiding over a spiritual monopoly that the Spanish crown had granted to the organization.
Diego de Landa, a Catholic priest, gave the order to burn several Maya codices in bulk because he thought they were the devil's work. A disputed number of Maya codices (27 books, according to Landa) and perhaps 5000 Maya worship images were burned during the ritual on July 12, 1562.
To learn more about Diego de Landa, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29036461
#SPJ4
who created the phase “no taxation without representation”
Answer:
Patrick Henry wrote the Virginia Resolves, which clearly laid out the “taxation without representation” argument
Explanation:
how did mcculloch v. maryland help define state and federal powers?
This decision established that the Constitution's intended goal of creating a powerful national government was achieved and that states cannot interfere with the authority granted to the federal government.
The court ruled that states lacked the authority to tax the federal government and that the federal government had the right and authority to establish a federal bank. The Federal Government won the case, and Marshall came to the conclusion that "the power to tax implies the right to destroy."
In the McCulloch v. Maryland decision, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had the authority to create a national bank and that a state (in this case, Maryland) did not have the authority to impose taxes on parts of the federal government that are using constitutionally authorised authorities.
For more questions on McCulloch v. Maryland decision
https://brainly.com/question/20374051
#SPJ4
McCulloch v. Maryland helped define state and federal powers by establishing the principle of federal supremacy.
In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that states could not tax federal institutions such as the Second Bank of the United States, which was chartered by Congress.
The Court held that Congress had the power to create the bank under the "Necessary and Proper Clause" of the Constitution, which gives Congress the authority to pass laws "necessary and proper" to carry out its other constitutional powers.
This ruling established that the federal government's powers were not limited to those explicitly enumerated in the Constitution, but also included implied powers necessary to carry out its responsibilities.
To learn more about McCulloch v. Maryland
https://brainly.com/question/544505
#SPJ4
I need an answer as soon as possible, please ^^"
Describe the historical context surrounding documents 1 and 2
Analyze Document 2 and explain how audience, purpose, bias, or point of view affects this document’s use as a reliable source of evidence
The historical context surrounding documents 1 and 2 is the forced relocation of Native American tribes in the United States in the 19th century, also known as the Indian Removal Era. Document 1, the Indian Removal Act of 1830, was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Andrew Jackson.
This law authorized the president to negotiate treaties with Native American tribes in the southeastern United States to exchange their lands for territory west of the Mississippi River. Document 2 is an excerpt from a speech by Major Ridge, a Cherokee leader, given to his fellow Cherokees in support of the 1835 Treaty of New Echota. This treaty, which was negotiated by Major Ridge and his son John, would have ceded traditional Cherokee lands in the Southeast to the U.S. Government and resulted in the forced removal of the Cherokee people.
Document 2 is a primary source and is valuable in understanding the perspective of the Cherokees during this period of history. However, the document is also subject to bias and point of view. Major Ridge was a leader among the Cherokees, but his perspective and opinions did not necessarily reflect those of the entire tribe. He and his son John negotiated the Treaty of New Echota without the support of most of the Cherokee people, so the document can be seen as representing a minority point of view.
What is the Document 2 about?The document reflects the pressure and coercion that the Cherokee people were facing from the U.S. Government at the time. The document also reveals that Major Ridge was aware of the difficult situation that the Cherokees were in, and the audience of the speech were his fellow Cherokees, and the purpose of the speech was to convince them to sign the treaty.
In conclusion, Document 2 is a valuable primary source for understanding the perspective of a minority of the Cherokee people during the Indian Removal Era. However, it is important to consider the bias and point of view of the author and the context in which it was written when evaluating its reliability as a source of evidence.
Learn more about exchange of lands from
https://brainly.com/question/4411061
#SPJ1
See transcribed text below
Document 1
An Act to provide for an exchange of lands with the Indians residing in any of the states or territories, and for their removal west of the river Mississippi.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That it shall and may be lawful for the President of the United States to cause so much of any territory belonging to the United States, west of the river Mississippi, not included in any state or organized territory, and to which the Indian title has been extinguished [ended], as he may judge necessary, to be divided into a suitable number of districts, for the reception of such tribes or nations of Indians as may choose to exchange the lands where they now reside, and remove there; and to cause each of said districts to be so described by natural or artificial marks, as to be easily distinguished from every other....
Source: Excerpt from the Indian Removal Act of 1830, passed by
Congress and signed into law by Andrew Jackson on May 28.
1830.
Document 2
This excerpt is from a speech by Major Ridge to his fellow Cherokees in support of the 1835 Treaty of New Echota. Major Ridge and his son John were Cherokee leaders who negotiated the Treaty of New Echota with the U.S. Government to leave traditional Cherokee lands in the Southeast without the support of most Cherokee people.
I am one of the native sons of these wild woods. I have hunted the deer and turkey here, more than fifty years. I have fought your battles, have defended your truth and honesty, and fair trading. The Georgians have shown a grasping spirit lately; they have extended their laws, to which we are unaccustomed, which harass our braves and make the children suffer and cry. I know the Indians have an older title than theirs. We obtained the land from the living God above. They got their title from the British. Yet they are strong and we are weak. We are few, they are many. We cannot remain here in safety and comfort. I know we love the graves of our fathers. We can never forget these homes, but an unbending, iron necessity tells us we must leave them. I would willingly die to preserve them, but any forcible effort to keep them will cost us our lands, our lives and the lives of our children. There is but one path of safety, one road to future existence as a
Nation. That path is open before you. Make a treaty of cession. Give up these lands and go over beyond the great Father of Waters.
Source: Quoted in John Ehle, Trail of Tears: The Rise and Fall of the Cherokee Nation, (New York: Doubleday, 1988).
Describe the historical context surrounding documents 1 and 2
Analyze Document 2 and explain how audience, purpose, bias, or point of view affects this document’s use as a reliable source of evidence
which international conference led to an agreement limiting the number of ships of each of the great powers?
a. Washington Naval Conference
b. international maritime conference
c. Diplomatic Conference
d. The London Naval Conference
Washington Naval Conference led to an agreement limiting the number of ships of each of the great powers. The correct option is A.
The Washington Conference, also known as the Washington Naval Conference, was an international gathering held by the United States in 1921 and 1922 to discuss security issues in the Pacific region and to curb the naval arms race.
It restricted the signatories' ability to build aircraft carriers, battleships, and battlecruisers. The treaty did not establish a cap on the number of other types of warships, such as cruisers, destroyers, and submarines, but it did impose a weight restriction of 10,000 tonnes per ship.
To know more about Conference, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/9753882
#SPJ4
According to declaration , whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to do what? ( Own words)
The right of the people to alter or abolish it and institute new government.
What does the Declaration of Independence say about abolishing government?
The Declaration of Independence does not explicitly address abolishing government; however, it does state that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed and that it is the right of the people to alter or abolish them if they become destructive of the ends for which they were established.
People to alter or abolish it and institute new government laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. This is justified by the fact that the people have the right to self-determination and to choose a form of government that best meets their needs and suits their values. A government should serve the interests of the people, not just those of a few. If the government does not adequately serve the interests of the people, then it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it and create a new government that will better serve them.
Therefore, alter or abolish it and institute new government is the right of the people
To learn more about Declaration of Independence from the link
https://brainly.com/question/14578050
#SPJ1
Which type of rhetorical appeal does Garrison use in this excerpt?
kairos
ethos
logos
pathos
Answer: Pathos
Explanation:
As late as the 1870s only ______Of the continent was under dites to European control,with Algeria held by_______The cape colony and natal (both in modern South Africa) by_____And Angola by_____
As late as the 1870s, only 10% of the continent was under direct European control, with Algeria held by France, the Cape Colony and Natal (both in modern South Africa) by Britain, and Angola by Portugal.
In what ways did European contact with Africa rise toward the end of the 1800s?
In the 1800s, technology and medicine made it easier for Europeans to get to Africa, which led to an increase in European contact with the continent.
In the late 1870s, what was the primary impetus behind European imperialism?These nations expanded their influence over other regions in the late 1870s for economic, political, and religious reasons, each with the intention of increasing their global power. Natural resources were required to power newly developed vehicles and machinery during the 1870s' Industrial Revolution.
Learn more about European control :
brainly.com/question/1108052
#SPJ1
Why was governor sam houston against texas secession?
Houston was against the Texas Secession Convention's actions because it thought it had gone too far by joining the newly formed Confederacy. He was removed from office for refusing to swear allegiance to the Confederacy.
No secession ball will commemorate the occasion. Texas, which would rather celebrate its independence, does not appear to be planning any other commemorative events. However, on February 1, 1861, 150 years to the day, an overwhelming majority of state convention members voted to secede from the Union. A brief document stating that the federal government was becoming "a weapon with which to strike down the interests and prosperity of the people of Texas and her Sister slaveholding States" was approved by jubilant delegates to the special convention in Austin on the second floor of the old Texas statehouse, just south of the current Capitol, near the Alamo and Texas Rangers monuments. They declared that Texas would now be a "separate sovereign state... absolved from all allegiance to the United States" from that point forward. A day later, an even more specific "declaration of causes" was issued; It is definitely worth reading.) This was the darkest day for one elderly veteran in the hall. Despite being a slave owner himself, Sam Houston, the 67-year-old governor of Texas who had previously held the position of president of the Republic of Texas twice, had for years almost entirely prevented secessionist sentiment from spreading throughout the state. Houston had led the fledgling Republic into the Union and fought for Texan independence from Mexico nearly three decades earlier.
To know more about Texas Secession visit
brainly.com/question/15615320
#SPJ4
Why was Roosevelt a more progressive president than Taft?