Until recently, the classification of "moderate" would have applied to a. most Americans.
What is the term moderate?The term "moderate" typically refers to a political ideology that falls somewhere between the more extreme positions of the left and the right. While the exact definition of "moderate" can vary depending on the context, it generally implies a willingness to compromise and work towards solutions that are acceptable to a broad range of people.
Historically, polls have shown that a majority of Americans identify as moderate, rather than liberal or conservative. However, in recent years, there has been a growing polarization in American politics, with more people identifying as either very liberal or very conservative.
Despite this trend, it is still likely that until recently, the classification of "moderate" would have applied to most Americans.
Therefore the correct option is A.
Learn more about moderate here:https://brainly.com/question/16797771
#SPJ1
The fifty-five men who met together in
to write a
constitution for the new nation were a remarkable collection of talented, educated and experienced leaders.
It is true that the fifty-five men who gathered to draught the new country's constitution were a remarkable group of gifted, educated, and seasoned leaders.
Who signed the first constitution of India?Dr. Rajendra Prasad, India's first president, signed the Constitution of India on January 24. Feroze Gandhi, the president of the Constituent Assembly at the time, was the last to do so.
Who were the key architects of the Indian Constitution?The Indian Constitution, which offers a comprehensive and dynamic framework to lead and rule the country while keeping in mind her distinctive social, cultural, and religious diversity, is credited to. The chairman of its Drafting Committee is Dr. BR Ambedkar.
To know more about constitution visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ1
How did the English war began and what were the results
Answer:
the trial of and execution of Charles I (1649); the exile of his son, Charles II (1651); and the replacement of English monarchy with the Commonwealth of England are the results and how it started was Charles I raised an army against the wishes of Parliament, ostensibly to deal with a rebellion in Ireland.
How is the French revolution Connected to Great Fear?
Answer: Known as the Great Fear (la Grande peur), the agrarian insurrection hastened the growing exodus of nobles from France and inspired the National Constituent Assembly to abolish feudalism on August 4, 1789, signing what historian Georges Lefebvre later called the “death certificate of the old order.”
Explanation: The Great Fear, called La Grande Peur in French, was a period immediately following the storming of the Bastille. It was a time when members of the nobility began to fear for their lives because of the popular uprisings that were spreading rapidly across France.
The Great Fear played a significant role in the early phases of the French Revolution, helping to rally the peasantry and contributing to the radicalization of the movement. As a result, there is a connection between the Great Fear and the French Revolution.
What was the relationship between the Great Fear and the Bastille storming?La Grande Peur, or "The Big Fear," was a time period that followed the storming of the Bastille. It was a moment when the nobility started to worry for their safety.
What was the cause of France's Great Fear?A wave of peasant uprisings and violence known as The Great Fear (French: Grande Peur) swept over France in July and August 1789. Economic worries prompted these riots.
To know more about French Revolution visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/2796465
#SPJ1
In what ways were the American Revolution and Civil War similar? Did the wars
ultimately achieve their objectives?
Answer:
The American Revolution and Civil War were both significant events in American history, but they had distinct differences and similarities.
Similarities:
Both wars were fought on American soil, with American soldiers on both sides.
Both wars were fought over issues related to freedom and liberty.
Both wars had significant impacts on American society and the development of American democracy.
Both wars resulted in significant loss of life and resources.
Differences:
The American Revolution was fought to gain independence from British colonial rule, while the Civil War was fought over issues of states' rights and slavery.
The American Revolution was a war of independence, while the Civil War was a war of secession and reunion.
The American Revolution was fought primarily by colonial militias and the Continental Army, while the Civil War was fought by the Union and Confederate armies.
In terms of achieving their objectives, the American Revolution achieved its objective of gaining independence from British rule, while the Civil War achieved its objective of preserving the Union and abolishing slavery. However, both wars also had long-lasting consequences and ongoing challenges. The American Revolution led to the development of a new nation, but also to ongoing conflicts and challenges related to issues of race, class, and economic inequality. The Civil War abolished slavery, but also led to ongoing struggles for civil rights and equality for African Americans, as well as ongoing debates over issues related to states' rights and federal power. Overall, both wars had significant impacts on American history and society, and continue to shape American politics and culture today.
Explanation:
How many pilgrims were killed in they first encounter with the indians
Answer:
There isn't a record of any deaths or injury's
Explanation:
What did Misa mean in Chapter 5 when he referred to the "Business of Science?"
Provide and explain an example of this from Chapter 5.
Answer:
In Chapter 5 of the book "The Soul of A New Machine" by Tracy Kidder, Misa used the term "Business of Science" to refer to the process of translating scientific theories and concepts into practical applications that can be used in the real world. He was highlighting the importance of bridging the gap between academic research and commercial technology development.
One example of the "Business of Science" from Chapter 5 can be seen in the discussion about the memory design for the Eagle computer. The design team was faced with the challenge of developing a new memory board that would meet the requirements of the computer's overall performance, as well as being cost-effective and reliable. To accomplish this, they had to consider the latest scientific knowledge about memory technology, while also balancing the needs of the marketplace and the financial constraints of the company.
The team had to conduct extensive research and experimentation to find the optimal design, and then worked with the manufacturing department to ensure that it could be produced in large quantities at an affordable price. Ultimately, they were able to create a memory board that met all of these requirements and helped to make the Eagle a successful commercial product.
This example shows how the "Business of Science" involves not only the scientific knowledge and research, but also the practical considerations of the marketplace and the business world. It requires a collaboration between different departments and stakeholders to translate scientific theories and concepts into practical applications that can benefit society.
Explanation:
Rules and regulations issued by the president that have the effect of law are O independent executive agencies. O government corporations. O none of these answers. O executive orders.
Answer:
The correct answer is executive orders because they are directives issued by the President of the United States that have the force of law. According to the Congressional Research Service, executive orders "are used to manage operations of the federal government" and "have been issued on a wide range of subjects, such as national security, immigration, and the economy." (CRS Report R45442, "Executive Orders: An Introduction")
Independent executive agencies (option A) are entities within the executive branch that are not part of a cabinet-level department but are still subject to presidential control. They can issue regulations, but these regulations do not have the force of law unless authorized by Congress.
Government corporations (option B) are entities created by Congress to provide goods and services to the public. While they are technically part of the executive branch, their governing boards are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, and they operate more like private businesses than traditional government agencies. Government corporations can issue regulations, but these regulations are not executive orders and do not have the force of law unless authorized by Congress.
Therefore, the correct answer is executive orders because they are the rules and regulations issued by the President that have the force of law, while the other options do not meet this criteria.
Connecticut is the only New England state without a shore line.
TrueFalse
Answer:
False. Connecticut has a coastline along Long Island Sound, making it one of the four New England states with a shoreline.
Explanation:
If one judge interprets a law in a manner that pardons a person in 2011, a different judge ruling on the same type of case in 2020
O must absolutely abide by the 2011 interpretation
• can cite the 2011 case as a model for the 2020 ruling
O can ignore the 2011 decision even if the law is the same
O can overtum the 2011 decision since five years have passed
Answer:
A different judge ruling on the same type of case in 2020 is not absolutely bound to abide by the 2011 interpretation, but they can certainly consider it as persuasive authority. The 2011 decision can be cited as a model for the 2020 ruling, but it is not binding precedent.
The judge can ignore the 2011 decision if they believe that it was wrongly decided or if there are significant changes in the law or circumstances that justify a different interpretation. However, if the law and circumstances remain the same, it is unlikely that a judge would completely ignore a prior decision without providing a compelling reason for doing so.
It is also important to note that a judge in 2020 cannot simply overturn the 2011 decision solely based on the passage of time. To overturn a prior decision, there must be a valid legal reason, such as a change in the law or a new interpretation of the law by a higher court. The mere passage of time is not a sufficient reason to overturn a prior decision
Read the following excerpt, then select the correct answer.
The text is an excerpt from President Harry Truman's "Truman Doctrine" address before a joint session of Congress in 1947.
It is necessary only to glance at a map to realize that the survival and integrity of the Greek nation are of grave importance in a much wider
situation. If Greece should fall under the control of an armed minority, the effect upon its neighbor, Turkey, would be immediate and serious
Confusion and disorder might well spread throughout the entire Middle East. Moreover, the disappearance of Greece as an independent state
would have a profound effect upon those countries in Europe whose peoples are struggling against great difficulties to maintain their freedoms
and their independence while they repair the damages of war.
How does this passage from the Truman Doctrine speech illustrate the domino theory?
O A.
О в.
It emphasizes the importance of economic development to spreading democracy.
It recognizes that repairing the damages of war was the best way to prevent communism.
О c.
It argues that people should be able to maintain their freedom and independence.
D. It demonstrates the belief that the future of one country will affect others as well.
Answer:
Truman argued that the United States could no longer stand by and allow the forcible expansion of Soviet totalitarianism into free, independent nations, because American national security now depended upon more than just the physical security of American territory.
The passage from the Truman Doctrine speech does illustrate the domino theory by recognizing that repairing the damages of war was the best way to prevent communism. The Option B is correct.
What was the importance President Harry "Truman Doctrine" speech?The Truman Doctrine was a significant moment in U.S. foreign policy, which was announced by President Harry S. Truman in a speech to Congress on March 12, 1947. Its importance lies in the fact that it represented a major shift in U.S. policy towards Europe and the Soviet Union, and set the stage for the Cold War.
The Truman Doctrine was developed in response to the growing threat of Soviet expansion in Europe, particularly in Greece and Turkey, which were facing communist insurgencies. Truman argued that the United States had a responsibility to support democratic governments and resist communist aggression in order to prevent the spread of communism around the world.
Read more about Truman Doctrine
brainly.com/question/669792
#SPJ1
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
The Soviet Union was made of 15
? states. Of them, ? was considered the most powerful.
The Soviet Union was made up of 15 republics, which were divided into two tiers of the federal units.
What was Soviet Union?The Soviet Union, officially known as the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), was a federal socialist state that existed from 1922 to 1991. The Soviet Union was composed of 15 republics, covering a vast territory in Eurasia. It emerged as a global superpower after World War II, competing with the United States in political, economic, and military arenas in the Cold War. The Soviet Union was governed by the Communist Party, which controlled all aspects of political, economic, and social life. The Soviet economy was heavily centralized and planned, with the government controlling the means of production. The Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 due to economic stagnation, political upheaval, and nationalist movements within its constituent republics.
To learn more about Soviet Union, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16655124
#SPJ1
One pager on the butler
Main character Cecil Gaines
A border of your choice
Character traits/personality
Indicate if the character is static or dynamic
2 quotes from the character
Choose a scene the character is in that impacted them in some sort of way. How does the character react?
1 civil rights event that you connected with- include minor details
Cecil Gaines is the main character in the 2013 movie The Butler. He is a hard-working, loyal, and dedicated African-American man who works as a butler in the White House for over thirty years.
What is character?Character is a set of individual traits, behaviors, and qualities that make up an individual's personality. It is a combination of qualities that distinguish someone or something from others. Character can be formed through experiences, environment, and education. Character is the result of choices made by an individual throughout his or her life. Character is demonstrated through the values, beliefs, and actions of an individual.
Cecil is a static character, as he maintains his humble personality and determination to serve others no matter the cost throughout the film. His strong moral compass and unwavering loyalty are traits that define him and serve as a source of strength despite the external struggles he endures.
To learn more about character
https://brainly.com/question/30058702
#SPJ1
Two types of resources are natural and human.
TrueFalse
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Resources can be classified into two broad categories: natural and human resources. Natural resources are the resources that exist in nature and have not been created or modified by human beings, such as land, water, minerals, forests, and wildlife. Human resources, on the other hand, refer to the human labor, skills, knowledge, and abilities that are utilized to produce goods and services. Therefore, the statement "Two types of resources are natural and human" is true.
Which of the following is NOT a way in which Richard Nixon tried to cover up links between the Watergate scandal and him?
A. Publish false news reports
B. Paying off the accused
C. Shredding documents
D. Citing national security constraints
Answer:
I believe it's A!
Explanation:
It would most likely be A. Publish false news reports, as Nixon and his administration were not known to have directly published false news reports as part of their efforts to cover up the Watergate scandal.
Why it's not the other options:
It is not B, C, and D because all of these were ways in which Nixon tried to cover up his involvement in the Watergate scandal:
B. Paying off the accused - Nixon's administration attempted to pay off the Watergate burglars to keep them from implicating the administration in the break-in.
C. Shredding documents - Nixon's administration destroyed evidence related to the Watergate scandal, including documents and tapes.
D. Citing national security constraints - Nixon claimed that releasing certain documents and tapes related to the Watergate scandal would compromise national security.
Therefore, the answer is A, "Publish false news reports", as this was not a tactic used by Nixon to cover up his involvement in the Watergate scandal.
Hope this helps! Sorry if it's wrong. If you need more help, ask me! :]
which factors contributed to the beginning of the enlightment movements?choose 3 answers
The factors which contributed to the beginning of the enlightment movements includes:
The age of science and scientific inquiryThe age of reason-based inquiryThe advancement in all areas of human interest.Why is the enlightenment movement important?The Enlightenment has long been considered the bedrock of modern Western political and intellectual culture. The Enlightenment brought political modernization to the West in the form of democratic values and institutions, as well as the establishment of modern, liberal democracies.
Scholars have widely accepted this thesis, which has been bolstered by large-scale studies by Robert Darnton, Roy Porter, and, most recently, Jonathan Israel. Enlightenment thought had a significant impact on politics.
Read more about enlightenment
brainly.com/question/1688832
#SPJ1
In order for an amendment to be added the Constitution, 3/4's of the states must ___________ it.
In order for an amendment to be added to the United States Constitution, 3/4ths of the states must "ratify" it.
What is ratification?Ratification tend to means that the state's legislative body or a state convention must approve the proposed amendment by a 3/4ths majority vote. Once 3/4ths of the states have ratified an amendment, it becomes part of the United States Constitution.
To add an amendment to the United States Constitution, the amendment must be first proposed by either Congress or a national convention. Once proposed, the amendment must then be ratified by the states before it becomes a part of the Constitution.
For an amendment to be added to the Constitution, at least 3/4ths of the states must approve or ratify it. This means that 38 out of the 50 states must ratify the proposed amendment.
Learn more about ratification here:https://brainly.com/question/4954051
#SPJ1
Assignment for a Short Essay
The short essay allows you to present your thoughts and ideas on a political topic that interests you. You can conduct research and write an essay on any political topic of your choice. In your essay, you will identify an issue, explain why or how it is relevant to comparative politics, and explain why bringing it up in class is important. In 750 words, you must demonstrate that you have done research and make your case. Links and images can be used to illustrate your points, but they do not count towards your word count or improve your grade on their own. Your evaluation is based on your stated comprehension of your research.
Three questions for thought or reflection must be included in the essay. That is raised by the problem you have identified. These inquiries should appear at the end of your paper. Please follow the instructions and provide references to the topic.
Answer:
The Value of Minority Political Representation
In comparative politics, the subject of minority political representation has received substantial attention. It is crucial to guarantee that each person or group has an equal voice in decision-making. For the advancement of diversity, inclusion, and equality, there must be enough representation of minorities, particularly in elected entities. The social, economic, and political rights of marginalised groups may suffer as a result of their political underrepresentation. Consequently, the purpose of this article is to emphasise the significance of political representation of minorities in comparative politics as well as the significance of discussing this topic in class.
The encouragement of various viewpoints in decision-making processes is one of the key reasons why political representation of minorities is crucial. In a democracy, people are represented.
Also, minorities' political representation is essential for advancing social justice and equality. Minority groups have historically experienced marginalisation and exclusion from political power, including women, people of colour, and the LGBTQ+ community. Due to this exclusion, regulations and behaviours that promote discrimination have been developed. Minority political representation can encourage policies that address social inequalities and assist in removing these obstacles. For instance, more women being elected to political positions may result in laws that support women's rights, such as equal pay and access to contraception. Similar to this, the inclusion of people of colour in media can influence the development of anti-racial measures like criminal justice and police reform.
Also, the political representation of minorities can have a big
HELP QUICKLY PLEASE! 10+ POINTS!
What is a synthetic a priori judgement, according to Kant? Please explain and provide an example.
In Kantian philosophy, a synthetic a priori judgement is a type of statement that is both necessary and universal, but also adds new information to our understanding of the world. This type of judgement is different from analytic judgements, which are true by definition and do not add any new information to our understanding of the world.
According to Kant, synthetic a priori judgements are possible because they are based on innate concepts of the mind, which allow us to gain knowledge about the world without relying solely on experience. These innate concepts are what Kant calls the "categories," which provide the framework for our understanding of the world.
An example of a synthetic a priori judgement is "All events have a cause." This statement is necessary and universal, as it applies to all events, everywhere and at all times. However, it is also synthetic because it adds new information to our understanding of the world. We cannot know through pure reason alone that events have causes, as it is not a necessary truth like "all bachelors are unmarried." Instead, we must use experience to observe that events do indeed have causes, and then use reason to understand why this is the case.
Hope this helps!
Brainliest and a like is much appreciated!
Why did Washington not perticipate in the discussion of the Constitution?
Answer:
Further, Washington initially refused to attend because he suspected that he would be made the Convention's leader, and probably be proposed as the nation's first chief executive.
Explanation:
Which of the following is an action a president may take unilaterally?
Question 50 options:
a)
appoint cabinet members
b)
approve international treaties
c)
remove senators from office
d)
fire cabinet members
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Why might the values to the right represent less significant change compared to the values at the left?
Answer:
The values to the right represent less significant change compared to the values at the left because Less of a time period, the easy/cheap/fast solutions to pollution might have been used early on in the history of the EPA.
To be intensely loyal to a cause or a country, to be a fanatic about something, is that a good thing ( "man's best") or a bad thing ("man's worst")? Could it be both? How? Why?
Being intensely loyal to cause or a country can be both a good thing and a bad thing, depending on the context and the actions that stem from that loyalty.
What is loyalty?Loyalty is quality of being faithful and committed to someone or something. It involves a sense of allegiance and dedication, often motivated by a deep sense of respect, love, or obligation. Loyalty can be demonstrated in various ways, such as sticking by someone through thick and thin, defending their honor, keeping promises, or supporting their goals and values. It requires trust, honesty, and mutual understanding, and can be a source of strength and comfort in difficult times. Loyalty can be to a person, group, organization, or even a cause. Ultimately, loyalty reflects one's values and priorities and can shape their relationships and decisions in life.
To learn more about loyalty, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7039790
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP ME PLEASE I WILL MARK BRAIN LIST TO WHOEVER ANSWERS FIRST PLUS 15 POINTS
No plagiarizing, please. Read all of the "Letter from Birmingham Jail" Written by Dr.Marthen Luther Jr. And write 3 analytical paragraphs explaining two Littery devices he used to make his point. Make sure to include evidence
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from Birmingham Jail" is powerful piece of literature that uses several literary devices to convey its message.
What is literature?Literature is a broad term that encompasses written works of art, including novels, poems, plays, and essays. It serves as a reflection of society, culture, and the human experience, and allows us to explore different perspectives and emotions. Through literature, we can delve into the complexities of the human condition and gain insight into the world around us. It has the power to provoke thought, inspire empathy, and spark imagination. Literature can also be a form of entertainment, providing a means of escape or relaxation. Ultimately, literature is a vital part of our cultural heritage and an important tool for self-discovery and personal growth.
To learn more about literature, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29788683
#SPJ1
Ashoka the Great contributed to the spread of Buddhism by:
Explanation:
Ashoka the Great contributed significantly to the spread of Buddhism by promoting it throughout his empire and beyond. He was an Indian emperor of the Maurya Dynasty who ruled from 268 to 232 BCE. Ashoka was a fierce ruler, known for his military conquests, but after witnessing the devastation caused by his wars, he experienced a profound change of heart and converted to Buddhism.
Once he became a Buddhist, Ashoka worked tirelessly to promote Buddhist teachings throughout his vast empire. He sponsored the building of numerous Buddhist temples, monasteries, and stupas (dome-shaped structures that contain Buddhist relics or symbols) and sent missionaries to other countries to spread the faith. In fact, Ashoka's missionaries are credited with helping to establish Buddhism in many parts of Southeast Asia, including modern-day Sri Lanka and Myanmar.
Ashoka also promoted the values of nonviolence, compassion, and tolerance that are at the core of Buddhist teachings. He enacted a number of edicts, or laws, that encouraged peaceful coexistence among different religious and ethnic groups within his empire. For example, one edict reads, "All religions should reside everywhere, for all of them desire self-control and purity of heart." Another edict prohibits the killing of any animal on certain days, including holidays associated with different religions.
Through his efforts, Ashoka helped to make Buddhism a major world religion, with millions of followers throughout Asia and beyond. Today, he is remembered as one of the most influential figures in the history of Buddhism and a champion of peace, tolerance, and religious freedom.
Which of the following is NOT a way in which Richard Nixon tried to cover up links between the Watergate scandal and him?
A. Publish false news reports
B. Paying off the accused
C. Shredding documents
D. Citing national security constraints
B. Richard Nixon did not attempt to conceal connections between him and the Watergate scandal by compensating the accused.
Who was Richard Nixon ?President Richard M. Nixon's first objective was reconciliation. The nation was bitterly divided, and there was conflict overseas as well as turmoil in the cities. Nixon was successful in ending American combat in Viet Nam and improving relations with China and the USSR during his tenure as president. However, the nation was further divided by the Watergate scandal, which ultimately resulted in his resignation.
His 1968 election marked the end of a career that was unusual in two ways: his early success and return to politics after losing the races for governor of California and president in 1960 and 1962, respectively.
Nixon, who was born in 1913 in California, had a stellar academic record at Whittier College and Duke University Law School before entering the legal profession. He wed Patricia Ryan in 1940; Patricia (Tricia) and Julie were their two daughters. Nixon was a Navy lieutenant commander in the Pacific during World War II.
To learn more about World War II visit :
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ1
how did the enlightments theories of government view the role of government
Answer: D
Explanation:
Was the United States
Justified in Going to
War With Mexico?
EV
Answer: The United States was justified in going to war with Mexico. The cause of the war between the nations is the possession of Texas. Mexico's military had killed Americans on U.S. soil. Before, Mexico was an independent republic. This means it had a right to rule itself. Texas tried to become apart of the United States until Mexico interfered. Mexico tried preventing Texas from being annexed with the U.S. The United States had a right to go with war because they were protecting Texans' own choice on becoming apart of a country.
Complete the chart about the bill of rights.
2nd Amendment - Right to bear arms and 3rd Amendment - Protection from quartering of soldiers in private homes without the owner's consent.
What is Amendment?An amendment is a formal or official change made to a law, contract, constitution, or other legal document. It is based on the verb to amend, which means to change for the better. Amendments can add, remove, or update parts of these agreements. They are often used when it is better to change the document than to write a new one.
4th Amendment - Protection against unreasonable searches and seizures
5th Amendment - Right to due process, protection from self-incrimination, and just compensation for private property taken for public use.
To learn more about Amendment
https://brainly.com/question/7568569
#SPJ1
The Freedom of Information Act
Question 7 options:
a)
affirms the power of federal courts to subpoena agency records for civil and criminal cases.
b)
allows journalists and citizens to request most agency records.
c)
requires agencies to put all of their records and decision-making online.
d)
ensures that members of Congress have access to agency records.
Answer:
Answer:
b) The Freedom of Information Act allows journalists and citizens to request most agency records.
In which of the following countries are citizens unable to participate directly in elections for any part of the national legislature?
Nigeria
China
Great Britain
Russia