Even with a BAC as low as 0.02%, it becomes more difficult to coordinate the eyes, feet and hands as a cohesive unit. Thus, the given statement is true.
What are the effects of a 0.02% BAC?Alcohol affects every organ in your body and is a central nervous system depressive (it lessens stimulation in your central nervous system). You could feel relaxed, change your mood, and have a little lack of judgment at this proportion. BAC 0.05%: You could feel unconstrained, be less awake, and have poorer judgment at this level. Alcohol can cause some people to get tolerant of it.
This implies that individuals might not experience the same physical and psychological side effects of alcohol use as they did in the past. Their blood alcohol content (BAC) is not always lower. It simply implies that people react to alcohol in a different ways. You may obtain the results of the BAC test within a few hours to several business days, depending on the cause of the test.
Learn more about alcohol, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28448244
#SPJ5
A.D.A. vs. Prosecutor ---Same, similar or different-Explain
Public prosecutors, state's attorneys, and prosecuting attorneys are other terms for district attorneys.
A United States Attorney holds the equivalent post in the federal government. The prosecutor who presents evidence against the defendant in front of the jury is known as the ADA. When the DA's Office receives a criminal case, the DA assigns it to one of the ADAs, who will subsequently gather evidence and oversee further case processes.
Advocate, Counselor, Counselor-at-Law, Attorney, Attorney-at-Law, Counselor, Unlike attorneys, who can be hired by anybody (even the government), the district attorney only represents the government and is only charged with one task: bringing criminal offenders before the court on the government's behalf. a prosecutor. A prosecutor is a lawyer who represents the state or the government and is in charge of initiating legal action as well as establishing in court that the defendant committed the alleged crime. A defense lawyer is a prosecutor's opposite.
Learn more about state's attorneys hear :
https://brainly.com/question/12057544
#SPJ9
Who would have had to follow the precedent
if the case had been decided by a judge in a
state supreme court?
Answer:
Lower courts
Explanation:
I'm assuming you are taking government. I suffered through government last year. So, ik
mary, a citizen of alaska, has put up a web site about her use of over the counter drugs to lose weight. the web site merely posted information and has no interactive capbalities. sarah, a citizen of indiana, looks at the site on her computer in indiana and without contacting her doctor takes the same over the counter drugs and gets sick. she decides to sue mary. the proper jurisdiction for this case is:
The proper jurisdiction for this case is "Minimum contacts".
The defendant has engaged in at least a small but significant amount of activity that qualifies as "minimum contacts" in the state where the lawsuit was filed. The "minimum contacts" requirement generally means that a defendant must have a sufficient connection to the state in which a case has been filed for a judge to conclude that the state has the right to exercise power over the defendant. A judge is likely to conclude that "minimum contacts" exist if a company with its headquarters in another state sends mail order catalogs into the state where the suit is filed, does business with paid subscribers, or accepts online orders from customers in the state where the case is filed.
Learn more about "minimum contacts"-
https://brainly.com/question/10260455
#SPJ4
What was the first major supreme court decision to define the relationship between the federal and state governments?.
Answer:
McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that defined the scope of the U.S. Congress's legislative power and how it relates to the powers of American state legislatures. The dispute in McCulloch involved the legality of the national bank and a tax that the state of Maryland imposed on it. In its ruling, the Supreme Court established firstly that the "Necessary and Proper" Clause of the U.S. Constitution gives the U.S. federal government certain implied powers that are not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution, and secondly that the American federal government is supreme over the states, and so states' ability to interfere with the federal government is restricted.
The court determined that the federal government had the right and power to establish a federal bank and that states lacked the ability to tax the federal government. Marshall arrived at the judgment that "the power to tax includes the right to destroy" after the Federal Government prevailed in the case.
The shared governance system between the federal and state governments is referred to as federalism. It is easier to understand how the states and the federal government negotiate the balance of power because they each have both exclusive and concurrent powers. The U.S. Constitution grants only a limited number of powers to the federal government, leaving all remaining powers in the hands of the states. Local governments are established by state governments, who also give them some authority inside their borders. Federalism restricts the scope of government by dividing it into two sovereign powers the federal government and the state governments—and limiting the influence of each. The separation of powers pits one arm of the government against another, assigns each branch specific duties, and calls for them to share power, all of which create internal restraints.
Know more about the federal government:
https://brainly.com/question/371257
#SPJ4
What is a putative marriage
A putative marriage is an apparently valid marriage performed in good faith on the part of at least one of the spouses but is legally invalid due to a technical impediment, such as a pre-existing marriage of one party.
The term "putative marriage", as used in this article, means an authentic marriage by a person claiming to be a hypothetical spouse, null and void by reason of impediment. this person did not know but still existed at that time. of trying to get married.
A putative marriage can be a hypothetical marriage. Presumptive marriage has some consequences for civil marriage. For the nullity of marriage hypothesis, one or both parties must let go of what made their marriage null and void.
Learn more about putative marriage here: https://brainly.com/question/9275150
#SPJ9
Formal authority is
A. an established organization, especially one providing a public service.
B. the ability to cause others to behave as they might not otherwise choose
to do.
C. the legal right or power to give orders and enforce rules.
the process and method of making decisions for groups.
Answer: C. the legal right or power to give orders and enforce rules.
Explanation:
Formal authority is the power that is given to a leader by an organization.
the court will suspend, restrict, delay or revoke your driving privileges for one year if you are convicted of being a habitual truant from school.
'The court will suspend, restrict, delay or revoke your driving privileges for one year if you are convicted of being a habitual truant from school.
This statement is True.
Habitual behavior is defined as behavior that occurs automatically in the presence of a target. H. A direct goal-action connection, not preceded by a consciously developed intention.
The definition of addictive is by habit. An example of a habit used as an adjective is the phrase "habitual walk," meaning someone goes for a walk every day.
Habit learning is the process of creating systematic habits designed to facilitate learning. Instead of relying on the fallacy that you have to go to school to learn anything, learn through books, online courses, mentors, and most importantly experimentation.
Learn more about habitual https://brainly.com/question/27369710
#SPJ4
if alabama passes a statute specifically permitting high school girls to try out for and play on varsity high school football teams if qualified, that statute would be reviewed using
The statute would be reviewed using intermediate scrutiny. Maintaining sexual equality is a policy that is crucial to the achievement of a governmental goal and is subject to intermediate scrutiny.
More about intermediate scrutiny:
The 2nd degree of deciding matters through judicial process is known as intermediate scrutiny in American constitutional law. The remaining categories are often referred to as stringent scrutiny and rational basis review.
The law or policy being contested must be proven to serve an important government interest using methods that are closely related to that purpose in order to pass the intermediate scrutiny test.
Learn more about intermediate scrutiny here:
https://brainly.com/question/28266959
#SPJ4
an example of a treaty automatically creating legal rights in the courts of a signatory state includes:
An example of a treaty automatically creating legal rights in the courts of a signatory state includes: Montreal Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air.
The Montreal convention is a multilateral treaty adopted with the aid of a diplomatic meeting of ICAO member states in 1999. It amended important provisions of the Warsaw convention's regime concerning reimbursement for the victims of air failures.
What is the motive of the Montreal convention?
The primary targets of the Montreal convention are to offer for equitable repayment for demise or harm to passengers, and damage to luggage and load, that occur in worldwide air carriage. To facilitate the green operation of global carriage by way of air of passengers, baggage and cargo.
Who does the Montreal convention practice to?
The Montreal convention applies to all international flights between nations and territories that honor the regulation. Currently, over a hundred thirty five nations and territories abide by way of the Montreal convention. All member states of the European Union and the general public of the UN member states recognize the convention.
Learn more about Montreal convention here:- https://brainly.com/question/27936767
#SPJ4
Vinny decides to sue allison. To begin the suit, vinny must file a complaint. A complaint should contain.
Vinny decides to sue Allison. To begin the suit, Vinny must file a complaint. A complaint should contain a statement of the basis for the court's jurisdiction.
A lawsuit is a civil prison action by means of one individual or entity (the plaintiff) towards any other individual or entity (the defendant), to be determined in a court docket. Relying on the remedy sought and the venue in which the plaintiff files the lawsuit, the case might be heard through a court of law or a courtroom of fairness.
The term sue means to take felony movement against a person or an agency, in particular by using asking in court docket for them to pay you cash due to harm that they have got caused you: sue for sth he is suing for £2.5m in damages for unfair dismissal.
Jurisdiction is the felony time period for the legal authority granted to a felony entity to enact justice. In federations just like the U.S.A., areas of jurisdiction follow nearby, national, and federal stages. The 3 foremost sorts of jurisdiction are referred to as territorial, personal, and problem rely on. The geo-political levels of jurisdiction are often divided into a nearby, nation, national, and global stages. Figuring out jurisdiction enables defining how a case will be attempted, and at what stage of the courts.
Learn more about Jurisdiction here brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
which scenario best illustrates the events that occur during an arraignment? a. shortly after being arrested for armed robbery, jenny is brought before a magistrate, who tells her the charges against her. b. lizzie has been arrested for murder. the prosecutor presents evidence to the judge in an effort to show that there is probable cause to continue the justice process. c. salma, who has been charged with burglary, is asked to enter a plea. d. jackie, a prosecutor, files a document with the court to continue the case against the defendant.
The scenario that best illustrates the events is "shortly after being arrested for armed robbery, jenny is brought before a magistrate, who tells her the charges against her".
The arraignment is your first appearance in court and the filing of formal charges against you. You will appear before a judge with your attorney at this brief hearing, which must take place as soon as possible following your arrest. The judge will confirm that you are the person charged with the offence, that you are aware of the crime, and that you have entered a plea of guilty, not guilty, or no contest.At the arraignment, almost all accused pleaded not guilty. This allows their lawyer additional time to prepare their case, even if they intend to plead guilty later. If a defendant enters a guilty plea during the arraignment, they will be sentenced immediately.Thus this is the meaning of the arraignment.
To learn more about the arraignment, refer: https://brainly.com/question/14919926
#SPJ4
Answer: Its c
Explanation:
Salma who has been charged with burglary..
because during this process, defendants stand before the judge to hear information against them then asked to enter a plea
HURRY
Privatized prisons may be more likely to experience assaults between prisoners and guards and or jail brakes because
Privatized prisons may be more likely to experience assaults between prisoners and guards and or jail brakes because he advantages of private prisons encompass lower working fee, controlling the populace of prisoners, and the advent of jobs in the network. The negative aspects of private prisons consist of a loss of value-effectiveness, a loss of safety and protection issues, bad situations, and the ability for corruption.
Privatizing prisons can lessen prison overpopulation, making the facilities more secure for inmates and employees. private prisons can remodel the broken government-run jail machine. Non-public prisons provide revolutionary packages to lower the costs of re-imprisonment.
The principle distinction between the 2 varieties of prisons comes right down to cash. Each for-income facility or organization houses individuals who violated the law. They may be run by means of non-public, 0.33-celebration businesses as opposed to the nation government, who runs conventional public prison.
Learn more about prisons here: https://brainly.com/question/28081510
#SPJ9
the doctrine of precedent is a basic principle of the common law system that requires a court to follow a previous decision of that court or a higher court in the jurisdiction when the current decision involves issues and key facts similar to those involved in the previous decision.
The statement is False. The doctrine of precedent is a basic principle of the common law system that requires a court to follow a previous decision of that court or a higher court in the jurisdiction when the current decision involves issues and key facts similar to those involved in the previous decision.
The primary means of the time period doctrine is “coaching.” Christian doctrine, thus, is the try and state in intellectually responsible phrases the message of the gospel and the content material of the religion it elicits.
Church doctrine - the written frame of teachings of a spiritual institution that might be commonly usual with the aid of that institution. spiritual doctrine, creed, gospel. unique sin - a sin said to be inherited via all descendants of Adam; "Adam and Eve devoted the unique sin when they ate the forbidden fruit within the lawn of Eden".
Doctrine consists of fundamental, unchanging truths of the gospel of Jesus Christ. A principle is an enduring reality or rule that individuals can adopt to guide them in making decisions. A few doctrines and principles are said without a doubt and openly inside the scripture text, whilst others are best implied.
Learn more about doctrine here https://brainly.com/question/1387240
#SPJ4
__?_enforces legal rights and duties
Answer:
Attorney General
Explanation:
Under which type of arrangement do lawyers receive a percentage of the amount recovered by winning or settling a case?.
Under contingency fee, lawyers receive a percentage of the amount recovered by winning or settling a case.
Under a contingency-fee association, the lawyer gets a percentage of the amount recovered via prevailing or settling a case. Contingency-charge arrangements are regularly utilized in automobile coincidence court cases, clinical malpractice claims, product legal responsibility lawsuits, and different private damage proceedings.
In a contingent fee arrangement, the attorney agrees to simply accept a set percent (regularly 1-3rd to forty percent) of the healing, that's the quantity finally paid to the client. In case you win the case, the attorney's charge comes out of the money provided to you.
A contingency fee is a form of price to an attorney for their criminal offerings. In contrast to a fixed hourly charge, in a contingent price association legal professionals get hold of a percent of the monetary amount that their purchaser gets once they win or settle the case.
Learn more about contingency fee here brainly.com/question/15739955
#SPJ4
The _______ prohibits price discrimination in sales to wholesalers, retailers, or other producers.
The Robinson-Patman Act prohibits price discrimination in sales to wholesalers, retailers, or other producers.
The Robinson-Putman Act of 1936 (or Anti-Price Discrimination Act, Pub. L. No. 74-692, 49 Stat. 1526 prohibits anticompetitive conduct by manufacturers It is a U.S. federal law that , especially price discrimination. Senator Joseph T. It was designed by Rep. Robinson (D-Arkansas) and Rep. Wright Patman (D-Texas) to protect small retail businesses from competition from chain stores by setting minimum prices for retail products.
Specifically, the law Robinson-Putman Act prohibits suppliers, wholesalers, or manufacturers from supplying goods at discounted prices to "preferred customers." We also avoid forcing suppliers to limit who they can sell their products to and who they cannot sell to.
Learn more about Robinson-Patman Act https://brainly.com/question/15713233
#SPJ4
a statue enacted by the wyoming state legislature to regulate trucking affects interstate commerce. in evaluating this statute, the courts will weight the burden that it imposes on interstate cmmerence against
The legislative branch of government is accountable for making legal guidelines within a rustic. Legislatures are made of people referred to as legislators who, in democracies, are elected with the aid of the united states' populace.
Their powers can also include passing legal guidelines, setting up the authorities' finances, confirming executive appointments, ratifying treaties, investigating the executive department, impeaching and casting off from workplace participants of the government and judiciary, and redressing components' grievances.
The Legislative meeting has four primary roles: to symbolize the people; to form the executive government for brand spanking new South Wales; to legislate, and to approve the government's request for cash.
A state is a legislative branch or body of a political subdivision in a federal gadget. two federations literally use the time period "state legislature": The legislative branches of each of the fifty nation governments of us are known as state legislatures.
Learn more about legislature here:
https://brainly.com/question/809346
#SPJ4
sharps safety devices such as safety lancets and needleless iv sets are for your protection and use is required by law.
Sharps safety devices such as safety lancets and needleless iv sets are for your protection and use is required by law.
The statement is true.
A safety device is a piece of equipment together with a hearth extinguisher, protection belt, or burglar alarm that reduces loss or damage from a hearth, coincidence, or spoil-in.
A safety device approaches a device, interlock or system that stops the entry of any portion of an man or woman's frame into the number one x-ray beam or that reasons the beam to close off upon access into its direction.
Common protection equipment in many offices incorporates of gloves, protection helmets, glasses/goggles, safety boots, hearing protectors, respirators, and high-visibility clothing like reflector jackets which are worn generally in production sites.
Learn more about safety device here: https://brainly.com/question/26386412
#SPJ4
Your question is incomplete. Please read below to find the missing content.
sharps safety devices such as safety lancets and needleless iv sets are for your protection and use is required by law.
True or false
The u. S. Supreme court case, cherokee nation v. Georgia ruled that the cherokee native americans did not meet what?.
The Supreme Court's refusal to acknowledge jurisdiction in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia meant that the Cherokee Nation did not have legal recourse against Georgia laws that sought to force them off their land.
A person or entity that has judicial powers to hear and resolve court (also called tribunal), civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military disputes. An example of a dish is a street without a walk-through. A Court of Justice is a building or room where trials are held and decisions are made by judges. A court example is when someone asserts his or her claim for a traffic violation.
The court will decide what really happened and what to do about it. They decide whether a person has committed a crime and what punishment should be given. It also provides a way for people to peacefully resolve private disputes that they cannot resolve on their own.
Learn more about Court here
https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ4
Topic: Should gun control be tightened?
1. Does the historical evidence support the conclusion that the second amendment phone to the right of individuals to possess firearms?
Answer: Gun control should be be tightened depending on the individual, area, and motives.
Explanation: The 2nd amendment proclaims the right to keep and bear arms. This amendment shall not be infringed.
why is the uniform crime report important?
For use by law enforcement, the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program produces accurate information. Additionally, it offers information to the general public, the media, scholars, and criminal justice students. Since 1930, the program has been producing crime statistics.
If you do report the incident, there is a greater chance that the offender will be apprehended and prevented from harming someone else in the future. Your neighbourhood victim services program can assist you and provide support if you wish to talk to someone before you take this action.
Over 18,000 law enforcement agencies participate in the Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR), a voluntary, national statistical endeavour that collects data on crimes that come to their attention.
The UCR Program of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) receives the crime data, as does a state UCR program.
Learn more about Uniform Crime Reporting here:
https://brainly.com/question/14450134
#SPJ9
What does the doctrine of comparative advantage means
Comparative advantage is the ability of an economy to produce a particular good or service at a lower opportunity cost than its trading counterparts. The theory of comparative advantage introduces opportunity cost as an analytic factor in choosing between different production alternatives.
comparative advantage, economic theory, was first developed by 19th-century British economist David Ricardo, who attributed the causes and benefits of international trade to differences in the relative opportunity cost (cost per other abandoned good) of producing the same good across countries.
The advantage of comparative advantage is the ability to produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost. A comparative advantage gives companies the ability to sell goods and services at lower prices than their competitors, resulting in higher profit margins and greater profits.
Learn more about comparative advantage here: https://brainly.com/question/14846093
#SPJ9
to establish res ipsa loquitur in most states, the plaintiff must demonstrate all but which of the following?
To establish res ipsa loquitur in most states, the plaintiff must demonstrate all but there is no requirement of direct evidence of the defendant's lack of due care.
Res ipsa loquitur is a doctrine within the Anglo-American not unusual regulation and Roman-Dutch regulation that announces in a tort or civil lawsuit a court docket can infer negligence from the very nature of a coincidence or damage in the absence of direct evidence on how any defendant behaved.
Under res ipsa loquitur doctrine, the plaintiff needs to reveal:
The harm more often than not could no longer arise within the absence of negligenceThe plaintiff or any other third party had no position in causing the damageThe defendant had different management of the element that triggered the damage.Various examples of res ipsa loquitur consist of the following: a piano falling from a window and touchdown on a character, a barrel falling from a skyscraper and harming someone below, a sponge left interior a patient following a surgical operation or the carcass of an animal is observed inner a meals can.
Learn more about res ipsa loquitur here brainly.com/question/12177938
#SPJ4
To help manage risk, it is essential that you blank
avoid overhead signs
remain alert to conditions or objects
avoid advance channelization
recognize signal backplates
that can increase levels of risk
To help manage risk, it is essential that you remain Alert to Conditions or Objects. Option B
This is further explained below.
What is risk management?Generally, Risk management is the process of identifying, evaluating, and prioritizing risks, followed by the coordinated and cost-effective application of resources to minimize, monitor, and control the probability of unfavorable events or the impact those events will have, or to maximize the potential for the realization of opportunities.
In conclusion, It is necessary that you Maintain Constant Vigilance Regarding Conditions or Objects in Order to Assist with Risk Management.
Read more about risk management
https://brainly.com/question/4680937
#SPJ1
Ralph is a seller of antique books. Marc is a collector of such books. Marc goes to Ralph's store and sees a vintage collection of Harry Potter books. Marc offers Ralph $1,000 for the collection. Ralph declines, but counteroffers with $1500. Desperate, Marc agrees to this price and pays a $200 security deposit for Ralph to retain the books for 1 week until Marc can gain the remaining money. If Marc doesn't show up with the money, Ralph keeps the $200. On the 6th day, Marc shows up with the remaining $1300 and is ready to take ownership of the Harry Potter books. Ralph grows sentimental of his collection, and declines to sell to Marc. Ralph wants to return the $200 security deposit to Marc, but Marc insists they have a contract. Do they have a contract?
Yes, Ralph and Marc they both have a contract.
Is Ralph required to sell Marc the collection?Ans. Since they have an agreement to buy the books at the agreed-upon price and Marc has provided a little advance payment for the booking, Ralph cannot refuse to sell Marc the collection.
What would happen if Ralph refused to change his mind?Ans. If Marc and Ralph have a contract and Ralph continues to refuse, Marc may file a complaint. Since the contract cannot be revoked once it has been signed with both parties' permission. and it can fight for the purpose as a security tool.
To Know more about payment
https://brainly.com/question/15138283
#SPJ9
4. Topic: should gun control be tightened
What did the court case District of Colombia v. Heller determine? Why is this significant regarding the 2nd amendment?
Answer:
The Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller was a landmark case that determined that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. This case is significant in regards to the Second Amendment because it affirms that the right to bear arms is an individual right, and not just a right that pertains to militias.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Which one of these word is not a sign of intoxication clumsiness slurred speech aggression coherent statement
Answer: Good Morning
Explanation: If someone says good morning I do not automatically think they are intoxicated.
all contracts which have for their object, directly or indirectly, to exempt any one from responsibility for his own fraud, or willful injury to the person or property of another, or violation of law, whether willful or negligent, are against the policy of the law.
This statement is true as per the California Civil Code, All contracts which have for their object, directly or indirectly, to exempt any one from responsibility for his own fraud, or willful injury to the person or property of another, or violation of law, whether willful or negligent, are against the policy of the law.
The California Civil Code is a set of statutes for the country of California. The California Civil Code is made of statutes which govern the overall responsibilities and rights of people inside the jurisdiction of California.
What are the 29 California Civil Code?
The California Civil Code are 29 felony codes enacted by the California state Legislature, which together form the general statutory regulation of California. The legitimate Codes are maintained by the California office of Legislative counsel for the Legislature.
What is California Civil Code segment 1946?
California Civil Code 1946 requires the tenant to serve a thirty-day word or a landlord to serve both a thirty-day or a sixty-day be aware to terminate the tenancy. The lease is owed till the lease terminates.
Learn more about California Civil Code here:- https://brainly.com/question/1995458
#SPJ4
investigate how the fight against gender-based violence and what are the successes
Look at how the combat against gender-primarily based violence is and what are the successes: POWA become the primary organization to set up a refuge for abused women in 1981 and pioneered 2d degree (or transitional) housing for ladies in 2009 in Gauteng.
Success is the country or circumstance of assembly a defined variety of expectancies. it may be considered the opposite of failure. The criteria for success depend upon context and may be relative to a selected observer or notion system.
It is very essential for us to come to be a hit in our lives. It gives us an awesome call and reputation in our society. success makes us greater assured and happier in existence. It also provides us terrific inner satisfaction as accomplishing achievement way getting the aspect that we desire and love doing in our life.
An instance of success is when you sooner or later finish a puzzle efficaciously. An example of achievement is when you have an excellent activity, a glad marriage, and a whole lot of cash. resulting in success; assuring, or promotive of, success; carrying out what was proposed; having the desired effect; wealth; being fortunate; happiness. There are eight specific varieties of successes that have numerous goals. those are inner fulfillment, bodily success, own family fulfillment, professional success, financial achievement, network achievement, journey achievement, and impact fulfillment.
Learn more about success here:
https://brainly.com/question/24959987
#SPJ9
Where is the majority of a city budget spending?
State and local governments spend most of their resources on education, health, and social service programs. In 2019, about one-third of state and local spending went toward combined elementary and secondary education (22%) and higher education (9%).