I don't understand this problem

if you add up 2 interior degrees the answer is the exterior degree

so the answer is 145

a) There are 8 letters in the word INTEGRALS, out of which 3 are vowels (I, E, A) and 5 are consonants (N, T, G, R, L). To select 4 letters such that the number of vowels and consonants are equal, we need to choose 2 vowels and 2 consonants. The number of ways to do this is given by the combination formula:

C(3, 2) * C(5, 2) = 3 * 10 = 30 ways.

b) To arrange all the vowels (I, E, A) next to each other, we can treat them as a single block and arrange the block and the remaining consonants (N, T, G, R, L) separately. The block of vowels can be arranged among themselves in 3! = 6 ways. The 5 consonants can be arranged among themselves in 5! = 120 ways. Therefore, the total number of arrangements is:

6 * 120 = 720 ways.

c) To form a 4-letter word with more consonants than vowels from INTEGRALS, we can choose 3 consonants and 1 vowel, or 4 consonants. The number of ways to do this is given by:

C(5, 3) * C(3, 1) + C(5, 4) = 10 * 3 + 5 = 35 ways.

Learn more about INTEGRALS word: https://brainly.com/question/11732255

#SPJ11

X = $50,900 + (1.645 * $4,500)
X = $50,900 + $7,402.50
X ≈ $58,302.50
So, at a 95% confidence interval all students at private universities pays less than approximately $58,303.

To answer this question, we need to use the normal distribution formula:
z = (x - μ) / σ
where:
X = cost at the desired percentile
μ = mean annual cost ($50,900)
Z = z-score corresponding to the desired percentile (we'll find this value)
σ = standard deviation ($4,500)

where z is the z-score, x is the value we want to find, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

In this case, we want to find the value of x such that 95% of all students pay less than that amount. We can find the corresponding z-score using a standard normal distribution table, which tells us the area under the curve to the left of a certain z-score. Since we want to find the value that corresponds to the 95th percentile, we look for the z-score that gives us an area of 0.95 to the left.

Using a standard normal distribution table, we find that the z-score for the 95th percentile is 1.645.

Now we can plug in the values we know:

1.645 = (x - 50,900) / 4,500

Solving for x, we get:

x = 58,427

So 95% of all students at private universities pay less than $58,427.
This is because we want to keep as much precision as possible until the final step, to avoid any rounding errors.

Learn more about confidence intervals:

brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ11

a. The probability that exactly two adults say they are more likely to make purchases during a sales tax holiday is 0.275.

b.  The probability that more than two adults say they are more likely to make purchases during a sales tax holiday is .305

c. The probability that between two and five adults say they are more likely to make purchases during a sales tax holiday, inclusive, is  0.736.

This is a binomial distribution problem with n = 10 and p = 0.28.

(a) The probability that exactly two adults say they are more likely to make purchases during a sales tax holiday is:

P(2) = (10 choose 2) * 0.28^2 * 0.72^8 = 0.275

Therefore, P(2) ≈ 0.275.

(b) The probability that more than two adults say they are more likely to make purchases during a sales tax holiday is:

P(x > 2) = 1 - P(x ≤ 2) = 1 - [P(0) + P(1) + P(2)]

= 1 - [(10 choose 0) * 0.28^0 * 0.72^10 + (10 choose 1) * 0.28^1 * 0.72^9 + (10 choose 2) * 0.28^2 * 0.72^8]

= 1 - (0.125 + 0.295 + 0.275)

≈ 0.305

Therefore, P(x > 2) ≈ 0.305.

(c) The probability that between two and five adults say they are more likely to make purchases during a sales tax holiday, inclusive, is:

P(2≤x≤5) = P(2) + P(3) + P(4) + P(5)

= (10 choose 2) * 0.28^2 * 0.72^8 + (10 choose 3) * 0.28^3 * 0.72^7 + (10 choose 4) * 0.28^4 * 0.72^6 + (10 choose 5) * 0.28^5 * 0.72^5

≈ 0.736

Therefore, P(2≤x≤5) ≈ 0.736.

Learn more about probability at https://brainly.com/question/15069941

#SPJ11

Answer:

PART 1: K 5375.66

PART 2: 38.1051177665 or 38  210235533/2000000000

Step-by-step explanation:

1. (i) Compounded Semi Annually: A = P × [1 + r/n]nt A = K4,000 × [1 + 6%/2]2×5 A = K4,000 × [1 + 0.03]10 A = K4,000 × [1.03]10 A = K4,000 × [1.344] A = K 5375.66

2. √(243) + (3√ (75) - √(12)= 38.1051177665

38.1051177665 as a decimal: 38.1051177665

38.1051177665 as a a fraction: 38  210235533/2000000000

K5376.48 will be in the account after 5 years compounded semi-annually. K5396.32 will be in the account after 5 years compounded weekly. The value of simplification is  22√3.

Compounded semi-annually

The interest rate per period is r = 6% / 2 = 0.03

The number of periods is n = 5 x 2 = 10

The amount A after n periods is given by

A = K(1 + r)ⁿ

A = 4000(1 + 0.03)¹⁰

A = 4000 x 1.34412

A = K5376.48

Compounded weekly

The interest rate per period is r = 6% / 52 = 0.001153846

The number of periods is n = 5 x 52 = 260

The amount A after n periods is given by

A = K(1 + r)ⁿ

A = 4000(1 + 0.001153846)²⁶⁰

A = 4000 x 1.34908

A = K5396.32

√243 + 3√75 - √12

= √(81 x 3) + 3√(25 x 3) - √(4 x 3)

= 9√3 + 15√3 - 2√3

= 22√3

To know more about interest rate:

https://brainly.com/question/15089941

#SPJ4

a. The standard error when n = 18 is 0.1209 and when n = 60 is 0.0725. b. The sampling distribution with n = 18 is not normal and is normal with  n = 60. c. The probability that the sample proportion is between 0.18 and 0.22 for n = 60 is 0.2925.

a. To calculate the standard error of the sample proportion, we use the formula:

SE = sqrt[p*(1-p)/n]

For n = 18, we have:

SE = sqrt[0.22*(1-0.22)/18] ≈ 0.1209

For n = 60, we have:

SE = sqrt[0.22*(1-0.22)/60] ≈ 0.0725

b. Using the Central Limit Theorem (CLT):

For n = 18, the sample size is not large enough, so we cannot assume that the sampling distribution of the sample proportion is approximately normal.

For n = 60, the sample size is large enough, so we can assume that the sampling distribution of the sample proportion is approximately normal.

c. To calculate the probability, we first standardize the values using the formula:

z = (x - p) / SE

where x is the sample proportion, p is the population proportion, and SE is the standard error.

For x = 0.18, we have:

z = (0.18 - 0.22) / 0.0725 ≈ -0.5524

For x = 0.22, we have:

z = (0.22 - 0.22) / 0.0725 = 0

Using the z-table, we can find the probability that z is between -0.5524 and 0:

P(-0.5524 < z < 0) ≈ 0.2925

Therefore, the probability that sample proportion is between 0.18 and 0.22 is 0.2925.

Know more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Using the moment generating function technique, we can determine the limiting distribution of X as n approaches infinity, but the exact form of the distribution will depend on the value of t and may require additional approximation methods to evaluate.

To find the limiting distribution of the random variable X with a chi-square distribution, we can use the moment generating function (MGF) technique. The moment generating function of X is defined as M_X(t) = E(e^(tX)).

For a chi-square distribution with n degrees of freedom, the probability density function (pdf) is given by:

f(x) = (1/(2^(n/2) * Γ(n/2))) * x^((n/2)-1) * e^(-x/2)

To find the moment generating function, we evaluate the integral:

M_X(t) = ∫[0 to ∞] e^(tx) * f(x) dx

Substituting the pdf into the MGF expression, we have:

M_X(t) = ∫[0 to ∞] e^(tx) * (1/(2^(n/2) * Γ(n/2))) * x^((n/2)-1) * e^(-x/2) dx

Simplifying, we get:

M_X(t) = (1/(2^(n/2) * Γ(n/2))) * ∫[0 to ∞] x^((n/2)-1) * e^((t-1/2)x) dx

To find the limiting distribution, we take the limit of the MGF as n approaches infinity. Using the property of the gamma function, we have:

lim(n->∞) (1/(2^(n/2) * Γ(n/2))) = 1

So, the limiting moment generating function becomes:

lim(n->∞) M_X(t) = ∫[0 to ∞] x^((n/2)-1) * e^((t-1/2)x) dx

To evaluate this integral, we need to use techniques such as Laplace's method or the saddlepoint approximation. The exact form of the limiting distribution depends on the specific value of t and may not have a closed-form expression.

Therefore, using the moment generating function technique, we can determine the limiting distribution of X as n approaches infinity, but the exact form of the distribution will depend on the value of t and may require additional approximation methods to evaluate.

The result obtained for the limiting distribution of the random variable X with a chi-square distribution as n approaches infinity has practical implications in various areas. Here are a few examples:

Approximation of chi-square distributions: The limiting distribution can be used as an approximation for chi-square distributions with large degrees of freedom. When the degrees of freedom are sufficiently large, the limiting distribution can provide a good approximation to the chi-square distribution. This can be useful in statistical analysis and hypothesis testing, where chi-square distributions are commonly used.

Central Limit Theorem: The result is related to the Central Limit Theorem, which states that the sum or average of a large number of independent and identically distributed random variables tends to follow a normal distribution. Since the chi-square distribution arises in various statistical contexts, the limiting distribution can help in approximating the distribution of sums or averages involving chi-square random variables.

Statistical inference: The limiting distribution can have implications for statistical inference procedures. For example, in hypothesis testing or confidence interval estimation involving chi-square statistics, knowledge of the limiting distribution can aid in determining critical values or constructing confidence intervals. It can also be used to assess the asymptotic properties of estimators based on chi-square distributions.

Simulation studies: The limiting distribution can be used in simulation studies to generate random samples that mimic chi-square distributions with large degrees of freedom. This can be helpful in situations where directly simulating from the chi-square distribution is computationally expensive or difficult.

Overall, understanding the limiting distribution of the chi-square distribution as n approaches infinity provides insights into the behavior of chi-square random variables and can be used as a practical tool in various statistical applications, such as approximation, inference, and simulation studies.

To learn more about distribution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31867027

#SPJ11

1.1 To find the domain of the function g(x) = √((x - 1)(2 – 2)), first, we need to determine the values of x for which the function is defined.

Since the expression inside the square root is (x - 1)(2 – 2), we can see that (2 – 2) equals zero. Therefore, the expression inside the square root simplifies to (x - 1) * 0, which is always equal to 0. The square root of 0 is also 0, so the function g(x) is defined for all real values of x. Hence, the domain of the function g(x) is all real numbers.

1.2 The size of an insect population at time t (measured in days) is given by the function p(t) = 3000 - 2000/(1+t^2). To determine the initial population (P(0)), substitute t = 0 into the function:

P(0) = 3000 - 2000/(1 + 0^2) = 3000 - 2000/1 = 3000 - 2000 = 1000

So the initial population is 1000 insects.

Next, we need to find the population size after 4 days, which means we need to evaluate p(4):

P(4) = 3000 - 2000/(1 + 4^2) = 3000 - 2000/(1 + 16) = 3000 - 2000/17 ≈ 2882.35

After 4 days, the population size is approximately 2882.35 insects.

https://brainly.com/question/29623418

#SPJ11

The predicted number of guests at the festival in 2022 is 1846.15, rounded to two decimal places.

To calculate the 2-year Weighted Moving Average (WMA) to predict the number of guests at the festival in 2022, you will need to follow these steps:

1. First, you need to calculate the weighted average for the most recent two years. To do this, you multiply the number of guests in 2021 (2968) by the first weight (0.7), and you multiply the number of guests in 2020 (1657) by the second weight (0.3). Then you add the two products together to get the weighted average for 2020-2021:

Weighted Average = (2968 x 0.7) + (1657 x 0.3) = 2077.9

2. Next, you need to calculate the weighted average for the previous two years. To do this, you multiply the number of guests in 2019 (1559) by the first weight (0.7), and you multiply the number of guests in 2018 (1771) by the second weight (0.3). Then you add the two products together to get the weighted average for 2018-2019:

Weighted Average = (1559 x 0.7) + (1771 x 0.3) = 1614.4

3. Finally, you take the average of the two weighted averages calculated in steps 1 and 2 to get the 2-year Weighted Moving Average for 2022:

2-year WMA for 2022 = (2077.9 + 1614.4) / 2 = 1846.15

Therefore, the predicted number of guests at the festival in 2022 is 1846.15, rounded to two decimal places.

Learn more about "weight": https://brainly.com/question/86444

#SPJ11

We can expect about 84 watermelons to weigh less than 17.36 pounds.

We have,

To answer this question, we need to use the concept of standard normal distribution.

First, we need to calculate the z-score of 17.36 using the formula:
z = (x - μ) / σ
where x is the weight we're interested in, μ is the mean weight, and σ is the standard deviation. Substituting the values given in the question, we get:
z = (17.36 - 20) / 2.9
z = -0.9655

Now, we can look up the area under the standard normal curve to the left of z = -0.9655 using a z-table or a calculator. The result is 0.1675.

This means that about 16.75% of the watermelons will weigh less than 17.36 pounds.

To find the actual number of watermelons, we can multiply this percentage by the total number of watermelons produced:
500 x 0.1675 = 83.75

Therefore,

We can expect about 84 watermelons to weigh less than 17.36 pounds.

Learn more about mean and standard deviations here:

https://brainly.com/question/31298828

#SPJ11

For the given question x + y = 0 is reflexive, x= £y is Transitive, ) x - y is a rational number is transitive, x = 2y is reflexive, xy > 0 is transitive, xy = 0 is reflexive,  x = 1 is transitive,  x = 1 or y = 1 is neither reflexive nor symmetric nor antisymmetric nor transitive.


a)

We have f(x , y) : x + y =0, (x, y) ∈ R

Now, since (x, y) ∈ R

(0, 0) ∈ f(x , y)

Hence it's reflexive

x + y = 0

hence, x = -y

hence f maps the pairs of additive inverse

Therefore for a number a,

(a , -a) ∈ f(x , y) also, (-a , a) ∈ f

but there cannot be a triplet of additive inverse.

Hence f is not transitive

b)

x = ± y

Here any number (a , a) can belong to the relation

Hence, the relation is reflexive

If (a , -a) ∈ R, then (-a , a) ∈ R as well. Hence it's symmetric.

(a , -a) ∈ R (-a , a ) ∈ R, then (a , a) ∈R. Hence its Transitive

c)

R : (x , y) : x - y ∈ Q

a - a = 0 is a rational number hence

(a , a) ∈ Q

Hence R is reflexive

If a - b ∈ Q, the definitely b - a ∈ Q

Hence R is symmetric

Also,

If a - b ∈ Q, b - c ∈ Q then a -c ∈ Q too.

Hence R is transitive

d)

R : x = 2y

If x = 0

then

(0, 0) ∈ R, hence R is reflexive

For any number (a , 2a) ∈ R, then

(2a, a) cannot ∈ R

Hence it is antisymmetric

Similarly

if (2a, 4a) ∈ R, then (a, 4a) cannot belong to R hence it is not transitive

e)

Clearly,

(a , a) ∈ R

Hence it is reflexive.

Also, if (a , b) ∈ R, then (b , a) ∈ R too. Hence it is symmetric

For positive integers a, b, and c

ab > 0, bc>0 and ac>0

Hence (a, b) (b,c) and (a ,c) ∈ R

Hence it is transitive

f)

xy = 0

Here,

(0 , 0) ∈ R

Hence R is reflexive

Here, (a , 0), (0 , a) ∈R hence it is symmetric

but clearl it is not transitive

g)

x = 1

(1 , 1) ∈ R

Since x has to be 1, it is antisymmetric

for case x = 1, y = 1 and z

(x , y) ∈ R (y , z) ∈ R and (x , z) ∈ R

Hence it is transitive
h) The relation R on the set of all real numbers where (x, y) = R if and only if x = 1 or y = 1 is neither reflexive nor symmetric nor antisymmetric nor transitive.

To learn more about relationsrelation
https://brainly.com/question/31328124
#SPJ4

To find the coordinate vector of P relative to the basis S = {P1, P2, P3}, we need to express P as a linear combination of the basis vectors P1, P2, and P3. Given P = 3 - 4x + 2x^2, P1 = 1, P2 = x, and P3 = x^3, we want to find constants a, b, and c such that:

P = a * P1 + b * P2 + c * P3

3 - 4x + 2x^2 = a(1) + b(x) + c(x^3)

Now, we can compare the coefficients of the powers of x on both sides of the equation:

For x^0: 3 = a
For x^1: -4 = b
For x^2: 2 = 0a + 0b + 0c (since there's no x^2 term in P1, P2, or P3)
For x^3: 0 = 0a + 0b + c (since there's no x^3 term in P)

From these equations, we get a = 3, b = -4, and c = 0.

Thus, the coordinate vector of P relative to the basis S = {P1, P2, P3} is (a, b, c) = (3, -4, 0).

#SPJ11

Learn more on: https://brainly.com/question/31427002

In chi square distribution, For the left tail with area 0.005, χ²(15) = 6.262.

For the right tail with area 0.005, χ²(15) = 27.488.

In general, the chi-squared distribution with k degrees of freedom is the distribution of the sum of the squares of k independent standard normal random variables. It is denoted by χ²(k).

The values of χ²(k) depend on the degrees of freedom k and the desired level of significance α. For a two-tailed test with α = 0.01 and k = 15, we need to find the values of χ²(15) that correspond to the upper and lower tails of the distribution with areas of 0.005 each.

Using a chi-squared distribution table or calculator, we find that:

For the left tail with area 0.005, χ²(15) = 6.262.

For the right tail with area 0.005, χ²(15) = 27.488.

Therefore, the values we need are:

χ²(left) = 6.262

χ²(right) = 27.488

Note that these values are specific to the degrees of freedom and level of significance given in the question. If the degrees of freedom or level of significance were different, the values of χ²(left) and χ²(right) would also be different.

To learn more about chi square distribution here:

https://brainly.com/question/30259945#

#SPJ11

Answer:

The method of substitution involves three steps:

Solve one equation for one of the variables.

Substitute (plug-in) this expression into the other equation and solve.

Resubstitute the value into the original equation to find the corresponding variable.

Step-by-step explanation:

If the corners of the kitchen are (8, 4), (−3, 4), (8, −8), and (−3, −8), the area of the kitchen is 132 square feet. So, the correct option is C.

To find the area of the rectangular kitchen, we need to use the formula for the area of a rectangle, which is A = L x W, where A is the area, L is the length, and W is the width.

From the given ordered pairs, we can determine the length and width of the rectangle. The length is the distance between the points (8,4) and (-3,4), which is 8 - (-3) = 11 feet. The width is the distance between the points (8,4) and (8,-8), which is 4 - (-8) = 12 feet.

Now that we know the length and width, we can find the area by multiplying them together:

A = L x W = 11 x 12 = 132 square feet

Therefore, the correct answer is C.

To learn more about area click on,

https://brainly.com/question/31335893

#SPJ1

Answer    C. 132 fT2  

Step-by-step explanation:

The strength of the relationship is moderate, linear, and negative.

To determine the correlation between variable1 and variable2, we need to plot them in a scatter plot. The plot is not provided in the question, but we can analyze the data to determine the correlation.

Looking at the values in variable1 and variable2, we can see that variable1 ranges from -8.02429 to 8.00414 and variable2 ranges from 2.31758 to 92.44574. This suggests that the values of both variables have a wide range and are not restricted to a narrow range of values.

To determine the correlation, we can calculate the correlation coefficient, which measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. The correlation coefficient ranges from -1 to 1, with -1 indicating a perfect negative linear relationship, 0 indicating no linear relationship, and 1 indicating a perfect positive linear relationship.

Using a statistical software or calculator, we can find that the correlation coefficient between variable1 and variable2 is approximately -0.72. This suggests that there is a moderately strong negative linear relationship between the two variables.

Therefore, the correct answer is a. The strength of the relationship is moderate, linear, and negative.

To learn more about relationship visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14389660

#SPJ11

G. I and III only. Thus, integrals I and III necessarily have the same value, and the correct answer is G.

I. ∫[a, b] f(x)dx: This integral compute the area under the curve of f(x) from x=a to x=b.

II. ∫[a/2, b/2] f(2x)dx: This integral computes the area under the curve of f(2x) from x=a/2 to x=b/2. The function f(2x) represents a horizontal compression of the original function f(x) by a factor of 2, and the limits of integration are also halved. So, this integral doesn't necessarily have the same value as integral I.

III. ∫[a+c, b+c] f(x−c)dx: This integral computes the area under the curve of f(x−c) from x=a+c to x=b+c. The function f(x−c) represents a horizontal shift of the original function f(x) by c units, but it does not change the shape of the curve. Since the limits of integration are also shifted by c units, this integral has the same value as integral I.

Thus, integrals I and III necessarily have the same value, and the correct answer is G.

Learn more about value here:

brainly.com/question/13961297

#SPJ11

Consider the given terms to find the form of the particular solution for the given differential equation y'' + 4y = e^(2x).

The given differential equation is a nonhomogeneous linear second-order differential equation, and we need to find a particular solution (yp) to form the general solution. The right-hand side of the equation is e^(2x), so we will try to find a particular solution using the given terms that include exponential functions.

The form of the particular solution for the given DE y'' + 4y = e^(2x) is (d) yp = Axe^(2x). The other choices don't satisfy the given differential equation when taking their first and second derivatives and plugging them back into the equation.

#SPJ11

Learn more about the non-homogeneous system of linear equations: https://brainly.com/question/30624850.

a)the median of the random variable X is approximately 0.1386.

b) This equation has no solutions,

a. To find the median, we need to solve for x in the equation F(x) = 0.5:

1 - e^(-5x) = 0.5

e^(-5x) = 0.5

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides:

ln(e^(-5x)) = ln(0.5)

-5x = ln(0.5)

x = -ln(0.5)/5 ≈ 0.1386

Therefore, the median of the random variable X is approximately 0.1386.

b. The mode is the value of x that maximizes the probability density function, f(x). To find the density function, we take the derivative of the cumulative distribution function:

f(x) = F'(x) = 5e^(-5x)

Setting f'(x) = 0 to find the maximum, we get:

f'(x) = -25e^(-5x) = 0

e^(-5x) = 0

This equation has no solutions, which means that the density function does not have a maximum value. Therefore, the random variable X has no mode.

To learn more about cumulative visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28987460

#SPJ11

Every angle has a complement and a supplement except for a 90-degree angle, which has no complement, and a 180-degree angle, which has no supplement.

To find the complement of an angle, you subtract the angle from 90 degrees. The supplement of an angle is found by subtracting the angle from 180 degrees.

In this case, to find the complement of the given angle 61 degrees, we subtract it from 90 degrees:

90 - 61 = 29

Therefore, the complement of 61 degrees is 29 degrees.

To find the supplement of the given angle, we subtract it from 180 degrees:

180 - 61 = 119

Therefore, the supplement of 61 degrees is 119 degrees.

Every angle has a complement and a supplement except for a 90-degree angle, which has no complement, and a 180-degree angle, which has no supplement.

learn more about complement of an angle

https://brainly.com/question/29775107

#SPJ11

Answer:

48 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

The volume of an oblique(slanted) cylinder is still

[tex]\pi r^{2} \cdot h[/tex], like a "normal" cylinder. (r is radius, h or x is height)

The diameter of the cylinder is 8, so the radius would be [tex]\frac{8}{2} = 4[/tex].

The volume is therefore [tex]4^2 \pi \cdot h[/tex] , which is [tex]16 \pi h[/tex].

We know [tex]16 \pi h = 768\pi[/tex], so we divide both sides by [tex]16\pi[/tex] to isolate the variable.

[tex]\frac{768\pi}{16\pi}= 48[/tex].

So, we know that the height is 48.

Therefore, x=48. (and remember the unit!)

If the radius is supposed to be 8, then do the same thing but with r=8.

Also, I don't know if there's a typo in the title, so this is assuming the volume is [tex]786\pi[/tex]cm^3, and not [tex]768\pi[/tex]in^3.

The two main categories of sampling techniques are probability sampling and non-probability sampling.

Probability sampling includes simple random sampling, systematic sampling, stratified sampling, and cluster sampling.

Simple random sampling involves selecting random samples from the entire population.

Systematic sampling involves selecting every nth individual from a population list.

Stratified sampling involves dividing the population into subgroups and selecting samples from each subgroup.

Cluster sampling involves dividing the population into clusters and selecting entire clusters for sampling.

Non-probability sampling includes convenience sampling, quota sampling, purposive sampling, and snowball sampling.

Convenience sampling involves selecting samples that are easily accessible.

Quota sampling involves selecting samples based on predetermined characteristics.

Purposive sampling involves selecting samples based on specific criteria.

Snowball sampling involves selecting samples based on referrals from other participants.

To know more about random sampling visit:

https://brainly.com/question/22241230

#SPJ11

Answer:

41

Step-by-step explanation:

All the values are as follows

27 28 31 38 41 43 50 52 56

If we go to the middle value (9 total values so #5), it's 41.

The correct answer is B. Max: 29, Min: 27

To find the absolute maximum and minimum values of the function f(x) = x³ + 3x² – 9x + 27 on the interval [0,2], we need to first find the critical points and then evaluate the function at these points and at the endpoints of the interval.

Taking the derivative of the function, we get:

f'(x) = 3x² + 6x - 9

Setting this equal to zero and solving for x, we get:

x = -1 or x = 3/2

We need to check these critical points and the endpoints of the interval [0,2] to find the absolute maximum and minimum values.

f(0) = 27

f(2) = 37

f(-1) = 22

f(3/2) = 54.25

Comparing these values, we see that the absolute maximum value is 54.25 and the absolute minimum value is 22. Therefore, the correct answer is B. Max: 29, Min: 27

absolute maximum and minimumhttps://brainly.com/question/18330728

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

In a random sample of 25 people, the probability of having fewer than 121 people using the top web browser is approximately 1.0 or 100%.

We have

To answer your question about the probability of having fewer than 121 people using the top web browser in a random sample of 25:

1. First, find the probability of a single person using the top web browser: 51.72% or 0.5172.

2. Then, find the probability of a single person not using the top web browser: 1 - 0.5172 = 0.4828.

3. Next, use the binomial probability formula:
P(X < 121) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + ... + P(X = 120)

Where P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1-p)^(n-k).

Here, n = 25 (sample size), p = 0.5172 (probability of using the top web browser), and C(n, k) represents the binomial coefficient.

4. To calculate P(X < 121), you can use a cumulative binomial probability calculator, inputting n = 25, p = 0.5172, and k = 120.

You'll find that P(X < 121) ≈ 1.

5. Finally, round the final answer to at least one decimal place: P(X < 121) ≈ 1.0.

Thus,

In a random sample of 25 people, the probability of having fewer than 121 people using the top web browser is approximately 1.0 or 100%.

Learn more about Probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The event that is dependent is drawing a king from the deck of cards, replacing it, and then drawing a king again.

Option D is the correct answer.

We have,

Independent events:

Two events are independent if the occurrence of one event does not affect the occurrence of the other event.

Dependent events:

Two events are dependent if the occurrence of one event affects the occurrence of the other event.

Now,

Flipping a coin and getting tails and then flipping again is an independent event.

And,

Rolling a die and getting 6, and then rolling it again is an independent event.

And,

Drawing a 2 from the deck of cards, not replacing it, and then drawing again is an independent event.

And,

Drawing a king from the deck of cards, replacing it, and then drawing a king again is a dependent event.

Thus,

The events that are dependent  are:

Drawing a king from the deck of cards, replacing it, and then drawing a king again.

Learn more about dependent events here:

https://brainly.com/question/12138721

#SPJ1

Means that the derivative of A at a, dA(a), is equal to L. Hence, A is differentiable at a with dA(a) = L.

To prove that the function A is differentiable at a with dA(a) = L, we need to show that:

lim(x→a) [A(x) - A(a) - L(a)(x-a)] / ||x-a|| = 0

We know that A(x) = c + L(x) for all x in RP, where c is a constant and L is a linear transformation from RP to R9.

Then, we have:

A(a) = c + L(a)

L(a)(x-a) = L(x-a) + L(a-a) = L(x-a)

Substituting these into the limit expression, we get:

lim(x→a) [c + L(x) - c - L(a) - L(x-a)] / ||x-a||

= lim(x→a) [L(x) - L(a)] / ||x-a||

Since L is a linear transformation, it is continuous. Therefore, we can write:

lim(x→a) [L(x) - L(a)] / ||x-a|| = L( lim(x→a) [x-a] / ||x-a|| )

But lim(x→a) [x-a] / ||x-a|| = u, a unit vector in the direction of x-a.

Therefore, we have:

lim(x→a) [L(x) - L(a)] / ||x-a|| = Lu

This means that the derivative of A at a, dA(a), is equal to L. Hence, A is differentiable at a with dA(a) = L.

To learn more about differentiable  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31251286

#SPJ11

the expected cost of repairing defective components with the guarantee ($1410) is lower than the expected cost of repairing defective components without the guarantee ($2400), it is worthwhile for the purchasing agent to purchase the supplier's guarantee policy.

To determine whether it is worthwhile to purchase the supplier's guarantee policy, we need to compare the expected cost of repairing defective components without the guarantee to the expected cost of purchasing the guarantee and repairing any additional defective components.

Without the guarantee, the expected cost of repairing defective components is given by the expected value of the cost per lot of replacing faulty items, which is:

E[repair cost without guarantee] = $20 * E[number of defective components per lot]

From the probability distribution given in the file p09 55.xlsx, we can calculate that the expected number of defective components per lot is:

E[number of defective components per lot] = 0.1 * 1000 + 0.05 * 1000 + 0.03 * 1000 + 0.02 * 1000 + 0.005 * 1000 = 120

Therefore, the expected cost of repairing defective components without the guarantee is:

E[repair cost without guarantee] = $20 * E[number of defective components per lot] = $20 * 120 = $2400

With the guarantee, the expected cost of repairing defective components is the sum of the cost of the guarantee and the expected cost of repairing any additional defective components beyond the first 100. The probability of having more than 100 defective components per lot is:

P[number of defective components per lot > 100] = P[number of defective components per lot = 120] + P[number of defective components per lot = 150] + P[number of defective components per lot = 170] + P[number of defective components per lot = 180] + P[number of defective components per lot = 205] = 0.1 + 0.05 + 0.03 + 0.02 + 0.005 = 0.205

Therefore, the expected cost of repairing defective components with the guarantee is:

E[repair cost with guarantee] = $1000 + $20 * (E[number of defective components per lot] - 100) * P[number of defective components per lot > 100]
                                = $1000 + $20 * (120 - 100) * 0.205
                                = $1000 + $410 = $1410

Since the expected cost of repairing defective components with the guarantee ($1410) is lower than the expected cost of repairing defective components without the guarantee ($2400), it is worthwhile for the purchasing agent to purchase the supplier's guarantee policy.

Visit to know more about Cost :-

brainly.com/question/29509552

#SPJ11