The rulemaking function of most administrative agencies requires

True. The UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) is a set of laws that govern commercial transactions in the United States. In determining contract formation, the UCC places great importance on the intent of the parties involved to be bound by the terms of the contract.

This means that both parties must have a clear understanding of what they are agreeing to and must willingly consent to the terms of the contract. The UCC recognizes that contracts can be formed in a variety of ways, including oral agreements and conduct that demonstrates an intention to be bound. However, in order for a contract to be enforceable, both parties must have a mutual intent to be bound by its terms. This emphasis on intent helps to ensure that contracts are entered into voluntarily and with a full understanding of their terms, which is essential for the efficient and fair operation of commercial transactions.

Know more about Uniform Commercial Code here:

https://brainly.com/question/30031234

#SPJ11

It is believed that for every report of abuse the police and Child Protective Services (CPS) receive, there are b) 9 unreported cases.

It can be stated that various factors contribute to the underreporting of abuse cases. For example, victims may fear retaliation from the abuser, may not recognize that they are being abused, or may not know how to report it. Additionally, some cases may go unreported due to the lack of evidence, insufficient resources, or the reluctance of authorities to investigate.

It is difficult to determine the exact number of unreported abuse cases, but it is important to raise awareness about the issue and provide resources for victims to come forward and seek help. It is also crucial for authorities to take every report seriously and thoroughly investigate all allegations of abuse.

This statistic highlights the prevalence of unreported child abuse cases and the importance of addressing this issue. Many factors contribute to underreporting, such as fear, lack of awareness, and reluctance to involve authorities.

Increasing awareness and improving reporting mechanisms can help protect more children from abuse and ensure they receive the support they need.

To know more about Child Protective Services visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30576168

#SPJ11

Nonrecognition provisions are an important part of the tax code and refer to specific types of income that taxpayers may not need to include in their gross income. Gross income is the total amount of income that a taxpayer earns before any deductions or exemptions.

Nonrecognition provisions allow taxpayers to either permanently exclude certain types of income from their gross income or temporarily defer it until a later period.There are several different types of nonrecognition provisions in the tax code, including provisions related to like-kind exchanges, involuntary conversions, and certain types of reorganizations. Like-kind exchanges, for example, allow taxpayers to exchange similar types of property without recognizing any gain or loss for tax purposes. Involuntary conversions may occur when property is lost or destroyed and can also result in nonrecognition of any gain or loss. Certain types of reorganizations, such as mergers or acquisitions, may also be subject to nonrecognition provisions.Overall, nonrecognition provisions can provide significant tax benefits to taxpayers by reducing their taxable income or deferring it to a later period. However, it is important to understand the specific requirements and limitations of each provision in order to ensure compliance with the tax code.

Learn more about tax here

https://brainly.com/question/30157668

#SPJ11

Based on the scenario you described, Brenda has committed the crime of mail fraud. Mail fraud is a federal offense that involves using the mail to carry out a scheme to defraud others of money or property.

Brenda's act of sending falsified financial statements through UPS to induce the banker to loan her company $1 million and then not paying back the loan constitutes mail fraud. Forgery, bribery, larceny, and insider trading do not seem to apply to the scenario described. Forgery involves falsely making or altering a document with the intent to defraud. Bribery involves offering or receiving something of value to influence someone's actions. Larceny involves taking someone else's property without their consent. Insider trading involves trading securities based on material, non-public information.

Learn more about committed here:

https://brainly.com/question/19624717

#SPJ11

Answer:

True

Explanation:

In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), the US Supreme Court ruled that students who had been disciplined for wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War were entitled to collect monetary damages from the school district because their constitutional rights had been violated.

The APA (Administrative Procedure Act) is a federal law that outlines the procedures that federal agencies must follow when making and enforcing rules.A. True

The APA applies to formal, hybrid, and informal rulemaking, and it requires certain formalities for each type of rulemaking process. For example, in formal rulemaking, the APA requires agencies to provide notice of the proposed rulemaking, to provide an opportunity for public comment, and to hold a public hearing. In hybrid rulemaking, which is a combination of formal and informal rulemaking, agencies must also provide notice and an opportunity for public comment, but they may not be required to hold a public hearing. In informal rulemaking, agencies are not required to provide notice or hold a public hearing, but they must still provide an opportunity for public comment. Overall, the APA is an important law that helps ensure transparency, accountability, and fairness in the rulemaking process, and it provides important protections for individuals and organizations affected by federal regulations.

Learn more about organizations here:

https://brainly.com/question/17164427

#SPJ11

In the case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992, the Supreme Court upheld the central holding of Roe v.

In the case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992, the Supreme Court upheld the central holding of Roe v. Wade (1973) that women have a constitutional right to choose to have an abortion, but it modified the framework for analyzing restrictions on that right. The court abandoned the trimester framework and established a new standard based on the concept of undue burden. The court held that a state may not place an undue burden on a woman's right to choose to have an abortion before viability, which is the point at which the fetus can survive outside the womb. The court also held that states have an interest in protecting the potential life of the fetus after viability, but they may not impose an undue burden on a woman's right to choose to have an abortion even after viability, except in cases where the woman's life or health is at risk.

Learn more about established here:

https://brainly.com/question/28542155

#SPJ11

When determining whether a contract falls under Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), one must first determine if the transaction involves the sale of goods.

Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) governs the sale of goods in the United States. To determine whether a contract falls under Article 2 of the UCC, the first step is to determine whether the transaction involves the sale of goods.

Under the UCC, a "sale" is defined as the passing of title from the seller to the buyer for a price. In general, a sale of goods involves tangible, movable property that is primarily used for personal, household, or business purposes. Examples of goods that would fall under Article 2 of the UCC include clothing, electronics, furniture, and vehicles.

If the transaction involves the sale of goods, then the contract is subject to Article 2 of the UCC. This means that the parties must comply with the requirements and obligations set forth in Article 2, such as the requirements for the formation of a contract, warranties, and remedies for breach of contract.

Learn more about Commercial  here:

https://brainly.com/question/13379893

#SPJ11

The River City Council, the Santa Clara County Board, the Texas state legislature, and the U.S. Congress all have the authority to enact laws, which would constitute statutory law.

Statutory law is the body of laws enacted by legislative bodies, such as city councils, county boards, state legislatures, and the federal Congress. This type of law is distinguished from other types of law, such as case law or administrative law, which are created through court decisions or administrative regulations, respectively.

Therefore, the correct answer is: c. statutory law.

The laws enacted by the River City Council, the Santa Clara County Board, the Texas state legislature, and the U.S. Congress constitute c) statutory law.

Statutory law refers to laws that are created and enacted by legislative bodies, such as city councils, county boards, state legislatures, and the federal government. These laws are codified in written form and are part of the body of law that governs our society.

Its important to note that statutory law is one of three main types of law in the United States, along with case law and administrative law. Case law refers to legal decisions made by judges in court cases, while administrative law refers to the rules and regulations created by government agencies.

The laws enacted by the River City Council, the Santa Clara County Board, the Texas state legislature, and the U.S. Congress constitute statutory law, which is one of the three main types of law in the United States. It's important to understand the differences between statutory law, case law, and administrative law in order to have a comprehensive understanding of the legal system.

To know more about statutory law visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28620883

#SPJ11

When constitutional objections are raised within an administrative proceeding concerning an agency's rules or procedures, that issue will initially be decided by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) or the agency head, depending on the specific agency's organizational structure and the nature of the proceeding.

Administrative proceedings involve disputes between individuals or organizations and administrative agencies. These agencies have the power to create rules, adjudicate disputes, and enforce regulations as granted to them by the legislative and executive branches of the government. When a party believes that an agency's rules or procedures violate the constitution, they can raise these objections during the administrative proceeding.
Administrative Law Judges are impartial decision-makers who oversee the administrative proceeding and ensure that the process is fair and adheres to relevant laws and regulations. They possess the authority to make initial determinations on constitutional objections, which can be further appealed within the agency or ultimately to a judicial court.
The agency head, who is typically responsible for the overall management and direction of the agency, may also have the authority to decide on constitutional objections in some cases. This could occur when the agency's organizational structure allows the head to review ALJ decisions or when the agency head is directly involved in the adjudication process.
In summary, constitutional objections raised within an administrative proceeding concerning an agency's rules or procedures will initially be decided by either an Administrative Law Judge or the agency head, depending on the specific circumstances and the agency's structure. This decision may be subject to further review and appeal within the agency or the judicial system.

Learn more about Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) here:

https://brainly.com/question/14552070

#SPJ11

The question at hand is regarding plea deals and whether they are always a disadvantage for offenders. While it's true that some critics argue that plea deals give criminal an unfair advantage, it's important to note that evidence shows that plea deals can also benefit offenders who are guilty of a crime.

By accepting a plea deal, offenders can often secure a lighter sentence or avoid a more severe punishment. This can actually work to the advantage of both the offender and the justice system as a whole, as it can help to reduce the backlog of cases in court and free up resources for other cases. Ultimately, while plea deals may have some disadvantages, the evidence suggests that they can also have significant benefits for both offenders and the justice system. Plea deals can indeed provide offenders with an opportunity to secure a lighter term or avoid more severe punishment, even if they are guilty of the crime. However, it's essential to consider the benefits and drawbacks of plea bargains in the justice system. While some argue that plea deals may result in lesser sentences for guilty parties, they also offer advantages such as saving court resources, reducing case backlogs, and allowing for quicker resolutions for both the accused and the victims involved.

Learn more about criminal here:

https://brainly.com/question/9336457

#SPJ11

The organizing document of a local government that authorizes its existence and states its authority is called a "charter." A charter is a legal document that outlines the powers, functions, and structure of a local government, such as a city or county. It serves as the foundation for the government's operations and provides guidelines for how the government should be organized, managed, and governed.

Charters are essential for ensuring that a local government operates within its legal bounds and serves the interests of its constituents. They may define the roles and responsibilities of elected officials, establish the boundaries of the jurisdiction, and outline the procedures for enacting local ordinances or resolutions. Charters also serve as a means of providing checks and balances within the government by outlining the separation of powers between different branches or departments.

In many countries, local government charters are granted by a higher level of government, such as a state or national government. This ensures that the local government operates in accordance with the broader legal framework and adheres to the principles of good governance.

In summary, a local government charter is a crucial document that lays the foundation for the operation and authority of a local government. It establishes the legal basis for the government's existence, outlines its powers and functions, and provides guidelines for its organization and management. Charters are essential for maintaining accountability, transparency, and efficiency within local governments.

Learn more about government here:

https://brainly.com/question/16940043

#SPJ11

Single taxpayers meeting certain requirements can exclude up to $250,000 of the realized gain on the sale of their primary residence, provided they've owned and used the property for at least two out of the five years leading up to the sale.

Single taxpayers meeting certain homeownership and use requirements can permanently exclude up to $250,000 of the realized gain on the sale of their principal residence. To qualify for this exclusion, the homeowner must have owned and used the property as their primary residence for at least two out of the five years leading up to the sale. Additionally, the homeowner cannot have excluded a gain from the sale of another home within the past two years.

It's important to note that any gain above the $250,000 exclusion amount will be subject to capital gains taxes. However, there are some situations where a homeowner may be able to avoid or reduce these taxes. For example, if the homeowner sells the property due to a change in employment or health reasons, they may be eligible for a partial exclusion.

It's also worth mentioning that these rules apply specifically to single taxpayers. Married couples filing jointly can exclude up to $500,000 of the realized gain on the sale of their principal residence if they meet the same homeownership and use requirements.

Learn more about taxpayers here:-

https://brainly.com/question/29664276

#SPJ11

Primarily for the protection of minors and to ensure their well-being, most courts or state legislatures have determined that a minor should not have the right to disaffirm certain types of contracts, education loans, and marriage contracts.

Education loans are financial aids that are specifically designed to help students pay for their post-secondary education expenses, such as tuition fees, books, accommodation, and other related costs. These loans are typically offered by the government or private financial institutions and must be repaid over a set period with interest. The interest rates, repayment terms, and eligibility criteria for education loans vary depending on the lender and the borrower's creditworthiness. Education loans can be secured or unsecured, and some may offer deferred payment options or income-driven repayment plans. Education loans allow students who may not have the financial means to pursue higher education to access educational opportunities and achieve their academic goals.

Learn more about Education loans here:

https://brainly.com/question/30011842

#SPJ11

The answer is a. true.  In an agency hearing, the individual or business that is the subject of the hearing (known as the respondent) is typically required to bear the burden of proof.

This means that they are responsible for presenting evidence to support their position and to prove that they did not violate any regulations or laws that are within the jurisdiction of the agency. The burden of proof may shift in some circumstances, such as when the agency initiates the hearing or when the respondent asserts an affirmative defense, but in general, the burden is on the respondent.

An agency hearing is a legal proceeding before a government agency that is designed to resolve disputes between the agency and the individuals or businesses that it regulates. These hearings are often used to determine whether an individual or business has violated regulations or laws that are within the jurisdiction of the agency.

The burden of proof is the responsibility to prove or disprove a particular fact or allegation. In an agency hearing, the burden of proof usually falls on the respondent, which is the individual or business that is the subject of the hearing. This means that the respondent is responsible for presenting evidence to prove that they did not violate the regulations or laws that are within the jurisdiction of the agency.

Learn more about business here:

https://brainly.com/question/15826771

#SPJ11

The role of IGOs in Liberal Institutionalization is to promote cooperation and coordination among states, and to provide a framework for addressing common problems and pursuing shared goals.

In Liberal Institutionalism, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) play a key role in promoting cooperation and collaboration among states. These organizations are formed by member states to address common problems and pursue shared goals, such as promoting trade, protecting human rights, and addressing security concerns.

The central idea of Liberal Institutionalism is that the international system can be improved through the creation of international institutions that promote cooperation and provide incentives for states to follow rules and norms. IGOs are seen as one type of international institution that can help achieve these goals.

Learn more about Institutionalization here:

https://brainly.com/question/28328197

#SPJ11

Documentation, collection, and Preservation of scattered remains are vital steps in forensic examinations.

Here are a few contemplations related with each of these strategies:

1. Documentation: The primary step within the handle is to report the remains and the encompassing zone. This documentation incorporates notes, photos, and portrays of the remains and their area. The documentation ought to be nitty gritty and incorporate the area, introduction, and connections of the bones or parts to each other and any adjacent objects or highlights. Moreover, it is vital to record any evidence of injury or other physical prove which will offer assistance recognize the remains, such as clothing or gems.

2. Collection: Once the documentation is total, the remains must be carefully collected. The collection includes gathering all of the scattered parts and setting them in a holder, such as a pack or box. It is critical to dodge sullying the remains amid this process, as this will compromise the judgment of any DNA or other prove which will be show.

3. Conservation: After collection, the remains must be appropriately protected to avoid debasement or harm. This may incorporate putting away the remains in a temperature and humidity-controlled environment, utilizing defensive bundling to anticipate breakage, and applying additives to the bones to avoid disintegration.

Learn more about forensic here: https://brainly.com/question/19238665

#SPJ1

Many courts hold the defendant liable for the injuries of bystanders who attempt to rescue victims injured by the defendant's negligence under what is known as the rescue doctrine.

Rescue doctrine allows bystanders who suffer harm while attempting to rescue a victim to recover damages from the defendant whose negligence caused the initial harm.

The rationale behind this doctrine is that the defendant's negligent actions created a dangerous situation that required the bystander's intervention to prevent further harm, and therefore, the defendant should be responsible for any injuries resulting from that intervention.

However, not all states recognize the rescue doctrine, and the specific requirements for its application may vary depending on the jurisdiction.

Learn more about doctrine:

https://brainly.com/question/1602568

#SPJ11

Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), a federal agency generally has 20 business days to respond to a request. However, if the agency needs more time due to the complexity of the request or the need to consult with other departments, they may grant themselves a 10-business-day extension.

Under the federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), federal agencies are generally required to respond to a FOIA request within 20 business days after receiving it. However, this does not necessarily mean that the agency will provide all of the requested information within that timeframe. In some cases, the agency may need to seek additional time or ask for clarification before it can fully respond to the request. Overall, the FOIA is an important tool for ensuring transparency and accountability in the federal government. It allows individuals and organizations to request and receive information from federal agencies about their operations and decision-making processes. While agencies are generally required to respond to FOIA law requests within a reasonable timeframe, there are some exceptions and limitations to this rule. It is important for requesters to understand their rights and obligations under the FOIA, and to work with experienced legal professionals when necessary to ensure that their requests are handled properly.

Learn more about law here:

brainly.com/question/30561419

#SPJ11

The answer is a. true. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requires federal agencies to disclose all information requested by the public.

These exemptions include information related to national security, personal privacy, law enforcement investigations, and confidential business information. The goal of the FOIA is to promote transparency and accountability in government by allowing citizens to access information about government activities and decision-making. It is important to note that the FOIA only applies to federal agencies and does not cover information held by state or local governments, private businesses, or individuals. Additionally, there may be instances where information requested under the FOIA is redacted or withheld due to one of the exemptions. In such cases, the agency must provide a justification for the withholding of information and the requester has the right to appeal the decision.

Learn more about law :

https://brainly.com/question/29553358

#SPJ11

The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) is a federal law that protects the rights of private-sector employees to organize and bargain collectively with their employers.

Here, correct option is A.

It does not cover all workers, however. Independent contractors, employees of the federal government, and employees of state governments are all excluded from the NLRA's protection. Independent contractors have a different legal status than regular employees, and their relationship with their clients or employers is usually governed by contract.

Employees of the federal government are typically covered by the Federal Labor Management Relations Act, which establishes a different set of rules and procedures for collective bargaining. Similarly, employees of state governments are typically covered by state laws, not the NLRA.

know more about National Labor Relations Act here

https://brainly.com/question/8726856#

#SPJ11

A. True Under the Privacy Act, agency disclosures of records retrievable by a person's name are generally forbidden to anyone other than the person to whom the record relates.

This means that agencies must generally obtain the written consent of an individual before disclosing their records to any third party, except in certain limited circumstances, such as when the disclosure is required by law or when the disclosure is made to other government agencies for authorized purposes.

The Privacy Act is a federal law that regulates the collection, use, and dissemination of personal information by federal agencies. The Act was enacted in 1974 to safeguard individual privacy from the misuse of personal information by the federal government.

Learn more about agency here:

https://brainly.com/question/10067107

#SPJ11

A local replacement policy (C) chooses only among the resident pages of the process that generated the page fault in selecting a page to replace.

In a local replacement policy, the operating system chooses a page to replace from among the resident pages of the process that generated the page fault. This means that the page replacement algorithm only considers the pages that belong to the process that caused the page fault, rather than looking at all the pages in memory.

The goal of a local replacement policy is to minimize the number of page faults within a specific process, while potentially increasing the number of page faults in other processes. This strategy can be effective in scenarios where some processes have higher memory requirements than others.

Learn more about local replacement policy here:

https://brainly.com/question/29222230

#SPJ11

Structural Realism, also known as Neorealism, is a theory of international relations that explores how the structure of the international system affects the behavior of states.

This theory emphasizes the importance of the distribution of power among states and how it shapes their interactions with each other.

According to Structural Realism, the international system is characterized by anarchy, meaning that there is no central authority or governing body that can enforce rules or prevent conflict between states. In this context, states must rely on their own capabilities to ensure their security and advance their interests, leading to competition and conflict between them.

Structural Realism also emphasizes the concept of the balance of power, which refers to the idea that states will seek to maintain a distribution of power that prevents any one state from becoming too dominant. This can lead to the formation of alliances and the balancing of power between different states, as well as the pursuit of military capabilities and the use of force to achieve strategic objectives.

Overall, Structural Realism provides a framework for understanding the dynamics of the international system and the behavior of states within it, emphasizing the role of power and self-help in shaping international relations.

Learn more about emphasizes here:

https://brainly.com/question/28525593

#SPJ11

Answer:

One major role of political parties in United States politics is to nominate and support candidates for elected office. Political parties identify and recruit potential candidates for various elected positions, such as the presidency, Congress, and state and local offices. They provide funding, resources, and organizational support to these candidates, helping them to campaign and reach out to voters. Political parties also work to mobilize their supporters and increase voter turnout on election day. Additionally, political parties help to shape public policy by promoting their platforms and advocating for their positions on issues. They also play a role in organizing the legislative process by coordinating the activities of party members in Congress and other legislative bodies. Overall, political parties are an important part of the political process in the United States and play a crucial role in shaping the direction of the country.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Nominating and supporting candidates for public office is one of the main functions of political parties in American politics. Candidates for numerous elected posts, including the presidency, Congress, and state and municipal seats, are identified and sought for by political parties. They assist these politicians' campaigns and efforts to engage voters by giving them money, materials, and organizational support. On election day, political parties also strive to turn out more voters by organizing their followers. Political parties also contribute to the formation of public policy by advancing their platforms and arguing in favor of their stances on certain subjects. By coordinating the actions of party members in Congress and other legislative bodies, they also contribute to the organization of the legislative process.In general, political parties are an essential component of American politics and have a significant impact on the nation's course.

If a taxpayer cashes out a life insurance policy before death due to a chronic illness, she may exclude from income the amount used to pay for her qualified long-term care expenses.

The exclusion is only available to the extent that the cash surrender value of the life insurance policy is used to pay for qualified long-term care expenses. Qualified long-term care expenses are those expenses that are necessary to provide medical or other necessary services to a chronically ill individual. The term "chronically ill individual" means an individual who has been certified by a licensed healthcare practitioner as being unable to perform at least two activities of daily living (such as eating, dressing, or bathing) for a period of at least 90 days due to a loss of functional capacity or requiring substantial supervision due to a cognitive impairment.

It is important to note that the exclusion is only available for the portion of the cash surrender value that is used to pay for qualified long-term care expenses. Any portion of the cash surrender value that is not used for qualified long-term care expenses will be subject to income tax. Additionally, if the taxpayer is eligible for the exclusion, she must report the exclusion on her tax return and attach a statement to the return certifying that she meets the eligibility requirements.

Learn more about taxpayer  here:-

https://brainly.com/question/29664276

#SPJ11

d. Juliet cannot sue to recover any money because the contract to wager is illegal and unenforceable.

Wagering on a prize fight is generally illegal in most jurisdictions, as it constitutes illegal gambling. Since the contract to wager is illegal and unenforceable, neither party has legal recourse to enforce the terms of the contract or recover any money they may have put into the transaction.

Therefore, if Juliet wants to take back her money and withdraw from the transaction before the fight starts, she would not have any legal basis to do so, and she would forfeit the money that she had put up as a wager. Similarly, Lance would not be able to successfully sue for breach of contract since the contract itself is illegal and unenforceable.

What is illegal gambling?

Illegal gambling refers to any form of gambling that is prohibited by law. The legality of gambling varies widely across jurisdictions, with some countries allowing only certain types of gambling, such as lotteries or betting on horse races, while others prohibit all forms of gambling.

To know more about Wagering:

https://brainly.com/question/31503876

#SPJ11

Before the fight begins, Juliet wants to take back her money and withdraw from the transaction. In this situation, the correct answer is: d. Juliet cannot sue to recover any money because the contract to wager is illegal and unenforceable.

Wagering contracts are generally considered illegal and unenforceable due to the public policy against gambling. This means that neither party can rely on the court to enforce the terms of the contract or resolve any disputes that may arise.

As a result, Juliet does not have a legal remedy to recover her money, and Lance cannot be forced to return it. In the same way, Lance cannot sue Juliet for breach of contract as the agreement itself is not legally enforceable.

In conclusion, although Juliet may wish to withdraw from the transaction, the illegality of the wagering contract prevents her from pursuing a legal course of action to recover her money.

To know more about gambling visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12020375

#SPJ11

The statement "Under the agent negotiation rule, if a contract falls within the statute of frauds if negotiated by a person, it must also be in writing even if negotiated by that person's agent" is true.

The Statute of Frauds is a legal rule that requires certain types of contracts to be in writing and signed by the parties in order to be enforceable. The rule also applies to contracts that are negotiated by an agent on behalf of a person.

Under the agent negotiation rule, an agent negotiating a contract on behalf of a person is considered to be the same as if the person negotiated the contract themselves. This means that if a contract falls within the Statute of Frauds, it must be in writing regardless of whether the negotiations were carried out by the person or their agent.

For example, if a person hires a real estate agent to negotiate the sale of their property, and the sale falls within the Statute of Frauds, then the contract must be in writing even if the negotiations were conducted by the agent. This ensures that all parties involved are aware of the terms and conditions of the contract and helps prevent misunderstandings and disputes down the line.

In summary, if a contract falls within the Statute of Frauds, it must be in writing even if negotiated by an agent on behalf of a person. This is known as the agent negotiation rule and is an important legal principle that ensures the validity and enforceability of contracts.

Know more about negotiation rule here:

https://brainly.com/question/14548073

#SPJ11

The statement "Review of agency decision by appellate courts is based upon the record made at the administrative hearing" is A. True

This is because appellate courts review the decisions made by administrative agencies based on the existing record from the initial hearing, rather than conducting a new trial or hearing additional evidence. They evaluate the case for any legal errors or issues in the application of the law.

Review of agency decisions by appellate courts is generally based upon the record made at the administrative hearing. This means that the appellate court will generally review the evidence and legal arguments presented to the administrative agency during the hearing and determine whether the agency's decision was supported by the evidence and consistent with the applicable law.

In some cases, the appellate court may also consider additional evidence or legal arguments that were not presented to the administrative agency, but this is generally only allowed in limited circumstances, such as when there is new evidence that was not available at the time of the hearing or when the agency's decision was based on an erroneous interpretation of the law.

Learn more about courts here:

https://brainly.com/question/12278977

#SPJ11