Identify the text structure of the following passage "Chimpanzees and humans are alike in many ways. A baby chimp laughs when its mother tickles it. After chimpanzees fight, they kiss and make up. When one chimpanzee comforts another, it gives it a hug or pat on the back. There are, of course, many ways that chimpanzees and humans are different. Chimpanzees are smaller and stronger than humans. An adult male chimpanzee stands three or four feet tall and weighs about 100 pounds. But a chimpanzee can lift more weight than a man who is six feet tall. "

The question you should ask yourself to ensure that you address your audience correctly when writing a procedural document is: How much are my readers likely to know about my topic? (Option D)

Knowing the audience's prior knowledge about the topic is crucial in writing any procedural document because it helps you determine the appropriate level of detail, terminology, and tone to use. Writing a document that is too basic or too advanced for the audience can lead to confusion, frustration, or disengagement. By understanding the readers' knowledge level, you can ensure that the document meets their needs and provides the information they require in a way that is clear and easy to follow.

"Follows after" is an example of redundancy. Redundancy occurs when words or phrases are unnecessarily repeated, resulting in a statement that is less clear or effective.

In this case, the word "follows" already implies that something comes after something else, so adding "after" is unnecessary and creates repetition. To improve the statement, simply use the word "follows" on its own. Redundant phrases can reduce the clarity and effectiveness of your communication, so it is important to identify and eliminate them in your writing and speech. This will lead to more concise and precise communication. Remember, it is crucial to be aware of redundancy and strive to express your ideas as clearly and concisely as possible.

To know more about the redundancy:

https://brainly.com/question/13266841

#SPJ11

Answer:

She is trusting when people are kind.

Explanation:

This statement refers to the wide range of written materials available to readers. Books, magazines, news articles, blogs, and various documents all contain valuable information and ideas that readers can access.

Books offer a deep dive into specific topics and provide in-depth knowledge and understanding, while magazines and news articles provide timely and relevant information on current events and trends. Blogs offer a more personal and informal perspective on topics and can be a great source of critical thinking skills. Moreover, written documents such as reports, scientific journals, blogs, and research papers are essential for acquiring accurate information and gaining a deeper understanding of specific subjects. These documents offer data and evidence-based analysis that can be helpful in making informed decisions.

Overall, the availability of various written materials provides readers with a diverse range of perspectives and ideas, which can help in gaining knowledge, expanding one's understanding, and developing critical thinking skills.

To learn more about critical thinking skills, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/30582374

#SPJ4

Because they are both possessive moms, the narrator's mother in "Safety of Numbers" and Jerry's mother in "Through the Tunnel" share comparable parenting styles.

Because they are both possessive moms who always want to have their children to themselves, the mothers of the narrator in "Safety of Numbers" and Jerry in "Through the Tunnel" approach parenting similarly. For instance, Jerry's mother was the one who opened the door for him, despite being possessive like the narrator's mother in "Safety of Numbers." This allowed Jerry to have his tunnel experience.

However, Lucy's mother is quite worried about safety in "Safety of Numbers" since she realises how important the entrance examinations are in determining her daughter's future profession. Given her background and the significance society places on academic success, she is appropriate to focus on this area.

Read more about parenting on:

https://brainly.com/question/3131915

#SPJ4

In Homer – The Odyssey (Book 4) - the nurse's words at the end of paragraph 7, "Besides, I cannot think ...all around it." serve as - foreshadowing that Odysseus will return (Option A)

Penelope receives valuable guidance from the nurse, as indicated by her words at the end of paragraph 7.

The nurse is offering advice on protecting Penelope's son from potential harm and danger. By expressing her concern through "let me advise you," the nurse underscores her interest in finding a solution to any problem that could arise.

Thus, the use of "besides, I cannot think" conveys the gravity of the situation and emphasizes that cautionary measures are crucial.

It is thus right to conclude that the correct option is A.

Learn more about Odysseus at:

https://brainly.com/question/6522443

#SPJ1

The rhetorical appeal in the list of grievances is primarily Logos (II), which appeals to reason and logic.

A list of grievances presents a logical argument that outlines specific complaints or wrongdoings that have occurred, which can be analyzed and debated based on their factual accuracy and relevance. This type of appeal aims to persuade the audience through sound reasoning and evidence, rather than emotional or ethical appeals.

The list of grievances can also incorporate Ethos (I) and Pathos (III) to some extent. Ethos is related to the credibility and trustworthiness of the speaker or writer, and a well-crafted list of grievances can establish the author's authority on the subject matter.

Pathos, on the other hand, appeals to emotions and can be used to stir up sympathy or anger in the audience, making them more likely to take action.

The effectiveness of a list of grievances as a rhetorical device depends on the balance of these three appeals, with Logos being the most essential component.

Learn more about rhetorical here:

https://brainly.com/question/12327267

#SPJ4

Based on the function of "subside" in the sentence, its most accurate definition is to become less intense or severe; to diminish in intensity or violence.

to sink or fall to the bottom : settle. : to become quiet or less : abate. as the fever subsides. my anger subsided. subsidence

to become less strong or intense. The pain/swelling will subside in a couple of hours. After his anger had subsided, he was able to look at things rationally. We'll have to wait until the wind/storm/rain subsides.

to know more about "subside" click this link -

brainly.com/question/30138933

#SPJ11

When Beowulf returns to Geatland, he is destined to become the king of the Geats. After successfully defeating Grendel and his mother, Beowulf gains immense fame and respect. Upon his return, he serves the current king, Hygelac, loyally.

After Hygelac's death, Beowulf ascends to the throne and rules wisely for 50 years, providing stability and prosperity to his people.

When Beowulf returns to Geatland, he is welcomed back as a hero and is soon crowned king. He rules over his people for 50 years, during which time he is known for his wisdom, generosity, and courage. However, despite his success as a leader, he is eventually faced with a final challenge when a dragon attacks his kingdom. Beowulf fights the dragon but is mortally wounded in the process. His people mourn his death and remember him as a great warrior and king.

To know more about Beowulf click here:

https://brainly.com/question/1565771

#SPJ11

In "The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks," Pattillo tells Skloot that Elsie Lacks was Henrietta's daughter who suffered from severe mental and physical disabilities.

Elsie was institutionalized at Crownsville Hospital in Maryland and died in 1955. Pattillo described how Elsie was frequently used for medical experiments without informed consent or proper consideration for her well-being, similar to what happened with her mother Henrietta's cells.

Pattillo tells Skloot that Elsie's medical records were likely destroyed, making it difficult to fully understand her condition and the nature of the medical experiments that were performed on her. However, she suggests that Elsie may have been used as a subject in medical experiments due to her disabilities, and that her experiences may have contributed to the Lacks family's mistrust of the medical community.

Pattillo's information about Elsie Lacks provides important context for understanding the experiences of the Lacks family and their relationship with the medical community. It highlights the ways in which vulnerable populations, such as people with disabilities, have been subjected to medical experimentation without their consent, and underscores the importance of ethical considerations in medical research.

To know more about The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, please click on:

https://brainly.com/question/23155894

#SPJ11

Every story has to begin somewhere, and this is called the exposition.

The exposition is the part of the story where the setting, characters, and the main conflict are introduced. It sets the stage for the rest of the story and provides essential background information that helps the reader understand the story's context. The exposition usually comes at the beginning of a story, and it's crucial to establish the tone and mood of the narrative. It helps the reader get a feel for the characters and their motivations, making it easier for them to get invested in the story. In some stories, the exposition can be quite lengthy, while in others, it may be brief. Still, regardless of the length, it plays a crucial role in the overall storytelling process. It's the foundation on which the rest of the story is built, and without it, the story would lack context and direction. Therefore, it's important to pay attention to the exposition and understand its significance in any story you read or write.

Learn more about exposition here:

https://brainly.com/question/11063323

#SPJ11

Mrs. Linde and Krogstad, characters in Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," have a shared past. They were previously in a romantic relationship, but Mrs. Linde ended it to marry another man for financial security.

At the time, she needed to support her family, which was her primary concern. Years later, after her husband's death and the loss of her financial stability, Mrs. Linde reunites with Krogstad and rekindles their relationship.

Throughout the play, their renewed connection becomes essential in resolving the main conflict involving Nora, the protagonist. Mrs. Linde's understanding of Krogstad's struggles allows her to convince him to retract his blackmail against Nora, ultimately setting the stage for Nora's self-realization and the play's conclusion.

In summary, Mrs. Linde and Krogstad know each other from a previous romantic relationship, and their reunion in "A Doll's House" plays a pivotal role in the story's development.

TO KNOW MORE ABOUT Mrs. Linde and Krogstad, characters  CLICK THIS LINK -

brainly.com/question/28775621

#SPJ11

The suffixes "ion", "sion", and "tion" are used to form nouns that typically represent an action or process, or a state or condition.

These suffixes are added to verbs to create nouns, which often describe the result of the action performed by the verb. For example, the verb "inform" becomes the noun "information" when the suffix "tion" is added.

The suffixes "ion", "sion", and "tion" are all used to create nouns from verbs or adjectives. "Ion" is typically used for verbs ending in "ate" (e.g. "create" becomes "creation"), "sion" is used for verbs ending in "d" or "se" (e.g. "decide" becomes "decision" and "impress" becomes "impression"), and "tion" is used for verbs ending in "te" (e.g. "activate" becomes "activation"). These suffixes indicate the action or result of the verb or adjective they are attached to.

To know more about suffixes click here:

https://brainly.com/question/20853128

#SPJ11

After Torvald reads the letter revealing Nora's secret loan and forgery, he realizes that Nora has been deceiving him and keeping important information from him.

Torvald feels an unsettling sense of dejection; one so deep that he could no longer distinguish between truth and deception.

This leads him to doubt her judgment and ability to make responsible decisions, which includes her ability to care for their children. Torvald feels that he cannot trust Nora with the responsibility of the children because she has shown that she is not entirely honest and reliable. He fears that her actions may put their children in danger or lead to further deception and betrayal. Therefore, Torvald feels that he must take control of the situation and protect their children by not trusting Nora with their care

To know more about Torvald pls visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27425865

.#SPJ11

Answer:

part A b PART B c  c

Explanation:

First one b Second one c third one c :)

Answer: Charlie may think he failed the inkblot test because he was unable to understand the purpose of the test and the responses that were expected of him. As a character in Daniel Keyes' novel "Flowers for Algernon," Charlie's cognitive abilities were initially limited, making it difficult for him to understand abstract concepts and instructions. The inkblot test, which requires individuals to interpret ambiguous images and provide a subjective response, may have been confusing for Charlie because it did not have a clear right or wrong answer.

"If I were in a situation where I was uncertain about how I did on a test, I would feel anxious and uncertain about my abilities. I might question whether I had prepared enough or if I had misunderstood the material. Similarly, Charlie may have felt frustrated and confused by his inability to understand the test and unsure of whether he had answered the questions correctly."

Explanation: Charlie's confusion with the inkblot test may have stemmed from his lack of experience with such tests and his limited cognitive abilities. As his intelligence improves throughout the novel, he may begin to understand the purpose of the test and the responses that are expected of him. Overall, the inkblot test represents a challenge for Charlie's intellectual growth and serves as a reminder of the limitations of his initial cognitive abilities.

After Christine leaves, Torvald makes several advances towards Nora in Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House." He compliments her beauty and expresses his desire to be intimate with her. Torvald also attempts to persuade Nora to dance with him and asks her to dress up in her favorite costume to please him. These advances are driven by Torvald's perception of Nora as a passive and submissive woman who should fulfill his desires.

However, it is important to note that Torvald's advances towards Nora are not based on genuine affection or respect for her as a person. Rather, they are rooted in his belief that Nora exists solely to please him and fulfill his needs. Furthermore, Torvald's behavior is indicative of the patriarchal norms and expectations of his time, which reinforce male dominance and female subordination.

In conclusion, while Torvald's advances towards Nora may seem like romantic gestures, they are actually a reflection of the oppressive gender dynamics that exist in the play.

To know more about Torvald  click this link-

brainly.in/question/14471226

#SPJ11

Answer:  B. Enthusiasm

Explanation:

Enthusiasm is an essential element in any successful speaker's delivery. The ability to feel and express enthusiasm is immensely empowering.  If you're speaking about something that just doesn't interest you, then you're going to be disengaged.

The key to achieving effective vocal variety is (B) Enthusiasm.

Enthusiasm refers to the energy and passion that a speaker brings to their delivery, and it is essential for engaging and connecting with the audience. Vocal variety refers to the range and modulation of a speaker's voice, including aspects such as pitch, volume, tone, and pacing. By using vocal variety effectively, a speaker can create emphasis, convey emotions, and maintain the audience's interest and attention. However, achieving vocal variety requires more than just technical skills such as pronunciation and projection. It also requires a genuine passion and enthusiasm for the topic, as well as an understanding of how to use vocal inflections and pacing to convey meaning and emotion effectively.

Learn more about speaker :

https://brainly.com/question/3855761

#SPJ11

In Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," Torvald Helmer, the protagonist's husband, initially reacts with anger and disappointment upon receiving the second letter from his wife, Nora, revealing her past forgery and deception. He feels betrayed and insulted by her actions and threatens to ruin her reputation by exposing her crime to the public. However, his reaction changes towards the end of the play when he realizes the extent of his own selfishness and the depth of Nora's sacrifices for their family. He eventually shows remorse and asks Nora to stay with him, but she chooses to leave in pursuit of her own self-discovery and independence.

Torvald receives and reads the first letter from Krogstad, which reveals Nora's secret about forging her father's signature on a loan document. Torvald becomes extremely angry and upset, accusing Nora of ruining his life and reputation. Shortly after, Torvald receives the second letter from Krogstad.. The second letter informs Torvald that Krogstad has decided to withdraw his accusations and return the incriminating bond. Upon reading the second letter, Torvald's mood quickly changes. He feels relieved and reassured about their situation. Torvald forgives Nora for her actions and promises that everything will go back to normal, disregarding the deeper issues that led to Nora's actions. However, it is important to note that Nora's realization of her own self-worth and independence eventually leads her to leave Torvald, despite his reaction to the second letter.

To know more about  A Doll's House click here:

brainly.com/question/12446066

#SPJ11

Sentences from both passages reflect the common theme of soldiers’ reluctance to talk about their war experiences. In "Ambush," the narrator's daughter asks if he had ever killed anyone, implying that war stories are always about violence and death.

However, the narrator chooses not to answer her question truthfully and instead comforts her. This suggests that he is reluctant to talk about his experiences. In "Symptoms," some soldiers are talkative and boastful about their experiences before battle but become silent afterward.

It is considered heroic, but the reason is that what they have seen or done is so horrible that they don't want to bring it back to haunt them or their listeners. This indicates that the soldiers are reluctant to talk about their war experiences because they are traumatized by them.

To know more about Theme:

https://brainly.com/question/19522386

#SPJ4

A girl was walking home one day, lost in thought about the events of the day. As she walked, she noticed a beautiful sunset painting the sky with hues of orange, pink and purple.

It was as if the sky was on fire, a sight she had never seen before. She paused for a moment to take it all in. As she continued on her way, she saw a group of children playing on the sidewalk. They were laughing and chasing each other, carefree and happy.

The girl couldn't help but smile at the sight. She continued walking and came across an old man struggling with his groceries. Without hesitation, she offered to help him carry his bags.

The old man was grateful for her kindness and struck up a conversation with her. He told her about his life, his struggles and his triumphs. The girl listened intently, amazed by his resilience and wisdom.

As they parted ways, the girl realized that sometimes, the most unexpected moments can turn out to be the most meaningful. She felt grateful for the beautiful sunset, the joyful children and the chance encounter with the old man. It was a reminder that life is full of surprises and opportunities to connect with others.

Learn more about sunset here:

https://brainly.com/question/29585331

#SPJ4

In an argumentative essay, the counterclaim allows you to introduce new evidence to your argument, option A, since it is information that opposes the claim

In an argumentative essay, the counterclaim is a viewpoint that opposes your thesis statement. Including a counterclaim in your essay shows that you have considered multiple perspectives on the issue, and it helps strengthen your argument by addressing potential weaknesses. The counterclaim is typically presented in a separate paragraph and is followed by a rebuttal that refutes the opposing argument using evidence and logic.

This can help you build credibility with your readers, as you show that you have considered multiple sides of the issue and still arrived at a strong, evidence-based conclusion. Ultimately, the counterclaim is a crucial element of persuasive writing, as it demonstrates your ability to engage with a range of perspectives and effectively persuade your audience.

Therefore, we believe option A to be the best answer for this question.

Learn more about counterclaim here:

https://brainly.com/question/11953701

#SPJ1

True, concepts and analytic insights are usually derived from field notes and interviews after the observation period has ended.

During the observation period, researchers gather data by observing subjects and taking field notes, which are detailed records of their observations. After the observation period, researchers analyze these field notes and the information gathered from interviews to identify patterns, relationships, and key concepts. These analytic insights help researchers better understand the subjects' behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs, allowing them to draw conclusions and formulate theories. In summary, the process of deriving concepts and analytic insights involves gathering data through field notes and interviews during the observation period, followed by analysis and interpretation after the observation period has ended.

To know more about the observation period :

https://brainly.com/question/31067246

#SPJ11

Answer: Even if you don't reach your goal, you'll land among something amazing! Shoot for something that really matters to you. Even if you don't quite make it, you're closer than you were before take off. Getting there is the hardest, take it in stride.

In general, a conclusion should effectively summarize and reinforce the main claim, reasons, and evidence presented in an argumentative essay.

The writer should avoid introducing new information or arguments in the conclusion and instead focus on bringing the essay's main points together in a clear and concise manner.

If the conclusion effectively ties everything together and leaves the reader with a clear understanding of the writer's position, it can be considered a strong conclusion.

A strong conclusion should effectively summarize the writer's main points and reinforce their claim. It should not introduce new information or arguments, as this can confuse the reader and detract from the overall persuasiveness of the essay.

Thus, these are the sentences evaluating the writer’s conclusion in relation to the essay’s claim, reasons, and evidence.

For more details regarding Argumentative Essay, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15727685

#SPJ1

Nora pointed out that their marriage lacked genuine communication and emotional connection, indicating that their relationship was superficial and built on misconceptions rather than true understanding of each other's needs and desires.

The guest notices that Nora does not recognise her after a reluctant greeting from Nora. Finally, Nora recognises the woman as Kristine Linde, a childhood acquaintance, and says that Mrs. Linde has changed since the two of them last spoke nine or ten years ago. According to Mrs. Linde, she just came that day by ship. Nora expresses regret for not writing Mrs. Linde three years earlier when she read in the newspaper that her husband had passed away and says that Mrs. Linde appears paler and thinner than she remembered.

To know more about communication please visit:

https://brainly.com/question/22558440

#SPJ11

Answer: All the choices are correct.

Explanation:

They are all examples of figurative language.

Answer: The figure of speech used in the line "the dirt screams from his flesh like a rotten smell" is Simile.

Explanation:

Simile is a figure of speech that compares two different things using the words "like" or "as".

The speaker is comparing the way dirt is being removed from someone's flesh to the way a rotten smell would scream out from it. The Simile is used to convey a strong sense of disgust and revulsion.

Read more about Simile:

https://brainly.com/question/273941

https://brainly.com/question/2416704

a. We will be called by them.

b. My father bought the shirt.

c. Was the car being driven by him?

Voice refers to the relationship between the subject of a sentence and the action being performed in the sentence. In grammar, there are two voices: active and passive. In active voice, the subject of the sentence performs the action, while in passive voice, the subject receives the action.

Changing a sentence from active voice to passive voice involves altering the structure of the sentence and switching the subject and object of the sentence. This is done by adding a form of the auxiliary verb "to be" before the past participle of the main verb.

Changing the voice of a sentence can affect the tone, emphasis, and clarity of the sentence. It is a useful tool in writing and can be used to add variety and interest to the text. It is important to use the appropriate voice depending on the context and purpose of the writing.

Learn more about change in voice here:

https://brainly.com/question/29795209

#SPJ1

"She believes in the Gospel, every word!" Though you be ordained in God's own tears, you are a coward now!" the quote shows that Proctor is trying to tell the court.

Elizabeth Proctor, who has been charged with witchcraft, is being defended by Proctor. He is struggling to speak the truth about what is occurring in Salem because he is dissatisfied with the court's proceedings.

Elizabeth's claim that she "believes in the Gospel, every word" was made by Proctor to demonstrate that she is a devout Christian and would never engage in witchcraft.

As a result, the significance of the Proctor is trying to tell the court are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (a) is correct.

Learn more about on "The Crucible", here:

https://brainly.com/question/355513

#SPJ1