pleassseee help will give good rating and brain :)

Answer: 4.1%

Step-by-step explanation:

Given data:

Measure value ( actual) = 36 pounds

Expected value = 34.5 pounds

Solution:

Percentage error = Actual value - expected value / expected value * 100

= 36 - 34.6 / 34.6 * 100

= 1.4/34.6 * 100

= 0.041 * 100

= 4.1

The percentage error is 4.1%

Answer:

It's Rational.

Step-by-step explanation:

A rational number is any integer, fraction, terminating decimal, or repeating decimal.

It is found that 0.27322370013414... is rational number.

Natural numbers are: 1, 2, 3, ....

Integer numbers are: ...., -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ... (so it includes positive and negative natural number, and 0 )

Rational numbers are numbers which can be written in the form of a/b where a and b are integers.

Example: 1/2, 3.5 (which is writable as 7/5) etc.

Irrational numbers are those real numbers which are not rational numbers.

Know that all natural numbers are integers, all integers are rational numbers. That means, natural numbers are not irrational.

Since, rational number is any integer, fraction, terminating decimal, or repeating decimal.

Thus, 0.27322370013414... is rational number.

Learn more about a number pattern:

brainly.com/question/14471389

#SPJ2

(Hope that helps (= The given says the height distribution is normally distributed with the mean height equal to 68 inches. In this case, the bell-shaped curve has a vertical symmetry at 68 inches. This means, half of the mean exceeds 68 inches while the other half has height below 68 inches.

The height range out of which only 5% of the young American men (from age 18 to 24) lie is  [63.35, 72.65] (in inches)

If we've got a normal distribution, then we can convert it to standard normal distribution and its values will give us the z score.

If we have

[tex]X \sim N(\mu, \sigma)[/tex]

(X is following normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex] )

then it can be converted to standard normal distribution as

[tex]Z = \dfrac{X - \mu}{\sigma}, \\\\Z \sim N(0,1)[/tex]

(Know the fact that in continuous distribution, probability of a single point is 0, so we can write

[tex]P(Z \leq z) = P(Z < z) )[/tex]

Also, know that if we look for Z = z in z tables, the p value we get is

[tex]P(Z \leq z) = \rm p \: value[/tex]

For this case, let we take:

Then, according to the given data, we have:
[tex]X \sim N(\mu = 68, \sigma = 2.5)[/tex]

where [tex]\mu[/tex] is mean value of X and [tex]\sigma[/tex] is standard deviation of X (both in inches).

Also, we can write:

[tex]P(X < a) + P(X > b) = 5\% = 0.05[/tex]

Since normal distribution is symmetric about its mean, we can take a and b equidistant from the mean, so as to get a symmetric range which makes much more sense than taking an asymmetric range which doesn't comply with the nature of values of X.

Thus, we have:

[tex]\mu - a = b - \mu\\b = 2\mu - a[/tex]

From this result and [tex]P(X < a) + P(X > b) = 5\% = 0.05[/tex], we get:
[tex]P(X < a) + P(X > 2\mu -a) = 0.05[/tex]

Converting X to Z(the standard normal distribution), we get;
[tex]Z = \dfrac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]P(X < a) + P(X > 2\mu -a) = 0.05\\\\P(Z < z = \dfrac{x-\mu}{\sigma} = \dfrac{a-68}{2.5}) + P(Z > \dfrac{2(68) - a - 68}{2.5}) = 0.05\\\\P(Z < \dfrac{a-68}{2.5}) + P(Z > \dfrac{68-a}{2.5}) = 0.05\\\\P(Z < \dfrac{a-68}{2.5}) + P(Z > -\dfrac{a-68}{2.5}) = 0.05\\\\P(Z < \dfrac{a-68}{2.5}) + P(Z \leq \dfrac{a-68}{2.5}) = 0.05 \: \: \: \: (\because P(Z > -k) = P(Z \leq k))\\\\2P(Z < \dfrac{a-68}{2.5}) = 0.05\\\\P(Z < \dfrac{a-68}{2.5}) = 0.025[/tex]

Using the z-tables, we get the value of Z for which p-value is 0.025 as

-1.96

Thus, we get:
[tex]\dfrac{a-68}{2.5} = -1.96\\\\a = 68 + (-1.96 \times 2.5)\\a = 63.35[/tex]

Thus, we get: [tex]b = 2\mu - a = 2(68) - 63.35 = 72.65[/tex]

Thus, the range is [a,b] = [63.35, 72.65]

Thus, the height range out of which only 5% of the young American men (from age 18 to 24) lie is  [63.35, 72.65] (in inches)

Learn more about standard normal distribution here:

https://brainly.com/question/10984889

Answer:89/1000

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\frac{89}{1000}[/tex]  

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope this helps!

Answer:

6.9y+2.4y

= 9.3y

Hope it helps u,

pls put thanks and pls mark as the brainliest

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Can i plz have brainliest :)

Answer:

The answer is choice 2 and 3, that is "The quotient has a final decimal and the whole number is less than 11".

Step-by-step explanation:

The product of a ratio: amount (r) over other(s) (variance from 0) becomes mandatory to note this quotient and in the following case Thus q is = 0.0882352941.

[tex]\to \frac{81}{918}= 0.0882352941[/tex]

It wasn't a repeating decimal, however a final decimal, so it's got an end.

Its quotient may be less than 11 in total.

Numbers of W = {0,1,2, ...} and 0 < 11 are provided for this entire series of data therefore It's real .

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

5x-(0)=30

add 0 to both sides to cancel

5x=30

divide by 5 on both sides to cancel

x=6

Answer:

∠RQS = 19°

∠RQT = 90°

∠RQV = 161°

∠UQV = 91°

Step-by-step explanation:

To get ∠RQV, you know that the line is equal to 180°, so subtract 19° from it:

∠RQV = 180 - 19

∠RQV = 161°

To get ∠UQV, you know that the line is equal to 180°, so subtract 71° and 18° from it:

∠UQV = 180 - 71 - 18

∠UQV = 91°

Hope this helps!

the answer to your question is 4

Answer:

yeah it is 4 i got it right

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]y=-4x+6[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

If you are looking for a parallel line with just the equation then look for an equation with the same slope and different Y intercept. After you find that just check and see if it passes the coordinate.

[tex]2=-4(1)+6[/tex]

[tex]2=-4+6[/tex]

[tex]2=2[/tex]

If it works you have your answer!

The equation of the line parallel to y = -4x - 6 and passing through (1, 2) is

y = -4x + 6.

The slope of y = -4x - 6 is -4.

passing through the point (1, 2)

the new line is parallel to the original line, it will have the same slope (-4).

Use the point-slope form of a linear equation to write the equation of the new line. The point-slope form is y - y1 = m(x - x1), where m is the slope, and (x1, y1) is the given point.

substituting values,

y - 2 = -4(x - 1)

y - 2 = -4x + 4

y = -4x + 6

learn more about slope here

brainly.com/question/2491620

#SPJ2

Answer:

5/12

Step-by-step explanation:

All of the other answers share at least one factor they can be divided by (the numerator in all cases). 5/12 however shares no factors and cannot be simplified anymore.

Answer:

6+3^3

Step-by-step explanation:

6 plus 3 cubed

which is 6+3^3

Answer:

79.50

Step-by-step explanation:

suma  130 mas 125.50 y el resultado de esta se los restas a el total.

Answer:

The first one, there are no repeating x values

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

20 caramel apples are covered with sprinkles

Step-by-step explanation:

Maya has 120 caramel apples to sell. Each caramel apple is covered with one topping. 1/5 of caramel apples are covered with peanuts. 1/3 are covered with chocolate chips. 3/10 are covered with coconut. The rest are covered with sprinkles.

Let the Total fraction of caramel apples = 1

1 = 1/5 + 1/3 + 3/10 + caramel apples covered in sprinkles

Fraction of caramel apples covered in sprinkles = 1 - (1/5 + 1/3 + 3/10 )

LCM of denominator = 30

= 1 - (6 + 10 + 9/30)

= 1 - 25/30

= 5/30

= 1/6

How many caramel apples are covered with sprinkles

This is calculated as :

Fraction of caramel apples covered in sprinkles × Total number of caramel apples

= 1/6 × 120

= 20 caramel apples covered in sprinkles.

Answer:

10 days: ofc there is an easier way to do this but i did my own way down below :)

Step-by-step explanation:

in 1 day

cowboys: 300+25 is 325

saints: 700-15=685

in 2 days:

cowboys: 325+25 is 350

saints: 685-15 is 670

in 3 days:

cowboys: 350+25 is 375

saints: 670-15 is 655

in 4 days:

cowboys: 375+25 is 400

saints: 655-15 is 640

in 5 days:

cowboys: 400+25 is 425

saints: 640-15 is 625

in 6 days:

cowboys: 425+25 is 450

saints: 625-15 is 610

in 7 days:

cowboys: 450+25=475

saints: 610-15 is 595

in 8 days:

cowboys: 475+25 is 500

saints: 595-15 is 580

in 9 days:

cowboys: 500+25 is 525

saints: 580-15 is 565

in 10 days:

cowboys: 525+25 is 550

saints: 565-15 is 550

in 10 days, they will have the same number of followers

Given : 56 men can do a work in 42 days .

To Find : In how many men will do the same work in 14 days .

Solution : We will use Unitary method here to solve the above problem . This is a case of inversely proportional that is when one will increase the other will decreases . Here if the number of men will increase then the number of days will decrease and vice - versa .

If in 42 days 56 men can do the work ,

Then in 1 day 42 × 56 men can do the work .

Then in 14 days , [tex]\sf \dfrac{42\times\cancel{56}}{\cancel{14}}[/tex] will do the work = 168 .

Hence 168 men will do the work in 14 days .

[tex]\Large\boxed{\red{\bf Answer = 168 \:men}}[/tex]

Answer:

(x-3) (x-7)

Step-by-step explanation:

The first term is,  x2  its coefficient is  1 .

The middle term is,  -10x  its coefficient is  -10 .

The last term, "the constant", is  +21  

Step-1 : Multiply the coefficient of the first term by the constant   1 • 21 = 21  

Step-2 : Find two factors of  21  whose sum equals the coefficient of the middle term, which is   -10 .

     -21    +    -1    =    -22  

     -7    +    -3    =    -10    That's it

Step-3 : Rewrite the polynomial splitting the middle term using the two factors found in step 2 above,  -7  and  -3  

                    x2 - 7x - 3x - 21

Step-4 : Add up the first 2 terms, pulling out like factors :

                   x • (x-7)

             Add up the last 2 terms, pulling out common factors :

                   3 • (x-7)

Step-5 : Add up the four terms of step 4 :

                   (x-3)  •  (x-7)

            Which is the desired factorization

Answer:

Its definitely B 84.5

I took the test

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

87

Step-by-step explanation:

The median score is the score that appears in the middle of the graph and the set of numbers. 87 is the median score.

The complete question is;

A popular band is trying to raise at least $20,000 for charity by holding multiple concerts at a park. It plans to sell tickets at $25 each. For each 2-hour concert, the band would need to pay the park $1,250 in fees for security, cleaning, and traffic services.

The band needs to find the combinations of number of tickets sold, t, and number of concerts held, c, that would allow it to reach its fundraising goal.

Write an inequality to represent the constraints in this situation.

Answer:

(25t)c - 1250 ≥ $20,000

Step-by-step explanation:

We are told the band is trying to raise at least $20,000.

It's trying to sell tickets at $25 each.

We are told that they pay the park $1,250 in fees for security, cleaning, and traffic services.

Now, expenses for each concert is $1,250.

Now, we are told that the number of tickets sold is t, and number of concerts held, c.

Thus, total amount that can be realized for "c" number of concerts is;

A = (25t)c

Now, expenses for each concert is $1,250.

Thus, total profit for "c" number of concerts is;

P = (25t)c - 1250

Now, they are trying to raise at least $20,000. Meaning greater than or equal to $20,000.

Thus, the profit must be greater than or equal to $20,000.

Thus, the inequality is;

(25t)c - 1250 ≥ $20,000

the answer is quadrant 3

Answer:

Its in quadrant 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Since they are both negative they go into the third quadrant

Answer:

Let 2n + 1 be an odd number......  B/2nd option

Step-by-step explanation:

The best choice is

Let 2n + 1 be an odd number; (2n + 1) + (2n + 1) = 4n + 2.

Because 4(n + 2) is divisible by 2, the sum of 2n + 1 and itself is even.

A hypothesis in mathematics is a conclusion or a proposition made tentatively without supporting evidence. Some conjectures, like the Fermat's Last Theorem or the Riemann hypothesis, have significantly influenced the development of new branches of mathematics.

First, Only three examples are given which is not appropriate at all.

Second, This is the best proof is

Let 2n + 1 be an odd number; (2n + 1) + (2n + 1) = 4n + 2. Because 4(n + 2) is divisible by 2, the sum of 2n + 1 and itself is even.

Fourth, State the meaning of Title without proof.

Learn more about Conjecture here:

https://brainly.com/question/29153415

#SPJ2

Answer:

113.29w +1.77

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The number 0 is a whole number, which is part of the rational numbers, is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

Absalom states that 0 is a rational number.

As the whole numbers are 0,1,2,3,... which is starting from 0, so the stated number 0 is a part of the whole number.

As all the whole number are rational numbers, so 0 is a rational number

Hence, the explanation (i) which is,

The number 0 is a whole number, which is part of the rational numbers, is correct.

The naturals numbers are 1,2,3,... which starts from 1, so 0 is not a part of the natural number, and the number 0 can be written as a fraction like [tex]0=\frac {0}{1}[/tex].

Hence, statement (ii) The number 0 is a natural number, which is part of the rational numbers as well as the statement (iii) The number 0 cannot be written as a fraction, are wrong.

Answer:

The number 0 is a whole number, which is part of the rational numbers.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

150

Step-by-step explanation:

add 79+ 71 because you rounded to get that number then add :)

150

When estimating you just round off the numbers so, 78.9 becomes 79 and 71.2 becomes 71 so, 79 + 71 = 150.

Answer:

rationale

Step-by-step explanation:

step by step instructions

Answer:

Irrational

Step-by-step explanation:

The decimal doesn't terminate.