Please help me............

Answer:

it will be in the thousands  place for sure

Step-by-step explanation:

hope that helps =) i forgot there were a decimal point

Answer:

The place value of 5 in "123.465" is the thousandths

Step-by-step explanation:

The reason for this is because the "5" is 3 points behind the decimal, making it in the thousanths place.

Answer:

=b^2+(9+2)b+18

=b^2+9b+2b+18

=b(b+9)+2(b+9)

=(b+9)(b+2)

Answer:

[tex](2,5), (3,6), (6,9)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Because the abscissa does not repeat with different ordinate (well, there's actually no repeating abscissa)

Answer:c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A) I hope I helped you ◉‿◉

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

directrix: x=-1

focus: (1,0)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

65kg=143.30047 pounds and 1kg=2.20462262 pounds

Answer:

x=1/2 or x=0.5

Step-by-step explanation:

14=18x+8 so 18x =6 so x=1/2

Answer:

x = 1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

14 = 18x + 8

Subtract 8 from both sides.

6 = 18x

Divide both sides by 18.

6/18 = x

Simplify.

1/3 = x

Answer:

-10

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-10

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

if 2.4 is there it will become -2. 4

Answer:

13 1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

im sure this is right btw

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

The tens digit a is cubed (a³ ) still less than the biggest possible 1 -digit number . It can be only 0 or 1 , so even 2³ =8 ( in such case the unit digit is 15,- that's  not possible) .

0 can not be the the first digit in 2 digit number. So the only possible tens digit is 1. So the unit number is 1+7=8.

Answer 18

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

100

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Place houses on

48

of the 100 squares to

represent

48/100

or 48% houses.

Answer:

x1= -4/3 and x2= 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-8

Step-by-step explanation:

-9.5-(-8)-6.5  There are two negatives next to each other, so it's a positive.

-9.5+8-6.5     We want to use the order of operations, so first we can add.

-9.5+8=-1.5     The problem now looks like...

-1.5-6.5           Finally, just subtract.

-8                     8 is your answer!!

I hope this helped you...have a wonderful day c:

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

this will help i think this will be the answer i am not sure

Answer:

$203,333

Step-by-step explanation:

Computation for the break-even in sales dollars for Division Q

First step is to compute the Segment Contribution Margin ratio

Using this formula

Segment Contribution Margin ratio = Segment contribution margin ÷ Segment sales

Let plug in the formula

Segment Contribution Margin ratio= $ 175,980÷ $ 419,000

Segment Contribution Margin ratio= 0.42

Last step is to find the break-even in sales dollars for Division Q using this formula

Break-even in sales dollars = Segment traceable fixed expenses ÷ Segment Contribution Margin ratio

Let plug in the formula

Break-even in sales dollars= $85,400÷ 0.42

Break-even in sales dollars=$203,333

Therefore the break-even in sales dollars for Division Q is $203,333

Answer:

1.50 is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

yeah I had it on a question yw

Answer:

eggffdf

Step-by-step explanation:

sfdsffgfddfdkkhsdghskjgfhjgdfjhdgdhdsdfh

maybe try quizzlet that would really help i swear

Answer:

u = 65/7

Step-by-step explanation:

u/5 = 13/7

Using the cross product

7u = 5*13

7u = 65

Divide each side by 7

7u/7 = 65/7

u = 65/7

Answer:

x=3

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Add 5 to both sides --> 40x=120

2. Divide 40 from both sides

3. x=3

Answer:

59

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The sequence is nor properly written. This is correct sequence

49, 36, 25, 16, 9, 4, 1...

Merely looking at the sequence, we can see that it doesn't form an arithmetic sequence nor does it form a geometric sequence.

The values of the sequence are all perfect squares.

Rewriting the sequence;

7², 6², 5², 4², 3², 2², 1²...

Now we can see that the base values for an arithmetic sequence as shown:

7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1...

We find the common difference of this sequence as shown

d = T2-T1 = T3-T2 = T4-T3

Given T1 = 7, T2 = 6, T3 = 5, T4 = 4

Substitute

d = 6-7 = 5-6 = 4-5 = -1

d = -1

Get the nth term using the sequence

Tn = a+(n-1)d

a is the first term

d is the common difference

n is number of terms

Tn = 7+(n-1)(-1)

Tn = 7+(-n+1)

Tn = 7+1-n

Tn = 8-n

Since their power are constant i.e squared, hence we will square the ntj term as well to get the nth term of the original sequence as;

Tn = (8-n)²

To conclude, we can say that the sequence is neither arithmetic nor geometric sequence since the terms of the sequence are prefect squares.

Answer:

y = -3x-5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

184.2 in^3

Step-by-step explanation:

vol of cone=

[tex]\pi {r}^{2} \frac{h}{3} [/tex]

[tex]3.14 \times 16 \times \frac{11}{3} [/tex]

=184.2

Answer:

21

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

67%

Step-by-step explanation:

the original amount had to increase by 67% in order to equal the final about simply by dividing 2000 by 3000 getting 2/3 which is 0.666667 then multiplying by 100 to get a rate

Answer:

a.  P(x = 3) = 0.061313

b. The expected number of radio blackouts = 4

c.  It is not possible to determine the next radio blackout

d. P(x = 4) = 0.19537

Step-by-step explanation:

From the given information:

Using a Poisson process to model the phenomenon:

Since minor radio blackouts occur, on average, twice per year.

Then:

[tex]\lambda = 2 \ years[/tex]

From question (a)

time t = 1/2 (i.e half of the year)

Let x be the random variable that denotes the probability that 3 events will happen in the rest of the year.

Then:

[tex]P(x = 3) = \dfrac{e^{-\lambda t} \times (\lambda t)^x}{x!}[/tex]

[tex]P(x = 3) = \dfrac{e^{-2* 0.5} \times (2 * 0.5)^3}{3!}[/tex]

P(x = 3) = 0.061313

b).

The number of radio blackouts  we expect to see in two years can be estimated as follows:

we know that:

t = 2 years

E(x) = λ × t

E(x) = 2 × 2

E(x) = 4

The expected number of radio blackouts = 4

c).

The amount of time we need to wait given that the probability of seeing the next radio blackout is at least 0.5 is as follows:

Here, the time (t) = ???

Thus:

P(x =1) = 0.5

[tex]P(x = 1) = \dfrac{e^{-\lambda t} \times (\lambda t)^x}{x!} = 0.5[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{e^{-\lambda t} \times (\lambda t)^x}{x!} = 0.5[/tex]

Thus, it is not possible to determine the probability (50%) of seeing the next radio blackout.

d)

The probability that the time to the 4th blackout is at most 2 years can be computed as follows:

Here;

x =4 , t = 2

Thus:

[tex]P(x = 4) = \dfrac{e^{-4 } \times (4)^4}{4!}[/tex]

P(x = 4) = 0.19537