After taking a glance at Macbeth's correspondence in Act 1, Scene 3 of the famous play "Macbeth," Banquo begins to doubt his own ability to adhere to his convictions.
Why is this so?As Macbeth's fortunes begin to change as foretold by the witches' prophecy, Banquo is concerned he may be lured by offers promising power and success.
Demonstrating remarkable self-awareness and modesty, compared with Macbeth's future ruthless ambition, Banquo identifies the pitfalls that come with temptation and ponders whether he possesses enough fortitude to resist it.
Read more about Banquo here:
https://brainly.com/question/25668662
#SPJ1
In the first place, to make the poem or the novel the central concern of literary criticism has appeared to mean cutting it loose from its author and from the author’s particular hopes, fears, interests, conflicts, etc. A criticism so limited may seem bloodless and hollow.
In the second place, to emphasize the work seems to involve severing it from those who actually read it, and this severance may seem drastic and therefore disastrous. After all, literature is written to be read.
The formalist critic knows as well as anyone that poems and plays and novels are written as expressions of particular personalities and are written from all sorts of motives–for money, from a desire to express oneself, for the sake of a cause, etc. Moreover, the formalist critic knows as well as anyone that literary works are merely potential until they are read–that is, that they are re-created in the minds of actual readers, who vary enormously in their capabilities, their interests, their prejudices, their ideas. But the formalist critic is concerned primarily with the work itself. Speculation on the mental processes of the author takes the critic away from the work into biography and psychology. Such studies describe the process of composition, not the structure of the thing composed.
On the other hand, exploration of the various readings which the work has received also takes the critic away from the work into psychology and the history of taste. But such work, valuable and necessary as it may be, is to be distinguished from a criticism of the work itself. The formalist critic makes two assumptions: (1) that the relevant part of the author’s intention is what the author actually put into the work–that is, the critic assumes that the author’s intention as realized is the "intention" that counts. And (2) the formalist critic assumes an ideal reader–that is, instead of focusing on the varying spectrum of possible readings, the critic attempts to find a central point of reference from which to focus on the structure of the poem or novel.
There is no ideal reader, of course. But for the purpose of focusing on the poem rather than on the critic’s own reactions, it is a defensible strategy. (The alternatives are desperate: Either we say that one person’s reading is as good as another’s, and thus deny the possibility of any standard reading, or else we take the lowest common denominator of the various readings that have been made–that is, we frankly move from literary criticism into social psychology. To propose taking a consensus of the opinions of "qualified" readers is simply to split the ideal reader into a group of ideal readers.) As consequences of the distinction just referred to, the formalist critic rejects two popular tests for literary value. The first proves the value of the work from the author’s "sincerity" (or the intensity of the author’s feelings as he or she composed it). We discount also such tests as the intensity of the critic’s reaction.
A literary work is a document and as a document can be analyzed in terms of the forces that have produced it, or it may be manipulated as a force in its own right. It mirrors the past, it may influence the future. These facts it would be futile to deny, and I know of no critic who does deny them. But the reduction of a work of literature to its causes does not constitute literary criticism; nor does an estimate of its effects. Good literature is more than effective rhetoric applied to true ideas–even if we could agree upon a philosophical yardstick for measuring the truth of ideas and even if we could find some way that transcended nose counting for determining the effectiveness of the rhetoric.
Material used in this test passage has been adapted from the following source:
C. Brooks, The formalist critic. ©1951 by The Kenyon Review.
The author of the passage probably rejects the use of biography and psychology in literary criticism because these disciplines:
cannot provide any information about literature.
assume that the author’s intention as realized is the only intention that counts.
take into account the entire range of possible readings of a literary work.
focus on the process of literary composition and not on its product.
The author of the passage probably rejects the use of biography and psychology in literary criticism because these disciplines focus on the mental processes of the author and the history of taste, rather than the structure of the literary work itself.
According to the author, literary works are written as expressions of particular personalities, but the formalist critic is primarily concerned with the work itself and not with the author's intention or the process of composition.
The author argues that the relevant part of the author's intention is what the author actually put into the work, and an ideal reader is assumed to focus on the structure of the poem or novel rather than on the varying spectrum of possible readings.
Therefore, the author does not reject biography and psychology as disciplines, but rather as tools for literary criticism.
To know more about biography refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/868907
#SPJ11
Match each point of view with its definition.
Match Term Definition
First person A) The narrator is part of the story and gives a personal account of what they are thinking and feeling.
Third person limited B) The narrator is not part of the story and explains what all the characters are thinking and feeling.
Third person omniscient C) The narrator is not part of the story and explains what one character is thinking and feeling.
First person: A) The narrator is part of the story and gives a personal account of what they are thinking and feeling.
Third person limited: C) The narrator is not part of the story and explains what one character is thinking and feeling.
Third person omniscient: B) The narrator is not part of the story and explains what all the characters are thinking and feeling.
~~~Harsha~~~
First person (A) is when the narrator is part of the story and gives a personal account. Third person limited (B) is when the narrator is outside the story and explains what all the characters are thinking and feeling. Third person omniscient (C) is when the narrator is also outside the story but focuses on one character's thoughts and feelings.
First person (A): The narrator is part of the story and gives a personal account of what they are thinking and feeling.
Third person limited (B): The narrator is not part of the story and explains what all the characters are thinking and feeling.
Third person omniscient (C): The narrator is not part of the story and explains what one character is thinking and feeling.
Learn more about narrator here:
https://brainly.com/question/25229401
#SPJ2
Who do Baloo and Bagheera plead to help them find Mowgli?
answer choices
A. Rann
B. Kaa
C. Father Wolf
D. Mother Wolf
Baloo and Bagheera plead to Kaa to help them find Mowgli in the book "The Jungle Book" by Rudyard Kipling. The correct option is B).
The English author Rudyard Kipling's collection of stories known as The Jungle Book. A small kid who gets lost in the jungle is the subject of the Mowgli tale. The small youngster was taken in by the wolf pack and given the name Mowgli. When the vicious tiger Sher Khan attacks Mowgli's town, he gets disoriented and flees into the woods. There, Mowgli met Baloo the sage bear, Bagheera the black panther, and the rest of his animal companions. Together, they went on numerous adventures. Mowgli eventually witnessed people, but he made the choice to avoid them and stay in the Jungle with Baloo, Baghera, and the rest of his animal companions.
To know more about Mowgli click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30984982
#SPJ11
Read the words of Creon in Antigone, Part 2.
For anyonewho acts against the state, its enemy,I'd never make my friend. For I know wellour country is a ship which keeps us safe,and only when it sails its proper coursedo we make friends.
What is the effect of the metaphor in these lines?
The metaphor of the country as a ship emphasizes the importance of following the correct course of action for the good of the community.
It suggests that any action that goes against the state is akin to steering the ship off course, which could endanger everyone on board. The metaphor also underscores Creon's loyalty to the state and his belief that those who act against it are enemies, rather than friends. In the passage from Antigone, Part 2, the metaphor of the country as a ship creates a vivid image of stability and protection. The terms "wellour" and "coursedo" are likely typos and should be "well our" and "course do," respectively. The metaphor highlights the importance of maintaining a proper course, suggesting that loyalty to the state is crucial for the wellbeing of all citizens. This metaphor effectively conveys Creon's belief that anyone acting against the state is endangering the collective safety and unity.
To know more about community please visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22558440
#SPJ11
urgent help will get brainlist
To write this persuasive essay about The story of an Hour, you can say that this is a comment on all relationships and not feminist writing.
How to write the essayTo write this essay, you may begin by noting that the events of the story is obtainable in all relationships. The woman was initially grieved at the thought of her husband's death but later rejoiced when the visitors left. The reason was that her husband was not kind to her when alive.
In all relationships, there is a chance of not missing people who were unkind to us. So this story was about the oppression of women in the twentieth century.
Learn more about persuasive essays here:
https://brainly.com/question/25726765
#SPJ1
Read the passage from Little Women.
Beth said nothing ... while she resolved in her quiet little soul to be all that Father hoped to find her when the year brought round the happy coming home.
What does this passage reveal about Beth?
The passage reveals that Beth is a quiet and introspective person who is determined to become everything her father hopes for when he returns home.
She is a thoughtful and earnest individual who takes her responsibilities seriously and strives to meet the expectations of her loved ones.
Louisa May Alcott's novel Little Women tells the story of the four March girls as they make the transition to womanhood and struggle to conform to society's strict ideals of femininity in the midst of poverty. The story is set in 1860s Massachusetts during the Civil War and is loosely based on Alcott's own childhood.
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT Little Women CLICK THIS LINK -
brainly.com/question/22371804
#SPJ11
What Is an Interjection Word? Function, Examples, & Types
An interjection word is a type of word that is used to express a sudden or strong emotion, such as excitement, surprise, or anger.
The function of an interjection is to add emphasis or emotion to a sentence, and to convey the speaker's feelings in a more immediate and direct way. Examples of interjection words include "wow," "oh," "ouch," "hey," "ah," "oops," and "yikes." An interjection word is a part of speech that expresses a strong emotion or reaction, often used to convey surprise, joy, or other strong feelings. The function of an interjection is to convey these emotions spontaneously, without being grammatically connected to the sentence. Examples of interjection words include "Oh!", "Wow!", and "Ouch!".
To know more about emphasis refer :
brainly.com/question/1396671
#SPJ11
Hi! I really need some help with this. The prompt is attached. It can be very short. I'm just in a bit of a rush.
Tom Robinson, a 25-year-old African-American, was accused of sexually assaulting Mayella Ewell, who is Caucasian, in November of last year. Even though there was no physical proof and there were several witnesses, which included Tom himself, asserting his innocence, the jury found him culpable.
How to explain the informationThroughout the trial, Atticus Finch, a renowned lawyer from Maycomb, struggled to demonstrate Tom's blamelessness.
He revealed the discrepancies in Mayella's declaration and proffered evidence that implied her father, Bob Ewell, could be the true criminal. However, Attorney Finch's attempts were for naught, and ultimately Tom was condemned.
Learn more about Finch on
https://brainly.com/question/30909528
#SPJ1
There's no point ______ trying to get an interview with him. He never does interviews!
A. for.
B. about.
C. over.
D. in
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The sentence is saying that there is no point in trying to get an interview with him because he never does interviews. In this context, "for" is the appropriate preposition to use after "point" to indicate the purpose or reason for trying to get an interview.
Option B, "about", does not make sense in this context. Option C, "over", is not appropriate because it suggests a physical location or position. Option D, "in", is not the correct preposition to use in this context.
What is a theme of “The Adventure of the Three Students?”
Responses
Even in an emergency situation, it is wise to speak before taking action.
Even in an emergency situation, it is wise to speak before taking action.
Friends are not always trustworthy.
Friends are not always trustworthy.
An active mind is a content mind.
An active mind is a content mind.
Even after making a mistake, it is possible to change by doing something positive.
Even after making a mistake, it is possible to change by doing something positive.
An active mind is a content mind: is a theme of “The Adventure of the Three Students". Thus, option A is the correct option.
The Adventure of the Three Students essentially deals with a case of test fraud, which is not nearly as serious a crime as murder, blackmail, or the robbery of the crown jewels, but was handed to Sherlock Holmes due to the potential for controversy.
Physical action and brave heroes who protect others from peril or imminent disaster are hallmarks of adventure stories. The fast-paced adventure genre of literature typically centers on a protagonist (primary character) who finds himself or herself in a perilous or risky circumstance.
Learn more about Sherlock Holmes here:
https://brainly.com/question/31640217
#SPJ1
How does the light change in the scene between Dr. Rank and Nora?
The light in the scene between Dr. Rank and Nora changes subtly, reflecting the shifting emotions and dynamics between the two characters.
At the beginning of the scene, the light is bright and warm, indicating a sense of ease and comfort between them. However, as the conversation progresses and they delve into deeper topics, the light gradually dims, creating a more somber and serious atmosphere. This change in light underscores the weightiness of the conversation and the growing tension between the characters. In the scene between Dr. Rank and Nora, the light changes to reflect the emotional and thematic shifts in their conversation. As they discuss deeper topics and personal revelations, the lighting may become more intimate and subdued, highlighting the vulnerability and intensity of their interaction.
To know more about emotions please visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26692985
#SPJ11
Indicate whether that sentence contains a dangling modifier (DM) or a misplaced modifier (MM).
1. The car on the bridge which is green is mine.
2. Expecting confusion, our plans were made.
3. Feeling hot, sweater were taken off.
4. I showed my dog to the veterinarian with the fleas.
5. Larry told me he as getting married that afternoon at night.
How did Mrs. Linde support herself after her husband died?
Mrs. Linde, a character in Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," supported herself after her husband died by working various jobs. Initially, after her husband's death, she relied on her brothers for financial support. However, she soon realized that she wanted to be independent and self-sufficient. She started working as a seamstress and later became a teacher, which helped her support herself financially.
Mrs. Linde's financial independence was a significant departure from the traditional gender roles of the time. In the late 19th century, it was common for women to depend on their husbands or male relatives for financial support. Mrs. Linde's determination to support herself reflected the changing attitudes towards women's rights and independence during that period.
Overall, Mrs. Linde's story is an inspiring example of how women can overcome adversity and support themselves through hard work and determination. Her story is a reminder that women are capable of achieving financial independence and succeeding in any profession they choose.
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT Mrs. Linde, a character CLICK THIS LINK -
brainly.com/question/15113786
#SPJ11
What did you learn about yourself as you worked through the To-Do List?
You should gain an awareness of the working environment and what employers anticipate from their employees through job experience. a chance to consider potential career paths. more self-awareness, maturity, independence, and self-assurance.
job experience is the knowledge an employee acquires while engaged in a particular line of work, industry, or profession (for instance, four years of practical experience in web marketing). Your chances of finding your dream job depend heavily on the work experience portion of your resume.
A job obligation is a statement of the overall responsibilities and demands of a current or former position. The goal of a job self-awareness summary is to demonstrate to an employer your career learnings and how they can apply to the new position you are looking for.
Learn more about job experience, from :
brainly.com/question/12666629
#SPJ1
Compare and contrast the Turner Station that Skloot visited in 1999 with the Turner Station that Henrietta experienced as a young
woman.
In comparing the Turner Station that Skloot visited in 1999 with the Turner Station that Henrietta experienced as a young woman, there are notable differences in terms of infrastructure, socio-economic conditions, and racial segregation.
The Turner Station that Henrietta experienced as a young woman was a growing, predominantly African-American community that offered economic opportunities, particularly in the nearby factories. The area was segregated, with black residents having their own stores, churches, and schools. Life in Turner Station during Henrietta's time was characterized by a sense of community and close-knit relationships among neighbors.
In contrast, the Turner Station that Skloot visited in 1999 had experienced significant decline. The once-thriving factories had closed, leading to high unemployment rates and poverty. The infrastructure had deteriorated, with vacant buildings and crime becoming more prevalent. While racial segregation was no longer legally enforced, the socio-economic conditions had shifted, and the sense of community that once characterized Turner Station had diminished.
Overall, Turner Station had experienced a decline from Henrietta's time to Skloot's visit, with changes in the socio-economic landscape and racial dynamics impacting the community significantly.
To know more about henrietta, please click on:
https://brainly.com/question/2695993
#SPJ11
63. What tone does the alliteration in lines 606-611 help convey?
In lines 606-611, the alliteration of "mournful melody" and "doleful dirges" helps convey a tone of sadness and sorrow. The repeated use of the "m" and "d" sounds creates a sense of melancholy and mourning, emphasizing the sadness of the situation being described.
Alliteration is a literary device that involves the repetition of consonant sounds at the beginning of words in a series or close proximity. This technique often contributes to the tone or mood of the passage. In some cases, alliteration can help create a playful, lighthearted tone, while in other instances, it can contribute to a darker, more somber atmosphere. The specific tone conveyed by the alliteration in lines 606-611 would depend on the context and content of the text you are analyzing.
To know more about alliteration click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15678116
#SPJ11
What miracle does Nora expect to happen?
Nora expects a miracle to happen in which a difficult or seemingly impossible situation is resolved in an unexpected and positive manner.
Nora responds to Mrs. Linde's inquiry about why Dr. Rank knows her name but Torvald does not by saying that she has spoken to Dr. Rank about Mrs. Linde and other old friends but not with her husband because of his resentment. It's obvious from Nora's casual description that what Nora and Torvald think of as love is actually control. When Nora and Mrs. Linde realise they won't be able to prevent Torvald from reading Krogstad's letter, Nora says this to Mrs. Linde. Torvald accepting responsibility for falsifying the loan documentation is the "miracle" Nora is referring to. Nora has complete faith that Torvald will make this sacrifice for her since he loves her as much as she has loved him.
To know more about inquiry please visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29727366
#SPJ11
How does Torvald describe Nora talking about "scientific research?" Again, how does he think of her?
Torvald, Nora's husband, describes her talking about "scientific research" as charming and adorable. He thinks of her as a childlike creature who is naive about the world and its workings. Torvald believes that Nora's scientific research is merely a hobby, which she indulges in to amuse herself. He does not take her seriously as a researcher and views her pursuits as insignificant.
Torvald's condescending attitude towards Nora's interests reflects his patriarchal mindset, which deems women as incapable of intellectual pursuits. Nora's desire to engage in scientific research challenges Torvald's perception of her as a helpless, dependent wife.
Her curiosity and intelligence threaten his masculine identity, and he feels threatened by her independence. In short, Torvald's dismissive attitude towards Nora's scientific research reveals his sexist beliefs and his desire to control and dominate his wife.
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT Torvald describe Nora talking about "scientific research CLICK THIS LINK -
brainly.com/question/30955409
#SPJ11
When reviewing the content of your document, you should be concerned with
A) grammar and usage.
B) punctuation and spelling.
C) the accuracy and relevance of the information.
D) style and tone.
E) type styles and typefaces.
When reviewing the content of your document, you should be primarily concerned with the accuracy and relevance of the information. While grammar and usage, punctuation and spelling, style and tone, and type styles and typefaces are also important factors to consider, the content itself is the foundation of any document.
Without accurate and relevant information, the document loses its purpose and effectiveness. Therefore, it is essential to carefully review and revise the content to ensure that it is factually correct and directly relates to the intended audience and purpose of the document. This may involve conducting research to confirm the accuracy of the information or consulting with subject matter experts to ensure that the content is both relevant and timely. Once the accuracy and relevance of the content are established, attention can then be given to the other elements of the document, such as grammar and usage, punctuation and spelling, style and tone, and type styles and typefaces. These elements are important for enhancing the readability and professionalism of the document, but they should not overshadow the importance of the content itself.
Learn more about content of document here:
https://brainly.com/question/3247005
#SPJ11
Which stage in the writing process is the best time for the teacher to confer individually with students who may need help using what they know to tackle the writing task?
The best stage in the writing process for a teacher to confer individually with students who may need help is during the drafting stage.
This is the stage where students are beginning to put their ideas onto paper and may struggle with organizing their thoughts or finding the right words to express their ideas. By conferring with the student at this stage, the teacher can provide guidance on how to use what they know to tackle the writing task effectively. The teacher can help the student brainstorm ideas, provide feedback on their writing, and offer suggestions for improving the writing. By doing so, the student is able to receive personalized attention and support that can improve their writing skills. This stage is critical because it sets the foundation for the rest of the writing process and ensures that the student has a solid understanding of the writing task at hand.
To know more about the writing process:
https://brainly.com/question/17000723
#SPJ11
BRAINLIEST AND 15 POINTS!How does an essential question fit into the research process?
The essential question guides the research topic
The essential question is a claim made about the research topic
The essential question provides answers about the research topic
The essential question is used in the conclusion to restate the purpose
The essential question provides answers about the research topic.
The key concept of your entire endeavor will be your essential question. What you want to learn throughout the research process is the subject of your important inquiry, which should be quite specific. A crucial query inquires about a point you can back up with proof. It is not only a factual assertion. Your own critical thinking and some prior reading should lead to a crucial question.
Essential inquiries are meant to stimulate additional inquiry into a certain topic. Instead of merely giving a factual response to the question, they're meant to start a discussion on the issue. Students are drawn into the sort of thinking needed to fully comprehend a subject by using essential questions.
Therefore, Option C is the correct answer.
Learn more about Research here:
https://brainly.com/question/968894
#SPJ1
Today is "National Hanging Out Day." Who do you like to hang out with and what do you like to do?
Write 3 paragraphs.
Consider the poems.
"She Walks in Beauty"
by George Gordon Byron
She walks in Beauty, like the
night Of cloudless climes and
starry skies; And all that's best
of dark and bright Meet in her
aspect and her eyes: Thus
mellowed to that tender light
Which Heaven to gaudy day
denies.
One shade the more, one ray
the less, Had half impaired the
nameless grace Which waves
in every raven tress, or softly
Sahtona ales hanfanar 14/ha
Mark this and return
An excerpt from "To
Helen"
by Edgar Allan Poe
Helen, thy beauty is to
me Like those Nicean
barks of yore, That
gently, o'er a perfumed
sea, The weary,
wayworn wanderer
bore To his own native
shore.
Which statement best describes the tone of the
poems?
On desperate seas long
wont to roam, Thy
hyacinth hair, thy
classic face, Thy Naiad
Lalon hava honlaht ma
01:56:07
Both poems are sorrowful, mourning lost loves.
Both poems are complimentary, paying tribute to
loved ones.
Both poems are nostalgic, remembering better
times.
Both poems are introspective, thinking about serious
situations.
what’s the answer ?
Both poems are nostalgic, remembering better times is presented in the poem. Thus, option A is correct.
According to Byron, a woman's inner glow amplifies the power of her exterior beauty. He likens her to the star-lit night sky, which is even more stunning is presented in the poem.
To Helen by Edgar Allan Poe is a remembering -heavy lyric that uses Helen of Troy to represent his affection for an older woman. Over the three stanzas of "To Helen," the speaker makes comparisons between Helen and her mom of a dear friend, Jane Stanard. Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about the poem, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12155529
#SPJ1
What makes a good parent?
Where do you see, or not see, these traits within "Eleanor and Park" and the characters?
How do you know they are, or are not, good parents?
(explanatory "essay" describing qualities that make a good parent. evaluate characters within "eleanor and park". text evidence to support claims. at least 3 body paragraphs.)
Qualities that make a good parent include being loving, supportive, patient, understanding, and providing guidance and discipline when necessary.
A good parent is someone who loves and supports their children unconditionally, provides them with guidance and discipline when necessary, and is patient and understanding with them. In "Eleanor and Park," Park's parents are shown to be supportive and understanding of their son's relationship with Eleanor, but also willing to set boundaries and provide guidance when needed. On the other hand, Eleanor's stepfather is abusive and neglectful, showing none of the qualities of a good parent.
This is demonstrated through the text, as Park's parents are shown supporting and accepting Eleanor, while Eleanor's stepfather is portrayed as abusive and neglectful, highlighting the negative effects of his actions on Eleanor's well-being. Overall, the novel emphasizes the importance of parental love and support in a child's life, and how it can positively impact their emotional and psychological growth.
To learn more about Eleanor and Park, here
https://brainly.com/question/30685400
#SPJ1
Why does Nora say he rlife has not always been easy?
The reason Nora says her life has not always been easy is likely due to various challenges and hardships she has faced throughout her life.
These may include personal struggles, financial difficulties, or emotional turmoil. By acknowledging the difficulties she has experienced, Nora is able to express her resilience and strength in overcoming these obstacles. Torvald, Nora's husband, and the culture he represents are the main targets in her battle against the self-centered, constricting, and oppressive views. Rising action Nora's initial chat with Mrs. Linde; Krogstad's visit and extortion of Nora; and Krogstad's delivery of the letter in which Nora is later revealed.
To know more about Nora visit:
https://brainly.com/question/21728352
#SPJ11
What does Krogstad reveal about the bond used to secure the loan?
Krogstad reveals that the bond used to secure the loan is a forgery, as Nora Helmer, the borrower, falsified her father's signature on the document. This act of forgery could result in severe legal consequences for Nora if exposed.
In Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," Krogstad reveals that the bond used to secure the loan was forged. He tells Nora that he knows her husband Torvald did not sign the bond himself, and that Nora had signed it instead. This means that the loan was never legally binding, and Krogstad threatens to expose the forgery unless Nora convinces Torvald to allow him to keep his job at the bank. This revelation sets off a chain of events that ultimately leads to Nora's realization that she has been living in a stifling and oppressive marriage, and she decides to leave Torvald and strike out on her own.
To know more about Krogstad click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17580437
#SPJ11
What does Krogstad ask that Nora do to prevent him from losing his job?
Krogstad asks Nora to influence her husband, Torvald, to keep Krogstad's job at the bank. He wants her to convince Torvald not to fire him and preserve his employment
Krogstad asks Nora to use her influence with her husband, Torvald, to ensure that he doesn't fire him from his job at the bank. He specifically requests that she convinces Torvald to let him keep his position at the bank, even though he's been previously dismissed due to a forgery incident. This is one of the key moments in Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," where the complex relationships and power dynamics between the characters are first revealed and the story's central conflicts begin to emerge.
To know more about Krogstad visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30241322
#SPJ11
.
One key difference between disciplinary literacy and content area literacy is disciplinary literacy focuses on:
Disciplinary literacy is an approach to teaching and learning that focuses on the practices of a specific field. It is student-focused, meaning it is designed to help students become part of a particular discipline.
It also emphasizes the development of skills and strategies that students can use to become effective readers, writers, and communicators in a specific field. This approach is different from content area literacy, which involves teaching literacy skills in the context of a specific content area, such as math, science, or history.
Content area literacy focuses on reading and writing activities that are related to the content being studied, such as reading and writing assignments in a science class.
In contrast, disciplinary literacy focuses on developing the skills and strategies that are specific to a particular discipline, such as understanding the language and conventions of a field, knowing how to ask questions and analyze data, and using evidence to support arguments.
know more about Disciplinary literacy here
https://brainly.com/question/31518783#
#SPJ11
Why is Mrs. Linde so happy about Torvald's promotion?
Mrs. Linde is happy about Torvald's promotion for several reasons. Firstly, she knows that Nora, her childhood friend, has been struggling to make ends meet due to Torvald's lower position at the bank. With his promotion, they will have more financial stability, and Nora will no longer have to worry about money as much.
Secondly, Mrs. Linde is a practical woman who values hard work and success. She sees Torvald's promotion as a testament to his abilities and dedication to his job, and she is genuinely happy for him.
Lastly, Mrs. Linde is also happy because she knows that Torvald's promotion will improve Nora's status in society. In the patriarchal society of the time, a man's success was often tied to his wife's social standing. With Torvald's promotion, Nora will likely be invited to more social events and be viewed with more respect by others in their community.
In conclusion, Mrs. Linde is happy about Torvald's promotion because it will benefit her friend Nora, showcase Torvald's hard work, and improve Nora's social status.
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT Torvald's promotion CLICK THIS LINK -
brainly.com/question/30612002
#SPJ11
Is Torvald Helmer a deeply abhorrent character?
It can be argued that Torvald Helmer, the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen's "A Doll's House," is a deeply abhorrent character.
Throughout the play, Torvald is shown to be condescending, controlling, and dismissive towards his wife Nora. He constantly infantilizes her and sees her as a possession rather than an equal partner. His obsession with maintaining his reputation and social status causes him to prioritize appearances over his own family's well-being.
Additionally, he is hypocritical in his treatment of Nora, expecting her to adhere to strict societal norms while engaging in illicit affairs himself. Overall, Torvald's actions and attitudes towards Nora and women in general can be viewed as deeply problematic and unjustifiable.
However, it is also important to consider the societal norms and expectations of the time period in which the play is set, as these would have influenced Torvald's behavior.
For more question on abhorrent
https://brainly.com/question/28201852
#SPJ11