The British government led by David Cameron held a referendum on the issue in 2016; the electorate decided by a 3.8% majority to favour leaving the European Union.
hope it helpful
A referendum on the subject was held in 2016 by the David Cameron-led British government, and a 3.8% majority of voters supported leaving the EU.
What is a referendum?A direct vote by the populace on a proposition, law, or political problem is known as a referendum. This is in contrast to a representative voting on a matter. A new law or specific policy may be adopted as a consequence, or the referendum may just serve as advising guidance.
A referendum can only be authorized by a double majority, or a majority of voters in both the nation's electorate and the majority of the states, to pass. Only the national majority counts territory voters. If a referendum is successful, the Constitution is altered.
United States residents can put new legislation or recently passed legislation on the ballot for a popular vote through the initiatives and referendums processes. These processes are used in many U.S. states.
Any subject, matter, or action that has been put to the people's vote by the General Assembly, a local government, or a voter petition as permitted by law is referred to a referendum. Bond issues and constitutional amendments both require a referendum.
Learn more about referendum, here
https://brainly.com/question/4365145
#SPJ5
Please help its multiple choice pleasee im so confused
Answer:
He had just eaten, He was shot in the back, and lastly, the arrow went under his left armpit
Explanation:
this has to do with logic... read it carefully.. whatever is in the multiple choice that repeats the paragraph, choose that.
Answer:
A,B,E
Explanation:
A because in the beginning it says " half an hour after Otzi dined" which implies that he had just eaten. B because he was shot near/close to the back and E because it states in the paragraph that the arrow went under his left armpit.
what should be done to make foreign employment well managed by government host country and employees?
Answer:
47
Explanation:
What type of logical fallacy does this statement represent.
13% of unvaccinated people claim being vaccinated caused infertility
What is conservation?
Answer:
the process of changing or causing something to change from one form to another
Many believe the U.S. constitution was made to be slow and time consumin. If this is true, why would the Founding Fathers have made the constitution this way?
Answer:
To allow each branch's actions to be checked by another branch
Explanation:
The founders were big fans of making sure any change of the constitution would be extremely difficult without near unanimous support
Discuss the difference between Old regionalism and New regionalism
Answer:
New regionalism gave rise to regional organizations that had a wide-ranging set of stated policy objectives. ... Unlike old regionalism, which was oriented more toward interactions between states, new regionalism involved a variety of state and nonstate actors involved in a process of transformation of the world order.
Explanation:
Discuss the importance of individual differences in learners
Answer:
Thus, individual differences are important because they're associated with students' particular needs. These needs are related to learning pace, cognitive styles, and motivation levels, which teachers must take into account in the teaching and learning processes.
vận dụng qui luật phủ định của phủ định để phân tích nhận xét sau: thế hệ trẻ hiện nay sống không có hoài bão, mục đích và lý tưởng rõ ràng. quan điểm trên đúng hay sai ? vì sao ?
Answer:
UMMM
Explanation:
To which house of Congress must an appropriations bill be first introduced?
-Senate
-House of Representatives
-Supreme court
-Executive
Answer:
Article I, Section 7, of the Constitution provides that all bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives but that the Senate may propose, or concur with, amendments. By tradition, general appropriation bills also originate in the House of Representatives.
Explanation:
What does an IP right entitle a person with?
Intellectual property right (IP) gives a person the right to sole ownership or exclusiveness to their own innovation or any innovation they want to protect over a period of time.
Advantages of Intellectual property rights Promotes the marketability of your business.It converts ideas into money-making assetsMarkets the originality of your business' products and services.It Facilities access or raise finance for your business. Promotes export opportunities for your business.Learn more about IP right at https://brainly.com/question/1078532
Think about the debate and which claims were more clearly supported by reasons and evidence. Evaluate in a three paragraph
essay (4-5 sentences each).
Which candidate do you think proposed a more compelling argument about inflation? Support your daim with specific data
presented by the candidates. Be sure to mention at least one counterpoint, and refute this point with evidence.
Answer:
think the more compelling argument winner has to go to Jimmy Carter. Lots of facts stated, not just opinions and assumptions. For example; when he stated written facts from the CPI that his plan to bring inflation down has worked for him during is presidency.
With that being said I have to give credit where credit is due, Ronald Regan definitely had some powerful comebacks. Like for when he was showing that his governing in the state of California has worked in the past so why would it not work while running the country.
Explanation:
*not my answer*
marcelovarelaquintan- owner of this answer
What is the 9th and 10th amendment in your OWN WORDS!!
The Ninth Amendment says, "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
The Tenth Amendment says, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States ...
The earth is shaped by the movement of different forces, _______ water, wind, and ice.
Answer:
Fire
Explanation:
Not much to explain, it's just fire.
2) How did Hitler and the Nazi party create hatred and disdain towards
the Jewish people beforeland during World War II?
A)
They distributed propaganda blaming the Jewish
people for the punishing terms created at the end of
World War I
B)
They put millions of Jewish shopkeepers and business
owners on trial for making a profit during religious
holidays.
They blamed Jewish politicians for the war crimes
committed during the invasions of Poland, Denmark,
and the Soviet Union.
They discovered proof that most of the people that
D) were boycotting German businesses were Jewish
politicians and activists.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Why were gas planets able to become so large and massive
Which event led the US to join World War I?
Answer:
Germany's resumption of submarine attacks on passenger and merchant ships in 1917 became the primary motivation behind Wilson's decision to lead the United States into World War I.
Explanation: There was a lot of other causes but dat wus da main 1
Answer:
This was because of Germany's continuation of submarine attacks on passenger and merchant ships in the year 1917, this resulted in the US joining WWI.
I hope this helps! Please mark brainliest! :D
who is candice? someone plz tell me!!!
The only Candice I know is Candice King. If that is who you are talking about here are some facts about her.
Candice Rene King is an American actress, singer, and songwriter.She is well known for her role as Caroline Forbes in The CW supernatural drama series The Vampire Diaries and her recurring role as the same character on the spin-off series The Originals and Legacies. She is was born on May 13, 1987, she is also 34 years old she lives in Houston, TX She is also 5'8 Spouse: Joe King (m. 2014) Albums: It's Always the Innocent Ones Children: Florence May King, Josephine June King Siblings: Kree Thomas Accola
Answer:
Yeah, from Phineas and Ferb
What are the common characteristics of the North Central
Plains Region?
This language is spoken in the country that is shaped like a boot.
A. Germanic
B. Romance
C. Slavic
Answer:
the answer is a.Germanic
Explanation:
people all over the country speak languges of all kind and they do so accordinly and i looked it up
During the Progressive Era, muckrakers such as Jacob Riis exposed the harsh realities of
A
industrialization
В.
western settlements
с
interventionism
D
military life.
Answer:
a. indusditlization
Explanation:
The brutal realities of industrialization were exposed during the Progressive Era by muckrakers like Jacob Riis. Therefore, the correct answer is option a. industrialization.
American culture saw a great deal of change as a result of industrialization, but there were many unfavorable side consequences as well. Through their writing and photographs, muckrakers like Riis brought these issues to public light.
Child labor, dangerous working conditions, and poverty were all brought to light. For his work capturing the squalor that immigrants endured in the tenement dwellings of New York City, Riis was particularly well-known.
All things considered, the efforts of muckrakers throughout the Progressive Era contributed to the implementation of numerous significant reforms and changes in American society. Because of their efforts, all Americans now live in a more favorable and just society.
Therefore, the correct answer is option a. industrialization.
learn more about muckrakers here :
https://brainly.com/question/13379226
#SPJ3
a) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Shaw v. Reno and Easley v. Cromartie.
b) Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts elucidated in Easley v. Cromartie might have led to a different holding than the holding in Shaw v. Reno.
c) Describe an action that members of the public who disagree with the holding in Easley v. Cromartie could take to limit its impact.
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Answer: A.) Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act. While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings. Its goal is to impose significantly more constitutional limitations on the states than existed prior to the Civil War. Therefore, the Supreme Court ruled in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), that racial redistricting must be subject to strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause and that the bodies responsible for redistricting must be aware of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act. While the Supreme Court found that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in defining the 1997 borders was based on patently false conclusions in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001).
B.) Easley filed an appeal with the US Supreme Court in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, challenging the ruling in Hunt v. Cromartie. In the case of Hunt v. Cromartie, the court determined that the North Carolina legislature did not consider race when establishing the borders of the twelfth congressional district in 1992. The court ruled that there was no proof that the legislature had violated the equal protection article of the constitution or that it had drawn boundaries based on race rather than politics. In Easley v Cromartie the argument was that establishing the borders for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The United States Supreme Court ruled that the lower court's ruling was incorrect because it genuinely relied on racial issues, which is against the interests of the state. In Shaw v. Reno, the court found that North Carolina's voting strategy attempted to separate voters based on race.
c.) I think that a move that members of this court would disagree with the BLM (Black lives Matter) movement. This case, Easley v Cromartie has severe relations to the equal protection clause. This clause states, "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." This clause when then debunked when later furthering the case, which is almost exactly what the BLM movement was about. Both cases disagreed with the equality of particular groups of people.
Explanation: just submitted
Which of the following should you most likely include in an effective introductory paragraph?
O An interpretation of a key piece of data.
O Your main piece of evidence, so readers can see it right away.
O A list of the sources you intend to use.
O An overview of the problem or issue you're discussing.
Which diagram matches the 20th century crisis to the international response
the first one Explanation:
Answer: C
Explanation: I took the test :/
A piece of pipe that is 8 feet long is cut into 1 4 ft pieces. How many pieces can be cut from the pipe?
Answer:
32 pieces of pipe
Explanation:
In order to find the answer to this question you need to divide the length of the pipe by the length of the pieces using KCF. (Keep, Change, Flip)
[tex]8 \div \frac{1}{4}[/tex]
All whole numbers have a invisible denominator of one, make sure to remember that when dividing fractions and whole numbers.
[tex]8=\frac{8}{1}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{8}{1} \div\frac{1}{4}[/tex]
Use KCF
[tex]\frac{8}{1}\times\frac{4}{1}[/tex]
Multiply
[tex]8\times4=32[/tex]
[tex]1\times1=1[/tex]
[tex]=\frac{32}{1} =32[/tex]
=32 pieces of pipe
Hope this helps
1. What is an example of a business in the recreation and entertainment sector of the industry?
Restaurant
Hotel
Stadium
Train station
Answer:
C.) Stadium should be your answer here.
what are the factor affecting population change. discuss
Answer:
which chapter is this ???
Explanation:
___________________
Was Saratoga after Lexington in Conrad
who wants me to teach you Spanish?
9. En el siguiente cuadro ,describe las dos clases de liberalismo que existieron en el pais. ' 1. 2.
El liberalismo es un movimiento político-social que se originó en la Ilustración del siglo XVIII, en el que la libertad es el pilar central de la organización política y social de las naciones.
El liberalismo tiene como punto de partida la mayor libertad posible para el individuo siempre que no restrinja la libertad de los demás. Los liberales luchan por una sociedad en la que los ciudadanos disfruten de grandes libertades, como los derechos civiles que protegen al individuo y limitan el poder del estado y la iglesia.
El liberalismo también lucha por un mercado libre en el que el gobierno adopte una postura cautelosa. Otra punta de lanza del liberalismo es la separación de la iglesia y el estado (entre otras cosas como condición para la tolerancia religiosa).
El gobierno solo está obligado a ocuparse de aquellas áreas del gobierno que son imposibles de cuidar para el individuo, como las funciones públicas, las obras públicas y la defensa nacional.
Las dos corrientes principales del liberalismo que han tenido lugar en nuestro país han sido:
el liberalismo clásico, que representa una mínima interferencia del gobierno; liberalismo conservador, que pende entre el liberalismo económico y el conservadurismo sociocultural.Aprende más en https://brainly.com/question/15696042
The (Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence, Constitution)
gives people the right to worship freely.
Answer:
US Constitution
Explanation:
The answer is the free exercise clause, which is from Amendment 1 of the US Constitution.