Answer:
In law, a question of law, also known as a point of law, is a question that must be answered by applying relevant legal principles to interpretation of the law. Such a question is distinct from a question of fact, which must be answered by reference to facts and evidence as well inferences arising from those facts.
Explanation:
brainliest?
My last brain cells were used on picking whether or not to order chipotle or pizza. Which one?
Answer:
Explanation:pizza is good
Which statement best supports zimbardos belief that people are not born good or evil
Answer:
A . “‘Any of us can move across it... I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil — to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein.’” ( Paragraph 3)
Explanation:
Zimbardo claims that the line between good and evil is permeable, meaning that people are not born “good” or “evil”. On the contrary, everyone can cross that line, especially under certain circumstances. For example, the soldiers´ mental state and the lack of supervision, training, or accountability led to the abuse of an Iraqi prisoner in Abu Ghraib.
possible outcomes when senators vote?
pros and cons of being a federalist
pros
creates a sense of local patriotism
provides a better level of stability from a political perspective
It encourages involvement
It lessens the bureaucracy.
cons
It creates confusion.
It encourages governments to “pass the buck.”
It stops national policies from being implemented.
It causes uncertainty.
This one depends on your pov
It creates a wealth gap.
ROUND 3 FREE BRAINIEST
Answer:
thanks
Explanation:
4. When passing another vehicle, it is safe to return to your lane if your"
Explanation:
Before returning to your original lane after passing, you must make sure you are not dangerously close to the vehicle you have just passed. When you can see both of the vehicle's headlights in your rearview mirror, you may have enough room to return to the lane.
who do you want to win the election
Why do you think that resisting arrest is considered a serious crime? What elements of the crime of resisting arrest led you to this decision? Do you think it should be considered a misdemeanor or a felony? Explain.
* For Criminal Justice *
Answer:
Resisting should be a misdemeanor and evading should be a felony
Explanation:
If the person is trying to get out while being cuffed, they do not pose much of a danger to the public. But evading is a much larger category. For instance you could lead the police on a high speed car chase and then crash into someone and kill them. You pose a much greater threat to the public.
Resisting arrest is considered serious crime because it doess not only challenge the power of authority but also create security issues for general citizens.
Resisting Arrest
An arrest of a person signifies the power of State and strengthens the trust on Police Force, while the resistance over the arrest is the natural action of an accused but being successful in resisting creates doubt over police force and the authority.
Therefore, resisting arrest is considered serious crime. This should be considered as felony, because the term felony is related to the crimes which are considered very serious.
Learn more about Arrest here:
https://brainly.com/question/8533149
Why do candidates interested in pretrial services need to have an interest in different locations?
A. Their chief work is to monitor electronic ankle bracelets.
B. These services are offered by various types of agencies in different locations.
C. They will learn to serve in one specific judge's jurisdiction.
D. They will need to learn everything about parole.
Answer:
B. These services are offered by various types of agencies in different locations.
Explanation:
When are jurors allowed to consider evidence? PLEASE ANSWERRRR FAST AND CORRECTLY WILL MARK BRAINLIESTTTT
Answer:
The jury listens to the evidence during a trial, decides what facts the evidence has established, and draws inferences from those facts to form the basis for their decision. The jury decides whether a defendant is "guilty" or "not guilty" in criminal cases, and "liable" or "not liable" in civil cases.
Explanation:
A jury must begin with at least 6 and no more than 12 members, and each juror must participate in the verdict unless excused under Rule 47(c). (b) Verdict. Unless the parties stipulate otherwise, the verdict must be unanimous and must be returned by a jury of at least 6 members.
which of the following is not an intentional for a crime?
a. prevention
b. knowledge intent
c. negligence
d. reckless intent
Answer:
c
Explanation:
I know it
Those who argued for prison reformation based on religious viewpoints argued that which of the following was the best way to restore the moral balance of the soul?
labor
counseling
mediation
solitude
the first generation of computers used vaccum tubes .Why were they replaced by the transistors
Answer: They were replaced Because the transistor was so much smaller and consumed significantly less power, a computer system built with transistors was also much smaller, faster, and more efficient than a computer system built with vacuum tubes.
Another name for legal penalties is
A. crime
B. sanctions
C. jail term
D. probation
Answer:
B - Sanctions
Explanation:
The definition of sanctions is : ¨ a threatened penalty for disobeying a law or rule. ¨ I hope this helps!
What Is A Reconstructed Memory ?
Answer:
hello
Explanation:
Reconstructive memory is a theory of memory recall, in which the act of remembering is influenced by various other cognitive processes including perception, imagination, semantic memory and beliefs, amongst others.
Answer:
A memory that has been reconstructed
Explanation:
Reconstructive memory is a theory of memory recall
While the car is in motion, it's only safe for _____ to interact with GPS.
A. an adult
B. the driver
C. a passenger
D. a driver over 21
Answer:
D
Explanation:
kasi yon ang alam ko HAHAHAHA
Which of these statements is true of representative democracy?
A. Citizens have unlimited individual rights.
B. Citizens vote directly on all laws and government actions.
C. Government leaders rule by force.
D. The people elect government leaders.
Answer:
D Is the correct answere
In the case of DC vs Heller what was the constitutional issue addressed?
Answer:
i think D.C
Explanation:
Changes to laws and punishments for drug crimes that began in the 1980s include _____.an expansion of what constitutes a drug crime
more opportunities for acquittal
longer sentences for drug crimes
more serious punishments for drug crimes
PLS ANSWER ASAP
Changes to laws and punishments for drug crimes that began in the 1980s include "more serious punishments for drug crimes" (Option E)
What is Drug Crime?A drug-related crime involves the possession, production, or distribution of narcotics with the potential for abuse.
Drugs are also associated with crime since drug trafficking and manufacturing are frequently controlled by drug cartels, organized crime, and gangs.
The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 was passed by the United States House of Representatives and Senate in order to intensify Federal efforts to foster international drug law enforcement cooperation, improve enforcement of U.S. drug laws, enhance interdiction efforts, and to provide leadership in developing drug abuse deterrence.
Learn more about Drugs:
https://brainly.com/question/26254731
#SPJ1
Answer: an expansion of what constitutes a drug crime and more serious punishments for drug crimes
Explanation: had to put 2 so got it wrong on edge
All are done a couple of days after birth to minimize stress except?
O iron shot
O clip needle teeth
O dock tail
O slaughter
Because they were ___________, Quakers in Pennsylvania refused to go to war against the French.
Answer:
나는 당신이 답을 찾는 행운을 빕니다
Explanation:
미안해 너를 속였다
What argument can be made that would have kept president bush from becoming the running mate of john mccain in 2008?
Answer:
The dummies would argue two term limit but he would have been vice President not president
Why should Amy Coney Barrett be confirmed to become the next Associate Supreme Court Justice? Pleaseeee helpppp!
Answer:
Explanation:
Because she was confirmed by the Senate. All official proceedings were done and once they were done, she was confirmed by a majority vote and therefore, can assume the position.
To have a fair trial, juries must be a fair cross-section of the community. This most nearly means:
A. the community votes on jury members
B. the jury must reflect the surrounding community in gender, race, color, religion, and ethnic background
C. the jury must reflect must consist of family members from the defendant and plaintiff.
D. the jury must be the same race as the defendant
Answer:
B. the jury must reflect the surrounding community in gender, race, color, religion, and ethnic background
Explanation:
Because it needs to be around your community
4. IF YOU HAVE AN ACCIDENT, YOU MUST EXCHANGE YOUR DRIVERS LICENSE
INFORMATION AND
WITH THE OTHER PERSONS INVOLVED.
A. proof of insurance only
B. proof of insurance and vehicle registration only
C. proof of insurance, vehicle registration, and current address
As a health care professional which rights re often the easiest to honor which rights are more difficult to honor
Answer:
There are four principal of healthcare rights . they are autonomy, beneficience Nonmalfeasance Integrity is the most Difficult right to Honour
Opposing sides of a bill will do which of the following, which means giving arguments for or against a bill?
OA Debate
ОВ.
Enroll
OC. Propose
OD
Amend
Answer:
a. debate
Explanation:
Ned wants to enter the home of a suspect to search for evidence but does not have a warrant. He sees someone shredding paper through the window. Which of the following exceptions allow him to enter the home?
A.
probable cause
B.
arrest
C.
exigent circumstances
D.
hot pursuit
E.
USA PATRIOT Act
Answer: c
Explanation: took the test
Ned wants to enter the home of a suspect to search for evidence but does not have a warrant. Exigent circumstances following exceptions allow him to enter the home. Thus, the correct option is (C).
In the context of the criminal process, an exigent circumstance is defined as an emergency situation demanding immediate action to avert imminent risk to life or substantial property damage, or to avoid the probable escape of a suspect or the loss of evidence.
Conditions requiring a warrantless entrance, search, or seizure by police when a warrant would normally be necessary compare knock and announce rule, and no-knock search warrant at the warrant.
Therefore, the correct option is "C".
To know more about the exigent circumstances, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30611978
#SPJ2
Please help
If local citizens are unhappy with a locally elected official, they can conduct a recall election and "fire"
or remove that person from office.
O True
False
Example of voter apathy are voting in elections, volunteering for campaigns and working the election
polls.
O True
False
Answer:
False
False.
Explanation:
From the first question, local citizens cannot organise a recall election to "fire" an elected official whenever they like because he's not doing well. They can only wait till his tenure is finished and if he comes for re-election, he can be voted out.
Therefore, false.
Voter apathy is simply the lack of desire to participate in voting processes.
Therefore examples of voter apathy ARE NOT voting in election, volunteering for campaign, etc.
A person that is voter apathetic would not participate in any voting activity. Therefore, false.
Marty stabs Chris’s hand while playing poker because he is mad he is losing. Ordinarily, a person could just wrap a wound like this and be fine. However, Chris has hemophilia, but he hasn’t told anyone even though he’s had it for years, which means he bleeds more than most people and can die from even minor injuries. He bleeds to death.
CAN MARTY BE CHARGED FOR THE DEATH OF CHRIS?
Answer:
It is mostly the responsibility of Marty. Marty should’ve been more careful when playing poker with Chris. Either way there is concequences for everything bad you do so yes Marty is going to be charged for the death of Chris.
Explanation: