What is the minimum possible value of this decimal? Use words, pictures, or numbers to explain your reasoning.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the profit made by a company modeled by the function

p = -n² + 300n + 100,000

The company breaks even when p = 0

To get the number of boxes sold when the company breaks even, we will substitute p = 0 into the equation.

0 = -n² + 300n + 100,000

multiply through by -1

0 = n² - 300n - 100,000

n² - 300n - 100,000 = 0

(n² - 500n) + (200n - 100,000) = 0

n(n-500)+200(n-500) = 0

(n+200)(n-500) = 0

n+200 = 0 and n-500 = 0

n = -200 and n = 500

Since n cannot be negative

Hence n = 500

This means that the company breaks even when it sells 500 boxes

Answer:

b. diffusion and active transport

Step-by-step explanation:

these are two ways that substances, like nutrients, pass through cell membranes.

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1/6

Step-by-step explanation:

there are 6 sides, and 3 is one of the 6 sides. thus, the answer is 1/6

Answer:

1/6

Step-by-step explanation: there are 6 incomes and 1 number 3 in a die

Answer:

[tex]\left(x-1+3y\right)\left(x-1-3y\right)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]x^2-2x+1-9y^2\\\\factor(skip for time)\\\\\left(x-1\right)^2-9y^2\\\\[/tex]

A little algebra process later...

you got the answer

Hoped this helped ya

<3

Answer:

(x-1-3y) x (x-1+3y)

Step-by-step explanation:

x^2-2x+1-9y^2

Using a^2 - 2ab + b^2 = (a-b)^2 (factor the expression) = (x-1)^2 - 9y^2

(x-1)^2 - 9y^2 = (x-1-3y) x (x-1+3y)  should be the answer :)

Answer:

The point estimated is 0.260

Step-by-step explanation:

The computation is shown below:

Sample in which the people have diabetes = 52

Random sample = 200

Significance level = 5%

Based on this, the, estimation point is

= Sample in which the people have diabetes ÷ Random sample

= 52 ÷ 200

= 0.260

hence, the point estimated is 0.260

We simply applied the above formula

And, the same is to be considered

The Null Hypothesis is accepted because the value of z is 0.973 and this can be determined by performing the test of the Hypothesis.

Given :

Hypothesis are as follows:

Null hypothesis,  [tex]\rm H_0: p\leq 0.231[/tex]

Alternate hypothesis,  [tex]\rm H_a : p>0.231[/tex]

Now, performing the test of the hypothesis. The critical value z is given by:

[tex]z = \dfrac{\hat{p}-p_0}{\sqrt{\dfrac{p_0(1-p_0)}{n}}}[/tex]    ----- (1)

Now, the value of [tex]\hat {p}[/tex] is given by:

[tex]\hat{p}=\dfrac{52}{200} = 0.26[/tex]

Now, put the values of known terms in equation (1).

[tex]z = \dfrac{0.26-0.231}{\sqrt{\dfrac{0.231\times 0.769}{200}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \dfrac{0.029}{0.0298}[/tex]

z = 0.973

Therefore, the null hypothesis is accepted.

For more information, refer to the link given below:

https://brainly.com/question/19613147

Answer:

3 : 1

Step-by-step explanation:

The biggest circle has a radius of 20 cm

So that means, its area will be,

Area = [tex]\pi r^{2}[/tex]

Area = [tex]\pi * 20^{2}[/tex]

A = [tex]\pi * 400[/tex]

=> A = 400[tex]\pi[/tex]

We do not need to solve this because it is nit required

Then, one small circle has an area of,

Area = [tex]\pi r^{2}[/tex]

Area = [tex]\pi *5^{2}[/tex]

Area = [tex]\pi *25[/tex]

=> Area = 25[tex]\pi[/tex]

As there are 4 circles in, we get that the area covered by the small squares,

=> [tex]25\pi * 4[/tex]

=> [tex]100\pi[/tex]

So, the amount shaded = 100/400 (We can omit the [tex]\pi[/tex] at this stage because we are finding out a ratio)

=> 1/4

So, there is 1 cut region and the remaining is the uncut region,

As we need to find uncut to cut, the ratio will be,

=> remaining : 1

=> 3 : 1

If my answer helped, kindly mark me as the brainliest!!

Thanks!!

Answer:

A) The height of the trapezoid is 6.5 centimeters.

B) We used an algebraic approach to to solve the formula for [tex]b_{1}[/tex].  [tex]b_{1} = \frac{2\cdot A}{h}-b_{2}[/tex]

C) The length of the other base of the trapezoid is 20 centimeters.

D) We can find their lengths as both have the same length and number of variable is reduced to one, from [tex]b_{1}[/tex] and [tex]b_{2}[/tex] to [tex]b[/tex]. [tex]b = \frac{A}{h}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

A) The formula for the area of a trapezoid is:

[tex]A = \frac{1}{2}\cdot h \cdot (b_{1}+b_{2})[/tex] (Eq. 1)

Where:

[tex]h[/tex] - Height of the trapezoid, measured in centimeters.

[tex]b_{1}[/tex], [tex]b_{2}[/tex] - Lengths fo the bases, measured in centimeters.

[tex]A[/tex] - Area of the trapezoid, measured in square centimeters.

We proceed to clear the height of the trapezoid:

1) [tex]A = \frac{1}{2} \cdot h \cdot (b_{1}+b_{2})[/tex] Given.

2) [tex]A = 2^{-1}\cdot h \cdot (b_{1}+b_{2})[/tex] Definition of division.

3) [tex]2\cdot A\cdot (b_{1}+b_{2})^{-1} = (2\cdot 2^{-1})\cdot h\cdot [(b_{1}+b_{2})\cdot (b_{1}+b_{2})^{-1}][/tex] Compatibility with multiplication/Commutative and associative properties.

4) [tex]h = \frac{2\cdot A}{b_{1}+b_{2}}[/tex] Existence of multiplicative inverse/Modulative property/Definition of division/Result

If we know that [tex]A = 91\,cm^{2}[/tex], [tex]b_{1} = 16\,cm[/tex] and [tex]b_{2} = 12\,cm[/tex], then height of the trapezoid is:

[tex]h = \frac{2\cdot (91\,cm^{2})}{16\,cm+12\,cm}[/tex]

[tex]h = 6.5\,cm[/tex]

The height of the trapezoid is 6.5 centimeters.

B) We should follow this procedure to solve the formula for [tex]b_{1}[/tex]:

1) [tex]A = \frac{1}{2} \cdot h \cdot (b_{1}+b_{2})[/tex] Given.

2) [tex]A = 2^{-1}\cdot h \cdot (b_{1}+b_{2})[/tex] Definition of division.

3) [tex]2\cdot A \cdot h^{-1} = (2\cdot 2^{-1})\cdot (h\cdot h^{-1})\cdot (b_{1}+b_{2})[/tex] Compatibility with multiplication/Commutative and associative properties.

4) [tex]2\cdot A \cdot h^{-1} = b_{1}+b_{2}[/tex] Existence of multiplicative inverse/Modulative property

5) [tex]\frac{2\cdot A}{h} +(-b_{2}) = [b_{2}+(-b_{2})] +b_{1}[/tex] Definition of division/Compatibility with addition/Commutative and associative properties

6) [tex]b_{1} = \frac{2\cdot A}{h}-b_{2}[/tex] Existence of additive inverse/Definition of subtraction/Modulative property/Result.

We used an algebraic approach to to solve the formula for [tex]b_{1}[/tex].

C) We can use the result found in B) to determine the length of the remaining base of the trapezoid: ([tex]A= 215\,cm^{2}[/tex], [tex]h = 8.6\,cm[/tex] and [tex]b_{2} = 30\,cm[/tex])

[tex]b_{1} = \frac{2\cdot (215\,cm^{2})}{8.6\,cm} - 30\,cm[/tex]

[tex]b_{1} = 20\,cm[/tex]

The length of the other base of the trapezoid is 20 centimeters.

D) Yes, we can find their lengths as both have the same length and number of variable is reduced to one, from [tex]b_{1}[/tex] and [tex]b_{2}[/tex] to [tex]b[/tex]. Now we present the procedure to clear [tex]b[/tex] below:

1) [tex]A = \frac{1}{2} \cdot h \cdot (b_{1}+b_{2})[/tex] Given.

2) [tex]b_{1} = b_{2}[/tex] Given.

3) [tex]A = \frac{1}{2}\cdot h \cdot (2\cdot b)[/tex] 2) in 1)

4) [tex]A = 2^{-1}\cdot h\cdot (2\cdot b)[/tex] Definition of division.

5) [tex]A\cdot h^{-1} = (2\cdot 2^{-1})\cdot (h\cdot h^{-1})\cdot b[/tex] Commutative and associative properties/Compatibility with multiplication.

6) [tex]b = A \cdot h^{-1}[/tex] Existence of multiplicative inverse/Modulative property.

7) [tex]b = \frac{A}{h}[/tex] Definition of division/Result.

Answer:

D.) 14.2*0.784

Step-by-step explanation:when you calculate it, there is 4 numbers behind the decimal point.

Answer:

can i friend you

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

g=4 h=6

Step-by-step explanation:

3g +h = 18 (Equation 1)

2g+3h=26 (Equation 2)

From equation 1

3g+ h =18

h= 18-3g (equation 3)

substitute equation 3 into equation 2

2g+3h= 26

2g+ 3(18-3g)= 26

2g+3×18+3(-3g)=26

2g+54-9g=26

9g-2g= 54-26

7g=28

7g÷7 = 28÷7

g= 4

substitute g into equation 1

3g+h=18

3(4)+ h= 18

12+h= 18

h=18-12

h= 6

Answer:

g = 4; h = g

Step-by-step explanation:

When solving an equation with two variables, the goal is to isolate at least one of the variables so that you can plug it in to the equation to get the other. There are multiple ways to solve this so I'll just be giving one.

3g + h = 18

2g + 3h = 26

In these two equations, I notice that if I multiply the first equation by 3, the two equations will have the same values of h, so I'd be able to isolate g:

9g + 3h = 54

2g + 3h = 26

Now, subtract the second equation from the first to isolate g:

9g + 3h = 54

-2g + 3h = 26

= 7g = 28

= g = 4

Now that we have solved for g, we can plug it into either of the equations and solve for h:

2(4) + 3h = 26

= 8 + 3h = 26

= 3h = 18

= h = 6

And in conclusion, g = 4 and h = 6.

Answer:

4/5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]95 \frac{3}{4} \: inch \leqslant x \leqslant 96 \frac{1}{4} \: inch[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that a lumber supplier sells 96 inch Pieces of oak which must be within 1/4 of an inch.

This situation can be represented by the following absolute value inequality:

[tex]|x \: - 96| \: \leqslant \: \frac{1}{4} [/tex].

The absolute value can be thought of as the size of something because length cannot be negative. The length must be no more than 1/4 away from 96.

To simplify this, pretend this is a standard equality, |x-96| = 1/4. 1/4 is the range of acceptable length, 96 is the median of the range, and x is the size of the wood.

First apply the rule |x| = y → x = [tex]\pm[/tex]y

|x-96| = 1/4

x - 96 = [tex]\pm[/tex]1/4

x = [tex]96 \pm 1/4[/tex]

(These are just the minimum, and maximum sizes)

Now with a less than or equal to, the solutions are now everything included between these two values.

Therefore:

[tex]96 - 1/4 \: \leqslant x [/tex] [tex]\leqslant \: 96 + 1/4 [/tex]

With less than inequalities, you must have the lower value on the left, and the higher value on the right.

If x represents the size of the pieces, then the acceptable lengths are represented by this following inequality:

[tex]95 \frac{3}{4} \: inch \leqslant x \leqslant 96 \frac{1}{4} \: inch[/tex]

This is interpreted as x (being the size of the oak) is greater than or equal to 95 3/4, and less than or equal to 96 1/4 in inches.

Answer:

2 plus 3

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\tt Step-by-step~explanation:[/tex]

Slope = rise/run

[tex]\tt Steps:[/tex]

Rise: The line travels 5 units vertically (up) from the first point to the second.

Run: The line goes 6 units horizontally (left) from the first point to the second.

Slope = rise/run; Slope = 5/6

[tex]\Large\boxed{\tt The~slope~of~the~line~is:~\frac{5}{6}~units }[/tex]

Answer:

Slope = rise/run

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The big container holds 30 gallons and the small container holds 20 gallons

Step-by-step explanation:

Let

The big container = x

Small container = y

The big container can hold 10 gallons less than twice the small

x = 2y - 10

Total gasoline in both containers = 50 gallons

x + y = 50

Substitute x = 2y - 10 into the equation

2y - 10 + y = 50

3y = 50 + 10

3y = 60

Divide both sides by 3

y = 60 / 3

= 20

y = 20 gallons

Recall,

x + y = 50

x + 20 = 50

x = 50 - 20

= 30

x = 30 gallons

The big container holds 30 gallons and the small container holds 20 gallons

Answer:

The big container has 30 gallons and the small container has 20 gallons.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The maximum profit will be found in the vertex of the parabola, which is what your equation is. You could do this by completing the square, but it is way easier to just solve for h and k using the following formulas:

[tex]h=\frac{-b}{2a}[/tex] for the x coordinate of the vertex, and

[tex]k=c-\frac{b^2}{4a}[/tex] for the y coordinate of the vertex.

x will be the selling price of each widget and y will be the profit. Usually, x is the number of the items sold, but I'm going off your info here for what the vertex means in the context of this problem.

Our variables for the quadratic are as follows:

a = -10

b = 600

c = -3588. Therefore,

[tex]h=\frac{-600}{2(-10)}=30[/tex] so the cost of each widget is $30. Now for the profit:

[tex]k=-3588-(\frac{(600)^2}{4(-10)})[/tex] This one is worth the simplification step by step:

[tex]k=-3588-(\frac{360000}{-40})[/tex] and

k = -3588 - (-9000) and

k = -3588 + 9000 so

k = 5412

That means that the profit made by selling the widgets at $30 apiece is $5412.

Hence,the profit made by selling the widgets at $[tex]30[/tex] apiece is $[tex]5412[/tex].

What is the maximum profit?

Maximum profit, or profit maximisation, is the process of finding the right price for your products or services to produce the best profit.

Here given that,

A company sells widgets. The amount of profit, [tex]y[/tex], made by the company, is related to the selling price of each widget, [tex]x[/tex], by the given equation.

As the maximum profit found in the vertex of the parabola,

Here, [tex]x[/tex] will be the selling price of each widget and [tex]y[/tex] will be the profit.

The number of items sold is [tex]x[/tex].

So, the quadratic equation is:-

[tex]a = -10b = 600c = -3588.[/tex]

Therefore, so the cost of each widget is $[tex]30[/tex].

For the profit:-

[tex]k = -3588 - (-9000) andk = -3588 + 9000 sok = 5412[/tex]

Hence,the profit made by selling the widgets at $[tex]30[/tex] apiece is $[tex]5412[/tex].

To know more about the maximum profit

https://brainly.com/question/16755335

#SPJ2

Answer:

The answer is c. 5 5/8.

Step-by-step explanation:

Its c because your supposed to multiply them. When you multiply them you get 5 5/8. Hope this helped,have a great day!

Answer:

-8z +724 + 5y +2c

Step-by-step explanation:

Combine like terms

Answer:

172.72 centimeters

Step-by-step explanation:

1. 5 ft. = 60 in.

2. 60 in. + 8 in. = 68 in.

3. 68 x 2.54 = 172.72

4. add unit of measurement to your answer

Henry's height in centimeters is 172.72 cm

"A process of finding the value of a single unit, and based on this value we can find the required value. "

For given question,

Henry measured 5 feet 8 inches tall.

There are 2.54 centimeters in 1 inch.

that is, 1 inch = 2.54 cm

First we convert Henry's height in inches.

We know that 1 feet =  12 inches

⇒ 5 feet = 60 inches

so, Henry's height in inches would be,

5 feet 8 inches

= (60 + 8) inches

= 68 inches

From given, 1 inch = 2.54 cm

⇒ 68 inches = 172.72 cm

Therefore, Henry's height in centimeters is 172.72 cm

Learn more about the unitary method here:

brainly.com/question/22056199

#SPJ2

Answer:

Week 1 - 20

Week 2 - 27

Week 3- 34

Week 4 - 41

Week 5 - 48

Etc, etc,...

Step-by-step explanation:

The values increase by 7 each week.

Answer:

99.7%

Step-by-step explanation:

Empirical rule formula states that:

• 68% of data falls within 1 standard deviation from the mean - that means between μ - σ and μ + σ.

• 95% of data falls within 2 standard deviations from the mean - between μ – 2σ and μ + 2σ.

• 99.7% of data falls within 3 standard deviations from the mean - between μ - 3σ and μ + 3σ.

From the question, we have mean of 98.18 F and a standard deviation of 0.65 F

The approximate percentage of healthy adults with body temperatures between 96.23 F and100.13 ​F is

μ - 3σ

= 98.18 - 3(0.65)

= 98.18 - 1.95

= 96.23 F

μ + 3σ.

98.18 + 3(0.65)

= 98.18 + 1.95

= 100.13 F

Therefore, the approximate percentage of healthy adults with body temperatures between 96.23 F and 100.13 ​F which is within 3 standard deviations of the mean is 99.7%

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

See attachment

Answer:

The number of tickets sold at the gate is [tex] G = 211.25[/tex]

The number of tickets sold in advance is  [tex]  A = 311.25 [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

 The cost of a tickets at the gate is [tex]a =  \$ 5[/tex]  

  The cost of a ticket in advance is  [tex]b =  \$ 3[/tex]

Let the number of ticket sold in the gate be G

Let the number of ticket sold in advance  be   A

From the question we are told that

  One hundred more tickets were sold in advance than at the gate and this can be mathematically represented as

       [tex]G  +  100 =  A[/tex]

From the question we are told that

  The total revenue from ticket sales was $1990  and this can be mathematically represented as

    [tex]5 G  +  3A  =  1990[/tex]

substituting for  A in the equation above

    [tex]5 G  +  3[G  +  100]=  1990[/tex]    

    [tex]5 G  +  3G  +  300=  1990[/tex]    

    [tex] 8G  +  300=  1990[/tex]  

    [tex] 8G  =  1690[/tex]

=>  [tex] G = 211.25[/tex]

Substituting this for G in the above equation

     [tex]5 [211.25]  +  3A  =  1990[/tex]

=>    [tex]  3A  =  1990 - 1056.25[/tex]

=>    [tex]  A = 311.25 [/tex]

Answer:

elsa's interval width will be greater than that of frank

Step-by-step explanation:

first of all we are told that both Elsa and Frank have the same sample proportion so their midpoint is also going to be the same.

now as the confidence level goes higher, so also would the margin of error increase. then the width of the confidence interval would rise so it can be more confident.

from this question elsa has a larger confidence level therefore her intervals width will be greater than franks own.

Answer:

x=6/5 ,y= -7/15

Step-by-step explanation:

we are going to solve this simultaneously.

2x+3y=1.......(i)

and

5x+2=8

5x=6

x= 6/5 .......(ii)

Now let's put value of x into equation number (i)

2x+3y=1

2(6/5) +3y=1

12/5 +3y =1

3y= 1-(12/5)

3y = -7/5

y = (-7/5) ÷3

y= -7/15

Answer:

answer is 5

Step-by-step explanation:

f(5)= -5×5^2+26×5

= -125+130

= 5

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

5.234

Slope: 1/2

y-intercept(s): (0, 7/3)

x: 0, 7

y: 7/3, 0

Step-by-step explanation:

y=-3 -1/3(1+2)=2/3.3=1.3=3

y=3