What is the distance from b (-35,25) to c (-20, 15)

Answer:3rd one

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: left, down

Hope this helps.

Answer

the answer is a i

thinnk

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helped!!

The values of the fraction are a = 3, b= 3,   c= 5 is the correct answer.

A fraction is a part of a whole number, and a way to split up a number into equal parts. It is a number expressed as a quotient, in which a numerator is divided by a denominator.

For the given situation,

The fraction is given as  [tex]\frac{4\frac{1}{2} }{1\frac{1}{4} }[/tex]

⇒ [tex]\frac{\frac{9}{2} }{\frac{5}{4} }[/tex]

⇒ [tex]\frac{9}{2}[/tex] × [tex]\frac{4}{5}[/tex]  

⇒ [tex]\frac{18}{5}[/tex]

⇒ [tex]3\frac{3}{5}[/tex]

Thus from the above value a = 3, b= 3, c= 5.

Hence we can conclude that the values of the fraction are a = 3, b= 3,   c= 5 is the correct answer.

Learn more about fractions here

https://brainly.com/question/17205173

#SPJ2

Answer:

3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

3x - 2y = 18

y=(3/2)x-9

Slope of the given line=3/2

As parallel lines have same slope, slope of the line parallel to the line 3x - 2y = 18 is 3/2.

Hope it helps :)

Slope of a line parallel to the line whose equation is 3x - 2y = 18 is 3/2.

The slope of the line is the ratio of the rise to the run, or rise divided by the run. It describes the steepness of line in the coordinate plane.

The slope intercept form of a line is y=mx+b, where m is slope and b is the y intercept.

The slope of line passing through two points (x₁, y₁) and (x₂, y₂) is

m=y₂-y₁/x₂-x₁

Two lines are said to be parallel when their slopes are same.

To find the slope of parallel line, we need to find slope of 3x - 2y = 18

3x-2y=18

-2y=18-3x

y=-18/2+3/2x

y=3/2x-18/2

Slope of line is 3/2

Hence, slope of a line parallel to the line whose equation is 3x - 2y = 18 is 3/2.

To learn more on slope of line click:

https://brainly.com/question/14511992

#SPJ2

Answer:

More formally, statistical power is the probability of finding a statistically significant result, given that there really is a difference (or effect) in the population. ... So, larger sample sizes give more reliable results with greater precision and power, but they also cost more time and money.

Answer:

[tex](-5,\frac{1}{2} )[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Midpoint Formula: [tex](\frac{x_1+x_2}{2},\frac{y_1+y_2}{2} )[/tex]

Simply plug in your coordinates into the midpoint formula to find midpoint:

R(-2, 3)

S(-8, -2)

[tex](\frac{-2+-8}{2},\frac{3+-2}{2} )[/tex]

[tex](\frac{-10}{2},\frac{1}{2} )[/tex]

[tex](-5,\frac{1}{2} )[/tex]

The required simplified product is 3/2.

Given that fractions  3/8 ÷ 1/4.

To divide two fractions by multiplying the first fraction with the reciprocal of the second fraction.

Let a, b, c and d be any real numbers. Consider a/b ÷ c/d that gives

[tex]\frac{a}{b}[/tex]  ÷  [tex]\frac{c}{d}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{a}{b}[/tex] ×  [tex]\frac{c}{d}[/tex].

That implies, [tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex]  ÷  [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{3}{8}[/tex] ×  [tex]\frac{4}{1}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex].

Hence, the required simplified product is 3/2.

Learn more about simplification of fraction, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/16510095

#SPJ6

Answer:

x = 37

Step-by-step explanation:

4x + 3 + x - 8 = 180

4x + x - 8 + 3 = 180

5x - 5 = 180

5x = 185

x = 37

Hope this helps!

Answer:

sumthing that we hate doing

Step-by-step explanation:ughhhhhhhhhh

Answer:

1.24

Step-by-step explanation:

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The audience per dollar is ...

  Newspaper: 1000/$200 = 5/$

  Radio: 800/$100 = 8/$

  TV: 14000/$800 = 17.5/$

So, TV gives the greatest exposure. As much of the budget as possible should be spent on TV ads. That amount is the lesser of $6000 and ...

  (7 ads)($800/ad) = $5600

With $5600 spent on TV ads, the remaining advertising budget is ...

  $6000 -5600 = $400

The next most cost-effective medium is radio. The remaining $400 budget allows for ...

  $400/($100/ad) = 4 ads

__

To maximize exposure, the advertising budget should be spent this way:

Answer:

LOL UGH THAT KEEPS HAPPENING TO ME

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

try reloading the page or check your internet

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Between x = 48 and x = 45.

Step-by-step explanation:

Average rate of change of a function in the given interval is represented by,

Average rate of change = [tex]\frac{\triangle y}{\triangle x}[/tex]

From the table attached,

Average rate of change of the function between x = 3 and x = 9

= [tex]\frac{16-7}{9-3}[/tex]

= 3

Average rate of change in the interval x = 9 and x = 22

= [tex]\frac{32-16}{22-9}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{16}{13}[/tex]

= 1.23

Average rate of change in the interval x = 9 and x = 22,

= [tex]\frac{45-32}{45-22}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{13}{23}[/tex]

= 0.57

Average rate of change in the interval x = 45 and x = 48,

= [tex]\frac{63-45}{48-45}[/tex]

= 6

Therefore, average rate of change is maximum between x = 45 and 48.

Option given in bottom right will be the answer.

Answer:

x=½, -2

x= 0.5, -2

possibly im not perfect

Answer:

The answer is going to be option 1.

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer you get from multiply an number by itself is a perfect square.

Answer:

8×8 =8^2=64 (perfect square)

Step-by-step explanation:

64 is a perfect square because 8^2 =8×8 =64

Complete Question

Researchers investigated whether the proportion of American teenagers with some level of hearing loss was different in 2005–2006 than in 1988–1994. They collected data on random samples of American teenagers in those two time periods. Let the symbol [tex]\pi __{05-06}}[/tex] denote the population proportion of American teenagers with some level of hearing loss in 2005–2006 and similarly for [tex]\pi__{{88-94}}[/tex]. A 95% confidence interval for the parameter [tex]\pi__{{05-06}} }- \pi__{{88-94}}[/tex] turns out to be (0.0015, 0.0467).

Required:

What is an appropriate conclusion to draw?

Answer:

The appropriate conclusion is  

The sample data provide little evidence to doubt that the proportion of American teenagers with hearing loss was the same in 1988-1994 as in 2005-2006

Step-by-step explanation:

Generally the appropriate conclusion is

The sample data provide little evidence to doubt that the proportion of American teenagers with hearing loss was the same in 1988-1994 as in 2005-2006.

This because the confidence intervals are very close to zero , i.e both the upper limit and the lower limit are close to zero  and if we are take 0.05 as our level of significance we see that the both values of the confidence level are small to be significant

It a bc i said so hahahahaha

Answer:

that equation isnt set up right

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

40+14=54 and 50 = 4 + 54

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

58-90 bc its a right triangle

hope this helps

Answer:

28 weeks

Step-by-step explanation:

It says that $42 was 1/3 of her total. So you multiply $42 by 3 and you get $126. You now divide $126 by her weekly allowance, $4.5, and the answer is 28.

1. $42 x 3 = $126

2. $126/$4.5 = 28

3. The answer is Sharon has been saving her allowance for 28 weeks.

Hope this helps!

-Jerc

Answer:

She has been saving her money up for 28 weeks.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. If 42 is 1/3 of her money, then you would multiply 42 by 3 to get the full 3/3 so: 42•3=126

2. Next, you would divide $126 by $4.50 because that is the total amount of money divided by how much she saved up each week, so: 126/4.5=28 and that gives us the answer which is 28.

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

A horizontal line has a slope of zero and a vertical line has an undefined slope

Answer:

Explained below.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the Central limit theorem, if from an unknown population large samples of sizes n > 30, are selected and the sample proportion for each sample is computed then the sampling distribution of sample proportion follows a Normal distribution.

The mean of this sampling distribution of sample proportion is:

 [tex]\mu_{\hat p}= p[/tex]

The standard deviation of this sampling distribution of sample proportion is:

 [tex]\sigma_{\hat p}=\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}[/tex]

(a)

The sample selected is of size n = 450 > 30.

Then according to the central limit theorem the sampling distribution of sample proportion is normally distributed.

The mean and standard deviation are:

[tex]\mu_{\hat p}=p=0.75\\\\\sigma_{\hat p}=\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}=\sqrt{\frac{0.75(1-0.75)}{450}}=0.0204[/tex]

So, the sampling distribution of sample proportion is [tex]\hat p\sim N(0.75,0.0204^{2})[/tex].

(b)

Compute the probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion as follows:

[tex]P(p-0.04<\hat p<p+0.04)=P(\frac{-0.04}{0.0204}<\frac{\hat p-p}{\sigma_{\hat p}}<\frac{0.04}{0.0204})[/tex]

                                          [tex]=P(-1.96<Z<196)\\=P(Z<1.96)-P(Z<-1.96)\\=0.975-0.025\\=0.95[/tex]

Thus, the probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion is 0.95.

(c)

The sample selected is of size n = 200 > 30.

Then according to the central limit theorem the sampling distribution of sample proportion is normally distributed.

The mean and standard deviation are:

[tex]\mu_{\hat p}=p=0.75\\\\\sigma_{\hat p}=\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}=\sqrt{\frac{0.75(1-0.75)}{200}}=0.0306[/tex]

So, the sampling distribution of sample proportion is [tex]\hat p\sim N(0.75,0.0306^{2})[/tex].

(d)

Compute the probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion as follows:

[tex]P(p-0.04<\hat p<p+0.04)=P(\frac{-0.04}{0.0306}<\frac{\hat p-p}{\sigma_{\hat p}}<\frac{0.04}{0.0306})[/tex]

                                          [tex]=P(-1.31<Z<196)\\=P(Z<1.31)-P(Z<-1.96)\\=0.9049-0.0951\\=0.8098\\\approx 0.81[/tex]

Thus, the probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion is 0.81.

(e)

The probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion if the sample size is 450 is 0.95.

And the probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion if the sample size is 200 is 0.81.

So, there is a gain in precision on increasing the sample size.

Answer:

what do you need help with you did not provide a picture or any evidence

Step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation