Is this a WEAK or STRONG thesis statement and WHY.

1)The Burger Basket serves the world's best cheeseburgers.

2)Courts need to assign stronger punishments.

3)Seeing eye dogs, police dogs, and herding dogs are intelligent, working dogs.​​

The answer is alliteration

Answer:

Sports are a major part of our lives. We watch them on TV, we discuss them with friends, and some have even made careers out of being athletes. Sports are more than just a hobby for most people, they are a lifestyle. Sports have always been popular in the United States. More specifically, football is one of the most popular sports in our country as it is the most watched sport in America (NFL). Baseball and basketball follow as the second and third favorite leagues to watch (MLB).Huge investment has been put into bringing sports to everyone’s home over the last 60 years with major broadcasters such as ESPN and NBC bidding for rights bringing games to local and regional markets.Sports are an integral part of American culture. Sports offer opportunities for people of all ages to get involved in healthy, active lifestyles. The benefits of sport participation stretch across generations and impact the health and wellbeing of all Americans.The growth in sport participation is linked not only to its popularity as a pastime, but also to its ability to provide benefits at every stage of life, including improving mental health and academic performance.Sports participation can also be an important link to social capital because it creates opportunities for people to meet new people, develop friendships, improve leadership skills and become engaged with their communities.

Explanation:

Answer:

A graphic organizer can contrast text by being a beneficial visual tool to determine the differences and similarities between two things

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

P E X approved

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Juror 11 is most likely to sympathize with the defendant because both are foreign.

We can arrive at this answer because:

"The 12 Angry Men," tells the story of a Puerto Rican man who is accused of killing his father and must convince 12 jurors that he is innocent.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/5993449

The type of words that these words stand for are:

Given the meaning of all these types of sounds, we can generally refer to them as loud noises. So, the meaning of these sounds has been identified above.

Learn more about sounds here:

https://brainly.com/question/9349349

Answer:

Donald John Trump ? Former president of the United States of Merica YEEYEE ?

Explanation:

Answer:

Josh played basketball for 2 years.

Explanation:

And its 6:24 p. m. over here......

Answer:

what's your question?

Explanation:

Answer:

That can mean one of two things, 1. This student does better when working alone, or 2. This student does not do well when working alone.

Hope this helped!

Answer:

Second-degree burns may be treated with an antibiotic cream or other creams or ointments prescribed by a doctor. Third-degree and fourth-degree burns may need more intensive treatments such as intravenous (IV) antibiotics to prevent infection or IV fluids to replace fluids lost when skin was burned.

Explanation:

hope this helps! goodluck and enjoy the rest of your day /or night.

Answer: A it makes the most sense to me hope I helped!

The meaning of the word "waste" as it is used in the passage is:

Destroy

The use of the word "waste" suggests:

Death is destructive and devastating.

Let's explore the poem from which this was taken from.

"Ode on a Grecian Urn" is known to be metaphorical. The poet takes a look at beauty and uses it to relate the relationship between human life and its beauty. He went further to show how they complement each other.

We see the use of "waste" in the last stanza to talk about death:

"When old age shall this generation waste, / Thou shalt remain, in midst of other woe / Than ours, a friend to man".

Learn more about John Keats' poem "Ode on a Grecian Urn" on https://brainly.com/question/10101070

What is the meaning of the word waste as it is used in the passage?

✔ destroy  

What does the use of the word waste suggest?

✔ Death is destructive and devastating.

Answer: 1.) Weak.

2.) Strong.

3.) Weak.

Explanation: 1 is weak because it doesn't really grab the reader's attention.

2 is strong because it gets the reader's attention and gives an explanation for their claim all in one sentence.

3 is weak because there's no explanation for their claim and it doesn't get the attention of the reader.

The following is a weak or strong thesis statement.

A solid thesis is clear, concise, compelling, self-assured, and able to be supported. A compelling thesis presents readers with a viewpoint that can be argued for and refuted using evidence. Simply stating your topic or containing an unarguable, obvious fact constitutes a weak thesis.

A solid thesis is clear, concise, compelling, self-assured, and able to be supported. A compelling thesis presents readers with a viewpoint that can be argued for and refuted using evidence. Simply stating your topic or containing an unarguable, obvious fact constitutes a weak thesis.

Thus, the mentioned above are correctly matched with a weak or strong thesis.

Learn more about weak thesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/21313396

#SPJ2

when we draving in night make it slow as much possible don't draved acar

Answer:

The attorney stated at the outset of the lawsuit that his client was seeking both monetary and punitive damages for being dismissed without reason.

Explanation:

Answer:

Amanda felt that the court's punitive response was unjust as the man's transgression had only been minor.

Explanation:

In the book Dracula, when Renfield escapes, the place where he goes next is:

The thing which happens when Dr. Seward approaches him is:

Based on the complete text, we can see that Renfield was a vampire like Dracula and was working for him and aiming to please him based on the promises of flies and spiders which were promised to him by Dracula.

With this in mind, we can see that Dr Seward is a man that is obsessed with hunting the undead and goes on hunts, fuelled by morphine and Renfield is next on his list and he tracks him to Carfax estate where he plans to kill him, and there is a standoff.

Read more about Dracula here:

https://brainly.com/question/14199493

Answer:

Memorization, not rationalization. That is the advice of my 13-year-old daughter, Esmee, as I struggle to make sense of a paragraph of notes for an upcoming Earth Science test on minerals. “Minerals have crystal systems which are defined by the # of axis and the length of the axis that intersect the crystal faces.” That’s how the notes start, and they only get murkier after that. When I ask Esmee what this actually means, she gives me her homework credo.

Esmee is in the eighth grade at the NYC Lab Middle School for Collaborative Studies, a selective public school in the Chelsea neighborhood of Manhattan. My wife and I have noticed since she started there in February of last year that she has a lot of homework. We moved from Pacific Palisades, California, where Esmee also had a great deal of homework at Paul Revere Charter Middle School in Brentwood. I have found, at both schools, that whenever I bring up the homework issue with teachers or administrators, their response is that they are required by the state to cover a certain amount of material. There are standardized tests, and everyone—students, teachers, schools—is being evaluated on those tests. I’m not interested in the debates over teaching to the test or No Child Left Behind. What I am interested in is what my daughter is doing during those nightly hours between 8 o’clock and midnight, when she finally gets to bed. During the school week, she averages three to four hours of homework a night and six and a half hours of sleep.

Explanation:

~ Extracted from Stories of Quartz

Answer:

nani nani nani nani nani nani!

The above question requires a personal answer, for that reason, I cannot answer this question for you, but I will show you how to answer it.

First, you will need to read the texts that were presented in the unit and identify how these texts present the relationships between society and the environment, what are the causes, consequences, and maintenance of these relationships.

After this reading, you should identify how these texts were able to resolve doubts you had about the relationship between humans and nature. You should identify how opinions you had about these relationships changed as you read the texts.

After that, you can write your answer as follows:

You can find more information about the relationship between humans and nature at the link:

https://brainly.com/question/11976287

1. do spring begin in March april- it's in march

2. across the meadow speeds the does and her fawn- she's succfully across the medow

3. here are the missing papers- they are all not actually missing

Explanation:

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

Answer:

1.) Apocryphal

2.) Crypt

3.) Anachronism

4.) Chronological

5.) Encrypt

6.) Synchronize

7.) Chronic

8.) Cryptogram

Explanation:

You're welcome and please give brainliest:D

Answer:

2. crypt

4. chronological

6. synchronize

8. cryptogram

Explanation:

Answer:

This is an example of a simile because it compares the pill bottle to a buried mine using like. A fountain of books sprang down upon Montag as he climbed shuddering up the sheer stair-well; This is an example of a metaphor because there is not a literal fountain of books but it paints a picture for you.

Hope that helps. x

Answer:

(2.2)

2. what time does the Bank close here?

3. I have a car., but I don't use it much

4. where does Maria come from? Is she Spanish?

5. "what do you do?" ' I'm an electrician'

6. look at this sentence . what does this word mean?

7. David isn't very fit. He doesn't do any sports.

8. It takes me an hour to get to work. How long does it take you?

(2.3)

3. The sun rises in the east.

4. Bees make honey.

5. Vegetarians don't eat meat.

6. An atheist doesn't believe in God.

7. An interpreter translates one language into another.

8. Liars are people who don't tell the truth.

9. The river amazon flows into the Atlantic ocean.

(2.4)

2. Does your sister pay tennis as well?

3. How often do you go to the cinema?

4. What does your brother do?

5. Do you speak Spanish?

6. Where do your grandparents live?

hope this helps☆☆☆

Based on the information, the author can use bold print in this article in order to D. indicate important but perhaps unfamiliar words.

It should be noted that the bolding of words is simply used in emphasizing something strongly when writing. Bolding can be used to point out a particular thing.

In this article, bold was used by the author to indicate important but perhaps unfamiliar words. Words such as anteaters, Megalonychidae, etc can be bolded.

Learn more about bolding on:

https://brainly.com/question/12995727

Answer:

Number 1 response:

The steps that experience readers can use to analyze conflicting viewpoints and information on the same topic are trying to understand both viewpoints, do their research, and then look at the conflicting viewpoints on the topic again to see their reasoning and evidence more clearly and so they can understand their opinions. It is very important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information because the advantage of this is they won’t have much of an opinion when they must write an informative response because they’ve seen both sides and both arguments and evidence included. Some examples of this helping I will pull from ‘’Say no to genetically engineered salmon’’ and ‘’Genetically modified salmon can feed the world’’ (both from CNN I will leave the links in the bibliography). Let’s say for example you only read ‘’Say no to genetically engineered salmon’’ your information will be sided and you shall have no choice but to write information about one point of view on the topic making you more likely to mistakenly write an opinionated response whilst if you read both ‘’Say no to genetically engineered salmon’’ AND ‘Genetically modified salmon can feed the world’’ you will not only have an easier time to write a nonopinionated response but you will have more evidence and research on the topic from two sources on the same topic.

Number 2 response:

It matters when two authors interpret facts differently because its more informational when two people have different information about the same subject and you can get the topics on both sides of the argument therefore not have an opiniated topic on the matter and being able to write an informative response or essay. Yonathan Zohar believes genetically modified salmon can be of good use while one the other hand Rick Moonen believes otherwise. Zohar’s reasoning for his opinion is that since a great amount of people are going to eat fish more often because of the health benefits workers are spending more time and money to catch more fish, causing the factories to package them to overfill and causing a handful of fish that used to be extremely common to now barely seen in the wild so in solution he want to genetically modify salmon so more people can be feed and less resources are wasted. Moonen’s reasoning for his opinion is that genetically modified food, in general, is bad for you and he believes it's also a tactic to make already big companies more profit.

Number 3 response:

If you include a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument it can make it more persuasive because lets say you just heard someone say something like ‘’ I think that we should use solar panels from now on anywhere and always no matter what’’, its not much evidence r much of an opinion even but its still a claim. Imagine right after somebody has an opposite opinion like ‘’yes I believe solar panels are more healthy but they’re expensive and if its night time we cant have electricity and if the sun goes dark somehow we will have no power and no way to have light or entertainment or contact’’ its significantly more persuasive because it provides evidence which makes their argument more causing to believe since it seems they know what they are talking about. The effect that the conflicting sides have evidence and fair reasoning can have on readers for people listening can be the fact that they have more information on the topic, that they can understand where both sides are coming from and for readers their response will be a more understanding and informational one and listeners will have more info on the topic like readers. The examples I will pull from ‘’Genetically modified salmon can feed the world’’. Imagine if Yonathon Zohar (the author of ‘genetically modified salmon can feed the world’) just blatantly said I think genetically modified salmon is good for us, no one, would be persuaded to be towards his belief so he put evidence, proof, and reasoning to his viewpoint for example; ‘’ Fish species that used to be plentiful, such as cod, plaice, haddock and others, are now rare in the wild. The king of the oceans, the giant bluefin tuna, is now near the point of no return, its stocks dropping precipitously in the past decade alone.’’ Stating that we are losing our amount of fish because the massive amount of fish we are fishing for food when we can just genetically modify it.

Explanation:

This was on Jiskha, re-word it