Answer:
The Battle of Midway was a significant naval battle fought between the United States and Japan in June 1942, during World War II. The battle was a turning point in the Pacific theater of the war and had several significant impacts, including:
1. Stopping the Japanese advance: Prior to the Battle of Midway, the Japanese had made significant advances in the Pacific, conquering territory throughout Southeast Asia and the Pacific. The victory at Midway stopped the Japanese advance and marked the beginning of the end of their dominance in the Pacific.
2. Weakening Japan's naval power: The Japanese lost four of their aircraft carriers, along with hundreds of planes and thousands of skilled pilots, in the Battle of Midway. This weakened their naval power and gave the United States a strategic advantage in the Pacific.
3. Boosting American morale: The victory at Midway was a major morale boost for the United States, which had suffered significant losses in the Pacific prior to the battle. It also proved that the United States could defeat the Japanese in a major naval engagement, which further strengthened American resolve to continue fighting in the Pacific.
4. Allowing for an offensive in the Pacific: With the Japanese navy weakened, the United States was able to launch a counteroffensive in the Pacific. This eventually led to the recapture of territory and the eventual defeat of Japan in the Pacific.
In conclusion, the Battle of Midway was a significant turning point in the Pacific theater of World War II. It stopped the Japanese advance, weakened their naval power, boosted American morale, and allowed for an offensive in the Pacific, ultimately leading to Japan's defeat.
Explanation:
The Battle of Midway marked a significant turning point in the Pacific War during World War II. It halted Japan's advance across the Pacific and shifted power balance to the Allies. The subsequent 'island hopping' strategy further tidied the Allies' advance towards Japan.
Explanation:The Battle of Midway was of critical importance during World War II as it marked the decisive turning point in the Pacific War. This battle took place in June 1942, stopping the Japanese advance across the Pacific. The Japanese suffered significant losses, including four aircraft carriers and a heavy cruiser, with several other ships being severely damaged. This monumental defeat signified the first major naval loss for Japan since the 19th century, triggering a clear shift in power towards the Allies.
The strategy of 'island hopping' was employed by Allied forces. This selective targeting of strategic Pacific islands effectively disrupted Japanese communications and transportation routes, gradually facilitating the Allied advance to Japan. The strategy began bearing fruit after the Battle of Midway, with steady gains in territories where the Japanese once had control, taunting the Japanese military's authority.
The result of the Battle of Midway set a new course for the Pacific War, providing a platform for the United States and Allied forces to increase attacks and eventually defeat Japan.
Learn more about Battle of Midway here:https://brainly.com/question/12905347
#SPJ6
Use the map below below to answer the following question: which of the claims below is most supported by the map above
Using the map to determine, the true statement is most European nations are part of the European Union. Thus, option (D) is correct.
The European Union (EU) is a political and economic union which was basically created to serve it's member nations. The EU was established in 1993, and its main purpose is to promote peace, stability, and economic prosperity in Europe.
The EU has its own currency, the euro, and its institutions include the European Commission, the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and the European Court of Justice.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about European Union here:
https://brainly.com/question/497078
#SPJ1
The complete question might be:
Use the map to determine which statement is true.
Most eastern European nations are candidate countries.
All of the Western European nations are part of the European Union.
All European nations want to be part of the European Union.
Most European nations are part of the European Union.
Points earned on this question:
What were two main reasons the Central American Federation did not last?
The individual provinces had no previous contact with each other.
Provincial leaders couldn't get along.
Individual provinces broke away.
They had no experience running a government.
Two main reasons the Central American Federation did not last:
Provincial leaders couldn't get along.Individual provinces broke away.A civil war broke out in the federation between the years of 1838 and 1840, pitting conservatives against liberals and secessionists against each other. After several brutal battles, the federation was disbanded because these groups could not reconcile their ideological differences.
The last successful attempt to unite Central America into a single political entity was The Greater Republic. A last attempt was made in 1921–1922, involving Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras, but it failed owing to Nicaragua's lack of support.
Learn more about Central American Federation here:
https://brainly.com/question/10897123
#SPJ1
you need to explore what “appeasement” was in regard to Hitler’s actions in the 1930s and discuss a couple of examples. Make sure to include the response of the leaders from France and Great Britain at the time and why you believe they acted as they did. This is hypothetical…but how should the world have possibly reacted instead?
Answer:
Appeasement was a policy adopted by European powers towards Hitler's actions in the 1930s, which involved giving in to his demands in an attempt to avoid war. The policy was motivated by the fear of another world war, given the devastation caused by World War I, and the belief that Hitler's demands were reasonable and could be satisfied without the need for military action.
One example of appeasement was the Munich Agreement of 1938, in which France and Great Britain agreed to let Germany annex the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia, with the hope that this would satisfy Hitler's territorial ambitions and prevent war. Another example was the Anschluss of Austria, in which Germany annexed Austria in 1938 without any significant opposition from other European powers.
The response of the leaders from France and Great Britain at the time was to adopt a policy of appeasement towards Hitler's aggressive actions. The French leader, Édouard Daladier, and the British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, believed that appeasement would prevent another devastating war and that Hitler's territorial demands were reasonable.
However, this policy of appeasement ultimately failed, as Hitler continued to expand his territory and increase his military power. The invasion of Poland in 1939 finally led to the outbreak of World War II.
In hindsight, the world should have reacted differently to Hitler's actions in the 1930s. Instead of appeasement, a more firm and united response from European powers, particularly France and Great Britain, could have deterred Hitler and prevented the outbreak of war. For instance, economic sanctions or a military alliance could have been formed to counter Hitler's aggression. The lack of a strong and united response allowed Hitler to pursue his ambitions and ultimately led to the devastation of World War II.
Huey Long’s “share our wealth” plan is often compared to president Roosevelt’s “new deal. “ choose all features that describe BOTH of these plans.
Several descriptions are shared by Huey Long's "Share Our Wealth" mission and President Roosevelt's "New Deal": their focus on fighting poverty and financial inequality.
features that describe BOTH of these plans.Both initiatives catered to those enduring the Great Depression with proposals of government inducement in the economy, investments in public sector projects, reforms of banking and finance sectors, higher taxes levied on wealthy class and business entities, plus incentives intended to develop the economy and generate jobs.
Nevertheless, these plans been heavily criticized for being too unrefined or extreme in their outlooks.
Read more on Huey Long here:https://brainly.com/question/27335556
#SPJ1
100 points please help
3 concrete details about being a soldier during World War I. This might include daily life, a description of a battle, how soldiers are handing the trench conditions, the need for supplies, loss of friends, missing life, or other topics that you have researched.
5-6 sentences.
Answer:Trench Warfare: Soldiers during World War I had to endure long periods of trench warfare, where they had to live in narrow, muddy, and rat-infested trenches. The constant threat of enemy fire, disease, and exhaustion made it difficult for them to maintain their physical and mental well-being.
Battle of the Somme: One of the bloodiest battles of World War I was the Battle of the Somme. On July 1, 1916, British forces launched an offensive against German lines. In just one day, over 19,000 British soldiers were killed, and many more were wounded. The battle lasted for months, and the total number of casualties on both sides exceeded one million.
Supplies and Logistics: In addition to the dangers of combat, soldiers during World War I had to deal with shortages of food, water, medical supplies, and ammunition. The logistical challenges of supplying troops in the front lines were enormous, and soldiers often had to go without basic necessities for days or even weeks at a time. This made their already challenging lives even more difficult, and many soldiers suffered from malnutrition and other health problems as a result.
Being a soldier during World War I was an arduous and challenging experience. One concrete detail was the grueling daily routine that soldiers endured, which included long marches, regular drills, and the constant threat of enemy attack. Another detail was the horrific conditions in the trenches, with soldiers having to contend with mud, rats, and disease. In battles, soldiers had to face terrifying weapons, such as gas attacks and machine guns, which could kill many in a matter of seconds. Supplies, such as food and ammunition, were also scarce, and soldiers often had to make do with limited resources. Additionally, the loss of friends and missing life back home added to the psychological burden that soldiers carried.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Soldiers in World War I needed to know how to repair things, like trench networks, and camps. Basic things like this could be learned on duty, but was very useful to have already known. Another thing they did was inspect riffles, or riffle inspections, which is finding out which riffles weren't safe to fire. They also check for rust and carbon. The last thing they did was write letters to their families, because the war then was overseas, depending on where they lived. It was a very had life as a soldier in WWI.
Explain the organs of the following names:Christopolis,Monrovia and Liberia
Answer:
Christopolis is not the name of an actual city or organ. However, "Christo" is a Greek word meaning "anointed one" or "messiah", and "polis" means "city". Therefore, "Christopolis" could be interpreted as a hypothetical city named after Jesus Christ.
Monrovia is the capital city of Liberia, a country located in West Africa. Monrovia was named after James Monroe, the fifth President of the United States, who played a significant role in the founding of Liberia in the early 19th century. The city serves as the political, economic, and cultural center of Liberia, and is home to several important institutions such as the University of Liberia and the National Museum of Liberia.
Liberia is a West African country bordered by Sierra Leone, Guinea, Côte d'Ivoire, and the Atlantic Ocean. Founded in 1847 as a republic for freed American slaves, it boasts a rich heritage, beautiful beaches, dense rainforests, and diverse wildlife. Home to over 4 million people, Liberia's capital city is Monrovia.
Should the U.S census Bureau remove the category of race from the next census? Explain your answer
Background (Write approximately 1-2 pages) ✓ Explain the historical context of the question. ✓ Give some background information about the pseudoscientific ideas of race on the jewish by the Nazi Germany during the period 1933 to 1946
Answer:
The period from 1933 to 1946 was one of the darkest periods in human history, marked by the rise and fall of Nazi Germany and its horrific policies, including the systematic persecution and genocide of millions of Jews and other groups considered "undesirable" by the Nazi regime. At the heart of Nazi ideology was the pseudoscientific concept of race, which formed the basis of the Nazi belief in Aryan supremacy and the inferiority of other races, particularly Jews.
The Nazi regime, led by Adolf Hitler, came to power in 1933, and immediately began implementing policies designed to promote the "racial purity" of the Aryan race. This included the enactment of the Nuremberg Laws, which stripped Jews of their citizenship and other rights, and the establishment of ghettos and concentration camps, where Jews and other "undesirables" were held and subjected to brutal treatment.
The Nazi regime's pseudoscientific ideas of race were based on the belief in the superiority of the Aryan race, which they believed was a pure, Nordic race that was superior to all other races. This belief was not based on any scientific evidence, but rather on a twisted interpretation of history and anthropology that sought to justify the Nazi regime's policies of persecution and genocide.
The Nazis believed that Jews were a separate, inferior race that posed a threat to the purity and superiority of the Aryan race. This belief was based on a variety of pseudoscientific ideas, including the notion that Jews were biologically predisposed to certain negative traits, such as greed and dishonesty. The Nazi regime used this belief to justify policies such as the segregation of Jews into ghettos and the extermination of Jews in concentration camps.
The Nazi regime's pseudoscientific ideas of race also extended to other groups considered "undesirable," including Roma (Gypsies), homosexuals, and people with disabilities. These groups were also subjected to persecution and genocide, based on the belief that they were biologically inferior and posed a threat to the purity and superiority of the Aryan race.
The Nazi regime's pseudoscientific ideas of race had devastating consequences, leading to the deaths of millions of people in the Holocaust and other atrocities. The legacy of these ideas continues to be felt today, as we strive to combat racism, antisemitism, and other forms of discrimination and prejudice.
Explanation:
Woman activists saw Reconstruction as an opportunity to push for?
A- women enlisting in the military
B- voting rights
C- women acquiring land out west
D- none of these
How has the KKK's organizational structure MOST likely influenced its ability to survive as an active extremist group?
It has made it easier for the group to withstand challenges.
It has made it easier for the group to join forces and act as one.
It has made it harder for the group to finance local efforts.
It has made it harder for the group to select its leaders.
OA
OB
Oc
OD.
Answer:
The KKK's organizational structure has MOST likely influenced its ability to survive as an active extremist group by making it easier for the group to withstand challenges. The KKK has a hierarchical structure with a centralized leadership that has enabled the group to withstand crackdowns by law enforcement and continue its activities in secret. The group's leadership structure has also made it easier to maintain secrecy, discipline, and loyalty among its members. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
you need to explore what “appeasement” was in regard to Hitler’s actions in the 1930s and discuss a couple of examples. Make sure to include the response of the leaders from France and Great Britain at the time and why you believe they acted as they did. This is hypothetical…but how should the world have possibly reacted instead?
Answer:
Appeasement was a policy adopted by European leaders towards Nazi Germany in the 1930s, which involved making concessions to Hitler in the hope of avoiding war. The term was coined by British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who sought to avoid conflict with Germany at all costs. The policy of appeasement was based on the belief that Hitler's demands were reasonable and that he could be appeased by making concessions.
One of the most notable examples of appeasement was the Munich Agreement of 1938, which was signed by the leaders of France, Great Britain, and Italy. The agreement allowed Hitler to annex the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia, which was home to a large German-speaking population. The leaders of France and Great Britain believed that by allowing Germany to annex the Sudetenland, they could avoid war and maintain peace in Europe.
Another example of appeasement was the Anglo-German Naval Agreement of 1935, which allowed Germany to build up its navy and violate the terms of the Treaty of Versailles. This agreement was signed by the British government under the leadership of Neville Chamberlain, who believed that it would help to maintain peace in Europe by giving Hitler what he wanted.
The leaders of France and Great Britain at the time acted as they did due to a combination of factors. They were still reeling from the devastation of World War I and were hesitant to engage in another war. They also underestimated the extent of Hitler's ambition and believed that by making concessions, they could avoid conflict and maintain peace in Europe.
In hindsight, the world should have reacted differently. The policy of appeasement only emboldened Hitler and gave him the impression that he could achieve his goals through aggression. The world should have taken a stronger stance against Hitler's expansionist policies and sought to contain German aggression. It is possible that a more forceful response earlier on could have prevented the outbreak of World War II and the atrocities that followed.
A one pager on the renaissance
Answer:
The Renaissance was a period of intellectual and artistic flourishing in Europe from the 14th to the 17th century. The word "renaissance" means "rebirth" or "revival" and reflects a renewed interest in classical learning, humanism, and individualism. The Renaissance was marked by significant social, cultural, and technological change. It marked a transition from the medieval to the modern world.
During the Renaissance, scholars and artists sought inspiration from the past literature, philosophy, and art of ancient Greece and Rome. They believed that these ancient civilizations had achieved cultural and intellectual achievement worth imitating. A central tenet of Renaissance thought was humanism. Humanism is notion that human beings can excel and be valued for individual talents and accomplishments.
The invention of the printing press was a significant development of the Renaissance. It helped produce more books quickly and cheaply than ever before. This made knowledge more widely available and escalated the spread of ideas across Europe. The Renaissance also saw significant advances in science, mathematics, and technology. Scholars like Galileo, Copernicus, and Leonardo da Vinci made groundbreaking discoveries and inventions.
The Renaissance was also marked by outstanding artistic achievement. Painters like Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and Raphael created iconic works of art in history using new techniques and styles emphasizing realism, perspective, and emotion. Architects like Brunelleschi and Palladio designed magnificent buildings and public spaces, while writers like Shakespeare and Dante created enduring literary masterpieces.
Despite these achievements, the Renaissance featured social and political upheaval. The rise of powerful city-states and the growth of trade and commerce produced a wealthy merchant class. This class challenged the traditional authority of monarchs and nobles. The Reformation caused conflict and division within the Catholic Church and promoted Protestantism. It was a religious movement that began in the early 16th century.
Overall, the Renaissance triggered changes and innovations with profound impacts on European culture and society. Its legacy can still be seen today in the art, literature, and ideas that continue to inspire and challenge us.
Explanation:
If a federal court hears a case and determines that it goes against the Constitution, then it is declared;
a.
in contempt of court
b.
unconstitutional
c.
guilty
d.
reviewable by a lower court
Answer:
b. unconstitutional
Which of the following "people" would be most likely to consider student loan
forgiveness to be unfair? (2 Correct Answers)
The republicans would most likely to consider student loan forgiveness to be unfair.
Who would be most likely to consider student loan forgiveness to be unfair?However, those who prioritize personal responsibility, self-reliance, and avoidance of government interference in the economy are more likely to oppose student loan forgiveness.
Conversely, those who prioritize social justice, view student debt as a barrier to upward mobility and financial security, and support government intervention in order to ameliorate systemic issues within society will likely champion this cause.
Read more on student loan here:https://brainly.com/question/29332020
#SPJ1
At the time that the Non-aggression pact was signed, it was reported that Britain, France, and
America were upset that the Soviets had agreed to peace with Hitler. Why would they have been
upset about the pact?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Non-aggression pact, also known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, was signed between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union on August 23, 1939, just a week before the start of World War II. The pact included a secret protocol dividing Eastern Europe into spheres of influence, which allowed Germany to invade Poland without Soviet interference.
At the time, Britain, France, and America were upset about the pact for a few reasons:
1.The pact undermined the idea of collective security: Britain and France had signed treaties with Poland guaranteeing its independence, and they had hoped that the Soviet Union would join them in a common defense against Nazi aggression. The Soviet Union's decision to sign a non-aggression pact with Germany was seen as a betrayal of this idea, and it left Britain and France without a key ally.
2.The pact allowed Germany to focus on the west: By signing the pact with the Soviet Union, Hitler was able to secure his eastern flank, which allowed him to focus on his plans to invade Western Europe. This made it more difficult for Britain and France to defend against German aggression.
3.The pact allowed the Soviet Union to expand its influence: The secret protocol of the pact allowed the Soviet Union to expand its influence into Eastern Europe, which worried Britain and France. They saw this as a threat to their own interests in the region.
Overall, the Non-aggression pact was seen as a major setback for Britain and France, as it left them without a key ally and allowed Germany to focus on the west. It also allowed the Soviet Union to expand its influence in Eastern Europe, which further complicated the situation.
 In Hidden Figures
What Jim Crow etiquette is observed at NASA? How does it change from the beginning to the end of the movie?
How has perceptions of human variation affected the lives of people in the past? Provide one example and explanation. Please and thank you!
Perceptions of human variation have had a significant impact on the lives of people throughout history, often leading to discrimination, inequality, and prejudice against individuals who are perceived as different. One example of this can be seen in the treatment of people with albinism.
Albinism is a genetic condition that results in a lack of melanin, the pigment that gives color to the skin, hair, and eyes. In many societies, people with albinism have been stigmatized and discriminated against due to their appearance, which is often seen as abnormal or even supernatural.
In some cultures, people with albinism have been treated as outcasts or even killed for their body parts, which are believed to have magical or medicinal properties. This has led to widespread violence and discrimination against people with albinism in many parts of the world, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa.
For example, in Tanzania, people with albinism have been targeted by witch doctors who believe that their body parts can bring good luck or cure diseases. This has led to a wave of brutal attacks, including the mutilation and murder of individuals with albinism, as well as the kidnapping of children for the purpose of selling their body parts.
To know more about variation
https://brainly.com/question/15621252
#SPJ1
ALOT OF POINTS please help.
What is the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict? Why are they fighting?
What is the One State Solution? What is the Two-State Solution?
What are the pros and cons of the One and Two-State solution?
Based on the readings, what do you believe is the best solution to this conflict and why?
Write 5-7sentences about each question
Answer:
The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict is a long-standing dispute between Israelis and Palestinians over territory and sovereignty in the Middle East. It has its roots in the early 20th century when Jewish immigrants began to settle in Palestine, then a part of the Ottoman Empire. The conflict has since escalated, with both sides claiming the same land and fighting for control over it.
The One State Solution is a proposed solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict that calls for a single state to be shared by Israelis and Palestinians. Supporters of this solution argue that it would allow both sides to live together peacefully, without the need for borders or walls. However, critics argue that this solution would be difficult to implement due to deep-seated cultural, religious, and political differences between the two sides.
The Two-State Solution is another proposed solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict that calls for the creation of two separate states, one for Israelis and one for Palestinians. Supporters of this solution argue that it would allow both sides to live in peace and would help to address many of the underlying issues that have fueled the conflict. However, critics argue that this solution would be difficult to implement due to issues such as the location of borders, the status of Jerusalem, and the rights of Palestinian refugees.
The pros of the One-State Solution include the potential for increased cooperation and understanding between Israelis and Palestinians. It would also eliminate the need for a divisive border, which has been a point of contention for both sides. However, the cons include the potential for ongoing conflict due to cultural and religious differences, as well as the difficulties associated with creating a shared government.
The pros of the Two-State Solution include the potential for both Israelis and Palestinians to have their own independent states. This would allow for greater self-determination and could help to reduce tensions between the two sides. However, the cons include the difficulty of creating a viable and sustainable Palestinian state, as well as the potential for ongoing conflict over issues such as borders and refugees.
Based on the readings, it is difficult to say which solution is best, as both have their pros and cons. Ultimately, the best solution will depend on the willingness of both sides to compromise and work towards a peaceful resolution.
Explanation:
NEED HELP QUICK
A It was a victory for the Patriots after they were able to sink many British ships crossing the Charles River.
B The Patriots had plenty of gunpowder, but were defeated by a British naval bombardment.
C The British attacked head-on and eventually won the hills, but only after losing more than a thousand men.
D British soldiers ran out of gunpowder and fled after the Patriots started to advance across the Charles River.
The best description of the Battle of Bunker Hill was C The British attacked head-on and eventually won the hills, but only after losing more than a thousand men.
What was the Battle of Bunker Hill ?On June 17, 1775, the Battle of Bunker Hill occurred during the early stages of the American Revolution. The British Army was commanded by General William Howe in a frontal attack on a fortified position atop Breed's Hill (previously known as Bunker Hill) in Charlestown, Massachusetts.
The colonists were forced to abandon the hill after running out of ammunition, allowing the British to declare victory. While the British won the fight, the steep cost of their triumph and the persistence of the colonial resistance demonstrated that the colonists were a deadly opponent, laying the groundwork for the long and hard war that followed.
Find out more on Bunker Hill at https://brainly.com/question/15152623
#SPJ1
Who was hired to help with the Home Front of WWII?
Ronald Reagan
Barrack Obama
Walt Disney
George Washington
Answer:
Walt Disney was hired to help with the Home Front of WWII. He produced a number of propaganda films for the US government during the war, including "Der Fuehrer's Face" and "Victory Through Air Power".
The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb.What claim about Russia does the author not agree with?
The choice to use the atomic bomb had additional political and strategic repercussions, such as the arms race and the Cold War, which influenced world politics for decades to come.
The author's choice to drop the atomic bomb had a significant impact on how war is fought, posing ethical dilemmas regarding the use of WMDs and the duty of leaders to safeguard civilians.
On August 6, 1945, Japan's Hiroshima was struck by the first atomic bomb. August 9, 1945, saw the detonation of the second bomb over Nagasaki. With the job achieved, the Japanese capitulated.
As a result, the significance of the Russia does the author not agree with are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on atomic bomb, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28739270
#SPJ1
How did laws change regarding children under the age of 12?
O A. They were now required to attend school more
B. They would soon be required to learn a trade
C. They would soon be required to have a college degree
OD. They were now required to work more hours
(1) What is a political party? What is a proportional representation system? What is a “winner takes all system?” Would you prefer a winner takes all or proportional representation system in the United States? Why did you prefer one system to the other?
(2) What is a primary election? What is a general election?
(3) What are the statistics of race, gender, religion, education levels, region, and age identifications of the Democratic Party and Republican Party? In other words, who generally votes for which party?
(4) What do you believe (your personal opinion) can be done to change the volatile political situation in the U.S.?
(1) A political party is an organized group of individuals with similar political beliefs and goals that seek to gain political power and influence through elections.
Proportional representation is a voting system in which seats in an elected body are allocated based on the proportion of votes received by a political party or candidate.
A "winner takes all" system is a voting system in which the candidate with the most votes wins the election, regardless of whether they receive a majority or not.
(2) A primary election is a preliminary round of voting where political parties choose their candidate for the general election. A general election is a national election where voters choose their representatives to hold public office.
(3) The Democratic Party tends to attract more voters who are non-white, female, less religious, more educated, and younger, while the Republican Party tends to attract more voters who are white, male, more religious, less educated, and older.
(4) Emphasis on civility, empathy, and collaboration in political discourse is needed to change the volatile political situation in the U.S. Politicians and voters need to prioritize the common good over party loyalty by listening and considering opposing viewpoints.
Learn more about general election here:
https://brainly.com/question/11185151
#SPJ1
6
After the English Civil War, what was brought back to power during a period known as the Restoration?
A Enlightenment Movement
B Monarchy
Catholic Church
D Parliament
When the Monarchy was brought back to power was known as the Restoration. The Option B.
What was brought back to power during the Restoration?The Restoration was a period after English Civil War and the Commonwealth period that was marked by the return of the monarchy with the restoration of King Charles II to the throne.
The monarchy was abolished during the Civil War and replaced with the Commonwealth of England which was a republic but with the Restoration, the monarchy regained its position as the dominant political institution in England although Parliament also retained significant power.
Read more about Restoration
brainly.com/question/12881158
#SPJ1
What happened as a result of Spain's early exploration of the New World?
O A. Spain worked with other European countries to set up colonies.
OB. Spain was able to keep other European countries from settling in
Canada.
OC. Spain was able to establish colonies in large areas of both
continents.
O D. Spain developed good relations with the native populations.
B. Spain was able to establish colonies in large areas of both continents.
What surprised Ibn Battuta about the status and/or treatment of Mongol women?
The death of President Lincoln created a void in the United States that could not be replaced during Reconstruction.”Instructions: For this assignment, you will write an essay explaining your position regarding the above quote.Your essay must be at least 250 words and should: •Take a clear and firm position on the subject.•Present evidence to support your stance.•Discuss opposing viewpoints and weaknesses in those arguments.•Present your argument in a logical and sensible order.•Use complete sentences, proper spelling, and proper grammar
Abraham Lincoln was assassinated in 1865. He was the driving force behind Reconstruction. He implemented a number of policies to heal the wounds of the civil war and address the systemic problems of racism and inequality. After his death, this vision faded and the country did not find a clear direction.
How does it create a void?The assassination of President Abraham Lincoln in 1865 had a profound impact on the United States. Some believe his death left a void that national reconstruction cannot fill. While others believe the administration could have continued without Lincoln, I believe his death dealt a significant blow to the nation's ability to heal and rebuild.
First, Lincoln was the driving force behind Reconstruction, with the goal of unifying the country and rebuilding the South. He implemented a number of policies to heal the wounds of the civil war and address the systemic problems of racism and inequality. After his death, this vision faded and the country did not find a clear direction. At the same time, Lincoln was an integral figure respected by both Republicans and Democrats.
He had a special compromising quality that brought together the people necessary for the success of reconstruction. With his death, there was no one left to fill this leadership void and the country was torn apart.
Opponents of this claim may argue that Lincoln's reconstruction plans were flawed and that his death did not significantly affect America's ability to rebuild. However, there are obvious weaknesses in this argument. Lincoln's policies had limited success, and his death left a significant leadership vacuum that prevented further progress.
Ultimately, I believe the death of President Lincoln left a void in America that Reconstruction could not fill. Lincoln's vision, leadership, and ability to bring people together were essential to the success of Reconstruction.
Without him, the country lacks clear direction and leadership, slowing progress and hindering the country's ability to heal and rebuild.
learn more about Abraham Lincoln: https://brainly.com/question/856804
#SPJ1
Why do you believe that the Provisional Government was not able to stop the Coup from happening?
In my opinion, the Provisional Government's lack of legitimacy and failure to address the issues facing Russia made it vulnerable to a coup, which was eventually carried out by the Bolsheviks.
What is Provisional Government?A provisional government, also known as an interim government, an emergency government, or a transitional government, is a governmental authority formed to handle a political transition in the case of a newly founded state or the collapse of the previous governing administration.
Accordingly, alluding to the Temporary Government of Russia in 1917, which was built up after the February Insurgency and gone before the Bolshevik government, one reason why it may not have been able to halt the Overthrow from happening is due to a need of prevalent bolster and authenticity.
Learn more about Provisional Government here: https://brainly.com/question/29816979
#SPJ1
why the portuguese soldiers come to ethiopian in 1541?
Answer:
Portuguese soldiers came to Ethiopia in 1541 to help the Ethiopian emperor, Gelawdewos, fight against the Muslim Adal Sultanate, which was threatening Ethiopia's sovereignty. The Portuguese soldiers were led by Cristóvão da Gama, the son of the famous explorer Vasco da Gama. The Portuguese and Ethiopian forces were successful in defeating the Adal Sultanate in the Battle of Wayna Daga, which helped to secure Ethiopia's independence.
Explanation:
discuss the three components of political parties. Discuss party-in-the-electorate, party organization, and party-in-government. Briefly describe who makes up each component and what each component does.