How are each congressional party's leaders chosen?

Answer:

The quote describes the horrific conditions of the middle passage, which was the voyage that enslaved Africans were forced to endure during the transatlantic slave trade. The quote highlights the extreme overcrowding of the slave ships, with people being packed so tightly that they could hardly move. This, combined with the heat and humidity of the climate, created an unbearable and suffocating atmosphere for the enslaved Africans. Additionally, the quote describes the sounds of suffering and agony that filled the ship, with women crying out and dying, creating a horrifying scene that was almost beyond imagination. Overall, the quote shows the inhumane and brutal conditions of the middle passage, where human beings were treated as nothing more than cargo to be transported across the ocean.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

It's not uncommon for people to get pulled into a situation or a problem they didn't start. Sometimes, this can happen due to circumstances beyond their control, such as being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Other times, it can be because of the actions of others, such as being falsely accused of something or being caught up in someone else's problems.

In some cases, people may also get pulled into a situation or problem because they choose to get involved, either out of a sense of responsibility, a desire to help, or simply because they believe it's the right thing to do.

Regardless of how it happens, being pulled into a situation or problem that you didn't start can be challenging and stressful. It's important to remain calm, assess the situation, and seek help or support as needed to find a solution or resolution.

The Silk Road was a vast trade network that linked Eurasia and North Africa by land and sea. The Silk Road was named after Chinese silk, a valuable commodity.

It is difficult to overestimate the Silk Road's historical significance. Religion and ideas spread as quickly as goods along the Silk Road. Along the route, towns grew into multicultural cities. Information exchange gave rise to new technologies and innovations that would change the world.

The Silk Road, widely regarded as history's first global trade route, had a scope and significance far beyond the simple exchange of goods. Indeed, the network of interconnected routes facilitated the fruitful exchange of arts, religion, cultures, ideas, and technology.

To know more about Silk Road visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/28316892

#SPJ1

Answer:

OC. punish Nazi leaders for their crimes against humanity during the Holocaust.

Answer:

c

Explanation:

"Pericles claimed that the Athenian government treated all its people fairly regardless of class. The administration favored the many instead of the few, and class considerations were not allowed to interfere with merit. Poverty did not bar a man from serving the state if he was able. The passage emphasizes Athenian democracy and its principles of equal justice and merit-based service." (ChatGPT, 2023)

Trickle-down economics is theory that suggests that economic benefits given to wealthy and businesses will trickle down to rest of population, creating economic growth and prosperity for all.

Economic growth refers to the increase in the production of goods and services in an economy over time. It is typically measured by the growth rate of gross domestic product (GDP), which is the total value of all goods and services produced in a country during a specific period. Economic growth is often seen as a key indicator of a healthy economy, as it can lead to increased employment opportunities, higher wages, and improved standards of living for citizens. However, it can also have negative impacts, such as environmental degradation and income inequality. Policymakers often use various tools such as fiscal and monetary policies to promote economic growth and mitigate its negative effects.

To learn more about citizens, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/21029209

#SPJ1

Answer:

A. a global superpower.

Answer:

D. economically unstable

Answer:

c

Explanation:

The New Deal, which was a series of programs and policies implemented by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in response to the Great Depression, significantly expanded the role of the federal government in the economy and society. It created a number of government agencies and programs, such as the Social Security Administration and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which had long-lasting impacts on American society.

The New Deal also established new regulations and oversight in various industries, including banking, securities, and agriculture, and introduced labor protections and collective bargaining rights for workers. These changes helped to mitigate some of the worst effects of the Great Depression and laid the groundwork for a stronger, more regulated economy and society.

The Lewis and Clark Expedition and the Dunbar and Hunter Expedition were both important exploratory expeditions in the early history of the United States. However, there are several key differences between the two.

Firstly, the Lewis and Clark Expedition was commissioned by President Thomas Jefferson in 1803 to explore the newly acquired Louisiana Territory and to find a water route to the Pacific Ocean. The expedition was led by Meriwether Lewis and William Clark, and it lasted from 1804 to 1806. The Dunbar and Hunter Expedition, on the other hand, was a scientific expedition led by William Dunbar and George Hunter in 1804 to explore the natural resources of the Ouachita River Valley in what is now Arkansas and Louisiana.

Secondly, while both expeditions had scientific objectives, the Lewis and Clark Expedition was primarily focused on exploration and mapping of the newly acquired territory, while the Dunbar and Hunter Expedition was focused on collecting specimens of plants and animals, and studying the geology of the region. The Dunbar and Hunter Expedition also had a commercial objective, as it was funded by the Spanish government, which was interested in the natural resources of the region.

Thirdly, the Lewis and Clark Expedition was much larger than the Dunbar and Hunter Expedition. The Lewis and Clark Expedition had a crew of 33 people, including soldiers, interpreters, and support staff, while the Dunbar and Hunter Expedition had a crew of only 11 people, including the two leaders.

Finally, the Lewis and Clark Expedition is more famous and well-known than the Dunbar and Hunter Expedition, in part because of the extensive documentation and publishing of the expedition's findings by Lewis and Clark, as well as the fact that it was a government-funded expedition. The Dunbar and Hunter Expedition, on the other hand, had limited documentation and was privately funded, which contributed to its relative obscurity.

In conclusion, both the Lewis and Clark Expedition and the Dunbar and Hunter Expedition were important exploratory expeditions in the early history of the United States, but they had different objectives, scopes, and outcomes. The Lewis and Clark Expedition was larger, more famous, and more focused on exploration, while the Dunbar and Hunter Expedition was smaller, privately funded, and focused on scientific study and commercial interests.

One of the first moral philosophers of the ethical school of thought, Socrates was a Greek philosopher who is recognized as the father of Western philosophy. His occupation was this.

As previously mentioned, Socrates was frequently the target of comedic satire while he was still living, but the majority of the plays that make mention of him have either been lost entirely or only exist in a fragmented form—Clouds being the main exception. Although Socrates is the main character in this play, Aristophanes used him to represent some intellectual trends in modern Athens, including the study of language and nature and, as Aristophanes implies, the amoralism and atheism that go along with these endeavors, rather than to provide a fair and accurate portrait of him (comedy never aspires to this). The fact that Socrates himself rejects the play as a valid source of information about him in Plato's Apology casts even more question on the play's value as a trustworthy source.

Learn more about socrates here:

https://brainly.com/question/20256015

#SPJ1

The U.S. entry into World War I led to a crackdown on civil liberties, as the government sought to maintain public support for the war effort and suppress dissent. These measures led to a notable erosion of civil liberties, with freedom of speech, press, and assembly being curtailed in the name of national security.

The U.S. entry into World War I had a significant impact on the civil liberties of ordinary Americans, as the government adopted measures to suppress dissent and maintain public support for the war effort.

The Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918 were passed to prevent anti-war activists from expressing their opposition, with many individuals being arrested and imprisoned for speaking out against the war. The government also conducted widespread surveillance of suspected subversives, and the American Protective League was established to help identify and apprehend those deemed disloyal.

Read more about World War I

brainly.com/question/446364

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Guomindang (also known as the Nationalist Party) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) were the two main political parties in China in the early 20th century. They had fundamentally different ideologies, with the Guomindang being a right-wing party that advocated for democracy and nationalism, while the CCP was a left-wing party that advocated for socialism and communism. The conflict between the two parties began in the 1920s and lasted for several decades.

The main cause of the conflict was the struggle for political power and control over China's future. The Guomindang, led by Chiang Kai-shek, had the support of the military and the urban middle class, while the CCP had the support of the peasants and the workers. The Guomindang was wary of the CCP's revolutionary ideology and feared that the CCP would undermine its power and lead China down the path of communism. On the other hand, the CCP saw the Guomindang as a tool of the imperialist powers and accused it of being corrupt and oppressive.

The conflict between the two parties intensified in the 1930s, with the outbreak of the Chinese Civil War. The Guomindang and the CCP fought against each other for control of China, with each side receiving support from different foreign powers. The CCP was able to win the support of the peasants by promising to redistribute land and improve their lives, while the Guomindang struggled to maintain its legitimacy.

However, despite their differences, the Guomindang and the CCP united temporarily during World War II to fight against the Japanese invasion of China. The two parties put aside their ideological differences and worked together to defend China against a common enemy. However, after the end of the war, the truce between the two parties quickly broke down and the conflict resumed. Ultimately, the CCP was able to emerge victorious and establish the People's Republic of China in 1949, while the Guomindang fled to Taiwan.

Explanation:

Ethnic separatism can be defined as the desire by a group of people to form their own country based upon a commonality. The correct option is option B.

Separatism is the advocacy of cultural, ethnic, tribal, religious, racial, governmental, or gender separation from the larger group. With transfer of power, separatism conventionally refers to full political separation.

Ethnic separatism is based more on differences in culture and language than religious or racial differences. It is culturally and tribally oriented. Armenian separatists of Nagorno-Karabakh in Azerbaijan is an example of ethnic Separatism.

Ethnic separatist is someone who secedes or supports separation from an established group, such as a church or nation.

Learn more about ethnic separatism here

https://brainly.com/question/639528

#SPJ1

Answer: it’s B

Source : trust me bro

Josephson's historical interpretation highlights the corrupt and exploitative nature of business leaders during this period. He sees them as selfish individuals who amassed wealth at the expense of workers and society at large.

Brands' interpretation, on the other hand, is more positive, highlighting the innovative and entrepreneurial spirit of his leader in these businesses. He argues that they were essential to US economic growth and development during this period The main difference between the two interpretations is the emphasis on negative or positive aspects of these leaders' actions. Whereas Josephson primarily focuses on the negative consequences of their actions, Brands emphasizes the positive contribution they made to the economy.

For more information on interpretations see:

https://brainly.com/question/6783130

#SPJ1

Answer:

money talk fr

Explanation:

The people on the right in the image are all dressed in very elaborate and expensive-looking clothing, indicating they likely come from a wealthy background.

Wealthy background is a term used to describe a person's family and/or social background. It is typically associated with a family of higher social and economic class. This often includes people who have inherited their wealth or become wealthy through their own success. Generally, wealthy background is characterized by a family that is well-educated, has access to quality healthcare, and is able to afford luxury goods. The family may be able to provide their children with the best education and other advantages, such as travel and cultural experiences.

They are wearing large, ornate hats and luxurious fabrics, suggesting they have access to a high level of wealth. The man on the bottom left corner, on the other hand, is wearing simpler clothing and a simple hat, suggesting he is from a lower class background.

To learn more about wealthy background

https://brainly.com/question/20662695

#SPJ9

During the Middle Ages, some Christian philosophers argued that the Ptolemaic model of the universe agreed with the Bible because it placed Earth, the home of humans, at the center of the universe.

At that time, the Ptolemaic model was the dominant view of the universe, which placed Earth at the center, with the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars orbiting around it in concentric circles. This model was consistent with the biblical view of creation, which described the Earth as the center of the universe and the focus of God's creation.

These Christian philosophers believed that the Ptolemaic model reflected the order and harmony of God's creation and that it provided evidence for the divine nature of the universe. They also believed that the model supported the idea that humans were the most important and privileged beings in the universe.

However, with the advent of the scientific revolution and the development of new astronomical models, such as the heliocentric model proposed by Copernicus, the Ptolemaic model was eventually replaced as the prevailing scientific view of the universe.

Learn more about the scientific revolution:

https://brainly.com/question/14231443

#SPJ11

Answer:

The colonists from England wished to have a greater say and more control over their own government. They wanted to have representation and a voice in the decisions that affected their lives.

Explanation:

Under British rule, the colonists had very little say in the government. The British monarchy held all the power and made decisions without any input from the colonists. This lack of representation led to frustration and resentment among the colonists. When they established their own government, they sought to create a system that would give them more control and representation. The idea of popular sovereignty - the belief that the people are the ultimate source of power in government - became a central tenet of American democracy, and the right to vote and participate in government became a fundamental aspect of American political culture.

Answer:

The British were eager to trade with India for several reasons, including:

Wealth and resources: India was a country rich in resources such as spices, silk, cotton, and tea. The British saw an opportunity to obtain these valuable commodities at a relatively low cost and sell them for a profit in Europe and other parts of the world.

Market expansion: The British saw India as a vast market for their goods, especially textiles. The East India Company, a British trading company, began exporting large quantities of textiles to India and also imported raw materials such as cotton from India to be processed in Britain.

Political and strategic considerations: Control of trade with India was seen as a way to establish and maintain British influence in the region. The British East India Company eventually became the dominant power in India, and its control over trade and commerce allowed it to exert significant political power and influence over the Indian subcontinent.

Geopolitical competition: The British were in competition with other European powers, such as the Portuguese, Dutch, and French, for control of trade with India. The British saw trade with India as a way to gain an advantage over their rivals and strengthen their global economic and political position.

If the federal government stopped funding educational research or offering school lunch programs to students from low-income families, the consequences would probably be profound and widespread.

Without these programs, many children from low-income families would find it difficult to receive a good education and enough food, which could have serious repercussions for both their futures and society as a whole.

Increased crime rates could result from this, as kids who don't get the nutrition and education they need may be more likely to commit crimes as adults. Children may also have trouble finding employment in the future without access to high-quality education, which could have a negative effect on tax receipts and welfare programs.

To know more about   federal government  here

https://brainly.com/question/860014

#SPJ4

Answer: Langston Hughes.

Explanation:

The most well-known poet during the Harlem Renaissance was Langston Hughes.

The impact of reparations on Germany's economy and its implications for the welfare of the people were prominent themes in Nazi propaganda during the 1920s.

Following World War I's devastation, the victorious powers imposed a series of treaties on the defeated powers. The 1919 Treaty of Versailles, for example, held Germany responsible for starting the war. Germany was held liable for massive material damages. The humiliation of defeat, as well as the 1919 peace treaty, played a significant role in the rise of Nazism in Germany and the outbreak of a second "world war" only 20 years later.

Almost ten million soldiers were killed. The The introduction of new weapons such as the machine gun and gas warfare resulted in massive losses on all sides. Military leaders failed to adapt their tactics to combat's increasingly mechanized nature. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers were killed as a result of an attrition policy, particularly on the Western Front.

To know more about  Treaty of Versailles visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/2956924

#SPJ1

Answer:

The reparations and the acceptance of war guilt.

Explanation:

Got this right at FLVS. All the other answer choices are inconsistent with historical facts or just don't make sense. Good luck, everyone!

The ancient Chinese civilization formed around 4,000 BCE in the Yellow River Valley, located in northeastern China.

The Yellow River, also known as the Huang He, was a significant factor in the development of this civilization, as it provided fertile soil for agriculture and allowed for the growth of settlements. The river was also known for its devastating floods, which often caused widespread destruction and loss of life, leading to the nickname "China's sorrow." The civilization that emerged in this region was characterized by the development of agriculture, writing, social hierarchy, and early forms of government. It laid the foundation for Chinese culture and history, and its influence can still be seen today in modern China.

To know more about ancient click here:

brainly.com/question/29405005

#SPJ4

Answer:

The Cold War had a profound impact on many countries across the world, with both positive and negative consequences. Two countries that experienced significant cultural changes as a result of the Cold War were the United States and Cuba.

In the United States, the Cold War led to a heightened sense of patriotism and nationalism, as the country became deeply invested in the struggle against communism. This led to a cultural emphasis on American exceptionalism, with a renewed focus on the values of democracy, freedom, and capitalism. At the same time, the Cold War also fueled anxiety and fear about the threat of communism, leading to increased censorship and a focus on conformity in American culture.

In Cuba, the Cold War had a more direct impact, as the country became a key battleground in the struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union. The Cuban Revolution of 1959, led by Fidel Castro, established a communist government and aligned the country with the Soviet Union, leading to a significant shift in Cuban culture. The new government emphasized socialist values, including equality, education, and healthcare, and implemented sweeping social and economic reforms. However, the close relationship with the Soviet Union also led to increased political repression and censorship, particularly during the 1970s and 1980s.

Overall, the Cold War had a profound cultural impact on countries across the world, shaping national identities and values, fueling anxiety and fear, and spurring significant social and political changes.

Answer:

ρ

=

mass

volume

, here

ρ

≅

1.6

⋅

g

⋅

c

m

−

3

Explanation:

Density

,

ρ

, is mass per unit volume and is thus defined as the quotient,

mass

volume

, and typically chemists use units of

g

⋅

c

m

−

3

or

g

⋅

m

L

−

1

.

And here this quotient is...........

12.9

⋅

g

8

⋅

c

m

3

; does this give the required units?

Note that

1

⋅

c

m

3

≡

1

⋅

m

L

...

...

Answer link

Explanation:

Scalawags joined the Republican Party in order to advance politically.

Scalawags were white Southerners who supported the Republican Party during the Reconstruction era after the Civil War. They were often former Whigs who saw the Republican Party as a way to advance their political careers and gain power in the South.

They were often seen as traitors by other white Southerners who supported the Democratic Party and opposed Reconstruction policies.

However, scalawags played an important role in the Republican Party's success in the South during the Reconstruction era, and many of them held political office at the local and state level.

For more such questions on Scalawags, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/12075524

#SPJ11

Answer:

C. to outline the freedoms protected by the 10th amendments in the Bill of Rights

A. assume too much power

A. interrupts learning

B. “The nation’s highest court ruled in Mary Beth’s favor, saying that she had a right to peacefully express her views.”

D. the manner of assembly

B. “But whether you say the Pledge is up to you.”

C. school-sponsored publications

B. trying to convince leaders to allow a pep rally

D. a curfew that doesn’t have exclusions for working teens

C. Students’ First Amendment rights are limited when they disrupt others.

Explanation:

If emigrants had known in advance the true difficulty of life on the trail, it could have changed the course of westward expansion in significant ways.

If all the emigrants who traveled west had known in advance the difficulty of life on the trail, it could have potentially changed the course of the Great Migration and Manifest Destiny in several ways:

It may have deterred some emigrants from making the journey altogether. The dangers and hardships of traveling west were widely known, but if the full extent of those challenges had been understood beforehand, it's possible that some people may have decided that the risks were not worth it.

Emigrants may have better prepared for the journey. If they knew the full extent of the challenges they would face, emigrants could have taken better precautions to ensure their safety and survival. This could include bringing more food and supplies, hiring experienced guides, and making sure they had adequate shelter and clothing.

It may have led to different routes being taken. If emigrants knew more about the challenges of specific trails, they may have chosen alternative routes that were less difficult or dangerous.

It could have led to more government support for westward expansion. If the challenges of westward expansion were better understood, there may have been greater pressure on the government to provide more support and resources for emigrants making the journey.

Overall, if emigrants had known in advance the true difficulty of life on the trail, it could have changed the course of westward expansion in significant ways. However, it's impossible to say exactly how things would have played out, as historical events are shaped by a complex web of factors and influences.

learn more about emigrants: https://brainly.com/question/27959789

#SPJ1