The sentence you provided is: "Jason lives fairly near his place of __, doesn't he?" To complete the sentence, you can use the term "work" to make it: "Jason lives fairly near his place of work, doesn't he?"
Grammatical explanation:
The sentence is an example of a tag question, which is formed by adding a question tag at the end of a statement. Tag questions are used to confirm information, seek agreement, or ask for verification. In this case, the tag question is "Doesn't he?"
The structure of the sentence is as follows:
1. Subject: "Jason"
2. Verb: "lives"
3. Adverb: "fairly" (modifies the adjective "near" to provide more detail about the proximity)
4. Adjective: "Near" (describes the relationship between Jason's residence and his place of work)
5. Prepositional phrase: "His place of work" (serves as the object of the verb "lives" and specifies where Jason resides in relation to his workplace)
6. Tag question: "Doesn't he?" (formed by using the auxiliary verb "does" in the negative form "doesn't," followed by the subject "he" and a question mark)
In summary, the sentence states that Jason lives close to his workplace and seeks confirmation or agreement from the listener with the tag question.
To learn more about verb, refer:-
https://brainly.com/question/30515563
#SPJ11
Which of the following narrators would likely be considered unreliable?
A narrator who is retelling the true story of a high school athlete preparing to run a race after an injury
A narrator who has clearly committed a crime and who tells their version of the story in hopes of being found not guilty
A narrator who is summarizing the events on the first day of school for three friends
A narrator who tells the historical account of two explorers who find a treasure in the Amazon
The narrator that would likely be considered unreliable is B. A narrator who has clearly committed a crime and who tells their version of the story in hopes of being found not guilty.
Which of the following narrators would likely be considered unreliable?An unreliable narrator, who has evidently transgressed the law, likely stands behind the construction of a story with the aim of escaping accusation of guilt.
Such an individual's self-centered aspirations and prejudices could shape the manner in which their tale is relayed, potentially allowing falsehoods to be omitted or transformed in attempts to charm those hearing or reading it.
Learn more about narrator on
https://brainly.com/question/860877
#SPJ1
COMMON LIT HELP 3. PART A: What is the meaning of "surplus" in
paragraph 24?
A. unexpected outcome
B. what one makes
OC. more than what's needed
D. Intellectual capacity
BACK
SAVE & NEXT
Question 2 (1 point)
Upon reading Macbeth's letter, this person expresses doubt about his strength
of will.
Banquo
After taking a glance at Macbeth's correspondence in Act 1, Scene 3 of the famous play "Macbeth," Banquo begins to doubt his own ability to adhere to his convictions.
Why is this so?As Macbeth's fortunes begin to change as foretold by the witches' prophecy, Banquo is concerned he may be lured by offers promising power and success.
Demonstrating remarkable self-awareness and modesty, compared with Macbeth's future ruthless ambition, Banquo identifies the pitfalls that come with temptation and ponders whether he possesses enough fortitude to resist it.
Read more about Banquo here:
https://brainly.com/question/25668662
#SPJ1
A student is writing a critical review of the novel Of Mice and Men for his literature class. The student wants to revise the draft to make sure it has adequate evidence and support for his claims. Read the draft and complete the task that follows.
Click on the sentence in the second paragraph that needs more evidence or support. The two main characters in Of Mice and Men are fiercely loyal to one another.
Together, the two men work on a farm but hope to later raise enough money to have their own farm. George, a smart but uneducated man, wants to make money. Lennie, his companion who is mentally challenged, simply wants to have a farm so that he can keep and care for bunnies. Both men show their loyalty in different ways. Lennie shows his loyalty to George by trusting George to keep all the money they earn and to make all the plans for their future. He never questions George's decisions. Lennie knows that George is smarter when it comes to money, and he is willing to stick with George though all of his plans and to work hard to contribute to their dream of having a farm. When bad things happen because of Lennie's mental limitations, George must act as his protector. In this way, George shows his loyalty to Lennie.
A crucial statement in the second paragraph lacking sufficient justification is "Both men display loyalty in varying ways."
What is the evidence?The paragraph details Lennie's display of loyalty to George, there is no explicit evidence or illustrative instances to validate the assertion that George reciprocates Lennie's loyalty in his unique style.
The student has the ability to illustrate George's dedication to Lennie through instances in the novel where George takes charge of Lennie or endeavors to shield him from hazardous situations. The student's argument can be made more persuasive and effective through the use of specialized proof to support their assertion.
Learn more about evidence from
https://brainly.com/question/1256677
#SPJ1
7. In this story, the reader is strongly encouraged to believe that Skidmore is guilty of poisoning his
brother Manchester. Explain several ways that the author develops this point of view without
actually stating that Skidmore is guilty. Be sure to use evidence from the text to support your
response. Write your response in the lines on the next pages.
Your response will be scored on how well you:
·
loser in every battle.
•
Demonstrate your understanding of the ideas of the text
Use evidence from the text to help develop and support your ideas
It should be noted that to make it look like Skidmore poisoned his own brother, the author shows how Skidmore hated his brother and hated him for silly and superfluous things, like thinking that his brother was provoking him by chewing gum while he was allergic.
How to explain the informationThis question is about “The Curse of the Poisoned Pretzel” by Paul Haven.
The author reinforces the enmity between them, but states that everyone loved Skidmore's brother, making the reader suspicious of anyone for poisoning, except Skidmore.
Learn more about Skidmore on
https://brainly.com/question/20302310
#SPJ1
Why did Nora forge her father's signature?
Nora forged her father's signature in Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House" to obtain a loan. She did this because her husband, Torvald, was ill and needed expensive treatment.
Nora knew that her husband's pride would prevent him from borrowing money, so she decided to take matters into her own hands and forge her father's signature to secure the loan without Torvald's knowledge.
However, forging a signature typically means that someone is attempting to pass off a document or agreement as legitimate when it is not. People may forge signatures for a variety of reasons, such as gaining access to money or property, signing a contract or agreement, or to cover up wrongdoing. Without additional context, it's difficult to determine why Nora specifically would have forged her father's signature.
To know more about Nora click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17580437
#SPJ11
Why does Ibsen include the conversation between helmer and nora about the fancy dress ball?
Ibsen includes the conversation between Helmer and Nora about the fancy dress ball as a way to highlight the superficiality of their relationship and society's expectations of gender roles.
In Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," the conversation between Helmer and Nora about the fancy dress ball serves several purposes:
1. Character development: The conversation reveals aspects of Helmer and Nora's personalities, such as Helmer's controlling nature and Nora's desire to please her husband.
2. Foreshadowing: The fancy dress ball is an important event in the plot, as it sets the stage for Nora's emotional transformation and ultimate decision to leave Helmer.
3. Symbolism: The costumes and the ball itself represent the façade and pretense in Nora and Helmer's marriage, as well as the societal expectations of their roles.
Overall, the conversation contributes to the development of the play's themes, characters, and plot.
To know more about Nora click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17580437
#SPJ11
Who does Torvald say corrupts children worst?
In Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," Torvald is a character who is preoccupied with social status and appearance.
In A doll's house, He believes that it is the duty of a wife and mother to uphold the image of a perfect home and family. In Act III, Torvald becomes enraged when he discovers that his wife, Nora, borrowed money without his knowledge in order to save his life. During their argument, Torvald makes a statement that reveals his perception of who corrupts children the worst. He says, "Nora, Nora, how like a woman! No, but seriously, Nora, you know what I think about that. No debt, no borrowing. There can be no freedom or beauty about a home life that depends on borrowing and debt. We two have kept bravely on the straight road so far, and we will go on the same way for the short time longer that there need be any struggle. But this must be a settled thing between us. Henceforth, no debt. There can be no question of what corrupts children the most. Rank poison spreads through the whole body politic; it is like the rottenness that attacks a wound." In other words, Torvald believes that debt and borrowing corrupt children the most. He believes that by setting an example of financial responsibility, he can protect his children from the moral decay that results from living beyond one's means.
learn more about A doll's house here:
https://brainly.com/question/17105961
#SPJ11
Why can't Nora eat macaroons?
Torvald prevents Nora from having macaroons, despite the fact that she adores them. Even if Nora ignores the rule, she must lie and say Mrs. Linde is to blame for the macaroons in order to win her husband over.
In the given context, Torvald's forbidding Nora from having macaroons reflects a power dynamic within their relationship. Torvald likely imposes this restriction as a way to assert control over Nora's actions and choices. Nora's love for macaroons represents her desire for personal freedom and autonomy, which clashes with Torvald's restrictive nature.
To maintain peace and avoid conflict, Nora disobeys Torvald's rule secretly. However, she feels compelled to lie and shift the blame onto Mrs. Linde, a trusted friend, to protect herself from Torvald's disapproval and potential consequences. This demonstrates the sacrifices and compromises Nora makes to navigate her constrained role within the relationship and society's expectations.
Learn more about Nora here:
https://brainly.com/question/31717802
#SPJ12
Probably the full question is:
Why can't Nora eat macaroons in the story "A Doll's House"?
Who does Nora ask to mend the dresses?
In Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," Nora asks her friend Kristine Linde to mend the dresses for her. Kristine is a widow who is struggling financially, and Nora hopes to offer her some employment as well as gain her assistance in convincing Nora's husband Torvald to give her a loan.
Kristine agrees to help Nora with the dresses, and in the process, the two women rekindle their friendship and share their stories of hardship and sacrifice. As the play progresses, Nora's dependence on Kristine for assistance and guidance increases, highlighting the limited options available to women in their society. The mending of the dresses symbolizes the need for women to support and rely on one another in a world where their opportunities for independence and autonomy are severely restricted.
learn more about Nora's character here:
https://brainly.com/question/23444043
#SPJ11
Our people expect their President and the Congress to find essential agreement on issues of great moment, the wise resolution of which will better shape the future of the Nation.
Which rhetorical appeal was used in this portion of Eisenhower's speech?
Ethos, because Eisenhower talks about what the President and Congress should ethically do to provide for the American people.
Logos, because Eisenhower lists statistics of his accomplishments over the course of his Presidency.
Pathos, because Eisenhower is making his audience feel sad that his presidential term is over.
Rhetorical question, because Eisenhower is posing a question for emphasis without expecting an answer.
Answer:
Ethos, because Eisenhower is establishing credibility and trustworthiness by appealing to the audience's expectations and shared values.
(I'm doing this rn!)
Answer:
Ethos, because Eisenhower is establishing credibility and trustworthiness by appealing to the audience's expectations and shared values.
Explanation:
I took the quiz i hope this helps
The template below gives you helpful suggestions for how to complete this poem. You will need to include more lines than just those below to equal the 25 minimum. Notice how the lines below include words, not in parentheses. You will use those in your poem. The words in parentheses are instructions for you to write new words pertaining to YOU. Do not include the parentheses in your final draft.
(Title: Make your title something meaningful)
By (Author Name)
I am from (specific ordinary item)
From (product name)
And (additional item).
I am from the (home description)
(adjective, adjective, sensory detail).
I am from the (plant, flower, or another natural item),
(description of the natural item).
I’m from (family tradition)
And (family trait),
From (name of family member)
And (another name).
I’m from the (description of family tendency)
And (another one).
From (something you were told as a child)
And (another).
I’m from (representation of religion/belief or lack of it)
(further description)
I’m from (place of birth and family ancestry),
(two food items representing your family).
From the (specific family story about a specific person and a detail)
The (another detail of another family member).
I am from (Location of family pictures, mementos, archives
And several more lines indicating their worth).
Answer:
It looks like you posted a template for a poem, but I'm not sure what your question is. If you need help completing the poem, here's an example of how you could fill it in:
(Title: Memories of Home) By Jane Doe
I am from the cozy armchair by the fireplace, From the aroma of freshly brewed coffee, And the sound of my favorite music.
I am from the brick house on the hill, (Tall, sturdy, overlooking the town). I am from the magnolia tree in the backyard, (Pretty, fragrant, blossoming every spring).
I’m from baking cookies on Christmas Eve, And from my mother’s patience and kindness, From my grandfather’s stories of the past, And my father’s unwavering work ethic.
I’m from the love of nature and animals, And from the respect for all people and cultures, From the stories of my ancestors who crossed the ocean, To find a new home and a better life.
From the homemade apple pie and roasted turkey, To the warm hugs and laughter around the table, I am from the memories of home, That will stay with me forever.
I hope this helps you complete your poem. Let me know if you need any further assistance.
Explanation:
Why does Nora enjoy talking to Dr. Rank?
Nora enjoys talking to Dr. Rank because he is a close friend of the family and understands her better than anyone else. She also feels comfortable confiding in him about her problems and secrets.
Additionally, Dr. Rank provides Nora with a sense of intellectual stimulation and companionship that she may not receive from her husband or other acquaintances. Nora enjoys talking to Dr. Rank because he provides her with intellectual stimulation, genuine friendship, and a sense of emotional support that she may not receive from her husband, Torvald.
To know more about intellectual refer :
brainly.com/question/17382321
#SPJ11
In what ways is Cecily's personality different from Gwendolen's?
Cecily and Gwendolen have distinct personalities that set them apart from one another. While Gwendolen is confident, sophisticated, and worldly, Cecily is more innocent, imaginative, and romantic.
Gwendolen is very concerned with social status and propriety, whereas Cecily is more focused on her own desires and whims. Gwendolen is very direct and assertive, while Cecily is more playful and whimsical. Additionally, Gwendolen is very self-assured and outspoken, while Cecily is more shy and reserved. These differences in personality are reflected in their interactions with others, their attitudes towards love and romance, and their overall outlook on life.
Cecily has a more romantic and idealistic view of men, while Gwendolen is more practical and pragmatic in her expectations of men and relationships.Cecily places a higher value on love and emotional connections, while Gwendolen places a higher value on social status and convention. Cecily is generally more easy-going and forgiving, while Gwendolen can be more stubborn and assertive. Cecily is interested in more romantic and imaginative pursuits, such as writing stories and playing the piano, while Gwendolen is more interested in fashion, social etiquette, and politics.
Overall, while both Cecily and Gwendolen are young, intelligent, and attractive women from wealthy families, their personalities are quite different, reflecting the diversity of human nature and experience.
To know more about Cecily, please click on:
https://brainly.com/question/31347133
#SPJ11
Laertes tells Ophelia if Hamlet loves her, she should be wise enough to see that his words only mean as much as the state of Denmark allows them to mean. Thus, the state is in control of who Hamlet can love and not love.
Why do you agree or disagree with Laertes?
Answer: Laertes' statement is a reflection of the political and social context of Shakespeare's play, Hamlet. In the play, the state of Denmark is in a state of political turmoil, and the actions of the characters are influenced by the political climate of the time. Laertes' statement can be interpreted as a commentary on the idea that love and personal relationships can be constrained by social and political forces. Ultimately, the interpretation of Laertes' statement depends on the reader's own understanding of the play and its themes.
Explanation:
What evidence does Tecumseh provide to support the central idea that Harrison should stop taking land from Indigenous peoples? Indigenous people believe that . As a result of Harrison’s actions, Indigenous people .
The American government and Tecumseh's Confederacy, led by the Shawnee chief Tecumseh in the Indiana Territory, engaged in battle during Tecumseh's War, also known as Tecumseh's Rebellion.
Tecumseh's War effectively lasted into the War of 1812 and is usually regarded as a part of that wider conflict, despite the fact that it is frequently believed to have reached its conclusion with William Henry Harrison's victory at the Battle of Tippecanoe in 1811. The conflict continued for two more years, until 1813, when Tecumseh and his deputy, Roundhead, perished in battle against Harrison's Army of the Northwest in Upper Canada, close to what is now Chatham, Ontario.
As a result, their confederacy fell apart. Some academic historians believe Tecumseh's War to be the culmination of a protracted military campaign.
Learn more about Tecumseh's War here:
https://brainly.com/question/30030926
#SPJ1
Answer:
land is common property, are running out of places to go
Explanation: Took the assignments
Romeo and Juliet, two days before her scheduled wedding to Paris, Juliet tells Friar Lawrence all the things she would rather do than marry Paris. Which of the following lines from her monologue foreshadow the outcome of the play? (1 point) A"O, bid me leap, rather than marry Paris, / From off the battlements of any tower" B"Or walk in thievish ways, or bid me lurk / Where serpents are; chain me with roaring bears" C"Or bid me go into a new-made grave / And hide me with a dead man in his shroud—" D."Things that, to hear them told, have made me tremble—"
The line that foreshadows the outcome of the play Romeo and Juliet is A: "O, bid me leap, rather than marry Paris, / From off the battlements of any tower."
This line suggests that Juliet would rather die than marry Paris, which ultimately leads to her tragic end. The theme of death is present throughout the play, and Juliet's willingness to leap from a tower foreshadows her eventual decision to fake her own death. This decision, in turn, leads to the tragic deaths of both Romeo and Juliet.
The other lines in Juliet's monologue suggest extreme actions she would rather take than marry Paris, but they do not necessarily foreshadow the outcome of the play as clearly as the line in option A. Comprehensively, Juliet's monologue reveals her desperation and despair, setting the stage for the tragic events that will unfold in the following days.
Learn more about Romeo and Juliet at
brainly.com/question/10468114
#SPJ4
Who introduces the idea that one's misdeeds affect future generations?
The idea that one's misdeeds affect future generations is introduced by the concept of karma in various Eastern religions, including Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. Karma is a universal law that emphasizes the interconnectedness of actions and consequences. It posits that an individual's actions, whether good or bad, will have repercussions not only for themselves but also for their descendants.
This notion suggests that our actions have a ripple effect, impacting the lives of those around us and extending to future generations. It encourages individuals to make morally and ethically sound choices, as their decisions could shape the destiny of their family lineage. Moreover, it underlines the importance of cultivating positive actions and avoiding negative ones to create a better future for ourselves and our descendants.
In conclusion, the idea that one's misdeeds affect future generations is introduced by the concept of karma in Eastern religions like Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. This principle emphasizes the interconnectedness of actions and consequences and promotes responsible decision-making to ensure a positive legacy for future generations.
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT one's misdeeds affect future generations CLICK THIS LINK -
brainly.com/question/29496562
#SPJ11
What was considered beautiful in japan?
Answer:
In addition to having light, clear skin, Japanese beauty standards value having large eyes and a double eyelid, or 二重 (futae). While there are many Japanese people who are born with a double eyelid, others go to great lengths to achieve the look.
Just exactly what it says ..making a poem using those sentences
Answer:
A duck named Reggie, oh so spry,
With feathers sleek and beady eye,
Swam in the pond with colors bright,
A masterpiece of pure delight.In oil painting, Reggie knew,
Linseed oil was his trusted glue,
It bound the pigments on his back,
And made his feathers glossy black.He dabbled in encaustic too,
Hot wax and pigments, oh so true,
Creating art that would endure,
With vibrant hues that would allure.But Reggie didn't stop just there,
He tried fresco with utmost care,
Applying pigments to wet plaster,
Creating scenes that would forever last.With glazes thin and colors grand,
Reggie painted with a master's hand,
Subtle blends and revisions made,
In oils and gouache, a skilled charade.His works were waterproof and bold,
A marvel to behold,
Acrylics and tempera too,
In Reggie's art, a modern view.So, if you see a duck named Reggie,
With a paintbrush, bold and edgy,
Admire his talent, skill, and flair,
A duck who made art his affair.
Explanation:
Answer:
A duck named Reggie, oh so spry,
With feathers sleek and beady eye,
Swam in the pond with colors bright,
A masterpiece of pure delight.In oil painting, Reggie knew,
Linseed oil was his trusted glue,
It bound the pigments on his back,
And made his feathers glossy black.He dabbled in encaustic too,
Hot wax and pigments, oh so true,
Creating art that would endure,
With vibrant hues that would allure.But Reggie didn't stop just there,
He tried fresco with utmost care,
Applying pigments to wet plaster,
Creating scenes that would forever last.With glazes thin and colors grand,
Reggie painted with a master's hand,
Subtle blends and revisions made,
In oils and gouache, a skilled charade.His works were waterproof and bold,
A marvel to behold,
Acrylics and tempera too,
In Reggie's art, a modern view.So, if you see a duck named Reggie,
With a paintbrush, bold and edgy,
Admire his talent, skill, and flair,
A duck who made art his affair.
What does the reader learn about Nora as she and Krogstad converse?
Through the conversation between Nora and Krogstad, the reader learns about Nora's character and her complex situation. Nora is revealed to be resourceful and determined, as she was able to forge her father's signature to obtain a loan when her husband, Torvald, was ill. This action demonstrates her courage and willingness to take risks for the sake of her family.
Additionally, we learn that Nora is under immense pressure due to her secret, as Krogstad threatens to reveal her forgery to Torvald. Nora's fear of the consequences and her efforts to protect her reputation highlight her vulnerability and concern for maintaining appearances.
Nora also displays a sense of naivety and moral ambiguity in her dealings with Krogstad. She initially fails to grasp the severity of her actions and the potential ramifications, but as the conversation progresses, Nora becomes more aware of the gravity of the situation.
Overall, the conversation between Nora and Krogstad provides insight into Nora's personality, illustrating her determination, resourcefulness, vulnerability, and naivety while also shedding light on the challenging circumstances she faces.
to know more about conversation between Nora and Krogstad, click this link -
brainly.com/question/17580437
#SPJ11
Describe the connection between systemic state racism and "nobodiness"
Answer: The connection between systemic state racism and "nobodiness" is that racism perpetuates a sense of marginalization, exclusion, and invisibility among racialized groups. When individuals and communities are subjected to discrimination, oppression, and violence due to their race, they may internalize the message that they are inferior and unworthy. This can result in a feeling of "nobodiness" or a sense of being dehumanized and excluded from full participation in society.
Explanation: For instance, Black Americans have been subjected to centuries of systemic state racism in the form of slavery, segregation, and ongoing discrimination. These practices have perpetuated a legacy of inequality and exclusion, which has contributed to a sense of "nobodiness" among many Black Americans. Despite significant progress in the civil rights movement, racism and its effects continue to be a pressing issue in contemporary society, impacting the lived experiences and opportunities of many racialized communities.
The first draft a document is often
A) clear.
B) compelling.
C) improvable.
D) tightly written.
E) perfect.
The first draft of a document is often improvable. It is rare for a writer to produce a perfect document on their first try. The first draft is usually a starting point, a rough outline of the writer's thoughts and ideas.
It is a chance for the writer to get their ideas down on paper and begin the process of refining and polishing their work. While the first draft may have some clear and tightly written sections, it is often the case that improvements can be made to increase the clarity and persuasiveness of the document. The first draft is a necessary step in the writing process, as it allows the writer to get their ideas out and start the process of refining their work. Through multiple rounds of revision and editing, the document can be improved and polished to a point where it is both compelling and clear. In conclusion, while the first draft is an important step in the writing process, it is often just the starting point for a document that can be improved through careful revision and editing.
Learn more about first draft of a document here:
https://brainly.com/question/9167770
#SPJ11
Companies come along to advertise jobs, which are usually in ___ ( manage), and the career structures and benefit packages that go with them
Companies come along to advertise jobs, which are usually in management positions, and the career structures and benefit packages that go with them.
These management positions can vary depending on the company and industry, but often include roles such as marketing managers, finance managers, human resources managers, and operations managers. In addition to competitive salaries, companies may offer benefits such as health insurance, retirement plans, and opportunities for professional development and advancement within the company. These packages are designed to attract and retain top talent in the industry and offer employees the support they need to grow their careers.
Learn more about structures here:
https://brainly.com/question/16445152
#SPJ11
In pursuing his campaign pledge to go beyond research and lay plans for the actual construction of a missile defense system, and thereby do away with the U.S.-Russian anti-missile treaty, George W. Bush is asking for trouble. Even when viewed from the most narrow perspective of the President's political self-interest, the decision offers little beyond a world of pain.
Why did the author write this paragraph?
A.
to compliment the President
B.
to entertain his readers
C.
to help the President out
D.
to criticize the President's policy
In the Gift of the Magi, Which sentence from the passage provides the best example of suspense within the story?
In the Gift of the Magi, "And the quietness of the street, interrupted by no horse's footfalls, became softly and benevolently musical as the night winds went among the trees and wrought their kindness upon the lamplight that struggled against the darkness." provides the best example of suspense within the story.
The sentence that provides the best example of suspense within "The Gift of the Magi" is "And the quietness of the street, interrupted by no horse's footfalls, became softly and benevolently musical as the night winds went among the trees and wrought their kindness upon the lamplight that struggled against the darkness."
This sentence creates a sense of suspense and anticipation by describing the quietness of the street and the absence of any horse's footfalls. The reader is left wondering what will happen next and what is causing the street to be so quiet. The description of the night winds going among the trees and wrought their kindness upon the lamplight further adds to the sense of mystery and anticipation.
To know more about Gift of the Magi, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/29775067
#SPJ1
Write an ORIGINAL short story, it can be about anything (just keep it PG)
Write about 200 words or more of you want
Read the passage.
I had to stay off my feet when I sprained my ankle. Reading suspense novels, I watched movies, and crossword puzzles kept me from going crazy.
Which revisions should be made to achieve parallel structure using gerunds?
Select all that apply.
To achieve parallel structure using gerunds in the given passage, you should revise it as follows: "When I sprained my ankle, I had to stay off my feet." "Reading suspense novels, watching movies, and solving crossword puzzles kept me from going crazy."
Here are the changes that have been made to achieve parallel structure using gerunds:
1. The original passage had a mix of verb forms, such as "I watched movies" and "crossword puzzles." To make the passage parallel, gerunds are used for all activities: "reading suspense novels," "watching movies," and "solving crossword puzzles."
2. The revised passage maintains a consistent structure by using gerunds (verbs ending in -ing) to describe the activities that kept the person from going crazy while recovering from the sprained ankle.
By making these revisions, the passage now exhibits a parallel structure, making it easier to understand and more enjoyable to read.
To know more about the consistent structure:
https://brainly.com/question/29118317
#SPJ11
Why, according to Torvald, should the forgery have been expected of Nora?
According to Torvald, Nora's forgery should have been expected because he believed that women were prone to such deceitful behavior.
Torvald's views on gender roles were very traditional, and he believed that men were the providers and protectors while women were expected to be submissive and obedient. He saw Nora as a delicate creature who needed his guidance and protection. Thus, when Nora forged her father's signature to borrow money, Torvald felt that it was a natural extension of her deceitful nature. He was deeply disappointed and felt betrayed by her actions, as he believed that he had provided her with a comfortable life and had always been faithful to her. However, Nora's actions were not a result of her gender, but rather a response to the patriarchal society that she lived in. Nora's forgery was a desperate attempt to protect herself and her family, as she saw no other way out of her financial troubles.
To know more about the forgery:
https://brainly.com/question/30820312
#SPJ11
Describe the difference in opinions about money between Nora and Torvald
The difference in opinions about money between Nora and Torvald is that Torvald makes and controls money while Nora spends it.
Torvard teases Nora repeatedly for spending money. The beginning of the play depicts Nora as a shallow woman who is highly concerned with material delights. However, later in the play, we find out that Nora has a loan to pay and that her desire for money comes from the necessity to pay off the debt.
Torvald isn't excited about money as the only time he talks about money is when he has to tease Nora. He wants a beautiful home and a beautiful wife to keep up his reputation. Nora spends money for necessary causes while Trovard spends it for shallow and selfish reasons.
To know more about the differences in traits between Nora and Torvald,
https://brainly.com/question/27425865