True or False? For policy to become enforceable, it only needs to be distributed, read, understood, and agreed to.

In this scenario, the bank that held the first mortgage would have the first lien on the property, meaning that they would have the first claim to any proceeds from the sale of the property to pay off the outstanding debt.

The lending company that held the second mortgage would have a secondary lien on the property, meaning that they would only be able to claim proceeds from the sale of the property after the first mortgage had been paid off in full. If the land was sold for less than the total amount owed on the mortgages, the bank would receive their portion of the proceeds first, up to the amount of the outstanding debt on the first mortgage. The lending company would then receive any remaining proceeds, up to the amount of the outstanding debt on the second mortgage. If there were still funds left over after paying off both mortgages, the remaining funds would go to the landowner. If the land was sold for more than the total amount owed on the mortgages, the bank would receive the full amount of their outstanding debt on the first mortgage, and the lending company would receive the full amount of their outstanding debt on the second mortgage. Any remaining funds would go to the landowner.

Learn more about property here:

https://brainly.com/question/29528698

#SPJ11

Answer: President Calvin Coolidge was known for his limited government philosophy and a belief in the importance of preserving individual liberties and states' rights. As a result, he generally opposed federal intervention in matters that he believed should be left to states and individuals to handle.

Coolidge believed that government should have a limited role in people's lives, and he was reluctant to use federal legislation to achieve social changes. He believed that such changes should be left to individuals and voluntary organizations rather than imposed by the government.

Moreover, during his presidency (1923-1929), the country experienced a period of economic prosperity and stability known as the "Roaring Twenties." As a result, Coolidge's focus was largely on maintaining this economic growth and stability, rather than enacting social reforms.

In summary, Coolidge's limited government philosophy, his belief in states' rights and individual liberties, and his focus on maintaining economic prosperity all contributed to his reluctance to use federal legislation to achieve social changes.

Answer:

60.7M adults (23.2 percent) volunteered 4.1B hours.

Note that skunks do not completely sleep, skunks enter at times of extreme cold or over the top snowfall a state called torpor.

Torpor may be a profound sleep that, like hibernation, moderates the digestion system down, brings down the body temperature and breathing and permits the skunk to outlive without being active.

In spite of the fact that skunks do not sleep, they can burrow in their dens during particularly cold spells. This implies you'd see them most some time recently and after long periods of snow cover. Late winter is additionally mating season for skunks and they have their youthful ordinarily in May or June.

Learn more about skunk from

https://brainly.com/question/14268184

#SPJ1

A. True Reviewing courts typically give great deference to the legal issues decided by an administrative agency as part of its quasi-judicial function.

A quasi-judicial function is a legal term that refers to a government agency's power to interpret and enforce laws and regulations through the conduct of administrative hearings or proceedings that resemble a courtroom process. A quasi-judicial function involves making decisions that affect the rights, privileges, or interests of individuals or organizations, based on the application of relevant laws, rules, and regulations. Unlike a purely administrative or executive function, a quasi-judicial function requires a fair and impartial decision-making process, adherence to due process requirements, and consideration of evidence and arguments presented by parties to the case. Examples of quasi-judicial functions include zoning board hearings, labor arbitration proceedings, and regulatory agency hearings.

Learn more about quasi-judicial function here:

https://brainly.com/question/31171215

#SPJ11

It suggests that a majority of defendants charged with a felony offense in the 75 largest counties in the United States rely on public defenders or other court-appointed counsel.

This may be due to a number of factors, including the high cost of private attorneys and the limited financial resources of many defendants. The use of public defenders and court-appointed counsel is a crucial aspect of the criminal justice system, as it helps to ensure that defendants receive legal representation even if they cannot afford to hire their own attorney. It suggests that a majority of defendants charged with a felony offense in the 75 largest counties in the United States rely on public defenders or other court-appointed counsel. However, there are concerns about the quality of representation provided by public defenders, as they often have large caseloads and limited resources, which can impact their ability to provide effective representation.

Learn more about counsel here:

https://brainly.com/question/19570707

#SPJ11

Answer:

Contracts containing conditions affecting the performance obligations of the parties are called conditional contracts.

Explanation:

A condition is a contractual provision that describes a future event or state of affairs that must occur before a party's performance obligations are triggered.

For example, let's say that you agree to sell your car to a buyer, but the sale is conditional upon the buyer securing financing for the purchase. In this case, the condition is that the buyer secures financing before the sale can proceed.

Conditions are important because they can impact the parties' rights and obligations under the contract. If a condition is not satisfied, the affected party may be relieved of its performance obligations, and the contract may be terminated. On the other hand, if the condition is satisfied, the parties will be required to perform under the terms of the contract.

There are different types of conditions, including precedent conditions (conditions that must be satisfied before a party's performance obligations are triggered) and subsequent conditions (conditions that can discharge a party's ongoing performance obligations).

Contracts containing conditions affecting the performance obligations of the parties are called conditional contracts. A conditional contract is a legally binding agreement that includes certain conditions or requirements that must be met in order for the parties to fulfill their obligations.

These conditions may relate to various aspects of the contract, such as payment terms, delivery schedules, quality standards, or other performance requirements.

For example, a conditional contract may stipulate that a certain payment must be made before a product is delivered, or that a particular service must be performed to a certain standard before payment is made. Similarly, a conditional contract may include provisions that specify the circumstances under which one or both parties may terminate the agreement, or the consequences of failing to meet certain performance obligations.

Conditional contracts are common in many different industries and are often used to help manage risk and ensure that both parties are protected in the event of unforeseen circumstances or changes in market conditions. By including specific conditions and requirements in the contract, the parties can minimize misunderstandings and disputes, and ensure that the contract is enforceable in a court of law if necessary.

Know more about Contracts here:

https://brainly.com/question/2669219

#SPJ11

Leased appliances may not be covered under a Condominium Commercial Unit-Owners Coverage Form.

Generally, a Condominium Commercial Unit-Owners Coverage Form provides coverage for the personal property owned by the commercial unit-owner and used in their business operations, including alterations, improvements, and fixtures. Leased appliances may not be covered under a Condominium Commercial Unit-Owners Coverage Form.  However, leased appliances are not owned by the commercial unit-owner and therefore may not be covered under this type of policy. It is important to carefully review the specific terms and conditions of any insurance policy to determine what is and is not covered.

Learn more about Commercial here:

https://brainly.com/question/13379893

#SPJ11

The speech pretending to be the President of the American Society of Criminology, a famous scholar with a major theory of your own right, delivering the annual Presidential keynote address is given below.

Dear esteemed colleagues and fellow scholars,

As President of the American Society of Criminology, I'm honored to address you. Having researched and developed a widely respected theory, my expertise in this field is well-established.

Today, I will discuss the future of criminology. Acknowledge progress in our field through expanding knowledge and interdisciplinary approaches to crime and criminal behavior. Still much work to be done.

Although psychology and sociology have contributed much to our comprehension of crime, I believe sociology should have a more prominent role in directing our path. Sociology offers a wider perspective, contextualizing crime within larger societal structures and dynamics.

Learn more about Criminology from

https://brainly.com/question/14317864

#SPJ1

It is important to critically evaluate biological theories of crime and consider other factors that may influence criminal behavior.

Early biological theories of crime can be critiqued on several grounds. Firstly, they rely on deterministic assumptions that individuals are biologically predisposed to criminal behavior, which fails to account for environmental and social factors that contribute to criminal behavior. Secondly, these theories often use flawed or biased research methods, such as small sample sizes, lack of control groups, and subjective interpretation of data, which undermines the validity of their findings. Thirdly, biological theories often perpetuate stereotypes and stigmatization of certain groups, such as those with mental illness or genetic predispositions, which can lead to discrimination and prejudice. Finally, biological theories may not account for the complexities of human behavior and may oversimplify the factors that contribute to criminal behavior.

Learn more about crime here:-

https://brainly.com/question/9997722

#SPJ11

True.A scintilla of evidence will support an agency's decision on a particular matter for purposed of appellate review.

The "scintilla of evidence" rule is a standard used by appellate courts to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support an administrative agency's decision. Under this standard, the agency's decision must be supported by at least a "scintilla" or a "mere trace" of evidence in the record.

This means that as long as there is some evidence in the administrative record to support the agency's decision, the court will generally defer to the agency's findings and conclusions. This deferential standard is based on the principle that administrative agencies are experts in their respective fields and are therefore in the best position to make factual determinations.

However, it is important to note that the scintilla of evidence standard is a relatively low bar and does not require the agency's decision to be based on substantial evidence or to be free from legal error.

Learn more about legal  here:

https://brainly.com/question/14994033

#SPJ11

Individuals with authorization and privileges to manage information within the organization are most likely to cause harm or damage by accident.

This is because these individuals have access to sensitive information and the responsibility to manage it properly. However, accidents can happen, and mistakes can be made, leading to unintentional harm or damage to the organization.

While individuals with intent or malice can certainly cause harm or damage, these situations are less common. An individual with intent may purposefully try to harm the organization, while an individual with malice may act with ill will or a desire for revenge. These situations are typically rare and may be the result of a personal grudge or other personal issues.

Negligence, on the other hand, may also be a factor in causing harm or damage to an organization. This occurs when an individual fails to take the necessary precautions or does not act responsibly in managing the organization's information. However, accidental incidents are more likely to occur due to a lack of training or knowledge, miscommunication, or other errors.

Overall, while individuals with authorization and privileges to manage information have a responsibility to protect the organization, they are also human and can make mistakes. Therefore, it is important for organizations to have proper training and policies in place to minimize the risk of accidental harm or damage.

Know more about accident here:

https://brainly.com/question/1235714

#SPJ11

False. If performance by a contracting party deviates only slightly from complete performance, a breach may not necessarily have occurred. Generally, the law recognizes that a slight deviation or a minor breach may not be material enough to justify terminating the contract or seeking damages.

Whether a deviation constitutes a breach depends on the terms of the contract and the circumstances of the particular case. In some cases, a contract may specify the level of performance required, such as a certain level of quality or quantity of goods or services. In other cases, the law may imply certain standards of performance, such as the duty of good faith and fair dealing, which require the parties to act in a manner consistent with the reasonable expectations of the other party. If a party fails to perform according to the terms of the contract or breaches a material provision, the non-breaching party may have remedies such as damages, specific performance, or termination of the contract. However, if the deviation from complete performance is minor and does not affect the essence of the contract or the intent of the parties, the non-breaching party may not be entitled to any remedies.

Learn more about performance here:

https://brainly.com/question/15466511

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:In a legal context, there are several elements that can cut off the liability of the defendant, depending on the type of case and the applicable laws. Here are a few examples:

Statute of limitations: This is a time limit set by law for filing a lawsuit. Once the statute of limitations has expired, the plaintiff can no longer sue the defendant, regardless of the merits of the case.

Contributory or comparative negligence: In some jurisdictions, if the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to their injury, the defendant may not be liable or may only be partially liable for damages.

Assumption of risk: If the plaintiff voluntarily engages in a dangerous activity or assumes a known risk, the defendant may not be liable for any resulting harm.

Consent: If the plaintiff consents to the defendant's actions, they may not be able to sue the defendant for any harm caused by those actions.

Lack of causation: In order to hold a defendant liable, the plaintiff must show that the defendant's actions caused their harm. If there is no causal link between the defendant's actions and the plaintiff's harm, the defendant may not be liable.

Answer:

Explanation:

The expert witness who would testify on previously broken bones of a victim is a Medical expert. Medical experts are professionals who have extensive knowledge and experience in the medical field and can provide expert opinions on medical issues related to a particular case. In this case, the medical expert would examine the victim's medical records, x-rays, and other relevant medical information to determine the nature and extent of the injuries sustained by the victim, including the previously broken bones. They would then provide expert testimony in court to explain their findings and opinions to the judge and jury.

The factor for evaluating insurance options that is related to the type of job you have is D. Occupation.

The nature of your profession can significantly impact the amount and level of insurance coverage that you might require. Suppose, for instance, you are employed in a precarious field such as construction. In that case, you may necessitate more inclusive insurance coverage to safeguard against potential job-related injuries.

Conversely, if your vocation is primarily sedentary, like working in an office setting, while requiring less insurance for work-connected injuries, you may still need more comprehensive coverage for irreversible disabilities or life-threatening illnesses.

Find out more on occupation at https://brainly.com/question/31543591

#SPJ1

Vacant land adjustments have to be made for differences in size, location, and other factors.

When comparing vacant land parcels for valuation or appraisal purposes, it is essential to adjust for differences in various aspects. Some common factors that require adjustments include:
1. Size: Larger or smaller parcels of land may have different values per square foot or acre, so adjustments need to be made to ensure a fair comparison.
2. Location: The value of land can be heavily influenced by its location, such as proximity to amenities, access to transportation, and surrounding development patterns. Therefore, adjustments should be made to account for these differences.
3. Topography: The physical characteristics of the land, such as slope, soil type, and drainage, can impact its value and development potential. Adjustments may be necessary to account for these variations.
4. Zoning and land use restrictions: Different zoning regulations and land use restrictions can significantly impact the value of a parcel of land. Adjustments need to be made to account for these differences when comparing parcels.
5. Utilities and infrastructure: The availability of utilities (water, sewer, electricity, etc.) and access to infrastructure (roads, bridges, etc.) can affect the value of vacant land. Adjustments should be made to account for these differences.
Vacant land adjustments are crucial in accurately assessing the value of land parcels for various purposes, such as real estate transactions or property taxes. These adjustments ensure a fair comparison between parcels by accounting for differences in size, location, and other factors.

For more information on Vacant land adjustments kindly visit to

https://brainly.com/question/14415858

#SPJ11

When OCM and Patty entered into a contract for landscaping, it was assumed that Patty would complete the work by Friday.

However, if Patty's schedule conflicts, it is her responsibility to inform OCM and seek their approval to assign the task to someone else. In this case, Patty asked Rochelle to complete the landscaping task, which was not agreed upon by OCM. Therefore, OCM has the right to either approve or reject the substitution.

If OCM approves the substitution, Patty is still responsible for ensuring that Rochelle is capable of completing the task to the required standard, and OCM can hold Patty accountable for any errors made by Rochelle.

It's always best to communicate with your clients and seek their approval before making any changes to the agreed-upon contract terms.

To know more about landscaping visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29041544

#SPJ11

In order to establish a prima facie case of employment discrimination under Title VII, Cody must show that he is a member of a protected class, which in this case is gender.

The Latin phrase "prima facie" means "at first glance" or "based on first impression." At first face or at first appearance, from the feminine forms of primus and facies, both in the ablative case, would be the literal translation. If there is no objection, prima facie evidence in jurisprudence suffices to establish the fact. For instance, it is prima facie evidence of misconduct on the side of the train company when buildings are set on fire by sparks from a train engine passing by the road. Prima facie case: The following criteria must be met: (i) the applicant must be a member of a protected class; (ii) the applicant must be qualified for the position; (iii) the applicant's application must be denied; and (iv) the position must have remained open following the rejection. 505–507 in Hicks, 509 U.S.

As a corporation, Delta is prohibited from discriminating against employees on the basis of gender or any other protected class. Cody does not need to show that Delta has no legal defenses or that other firms in the industry have committed discriminatory acts, but he does need to demonstrate that discriminatory intent motivated Delta's actions.

To learn more about Prima Facie, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30672837

#SPJ11

Answer:

arbitrary and capricious standard

Explanation:

When an administrative agency's decision is appealed, the most typical standard of review is the "arbitrary and capricious" standard. This means that the reviewing court will defer to the agency's decision as long as it is not arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion, and as long as the agency has followed the proper procedures and considered all relevant factors in making its decision. In other words, the reviewing court will not substitute its own judgment for that of the agency, but will only review the agency's decision-making process to ensure that it was rational and reasonable.

Administrative agency's are government bodies created to regulate and oversee specific areas of policy, such as the environment, labor, or finance. They have the power to create and enforce regulations and policies.

When an administrative agency's decision is appealed, the most typical standard of review is "deferential" or "arbitrary and capricious." This means that the reviewing court will give a high degree of deference to the agency's decision and will only overturn it if it was made without rational basis or if it was contrary to law. However, if the appeal raises a constitutional issue, the court will apply a "strict scrutiny" standard and will only uphold the agency's decision if it is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest.



Learn more about administrative agency's here:

https://brainly.com/question/28274991

#SPJ11

Both Louis and Al are engaged in illegal activities and could face criminal charges. Louis may be charged with solicitation of arson and Al may be charged with attempted arson.

Louis's offer to Al to burn down the buildings is illegal and can result in criminal charges for both of them.

Al's attempt to set fire to the buildings is also a criminal offense and can result in charges of arson.

Louis cannot sue Al to recover the $5,000 because their agreement is illegal and against public policy.

If Al suffers any harm or damage as a result of the illegal agreement with Louis, he may not be able to seek legal remedies for those damages.

Louis's refusal to pay Al is not legally justified because he is equally responsible for the illegal agreement.

The fact that the fire department intervened and prevented the buildings from being completely destroyed does not absolve Al of his criminal liability for attempting to commit arson.

Louis's actions have contributed to the ongoing illegal activity of drug dealers and homeless people living in the buildings, and he may be liable for any harm or damages caused by their continued presence.

Louis should take legal measures to properly secure and maintain his properties to prevent unlawful entry and use by others.

Individuals should not take the law into their own hands or engage in illegal activities to address social problems. Instead, they should work with law enforcement and other legal channels to address such issues.

Learn more about intervened here:

https://brainly.com/question/28013399

#SPJ11

b. false Judicial oversight does not make it permissible for the charging officer and the hearing officer to be the same person, as this can create a conflict of interest and undermine the fairness of the proceedings.

A charging officer is a legal professional who is responsible for reviewing evidence in criminal cases and deciding whether or not to file charges against a defendant. In the United States, charging officers are typically employed by the government, such as district attorneys or attorneys general, and they have significant discretion in determining which charges to file based on the strength of the evidence and the public interest in prosecution. The charging officer's primary duty is to ensure that the charges filed are legally sound and supported by sufficient evidence to establish probable cause. The charging officer may also be involved in negotiating plea bargains, dismissing charges, or presenting evidence at trial. Overall, the role of the charging officer is critical in the criminal justice system, as they play a key role in determining which cases proceed to trial and which defendants face criminal charges.

Learn more about charging officer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30892405

#SPJ11



state sanitary code            

In Massachusetts, the law that requires landlords to provide a clean and safe environment for tenants is the State Sanitary Code.

This code sets specific standards for things like heating, plumbing, ventilation, and pest control that landlords must adhere to in order to ensure their rental properties are safe and habitable for tenants. Landlords are responsible for maintaining their properties to these standards and can be held liable for any injuries or health issues that arise due to their failure to do so.

The state sanitary code, also known as 05 CMR 410, establishes the criteria used to evaluate shelter in the Commonwealth. The phrase's full name is "Minimum Standards of Fitness for Human Habitation." The state's sanitary code should be followed by all residents. Throughout the duration of your lease, you have the right to a safe and livable home. Tenants and the general public are protected by the State Sanitary Code from harm to their health, safety, and well-being. The Code is enforced by your local Board of Health in the city or town where you are renting.

To learn more about State Sanitary Code, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/21745998

#SPJ11

Answer:

Hilda is known as the "assignor" and George is the "assignee".

Explanation:

Hilda is known as the assignor and George is known as the assignee. In a contract, the party who transfers the rights to a third party is called the assignor.

And the party to whom the rights are transferred is called the assignee. The assignor essentially hands over their rights and obligations under the contract to the assignee. This means that the assignee steps into the shoes of the assignor and has the right to enforce the terms of the contract against the other party, and to receive the benefits and fulfill the obligations under the contract. The assignor, however, typically remains liable to the other party for performance of the contract, unless there is a novation (i.e., a new contract) that releases them from liability.

Learn more about obligations here:

https://brainly.com/question/29437673

#SPJ11

The best alternative is D. If a food employee has an infected open wound, the food manager must exclude the employee from working until a letter from a doctor is received.

This is because an infected wound can potentially contaminate the food being prepared, posing a health risk to consumers. The employee must not be allowed to work with any food until they have been cleared by a medical professional. This precaution ensures the safety and well-being of both the employee and the customers. In conclusion, it is the responsibility of the food manager to take immediate action and follow proper protocols to prevent any potential health hazards in the workplace. Restrict the employee from working with the open food.

to know about wound infection visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10143620

#SPJ11

Under ordinary circumstances, a party's duty to perform a promise agreed to in a contract may be changed to a different promise, but it is not necessarily easy to do so.

A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties, and any changes to that agreement must be made with the agreement of all parties involved. This means that changing a promise in a contract may require negotiations, modifications to the contract, and the consent of all parties.

In some cases, contracts may include provisions for modifying the agreement, such as clauses that allow for changes to be made with the consent of all parties. However, even in these cases, it may not be easy to make changes, as negotiations and discussions may still be required to come to an agreement.

Furthermore, changing a promise in a contract can have legal implications, and parties should be careful to ensure that any changes made are done so in accordance with the law and with the advice of legal counsel if necessary. Overall, while it is possible to change a promise in a contract, it is not necessarily an easy process, and parties should proceed with caution to ensure that any changes are made in a legally binding and enforceable manner.

Know more about contract here;

https://brainly.com/question/2669219

#SPJ11

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) establishes the rulemaking procedures for federal administrative agencies, and all agencies are required to follow these procedures. However, agencies may also have their own rules and regulations that they must follow in addition to the APA.

a. true All federal administrative agencies are governed by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), in addition to their own rules and regulations.

Federal administrative refers to the branch of government responsible for implementing and enforcing laws and policies at the federal level. It includes various agencies, departments, and other organizations that are responsible for carrying out a wide range of activities, such as regulation, oversight, and providing services to the public. The federal administrative system is designed to be a neutral and impartial entity that operates independently from political influence or bias. Its primary goal is to ensure that federal laws are enforced in a fair and consistent manner, and that the interests of the public are protected and promoted.

Learn more about federal administrative here:

https://brainly.com/question/18097732

#SPJ11

The term that refers to doctrines proclaimed as absolute true by religious institutions is "dogma".

Dogma refers to a set of principles or beliefs that are considered to be fundamental or essential to a particular religion or belief system. These beliefs are often presented as absolute truths that are not open to terms refers to doctrines proclaimed as absolutely true by religions institutions question or debate, and they may be enshrined in religious texts, creeds, or traditions. Dogma plays an important role in many religions, providing a framework for understanding the world and guiding ethical and moral behavior. However, the concept of dogma can also be controversial, as it may be seen as stifling intellectual inquiry or limiting individual freedom of thought and expression.

Learn more about absolute here:

https://brainly.com/question/13195054

#SPJ11

Appellate review of an administrative agency decision will result in affirmance of the agency's decision if the record shows that the decision was based upon substantial evidence, a reasonable interpretation of the law, and adherence to the appropriate procedures.

Substantial evidence and proper application of the law by the agency. In other words, if the appellate court determines that the agency's decision was supported by enough relevant and reliable evidence and was made in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations, then it will result in an affirmance of the agency's decision.

learn more about Appellate review here: brainly.com/question/30962544

#SPJ11

True. An agency decision is carpricious if changes a precedent established by past agency decisions and is based on no prior agency policy or rule and is irrational.

A decision by an administrative agency can be considered capricious if it is found to be arbitrary, unreasonable, or unsupported by any valid legal or factual basis.

Specifically, a decision may be considered capricious if it goes against precedent established by past agency decisions and lacks any prior agency policy or rule, or if it is based on irrational or illogical reasoning. Capricious agency decisions are subject to review by the courts, which may overturn or modify the decision if it is found to be arbitrary or capricious.

The capriciousness standard is an important check on the power of administrative agencies, which have broad discretion to interpret and enforce laws and regulations. By ensuring that agency decisions are based on sound legal and factual reasoning, the capriciousness standard helps to promote accountability, fairness, and transparency in the administrative process. It also helps to protect the rights of individuals and businesses who may be affected by agency decisions.

Learn more about businesses here:

https://brainly.com/question/15826604

#SPJ11