Helppp it’s due today

Step-by-step explanation:

Speed is the correct answer

Answer:

24 in

Step-by-step explanation:

Compare "like" things:

Big/small = Big/small

30/L = 10/8

Crossmultiply

240 = 10L

Divide by 10

240/10 = 10L/10

24 = L

Answer:

y=4x-3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

DO i care... no ask your dam teacher won der why u aint pass

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

71.02

Step-by-step explanation:

x is the number of days

1 week = 7 days

-3.64 (7) + 96.5 = 71.02

Answer:

16/100 = 4/25

Step-by-step explanation:

4/10 * 4/10 = 16/100

Answer: 2.8 W. 2.6 W. 2.4 W. 2.2 W. 2.0 W. 1.9 W. 1.7 W

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

LCD/ LCM = 100

Step-by-step explanation:

- 12.2 + 2.8W - 8.8 = 1.05W

- 12 [tex]\frac{2}{10}[/tex] + 2 [tex]\frac{8}{10}[/tex] W - 8 [tex]\frac{8}{10}[/tex] = 1 [tex]\frac{5}{100}[/tex] W

- [tex]\frac{122}{10}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{28}{10}[/tex] W - [tex]\frac{88}{10}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{105}{100}[/tex] W

the LCM/ LCD is 100

Answer:

(-3,2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Go where the two coordinates match, you'll see that it's (-3,2).

I see that that's Edge2021, I know how that feels. :/

Hope this helped! :)

Answer:

 (-3, 2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y= -2x+9

Step-by-step explanation:

First of all, since they need to be parallel, they must have the same slope to never intercept. Next, you can use a graphing calculator to test y-intercepts like desmos. You will find that 9 works, as it goes through (4,1) and never intercepts with the 1st line.

The difference in the proportions of both surveys goes from a maximum of 12.57% to a minimum of 4.76%.

Given that a survey found that in a sample of 75 families, 26 owned dogs, while a survey done 15 years ago found that in a sample of 60 families, 26 owned dogs, to find the 95% confidence intervals of the true difference in the proportions, the following calculation must be performed:

Therefore, the difference in the proportions of both surveys goes from a maximum of 12.57% to a minimum of 4.76%.

Learn more about maths in https://brainly.com/question/25989509

Answer:

Width = 38.57cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Perimeter = 270cm

Let x be the width, so

Length = 2 1/2 x = 5x/2

Perimeter of Rectangle = 2(length + width)

270cm = 2(5x/2 + x)

270 = 5x + 2x

7x = 270

x = 38.571 cm

Therefore, the width is 38.57cm (rounded to 2nd decimal place)

Answer:

width = 38.6 cm (approx.)

Step-by-step explanation:

let the width be x cm, so that the length is 2.5x cm.

Perimeter = 2 (length + width)

2 (length + width) = 270 cm

or, 2 (2½x cm + x cm) = 270 cm

or, 3½x cm = 270/2 = 135 cm

or, x = 270/7 cm = 38.6 cm (approx.)

Answer:

23, so 1. i know because i added 14+9 and got 23. im sorry if you meant like a definition term, please comment if thats what you meant. because i'll help you then.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  length ≈ 5.583 ft

  width ≈ 3.583 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

If we let x represent the length of the table in feet, then the width is (x-2). The area is ...

  A = LW

  20 = x(x -2)

Writing this in standard form gives ...

  x^2 -2x -20 = 0

The coefficients used in the quadratic formula are a=1, b=-2, c=-20. The solutions are ...

  [tex]x=\dfrac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}=\dfrac{-(-2)\pm\sqrt{(-2)^2-4(1)(-20)}}{2(1)}\\\\=\dfrac{2\pm\sqrt{4+80}}{2}=1\pm\sqrt{21}[/tex]

Of these values, the only one that makes sense is ...

  length = 1+√21 ≈ 5.583 ft

  width = length -2 ≈ 3.583 ft

Let width is x

length be x+2

On solving

we get

x is around 3.58 or 3.6ft

Answer:

88.75%

Step-by-step explanation:

add all the terms given = 355

there are 4 terms.in this set.

355 ÷ 4 = 88.75

Answer:

i think its D or 14/16

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\frac{14}{16}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{10}{16}[/tex]

Before adding we require the denominators of both fractions to be common

Multiply numerator/ denominator of first fraction by 4

= [tex]\frac{1(4)}{4(4)}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{10}{16}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{4}{16}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{10}{16}[/tex] ( now add the numerators leaving the common denominator )

= [tex]\frac{4+10}{16}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{14}{16}[/tex]

The fraction can be simplified by dividing the numerator/ denominator by 2 to

[tex]\frac{7}{8}[/tex]

Answer:

32/60

Step-by-step explanation:

because you are multiplying both the numerator and denominator by the same factor, you will get the same ratio (producing an equivalent fraction)

numerator: 8*4=32

denominator: 15*4=60

final equivalent fraction: 32/60

Answer:

what did you mean

Step-by-step explanation:

is not a question

Answer:

Unit rate = 220 calories

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to find the unit rate, you simply have to divide the total number of calories (1760) by the number of servings (8).

1760/8=220.

Therefore, the unit rate is 220 calories.

Answer:

−20−7+14

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

127/100 = 1.27

1.4

1 whole and 1/3 = 1.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps

May I get Braineist pls

Answer:

2x + 2 = 28

2x = 26

x = 13

Step-by-step explanation:

You likely mean to write the differential equation,

y'' - 2y' + y = exp(x)

The homogeneous part

y'' - 2y' + y = 0

has characteristic equation

r² - 2r + 1 = (r - 1)² = 0

with a root at r = 1 with multiplicity 2, so the characteristic solution is

y = C₁ exp(x) + C₂ x exp(x)

For the particular solution, we assume an ansatz

y = ax² exp(x)

where a is an unknown constant. Differentiating the ansatz twice:

y' = ax² exp(x) + 2ax exp(x) = (ax² + 2ax) exp(x)

y'' = (ax² + 2ax) exp(x) + (2ax + 2a) exp(x) = (ax² + 4ax + 2a) exp(x)

Substitute y and its derivatives into the DE:

(ax² + 4ax + 2a) exp(x) - 2 (ax² + 2ax) exp(x) + ax² exp(x) = exp(x)

Solve for a :

(ax² + 4ax + 2a) - 2 (ax² + 2ax) + ax² = 1

2a = 1

a = 1/2

Then the particular solution is

y = 1/2 x² exp(x)

The general solution is then

y = C₁ exp(x) + C₂ x exp(x) + 1/2 x² exp(x)

Answer:

5/6 + 1/3 = 7/6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

constant over time

Step-by-step explanation: for every 3 cookies the cost goes up 2 dollars

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If you're supposed to plot that, it would be a line from (0, 10) to (5, 0)

slope would be -2 mi/hr

Answer:

C. [tex] \frac{ {m}^{2} - m - 2}{ {m}^{2} - 1} [/tex]

Explanation:

[tex] \frac{ {m}^{2} - m - 2}{ {m}^{2} - 1} \\ = \frac{ {m}^{2} - 2m + m - 2 }{ {(m)}^{2} - {(1)}^{2} } \\ = \frac{ m(m - 2) + 1(m - 2)}{(m - 1)(m + 1)} \\ = \frac{(m + 1)(m - 2)}{(m - 1)(m +1) } \\ = \frac{(m - 2)}{(m - 1)} [/tex]

Hope you could get an idea from here.

Doubt clarification - use comment section.

Answer:

I've done alot of calculations on this but I cant get a definite answer I hope you got it I'm sorry I couldn't help you I tried but only got into a dead end

Answer:

1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

We know two points on the line

(-1,1) and (3,3)

The slope of a line is given by

m = (y2-y1)/ (x2-x1)

   = ( 3-1)/(3- -1)

    = (3-1) /(3+1)

    = ( 2/4

   = 1/2