which numerical pattern in nonlinear?
A. 3, 11, 19, 27,
B. 1, 3, 9, 27
C. 1, 4, 7, 10,
D. 2, 3, 4, 5

Answer:

744

Step-by-step explanation:

Complete Question

The worldwide market share for a web browser was 20.5​% in a recent month. Suppose that a sample of 200 random students at a certain university finds that 50 use the browser.

At the 0.05 level of​ significance, is there evidence that the market share for the web browser at the university is greater than the worldwide market share of 20.5​%?

Answer:

The decision rule is

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

There is no sufficient evidence to show that the market share for the web browser at the university is greater than the worldwide market share of  20.5 ​%?

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

          The population proportion is  [tex]p = 0.205[/tex]

          The sample size is  n  =  200

          The number that uses the browser is  k =  50

          The level of significance is  [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

Generally the sample proportion is mathematically represented as

       [tex]\^ p = \frac{50}{200}[/tex]

=>    [tex]\^ p = 0.250[/tex]

The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o : p = 0.205[/tex]

The  alternative hypothesis  is  [tex]H_a : p > 0.205[/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

          [tex]z = \frac{ \^ p - p }{ \sqrt{ \frac{ p (1 - p )}{ n} } }[/tex]

=>       [tex]z = \frac{ 0.250 - 0.205 }{ \sqrt{ \frac{ 0.205 (1 - 0.205 )}{ 200} } }[/tex]

=>       [tex]z = 1.5764[/tex]

Generally the area under  [tex]z = 1.5764[/tex]  to the right is  

     [tex]p-value = P( Z > 1.5764 ) = 0.057467[/tex]

From the value we obtained we can see that the [tex]p-value > \alpha[/tex] hence

 The decision rule is

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

   The conclusion is

There is no sufficient evidence to show that the market share for the web browser at the university is greater than the worldwide market share of 20.5 ​%?

Use the quotient rule:

[tex]\dfrac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dx}=\dfrac{(x^3-5)\frac{\mathrm d(x^2+4x)}{\mathrm dx}-(x^2+4x)\frac{\mathrm d(x^3-5)}{\mathrm dx}}{(x^3-5)^2}[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dx}=\dfrac{(2x+4)(x^3-5)-3x^2(x^2-4x)}{(x^3-5)^2}[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dx}=-\dfrac{x^4 - 16 x^3 + 10 x + 20}{(x^3-5)^2}[/tex]

Answer:

Irrational Number

Step-by-step explanation:

The irrational numbers are those that cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers. Examples are as well as the square roots of many other numbers, and special numbers like e and π. It turns out that there are as many irrational numbers as rational. Irrational numbers have no exact decimal equivalents.

Hope this helps (:

Answer:

Irrational number

Step-by-step explanation:

i had it on khan academy

Answer: 0=0

Step-by-step explanation: Simplify

Answer:

2 x 3 (prime number, 2 distinct)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1)

A. 2 meters to centimeters

1 m = 100 cm

[tex]2 m = 2 \times 100 \\2 m = 200 cm = 2 \times 10^2[/tex]

B)108 centimeters to meters

100 cm =1 m

[tex]1 cm = \frac{1}{100} m \\108 cm = \frac{108}{100}=108 \times 10^{-2} m[/tex]

C)2.49 meters to centimeters

1 m = 100 cm

[tex]2.49 m = 2.49 \times 100 = \frac{249}{100} \times 100 = 249 cm[/tex]

D)50 centimeters to meters

100 cm = 1m

[tex]1 cm = \frac{1}{100} m \\50 cm = \frac{50}{100}= 5 \times 10^{-1} m[/tex]

E)6.3 meters to centimeters

1 m = 100 cm

[tex]6.3 m = 6.3 \times 100=\frac{63}{10} \times 100 = 630 cm[/tex]

F)7 centimeters to meters

100 cm = 1 m

[tex]1 cm = \frac{1}{100} m\\\\7 cm = \frac{7}{100} = 7 \times 10^{-2} m[/tex]

2)

a)4 meters to millimeters

1 m = 1000 mm

[tex]4 m = 4000 = 4 \times 10^3 mm[/tex]

b)1.7 meters to millimeters

1 m = 1000 mm

[tex]1.7 m = 1.7 \times 1000= \frac{17}{10} \times 1000=17 \times 10^2 mm[/tex]

Answer:

The equation x + y = z relates the whole numbers.

Hopefully, this helps! :D

Ask your question below!

[tex]\mathfrak{\huge{\pink{\underline{\underline{AnSwEr:-}}}}}[/tex]

Actually Welcome to the Concept of the Statistics,

If we see here, The Andrew is working for 20 hours and his pay for 20hours is, $175

so for 1 hour, he gets = 175÷20 => $8.75 per hour

, so now after 1 year, his pay increases by $1.05 per hour, then we have to add this new amount of pay in his old amount, so that we can show that his pay is actually INCREASED, so the new pay is given as,

$8.75 + $1.05 (per hour)= $9.80

so now his total pay is given as,

E= 9.80h

Option D.) is correct

The answer fam is..... 14

Answer:

there is no graph. can you edit the question?

Answer:

Ok:

Step-by-step explanation:

Welp, I don't see the graph but I can tell you what to do. You find x = 4, and draw a vertical line up. Once your line reaches the graph, see what the y value is. If the question is nice, you should get an exact integer number

Answer:

For 6.) y=-2x+1; 9.) y=-7/3x-5

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope intercept form is y=mx+b. m would be the slope (-2 and -7/3) and y is the y-int (1 and -5).

Answer:

the answer is 0.4 The reason is because 0.4 x8=0.32

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

303.75

Step-by-step explanation:

135/20=6.75

6.75•45= 303.75

Answer:

Notebooks cost $4

Thumb drives cost $18

Step-by-step explanation:

x=$ for notebooks

y=$ for thumb drives

5x + 5y = 110 ----> for Troy

3x + 5y = 102 ----> for Lisa

Use subtraction to find x.

(5x + 5y = 110)

-(3x + 5y = 102)

_____________

2x + 0y = 8

2x = 8

x=4

Sub 4 for x into 5x + 5y = 110

20 + 5y = 110

-20 -20

___________

5y = 90

y=18

Notebooks cost $4

Thumb drives cost $18

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

if 3 magazines = $18

$72/$18 = 4 sets of 3

4 x 3 = 12 magazines

Answer:

A. Response Variable is POUND SOLD Explanatory variable is PRICE PER POUND

B. ii. -4.681

Step-by-step explanation:

A. Based on the statistics that was shown in the given information above the:

Response Variable is POUND SOLD Explanatory variable is PRICE PER POUND

B. Calculation to determine slope of the estimated regression line that relates the response variable to the predictor variable

Using this formula

Slope =r*Sy/Sx

Let plug in the formula

Slope=-0.927*18.33/3.63

Slope=-16.99191/3.63

Slope=-4.681

Therefore , the slope of the estimated regression line that relates the response variable to the predictor variable is: -4.681

Answer:

please wait two mins I will give you the answer, but which question 2 or 3

Answer:

28

Step-by-step explanation:

28/1 = 28

Answer: 348 girls so somewhere around 80 percent

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-4√10 / 5 or -8√10 / 5

Step-by-step explanation:

See attachment for calculation

Answer:

828 cubic units

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

50°

Step-by-step explanation:

Angle NMP is an angle that has its vertex on a point along the circumference of the circle, thus, angle NMP is referred to as an inscribed angle of the circle.

The measure of an inscribed angle is equal to half of the measure of the arc it intercepts.

Therefore, the following equation shows the relationship between inscribed angle NMP and arc NP:

m<NMP = ½ × measure of arc NP

m<NMP = ½*100

m<NMP = 50°

Answer:

It's the first one

Its A

PLEASE MARK ME AS THE BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Step-by-step explanation:

7 is the coeffiecient

3 is the constant

Answer:

B slope = 1 and y intercept is 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The y intercept is where the line crosses the y axis (x is zero).

The slope can be figured by how far the line rises and runs to the next intersection of lines. In this case it goes up 1 and to the right 1. The slope would be 1/1 or 1

Answer:

Slope =1 ; Y-intercept=3

Step-by-step explanation:

The y intercept would be the point on the vertical line that touches the graph which in this case is three.

then to get to the next point that's on the line would have to move over 1 once to the right and one time up. so the slope is 1 over 1 which would equal 1.