A lack of qualified males and females to develop a workforce that will improve economic growth
The lack of workers males and girls to develop a population that will improve economic growth is a tendency that is a worry in less developed countries with low student numbers.
There are fewer competent persons in the country if a higher percentage of people drop out of high school.Learning from what we've seen is a key driving force of economic progress. A country with a highly educated & employable population would be spurred to growth via invention.It concludes only a tiny number are employable, there will be a shortage of qualified people to lead to economic growth.Therefore, the answer is "Option C".
Learn more:
brainly.com/question/24819526
What is the leading coefficient of -23x^7 + x^9-6x^3 +10+2x^2?
Answer:
The leading coefficient is 9
Explanation:
A coefficient is usually written in front of a number in the form of an exponent.
The leading coefficient is the coefficient with the highest number in which the number could be positive, negative, fraction etc.
In the example above , the leading or highest coefficient is 9 which is higher than others such as 7,3 and 2.
100 POINTS!!!
How will the 2010 Supreme Court decision (Citizens United) allowing unlimited campaign funding by corporations and individuals affect public policy over the next ten years, particularly relative to control by voters. Discuss how it could impact major and minor policy areas.
The 2010 Citizens United Case has a significant impact on later elections. Having no limit on campaign donations gave wealthy corporations and individuals much more power. Politicians are much more likely to campaign in the interests of the wealthy because that is how they can receive the most money. Oil companies for example could donate to a candidate to discourage them from voting on a pollution bill that restricts oil drilling. Donation information is public and we can see many big companies donating to certain politicians to sway votes today.
The 2010 Citizens United Case has a significant impact on later elections. Having no limit on campaign donations gave wealthy corporations and individuals much more power. Politicians are much more likely to campaign in the interests of the wealthy because that is how they can receive the most money. Oil companies for example could donate to a candidate to discourage them from voting on a pollution bill that restricts oil drilling. Donation information is public and we can see many big companies donating to certain politicians to sway votes today.