Performance of a duty you are obligated to do under the law is not good consideration. this is known as the pre-existing duty rule.
A precept under settlement regulation that states that if a party to a contract is below a pre-existing responsibility to carry out, then no consideration is given for any amendment of the agreement and the amendment is consequently voidable.
Preexisting duty rule is a not unusual-law rule of agreement. It says that the rule of thumb that overall performance of an act by using which a celebration is already contractually sure to carry out does not represent legitimate consideration for a new promise.
The legal obligation rule does no longer practice if the parties mutually agree to alternate the terms of the settlement. As an instance, the owner of a house and contractor may want to conform to include a new window at an additional cost of $one thousand. instead, the events should agree not to perform part of the contract for a $500 reduction inside the price.
Learn more about pre-existing here : https://brainly.com/question/13811062
#SPJ4
The Small Business Administration provides entrepreneurs with helpful information about planning, starting, and running a business.
Choose the answer.
A.True
B.False
The statement is The Small Business Administration provides entrepreneurs with helpful information about planning, starting, and running a business is True.
What is The Small Business Administration?The Small Business Administration is an agency whose roles and responsibilities to rendered assistance to small scale business owners by providing them with the necessary information they need to know as well as the information that will enables the business owners to succeed in their respective business choice.
This agency support entrepreneur in all ways and they as well help to boost the economy of a country due to important roles they play.
Therefore we can conclude that statement is true.
Learn more about The Small Business Administration here: https://brainly.com/question/13424073
#SPJ1
Which of the following is an example of demonstrative evidence?
O Gun
O Fingerprint
O Handwritten note
O Model of crime scene
Answer:
D: model of the crime scene.
Explanation:
Demonstrative evidence is evidence that is not the original piece of evidence.
if correct, please mark me Brainiest.
You are to present the financial statements in slide form for use with a multimedia projector. Identify one type of software that you may use to display the statements
A type of software that you may use to display these statements is Microsoft PowerPoint.
What is PowerPoint?PowerPoint can be defined as a software application or program that is designed and developed by Microsoft Inc., so as to avail all of its end users an ability to create and display various slides containing both a textual (statements) and multimedia information which can be used during a presentation.
Additionally, some of the features that are available on Microsoft PowerPoint include the following:
Custom slideshowsAnimation effectsNarrationsTransition effectsFormatting options.In this context, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that Microsoft PowerPoint is a type of software that you may use to display the financial statements in slide form for use with a multimedia projector.
Read more on PowerPoint here: https://brainly.com/question/28220859
#SPJ1
john was driving his friend, mary, back to her home in his new car. on the way to mary's home, the car's brakes malfunctioned and they got into an accident. based on just these facts, the lawsuit with the greatest likelihood of succeeding would be:
Answer:
A lawsuit of the cost of damages on the company that John bought the car from.
Explanation:
if correct, pls mark smartest
The attitude someone has when committing a
crime, their intentions
The attitude someone has when committing crime, their intentions is celled mens rea.
The required details about intention is mentioned in below paragraph.
Intentions are intellectual states wherein the agent commits themselves to a path of motion. Having the plan to go to the zoo the next day is an instance of an goal. The motion plan is the content material of the goal even as the dedication is the mindset closer to this co
For human beings, however, having an goal means (a) that one has fashioned the view that the motion is really helpful, and which means that one want now no longer boost once more the query of whether or not it's miles really helpful to do so.
The plural of provision is mentes reae. A mens rea refers back to the dominion of thoughts statutorily needed on the thanks to convict a particular litigator of a selected crime.
Thus, mens rea is the attitude of someone committing a crime.
To learn about mens rea from the link.
https://brainly.com/question/15071197
#SPJ9
When an officer makes a vehicle stop what four things should he/she transmit to dispatch?
After an officer performs a vehicle stop, the four things they should transmit to dispatch include:
That they stopped a vehicle The CYMBALS information The occupant information The location of the stopWhat does an officer do when they stop a car?When an office stops a vehicle, there are procedures that they have to abide by and one of these include transmitting certain information back to dispatch.
They need to tell dispatch that they have made a vehicular stop, and then they should send the CYMBALS (Color, Year, Make, Body Type...) information as well as information on the occupants of the car. They should also transmit the location of the stop.
Find out more on officers at vehicle stops at https://brainly.com/question/28212059
#SPJ1
if a reasonable period of time passes after a minor reaches legal age and he or she has said nothing about disaffirming the contract, then in the eyes of the law it is considered as:
Answer:
Contractual capacity is defined by the law to mean the ability to understand the
consequences of a contract. This definition does not require that a person understand
the actual terms of the contract which may be written in technical legal terminology.
Nor does the definition require that the person have merely the actual understanding
of the terms whether expressed in legal terminology or not. Contractual capacity
requires only that she or he possess the ability to understand the consequences of
the terms.
There are two broad categories of parties that are recognized to lack the capacity:
1) Those who are said to be incapacitated and have special contractual rights due to a
legally recognized lack of such capacity. This group includes minors, the intoxicated, and
the mentally impaired.
2) The second category is made up of those who “lack the authority” to enter an agreement.
We will examine this group in the next lesson.
1. Incapacitated Parties - Minors
Incapacitated parties are assumed by the law to lack the maturity and experience to protect their
self-interests in contractual negotiations. The law grants these parties special contractual
protections designed to keep them from being cheated due to their lack of such contractual
capacity. Parties who have special contractual rights due to a legally recognized lack of such
capacity include minors, the intoxicated, and the mentally impaired.
Explanation:
During which of the following decades in American history was the crime rate
relatively stable?
The 1950s
The 1960s
The 1970s
The 1980s
Answer:
The 1950s
Explanation:
Following World War II, the crime rate in America remained relatively stable until the 1960s, when reported criminal activity increased dramatically.
rosa parks broke a law by refusing to give up her seat on a bus for a white man. ultimately, this act was a pivotal moment in the launch of the civil rights movement. rosa parks's refusal to move to the back of the bus is an example of .
Answer:
Pretty sure it was an example of positive deviance.
Explanation:
the city of la mesa has proposed a city ordinance prohibiting all political advertising on bus stop benches. a court would likely review this ordinance under the principles of
A court would likely review this ordinance under the principles of Model Code of Conduct does not violate Article 19(1)(a)
What are the rules around political advertising?
The accuracy of the information in political advertisements is not yet required by law. You can get in touch with the advertiser directly or your representative in local government if you have concerns about a political advertisement.
When must political ads stop?
The Broadcasting Services Act of 1992, which is overseen by ACMA, contains a clause that governs the broadcasting blackout period. From the conclusion of the Wednesday before election day until the end of voting on election day, no election advertisements may be broadcast on radio or television.
To know more about political ads follow the given link https://brainly.com/question/6304254
#SPJ4
there are many methods of discovery, and state laws often provide for broad discovery (such as encouraging the sharing of information among parties to a lawsuit). why do you think discovery is encouraged?
Discovery is encouraged so they can be appropriately arranged for the preliminary. Discovery is the way toward trading the data between the gatherings that will be displayed at the preliminary. The reason for existing is to make the gatherings mindful of the proof that might be introduced at the preliminary.
The primary forms of written discovery are Interrogatories, Requests for the production of documents, and Requests for Admissions. Shape Interrogatories permit a celebration to invite common questions from a list of questions provided with the aid of the California courts.
The criminal process of producing a list of all files associated with the complaints presently or previously inside the birthday party's ownership. If files have been previously inside the party's ownership, the birthday celebration can even need to specify after they had them, and to who they were disbursed.
The discovery segment consists of two key factors: making plans for collection to ensure that statistics are accrued, controlled, and shared in a scientific and planned manner. Amassing facts the usage of a spread of methods.
Learn more about Discovery here https://brainly.com/question/6640162
#SPJ4
Two neighbors have a conflict over the boundary between their properties. Both are talking to their own attorneys, but they wish to settle without involving anyone else. Which method of dispute resolution will they use?
A. Court action
B. Negotiation
C. Mediation
D. Arbitration
Two neighbors have a conflict over the boundary between their properties. Both are talking to their own attorneys, but they wish to settle without involving anyone else. They will use Negotiation method of dispute resolution.
Any kind of communication, whether direct or indirect, in which people with divergent interests debate potential collaborative actions to manage and ultimately settle their conflict is referred to as negotiation. Negotiations can be used to establish a future relationship between two or more parties or to fix an issue that has already arisen. Depending on the situation and the negotiating team's objectives, an attorney's role will change during a negotiation.
None of the parties to a voluntary negotiation are required to participate. The parties are free to accept or reject the results of the negotiations and to halt the procedure at any time. Parties have the option of taking part in the negotiations personally or choosing to have a third party, such as a relative, friend, attorney, or other professional, represent them.
Learn more about Conflicts here:
https://brainly.com/question/26083560
#SPJ1
How much total interest will Molly pay using this plan?
Answer:
1: I am sure that this is a mathematics question, not a law question.
2: How are people supposed provide an answer without even knowing what the plan Molly is using?
Explanation:
g while jason is inside the bank, he accidentally shoots a security guard who is chasing him. james drives the getaway car and remains outside the bank the whole time. he did not know that jason had brought a gun or that the security guard had been shot. what is james liable for?
Criminal responsibility is the legal term for when someone can be charged with breaking the law.
What does it mean to have criminal liability?Criminal responsibility is the legal term for when someone can be charged with breaking the law. Criminal culpability involves both prospective and actual blame, which implies that a defendant may face charges and a sentence regardless of whether they are shown to have committed a crime or not.The behavior that results in the victim's death constitutes the criminal act element necessary for murder. The distinction between murder and manslaughter is made by the criminal intent component of murder. The three varieties of malice aforethought are depraved heart, intent to kill, and purpose to cause significant bodily harm.Felony-murder. The Model Penal Code opposes the use of the death sentence for homicides that take place during theTo learn more about Criminal Liability refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29246755
#SPJ4
hijackers of a truck carrying dog food were arrested and indicted by a grand jury. during the grand jury's investigation. the district attorney's office subpoenaed the truck driver as a witness. to her relief, she was not asked questions about a series of thefts of shipments of dog chew toys that she was involved in, but believes that the subject might be brought up at trial by the defense lawyers. she is afraid that she likely will be fired if she invokes the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination on the witness stand, so she wants to avoid testifying at all at the trial, even if she is subpoenaed by the defense. as her lawyer, what advice should you give her about complying with a subpoena?
She cannot refuse to testify since she is permitted to invoke the Fifth Amendment while testifying.
With the exception of situations involving members of the armed forces, no one may be tried for a capital offense or other infamous crime without a grand jury's presentment or indictment or the militia who are serving in actual combat or other times of public danger; no one may be twice put in danger of losing their life or limb for the same offense; no one may be forced to testify against themselves in a criminal case; and no one may be deprived of their life, liberty, or property.A number of rights important to both criminal and civil judicial processes are established by the Fifth Amendment. The Fifth Amendment forbids "double jeopardy" in criminal proceedings, guarantees the right to a grand jury, and protects against self-incrimination. The "life, liberty, or property" of a citizen must also be preserved by "due process of law," and the government must compensate when removing private property for public use.Thus this is the meaning of Fifth Amendment.
Refer here to learn more about Fifth Amendment: https://brainly.com/question/1332952
#SPJ4
Question 4 of 20
Which of the following is an example of primary source?
O A. Law journal
O B. Legal encyclopedia
O C. Legal analysis
OD. Case law
Answer: O A. Law Journal
Explanation:
an individual who is injured as result of a tort may bring a legal action against the person who caused the injury. in a court of law, the injured party is known as the
the injured party is known as plaintiff.
What is plaintiff and tort law ?
Plaintiff is the person who initiates a legal case against someone in court.
A tort is a civil wrong that exposes the perpetrator to legal responsibility and results in loss or injury to the claimant. Criminal law, which deals with crimes that the state has the power to punish, can be compared with tort law. Tort law strives to recompense those who suffer injury as a result of the conduct of others, in contrast to criminal law, which seeks to punish people who commit crimes. In nations with distinct civil and criminal legal systems, some wrongdoings like assault and battery can lead to both a civil complaint and a criminal prosecution.
to learn more about tort law click :
https://brainly.com/question/9966122
#SPJ4
Nexus between law and war on terror
Answer:
The Law of War in the War on Terror The Bush administration has literalized its "war" on terrorism, dissolving the legal boundaries between what a government can do in peacetime and what's allowed in war.
Explanation:
how could a forensic ipse dixit statute potentially take away the defendant's constitutional rights in a courtroom if not for the melendez-diaz v. massachusetts (2009) decision?
It can take away by not allowing the lack of cross-examination of the forensic analyst
The government is relieved of its burden of proof by the forensic ipse dixit statutes, which also deny defendants the right to confrontation. Additionally, these laws encourage negligence and fraud in crime laboratories, inhibit robust defense advocacy, and raise the possibility of erroneous convictions and penalties. It is not a ridiculous quirk of Texas law that this forensic ipse dixit statute exists.
This forensic ipse dixit statute has been adopted by almost all of the states in the union. In the great majority of American jurisdictions, live testimony is not required to substantiate forensic claims; instead, the state may rely on a forensic certificate. If not for the Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts (2009) ruling the forensic analyst would not be cross-examined, resulting in negligent practice and increased rates of false convictions, a forensic ipse dixit statute may potentially take away the defendant's constitutional rights in a trial.
Read more about cross-examination on:
https://brainly.com/question/28523666
#SPJ4
in the federal court system, each circuit court of appeals has group of answer choices a few state court judges who also serve as circuit court judges. a range of permanent judgeships depending on the workload of the circuit. one permanent judge. 50 permanent judges and 100 part-time judges.
In the federal court system, each circuit court of appeals has a range of permanent judgeships depending on the workload of the circuit.
There are three sorts of federal courts within the federal system: 94 District Courts (trial courts), 13 Courts of Appeals (intermediate appellate courts), and the United States Supreme Court (the court of final review).Federal courts have unique authority to interpret the law, evaluate its constitutionality, and apply it to specific situations. The courts, like Congress, can employ subpoenas to compel the production of evidence and testimony.The 94 federal judicial districts are divided into 12 regional circuits, each with an appeals court. The appeal court's role is to determine whether the law was correctly applied in the trial court. Appeals courts are made up of three judges and do not use juries.Thus the correct option is B.
To learn more about circuit court of appeals, refer: https://brainly.com/question/24978344
#SPJ1
Discuss how the discretion of the prosecutor impacts the criminal justice system. Discuss the arbitrariness of prosecutorial decision-making. Is that justice?
please use about 250 words :)
Based on the use of discretion by a prosecutor, this can have an impact on the proceedings of the criminal justice system as the circumstances that led to an event is considered and weighed before making a criminal prosecution process.
Who is a Prosecutor?This refers to the legal term that is used to describe the public official that institutes legal proceedings against a person in the court of law, the judicial arm of government to answer to some accusations.
Hence, it can be seen that based on prosecutorial discretion, a prosecutor has to rely on his discretion to bring forward a case after he has weighed the circumstances.
With this in mind, it is clear to see that there are three main scenarios in which this prosecutorial discretion can be used and they are:
the decision to file charges, the decision to dismiss charges, plea bargaining.Read more about prosecutors here:
https://brainly.com/question/28876626
#SPJ1
what is the difference between rule of law and rule of man
Answer:
Absence of rule of law implies the absence of a legislature judiciary and a legal administrative and enforcement system. On the other hand rule of man is associated with the lack of a legal system that is lawlessness.
How do checks and balances AND the Bill of Rights ensure that the United States government would remain relevant throughout the history of the United States?
The chain is what keeps the process going.
One branch has the power to carry out an action, while another branch has the responsibility of making sure this power isn't abused.
The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of the constitution. These amendments still greatly affect how citizens of the U.S. can live.
Both checks and balances and Bill of Rights maintain the power of the U.S. government, providing reason to why it is still relevant after all these years.
what is the main idea of amendment 1
Answer:
freedom of speech. that every individual has the right to a voice and opinion
Explanation:
laws regulating the sale of alcohol serve the purpose of: a) preventing the sale of alcohol to minors under 21 years of age b) preventing the sale of alcohol to people who are intoxicated c) all of the above
Answer:
c
Explanation:
laws regulating the sale of alcohol serve the purpose of all of the above. The correct option is c.
The prohibition of selling alcohol to anyone under the legal drinking age of 21 as well as the prohibition against selling alcohol to people who are already intoxicated are two of the many goals of laws governing the sale of alcohol.
These laws are put into effect to increase public safety, stop underage drinking and the risks that come with it and lessen alcohol related harm. These laws seek to protect vulnerable groups, uphold order and encourage socially responsible alcohol consumption by enforcing age restrictions and outlawing the sale of alcohol to intoxicated people.
learn more about sale of alcohol here
brainly.com/question/4818130
#SPJ2
What are your thoughts on the ted bundy case? do you agree with the decision of killing him? What are your thoughts on Miranda v Arizona?
Answer: I agree because he killed people so there for he should be put to death
Explanation:
g every civil case in california begins with the filing of a(n) by the plaintiff. the defendant must then submit a(n) to this filing within thirty (30) days in which they either admit or deny every allegation that the plaintiff has made, and following this process, the parties will engage in a pretrial process of exchanging documents and asking questions of witnesses as well as experts, which is known as .
The parties will engage in a pretrial process of exchanging documents and asking questions of witnesses as well as experts, which is known as Discovery
What is the concept of Discovery?
Both sides participate in discovery to start the trial preparation process. The parties are formally exchanging information regarding the witnesses and evidence they'll use at trial during this procedure.
Before the trial even starts, the parties might learn what evidence might be used through discovery. It is intended to prevent "trial by ambush," in which one side learns of the other's testimony or evidence only during the trial, leaving no opportunity for the other side to provide rebuttal evidence.
Through depositions, a party can learn in advance what a witness would testify about at the trial. Important witnesses who are unable to attend the trial can nonetheless be called as witnesses through depositions. In that case, they were again read throughout the trial as evidence.
Want to know more about Discovery?
https://brainly.in/question/31590289
#SPJ4
Discuss the role of legal profession in development of law in Kenya
Legal profession of people such as lawmakers and judiciaries is the most important that led to the development of law and legal bodies in the Kenyan society.
What is the significance of a legal profession?A legal profession can be referred to or considered as the profession that deals in carrying and practicing activities related to laws and regulations of a particular society.
Lawmakers and members of the judiciary are the legal professionals who help in the development of laws in the countries and societies like they have in Kenya.
Therefore, the significance regarding a legal profession has been aforementioned.
Learn more about a legal profession here:
https://brainly.com/question/14477784
#SPJ1
Which factor contributed to the growth of the U.S. economy during the 20th
century?
A. The United States cut off trade with foreign countries.
B. The United States decided to remain on the gold standard.
C. The U.S. economy changed its focus back to agriculture.
OD. The United States increased international trade.
The United States increased international trade factor contributed to the growth of the U.S. economy during the 20th century. A factor is a specific kind of trader who engages in factorage, or receiving and selling products on compensation.
A mercantile fiduciary who does business in his own name without exposing his principal is referred to as a trade factor. One characteristic of the economy stocks that factor investors select is the value factor. The value factor is predicated on the idea that stocks outperform more costly ones when compared to some measure of underlying value. When international variations in factor endowment are the driving force behind commerce.
To learn more about trade, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/1900868
#SPJ1
a person who had been convicted of a felony 10 years ago was turned down for license. if he still desired a license, what is his next course of action?
His next course of action is Request a hearing before the Administrative Hearing Commission.
What is hearing?
A hearing refers to any formal proceeding before a court. The term usually refers to a brief court session that resolves a specific question before a full court trial takes place, or to such specialized proceedings as administrative hearings.
What is the purpose of hearing?
A hearing is a meeting or session of a Senate, House, joint, or special committee of Congress, usually open to the public, to obtain information and opinions on proposed legislation, conduct an investigation, or evaluate/oversee the activities of a government department or the implementation of a Federal law.
To learn more about hearing from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/5000833
#SPJ4