Maria rolls a regular number cube with sides labeled 1 through 6. How many possible outcomes are there?

The other answer is just wrong.

There are 9•9•8 = 648 distinct 3-digit codes. The first digit can be any numeral from 1-9, the next digit can be any from 0-9 minus the one used in the first position, and the last digit can be any from 0-9 minus both the numerals used in the first two positions.

But that doesn't even account for the divisibility constraint.

Let the code be [tex]abc[/tex]. We can expand this as

[tex]100a + 10b + c[/tex]

In order for this to be divisible by 4, we observe that

[tex]100a + 8b + 2b + c = 4 (25a + 2b) + (2b+c)[/tex]

so we only need [tex]2b+c[/tex] to be divisible by 4.

The last digit must be even, so there are only 5 choices for the last digit. I list the possibilities and outcomes below. For some integer [tex]k[/tex], we need

[tex]c=0 \implies 2b=4k \implies b=2k[/tex]

[tex]c=2 \implies 2b+2=4k \implies b = 2k-1[/tex]

[tex]c=4 \implies 2b+4 = 4k \implies b = 2(k-1)[/tex]

[tex]c=6 \implies 2b+6 = 4k \implies b = 2k-3[/tex]

[tex]c=8 \implies 2b+8=4k \implies b = 2(k-2)[/tex]

Ignoring [tex]a[/tex] for the moment, in the cases of [tex]c\in\{0,4,8\}[/tex], [tex]b[/tex] is also even. This leaves 3 choices for [tex]c[/tex] and 2 choices for [tex]b[/tex].

Likewise, in the cases of [tex]c\in\{2,6\}[/tex], [tex]b[/tex] is odd. This leaves 2 choices for [tex]c[/tex] and 5 choices for [tex]b[/tex].

Now taking into account the choice for [tex]a[/tex], we have the following decision tree.

• If [tex]a\in\{2,6\}[/tex] and [tex]c\in\{0,4,8\}[/tex], then [tex]b\in\{0,2,4,6,8\}\setminus\{a,c\}[/tex] - a total of 2•3•3 = 18 codes.

• If [tex]a\in\{4,8\}[/tex] and [tex]c\in\{0,4,8\}\setminus\{a\}[/tex], then [tex]b\in\{0,2,4,6,8\}\setminus\{a,c\}[/tex] - a total of 2•2•3 = 12 codes.

• If [tex]a\in\{2,6\}[/tex] and [tex]c\in\{2,6\}\setminus\{a\}[/tex], then [tex]b\in\{1,3,5,7,9\}\setminus\{a,c\}[/tex] - a total of 2•1•5 = 10 codes.

• If [tex]a\in\{4,8\}[/tex] and [tex]c \in\{2,6\}[/tex], then [tex]b\in\{1,3,5,7,9\}[/tex] - a total of 2•2•5 = 20 codes.

• If [tex]a\in\{1,3,5,7,9\}[/tex] and [tex]c\in\{0,4,8\}[/tex], then [tex]b\in\{0,2,4,6,8\}\setminus\{c\}[/tex] - a total of 5•3•4 = 60 codes.

• If [tex]a\in\{1,3,5,7,9\}[/tex] and [tex]c\in\{2,6\}[/tex], then [tex]b\in\{1,3,5,7,9\}\setminus\{a\}[/tex] - a total of 5•2•4 = 40 codes.

Hence there are a total of 18 + 12 + 10 + 20 + 60 + 40 = 160 codes.

Answer:

The solution is 9.01.

Step-by-step explanation:

To prove that 9.1 isn't the solution we have to plug 9.1 into the equation. By replacing n with 9.1 we get 2.7 which isn't equal to 2.61.

To find the solution we must add 6.4 to both sides of the equation.

Answer:

(15.23,41.016)

Step-by-step explanation:

WE must determine the mean of the data set: Which is the sum of the set divided by the number in the set.
[tex]= (21 + 24 + 25 + 32 + 35 + 31 + 29 + 28)/8 = 225/8 = 28.125[/tex]
We must also determine the standard deviation: Which is the square root of the variance and the variance is the sum of squares of the sample number minus the mean divided by the number if the set data:
[tex]= ((21 - 28.125)^{2} + (24 - 28.125)^{2} +(25 - 28.125)^{2} + (32 - 28.125)^{2} + (35 - 28.125)^{2} + (31 - 28.125)^{2} + (29 - 28.125)^{2} (28 - 28.125)^{2}[/tex]
[tex]= 148.877/8 = 18.6[/tex]
The 95% confidence interval is defined as: The mean ± 1.96*standard deviation divided by the sqaure root of the number of data in the set:
[tex]= 28.125 + (1.96 *18.6)/(\sqrt{8} )[/tex]
[tex]= 41.016[/tex]
[tex]= 28.125 - (1.96 * 18.6)/(\sqrt{8}) = 15.23[/tex]
The confidence interval for this data set is (15.23,41.016)

Answer:

32.7 ± 2.262(1.19)

Step-by-step explanation:

See attached pictures

Answer:

the width is 9in

Step-by-step explanation:

perimeter of triangle =3×16 = 48

let w= width of rectangle

perimeter of triangle = perimeter of rectangle

48= 2(15 +w)

24= 15 + w

w= 9

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps

Answer:

  a.  $150

  b.  $158.25

Step-by-step explanation:

The amount of tax is the product of the tax rate and the price being taxed. This relation can let us solve for the price.

  tax = tax rate × price

  price = tax/(tax rate) = $8.25/0.055 = $150.00

The purchase price of the table saw is $150.00.

__

The total price is the sum of the purchase price and the tax.

  total price = price + tax

  total price = $150.00 +8.25 = $158.25

The total price of the table saw is $158.25.

Answer:

Find the base, and then the height of this rhombus;

Base: 7 square units

Height: 7 square units

Multiply your base by the height to get the area;

Because the formula for the area of a rhombus is, A = BH

So,

A = 7(7)

A(area) = 49 square units.

Answer:

  1 ≤ x < 7/4

Step-by-step explanation:

The function f(x) is defined as increasing on the domain (-8, 4), so the ordering of the arguments is not changed by the function. We can solve the inequality as though f(x) = x, which is increasing everywhere.

  f(4x -3) ≥ f(2 -x²)

  4x -3 ≥ 2 -x² . . . . . . using our assumed definition of f(x)

  x² +4x -5 ≥ 0 . . . . . subtract 2-x²

  (x -1)(x +4) ≥ 0 . . . . factored form; zeros at -4, +1

The values of x that make this true are ones that make the factors have the same signs: x ≤ -4 or x ≥ 1.

The domain of f(x) is -8 < x < 4, so we require the arguments of f be restricted to those values

Left side

  -8 < 4x -3 < 4

  -5 < 4x < 7

  -5/4 < x < 7/4

Right side

  -8 < 2 -x² < 4 . . . . . right side is always true

  x² < 10 . . . . . . . . . . . add x² +8

  |x| < √10 . . . . . . . . . . less restrictive than the the left-side restriction

With the given domain restrictions on f(x), the inequality will be true on the interval ...

  1 ≤ x < 7/4

__

Additional comment

The attached graph shows the left-side function argument (dashed blue) and the right-side function argument (dashed green) with the given domain restrictions. The red curve is the difference in function values for the function defined as above. It is only non-negative between 1 and 1.75 as we found above.

This general behavior is applicable for any f(x) that can be described as in the problem statement. For example, f(x) = √(x+8) also gives an increasing curve for the difference f(4x-3)-f(2-x²) on the interval (-5/4, 7/4) with an x-intercept of +1.

<95141404393>

Answer:

Jack is 31

Lacy is 10

Step-by-step explanation:

x - 9 = 22

since jack is 3 times as old as lacy,

the formula is

3x - 9 = 22

3x = 31

x = 10.3

So Jack is 31

And Lacy is 10

To prove this, subract 9 (years) from both ages

It will give you an approximate sum of 22 years for both their ages, as the question states

Since Lacy is a little over 10 years old, Jack is 31 instead of 30

The formula was taken from someone elses answer so sorry if it`s wrong

Answer:

a set of numbers that are used to find the hypotenuse

Step-by-step explanation:

brainliest

The integer solutions to the Pythagorean theorem, are called Pythagoras triples.

The integer solutions to the Pythagorean theorem, [tex]a^{2} +b^{2} =c^{2}[/tex] are called Pythagorean triples which contains three positive integers a, b and c.

For example:

(3, 4, 5)

By evaluating we get

[tex]3^{2} +4^{2} =5^{2}[/tex]

⇒ 9 + 16 = 25

Hence, 3, 4 and 5 are Pythagorean triples.

Learn more about Pythagorean Triples here:

https://brainly.com/question/15190643

#SPJ2

the answer is b if i remeber

Answer:

120

Step-by-step explanation:

 Given:

3 Lines

A line with points M, H, K intersects a line with points J, H, L at point H.

A line extends from point H to point P between angle K H J.

Angle M H L is 140 degrees and angle K H P is 20 degrees.

Solve:

Since, Angle M H L is 140 degrees and angle K H P is 20 degrees.

Then 140 - 20 = 120

Answer is 120

~Lenvy~

Answer:

Number 1 is b

I found the answer on a website

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

The sides are not equal

Answer:

20

Step-by-step explanation:

from the numbers i was seeing my answer is 20 i am so sorry if it not right.

==========================================================

Let's simplify the expression:-

[tex]\bigstar{\boxed{\frac{3}{1} *\frac{1}{2}}[/tex]

Multiply 3 times 1 and 1 times 2:-

[tex]\bigstar{\boxed{\pmb{\frac{3}{2} }}[/tex]

======================================================

Hope everything is clear; if you need any clarification/explanation, kindly let me know, and I'll comment and/or edit my answer :)

Answer:

A) -4

Step-by-step explanation:

Question

[tex]\sf evaluate \ \dfrac{-4+(m+2)}{n} \ \sf when \ m=\dfrac23 \ and \ \sf n=\dfrac13[/tex]

Solution

Substitute the given values of m and n into the original expression:

[tex]\sf \implies \dfrac{-4+(\frac23+2)}{\frac13}[/tex]

Carry out the operation in the brackets first [tex]\sf (\frac23+3)=\frac83[/tex]

[tex]\sf \implies \dfrac{-4+\frac83}{\frac13}[/tex]

Now carry out the operation in the numerator [tex]-4+\frac83=-\frac43[/tex]

[tex]\sf \implies \dfrac{-\frac43}{\frac13}[/tex]

Dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying by the flipped version of the fraction (flipped = swap the numerator and denominator of the fraction we are dividing by):

[tex]\sf \implies -\dfrac43 \div \dfrac13=-\dfrac43 \times \dfrac31[/tex]

To multiply a fraction, simply multiply the numerators and multiply the denominators:

[tex]\sf \implies -\dfrac43 \times \dfrac31=\dfrac{-4 \times 3}{3 \times 1}=-\dfrac{12}{3}[/tex]

Finally simplify:

[tex]\sf \implies -\dfrac{12}{3}=-4[/tex]

Answer:

T

Step-by-step explanation:

The regression line is flat when there is no ability to predict whatsoever. The regression line is sloped at an angle when there is a relationship. The extent to which the regression line is sloped, however, represents the degree to which we are able to predict the y scores with the x scores

keeping in mind that perpendicular lines have negative reciprocal slopes, let's check for the slope of the equation above

[tex]y = \stackrel{\stackrel{m}{\downarrow }}{\cfrac{5}{6}}x+\cfrac{7}{6}\qquad \impliedby \begin{array}{|c|ll} \cline{1-1} slope-intercept~form\\ \cline{1-1} \\ y=\underset{y-intercept}{\stackrel{slope\qquad }{\stackrel{\downarrow }{m}x+\underset{\uparrow }{b}}} \\\\ \cline{1-1} \end{array}[/tex]

so we can say that

[tex]\stackrel{~\hspace{5em}\textit{perpendicular lines have \underline{negative reciprocal} slopes}~\hspace{5em}} {\stackrel{slope}{\cfrac{5}{6}} ~\hfill \stackrel{reciprocal}{\cfrac{6}{5}} ~\hfill \stackrel{negative~reciprocal}{-\cfrac{6}{5}}}[/tex]

so we're really looking for the equation of a line with a slope of -6/5 and that passes through (-8 , 9)

[tex](\stackrel{x_1}{-8}~,~\stackrel{y_1}{9})\qquad\qquad \stackrel{slope}{m}\implies -\cfrac{6}{5} \\\\\\ \begin{array}{|c|ll} \cline{1-1} \textit{point-slope form}\\ \cline{1-1} \\ y-y_1=m(x-x_1) \\\\ \cline{1-1} \end{array}\implies y-\stackrel{y_1}{9}=\stackrel{m}{-\cfrac{6}{5}}(x-\stackrel{x_1}{(-8)})\implies y-9=-\cfrac{6}{5}(x+8) \\\\\\ y-9=-\cfrac{6}{5}x-\cfrac{48}{5}\implies y=-\cfrac{6}{5}x-\cfrac{48}{5}+9\implies y=-\cfrac{6}{5}x-\cfrac{3}{5}[/tex]

Answer:

The farmer can predict that 55 cows in the entire population have no spots.

Step-by-step explanation:

The farmer can predict that 40 cows in the entire population have no spots, the correct option is C.

Suppose we're given that:

Favourable Cases X (in count, in sample)

Sample Size N

Level of significance =[tex]\alpha[/tex]

Then, the sample proportion of favorable cases is:

[tex]\hat{p} = \dfrac{X}{N}[/tex]

The critical value at the level of significance[tex]\alpha is Z_{1- \alpha/2}[/tex]

The corresponding confidence interval is:

[tex]CI = & \displaystyle \left( \hat p - z_c \sqrt{\frac{\hat p (1-\hat p)}{n}}, \hat p + z_c \sqrt{\frac{\hat p (1-\hat p)}{n}} \right)[/tex]

The given information;

The farmer took a random sample of 40 cows out of 200 total cows and found that 11 of those cows have no spots. We can use this sample data to make a prediction about the entire population using statistical inference.

Now,

Plugging in the values, we get:

CI = 0.275 ± 1.96sqrt((0.275(1-0.275))/40)

CI = 0.275 ± 0.139

CI = (0.136, 0.414)

This means that we can be 95% confident that the true proportion of cows with no spots in the entire population lies between 0.136 and 0.414.

the farmer can predict that between 13.6% and 41.4%

Therefore, by confidence interval the answer will be  farmer can predict that 40 cows in the entire population have no spots

Learn more about confidence interval for population proportion here:

https://brainly.com/question/16427118

#SPJ3

7x-10=6x-5

We simplify the equation to the form, which is simple to understand

7x-10=6x-5

We move all terms containing x to the left and all other terms to the right.

+7x-6x=-5+10

We simplify left and right side of the equation.

+1x=+5

We divide both sides of the equation by 1 to get x.

x=5

Answer:

2.013  to 3 DP's.

Step-by-step explanation:

f(4.04)  will be very close to the tangent line.

Equation of tangent line

is y - 4 = m(x - 10)

m = (4-2) / (10-4) = 1/3

y - 4 = 1/3(x - 10)

y = 1/3x - 10/3 + 4

y = 1/3x + 2/3

So the require estimate of f(4.04)

= 1/3(4.04) + 2/3

= 2.013333

the answer is

x^{2}-31x+5b

Answer:

180-52=128

Do mark BRAINLIEST

Answer:

[1,∞)

Step-by-step explanation:

Brackets indicate equal to while parentheses indicate not equal to this bound.

By rewriting the weights in decimal form and applying them to the correspondent percentages, we will see that the final grade is 92.8%.

The final grade will be given by:

G = a₁*x₁ + a₂*x₂ + ...

Where the values "a" are the weights, and the values "x" are the averages of Jeorge.

We know that the weights are:

Then we can write the weights in decimal form:

a₁ = 0.3

a₂ = 0.1

a₃ = 0.4

a₄ = 0.2

And the scores are:

So the final math grade will be:

G = 0.3*92 + 0.1*98 + 0.4*91 + 0.2*95 = 92.8%

If you want to learn more about percentages, you can read:

https://brainly.com/question/843074

Answer:

the answer is 92.8%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I'm not to sure of this answer

Answer:

2081days or 2086days

Step-by-step explanation:

1.9(365)=693.5

1.9(366)=695.4

693.5(3)=2080.5

695.4(3)=2086.2

Answer:

x=10

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x is 10 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

180-90=90

(2x+3)+(5x+17) = 90

7x+20=90

7x=70

x=10