What is “habeas corpus”?


the principle that a person’s property cannot be taken by the government without legislative approval


a written list of freedoms that a government promises to protect


the principle that a person cannot be imprisoned without being charged for a specific crime


the idea that no monarch or other government leader can levy taxes without legislative approval

Answer: The English Bill of Rights

Explanation:

Answer: foreign policy of friendly neutrality that would avoid creating enemies or international friendships of dubios value      

Explanation: this is what I have read

Answer:

Washington's address argued for a careful foreign policy of friendly neutrality that would avoid creating implacable enemies or international friendships of dubious value, nor entangle the United States in foreign alliances.

Explanation:

Answer:

i think C

plz correct me if im wrong

Explanation:

Answer:

n

Explanation:

Answer:

False I hope it helps

Explanation:

Answer:

I am so so soooo sorry if this wrong bc its my first time answering a question but I am pretty sure it is: True. (Again sorry if wrong)

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

So this is how it ends. The presidency of Donald John Trump, rooted from the beginning in anger, division and conspiracy-mongering, comes to a close with a violent mob storming the Capitol at the instigation of a defeated leader trying to hang onto power as if America were just another authoritarian nation.

The scenes in Washington would have once been unimaginable: A rampage through the citadel of American democracy. Police officers brandishing guns in an armed standoff to defend the House chamber. Tear gas deployed in the Rotunda. Lawmakers in hiding. Extremists standing in the vice president’s spot on the Senate dais and sitting at the desk of the speaker of the House.

The words used to describe it were equally alarming: Coup. Insurrection. Sedition. Suddenly the United States was being compared to a “banana republic” and receiving messages of concern from other capitals. “American carnage,” it turned out, was not what President Trump would stop, as he promised upon taking office, but what he wound up delivering four years later to the very building where he took the oath.

The convulsion in Washington capped 1,448 days of Twitter storms, provocations, race-baiting, busted norms, shock-jock governance and truth-bending from the Oval Office that have left the country more polarized than in generations. Those who warned of worst-case scenarios only to be dismissed as alarmists found some of their darkest fears realized. By day’s end, even some Republicans suggested removing Mr. Trump under the 25th Amendment rather than wait two weeks for the inauguration of President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.

The article continues:

While Washington has seen many protests over the years, including some that turned violent, the uprising on Wednesday was unlike anything that the capital has seen during a transition of power in modern times, literally interrupting the constitutional acceptance of Mr. Biden’s election victory. Mr. Trump all but egged them on during a “Save America March” on the Ellipse south of the White House just as Congress was convening to validate Mr. Biden’s election.

“We will never give up,” Mr. Trump had declared. “We will never concede. It doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved. Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore, and that’s what this is all about.”

It ends with this paragraph:

With Mr. Pence unwilling and unable to stop the count, the president’s supporters made it their mission to do it themselves. And for several hours, they succeeded. But after they were finally cleared out of the Capitol, lawmakers resumed the process of ending the Trump presidency, no matter how much he resists.

Answer:

the way i feel about the capital things happen is if i ere there i would fell terroriz and unconmterbal that people knew where i work and could easy to break in but way did they do it that way they could of march around the capital not break onto it they could of done some serious damage

Answer: it would depend on the situation.

Explanation:

Unfortunately I don’t have enough info on this alone to make a good call but I can give you this...

The police officer doesn’t have the right to improper searches. That being said the officer may ask for consent to look in the car, but if he is not given permission than he cannot without reason. There are some exceptions however. Police dogs for instance are very good at smelling, and although this problem doesn’t specifically say our officer used a dog, a dog could very well have smelled the drugs. If the dog alerted the officer, then he has a right to search the car. Ultimately I can’t be sure but this is what I will say. The officer was in the wrong. What the man had in his car was plenty illegal (in most states, assuming he went to court would say it was illegal in this one) but regardless he shouldn’t have had his stuff browsed by the officer. The court case would most likely favor the man as he would probably win saying the officer didn’t ask for consent. He still would most likely end up in prison for possession of illegal narcotics and the officer could face a punishment like being fired. Hope it helps.

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Periodization is the process or study of categorizing the past into discrete, quantified named blocks of time.[1] This is usually done in order to facilitate the study and analysis of history, understanding current and historical processes, and causality that might have linked those events.

plz mark me as brainlist...