Answer:
riverdale
Explanation:
ive never watched gossip girl lol
Answer:
riverdale
Explanation:
How does this confrontation advance the plot?
The concept of revenge is introduced for the first time in the play.
The play’s action reaches a climax as Laertes exacts revenge.
The suspense builds as Claudius clarifies Laertes's goal.
The play's action is resolved as Claudius and Laertes make peace.
The confrontation advanced the plot as C. The suspense builds as Claudius clarifies Laertes's goal.
In a literary work, a plot simply means the sequence of events where a particular event causes another event or occurrence. It is used by writers to structure what happens in a story.
From the story, it can be deduced that the confrontation advanced the plot as the suspense builds as Claudius clarifies Laertes's goal. This was vital in conveying the theme of the story to the readers.
Learn more about plots on:
https://brainly.com/question/20726607
Answer:The answer is C
Explanation: Got the question right on edge.
help plz ASAP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIST
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Answer:
C is your answer
Explanation:
Read the excerpt from "Albert Schweitzer: A Life of Service and Sacrifice.”
By the time Albert was twenty-one years old, it was clear to his friends and family that he was a very gifted man who would succeed in any career. Albert was also aware of his many talents, but instead of thinking about success, he was filled with feelings of gratitude. He began to develop the idea that he ought to pay something back for all of the good fortune in his life. He created an unusual life plan. He pledged to serve his own interests only until he turned thirty. After that, he would serve the world.
The central idea of this excerpt is that Albert Schweitzer
ANSWER ASAP 20 POINTS
developed a plan that would use his many talents to give back to the world.
was a very talented man who would one day become a great success.
started off as self-centered, but became a great humanitarian.
chose to go to Africa even though his family and friends thought he should not.
Answer:
B.was a very talented man who would one day become a great success.
Explanation:
Answer:b
Explanation:took the test and got it right if its wrong sorry
What information does setting provide the reader? Why is that information important?
Answer: The setting of a story is important because it gives the reader a sense of the time, location, and atmosphere in which the story takes place. It is also important because it enhances the experience of the reader and adds plot, atmosphere, and characters to the production of the story.
The dramatic structure of monster.
Answer: If it's the movie Monster it shows how people around Steve when he is acting.
Explanation:
When participating in a group discussion, a good group member maintains a balance between
speaking and listening.
summarizing and elaborating.
stating facts and offering opinions.
taking notes and contributing.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
just took the exam ;)
I was concerned about the constitution of the track team. It was made up of too many boys and not enough girls, leading me to think our team would not be competitive. What is most clearly the meaning of the word constitution in the sentences? A. the principles used to govern a nation, state, or corporation B. a written form of the principles used to govern C. the way something is put together D. the strength or health of a person's body
Answer:
the answer is C
Explanation:
Somebody plz help me .
Answer:
thriving
Explanation:
Answer:
i think its thriving
Explanation:
I'm not good at determining what is happening in a volleyball game. So if you can understand what I'm describing in this essay, the information I'm saying is relevant, and you actually understand how volleyball works, can you please tell me if this is good? Any negative comments are helpful.
The team's playing in this video are presented as Baylor Bears and Texas Longhorns. Baylor is #3 with a win to loss ratio of 11-2 for this season while Taylor is #1 with their unbeaten 11-0. Texas hit 294 as a team while Baylor hit 233, Texas Longhorns so far is the best hitting team efficiency wise in the country with a score of .359. Baylor took the lead in the first two sets when they made their first o2 comeback ever since Nov 1st of 2017. Hannah Sedwick, #14 Setter, in Baylor to me, seems like a really focused player, they mentioned how she was out for most of the season due to a fracture in her leg but yet she seems so active and awake, all of the players put in an effort but Hannah actually commits. When blocking the ball, her entire body became stiff and she carried the win for her team. On the other team there's Yossiana Pressley, #32 Outside Hitter, on the Baylor Bears who had 29 kills in the first part, and I have to say she completely dominated Baylor's with her spikes. Nilani Iosia, #12 Libero, in the Texas Longhorn scored 15 digs and an excellent passing percentage while Lauren Harrison, #31 Outside Hitter, Baylor Bears was the second leading attacker in the first part. Another notable player is Jhenna Gabriel, #2 setter, in Texas Longhorns who is the reigning national player of the big 12 player of the year.
The Texas Longhorns came through this game with a ratio of 3-2 remaining unbeaten for the 12th time in a row. In one play I remember Butler barely hit the ball over the net and scored. It wasn't such a critical play but it had strategy and reasoning behind it. While Baylor prepared for the worst by upgrading the offense, they left their defense bare. That's why I think it was smart how Butler quickly noticed that and surprised them. This team had a quick dynamic where they would hit the ball before the blockers could completely cover over the net. Somewhere in the beginning, I immediately had a feeling Taylors had something the Bears didn’t which helped them stay unbeaten. I’d say it’s how they made sure to make their hits clear so that it can go through the blockers, and they were very efficient with passing the ball to their hitters. They should’ve had a clearer touch with the ball as well even if they won, it looked like both teams couldn’t block the ball most of the time.
The losing team, Baylor Bears, was honestly close to Texas's score. I couldn't stop focusing on Yossiana Pressley in Baylor, she had perfect momentum and sharp reflexes. Not just because of her kills but I'd say she was the MVP player of this game. The team was always so supportive as well especially whenever a small mistake occurred like a foul for going over the line on a serve. I have to admit, most of their sets were average, and not to mention how their hitters would constantly hit out of the court. It seemed as if they were trying to get it to hit the net so Taylor's would have more difficulty blocking it, if that's the case then it's a very smart move, but otherwise, if they just happened to be lucky then I'd consider it a miracle. This team could always track the ball but when it came to controlling the ball, they were late and had bad momentum. The sad part is, the Baylor Bears are such a good team, I personally liked them more in the beginning where I saw more action, but whenever it came down to the ball constantly being passed back and forth it seemed as if they lost energy which to me, ultimately led to the downfall of their team.
Thank you :)
Answer:
I think the essay Is perfectly fine, I have read through it multiple times and I think it is very well worded.
Explanation:
please help asap! i will give you brainliest!!! :)
tysm!
Answer:
Answer is B) Future quakes in florida would probably cause only slight damage. If not the try C.
Explanation:
Have a great day
hi guys please answer these questions thank you:)
Answer:
23=
24=
25=c
26=b
Explanation:
I just knew only this much sorry
Help asap if you want brainliest. This is slightly a long story.
Read the following excerpt from Alfred Noyes’s narrative poem "The Highwayman." Which three literary elements do these stanzas contain?
The wind was a torrent of darkness among the gusty trees.
The moon was a ghostly galleon tossed upon cloudy seas.
The road was a ribbon of moonlight over the purple moor,
And the highwayman came riding—
Riding—riding—
The highwayman came riding, up to the old inn-door.
He’d a French cocked-hat on his forehead, a bunch of lace at his chin,
A coat of the claret velvet, and breeches of brown doe-skin.
They fitted with never a wrinkle. His boots were up to the thigh.
And he rode with a jewelled twinkle,
His pistol butts a-twinkle,
His rapier hilt a-twinkle, under the jewelled sky.
Over the cobbles he clattered and clashed in the dark inn-yard.
He tapped with his whip on the shutters, but all was locked and barred.
He whistled a tune to the window, and who should be waiting there
But the landlord’s black-eyed daughter,
Bess, the landlord’s daughter,
Plaiting a dark red love-knot into her long black hair.
characters
plot
theme
setting
flashback
The boy said he hadn’t stolen the car. He just wanted to go j_ _ _ _d_ _ _.
The boy said he hadn't stolen the car. He just wanted to go joyriding.
Joyriding:
Joyriding is a term used to describe the act of stealing a vehicle, typically a car or a motorcycle, and using it for a reckless and unauthorized joyride. The person who engages in joyriding does not have the owner's permission to use the vehicle. Joyriders often drive the stolen vehicle at high speeds, perform dangerous maneuvers, and may cause accidents or property damage. This activity is illegal and can result in criminal charges for theft, unauthorized use of a vehicle, and other related offenses.
2 PARA (2nd Battalion, Parachute Regiment):
2 PARA, also known as the 2nd Battalion, Parachute Regiment, is a military unit within the British Army. The Parachute Regiment is an elite airborne infantry regiment that specializes in parachute and air assault operations. It is one of the three regular army battalions in the Parachute Regiment, along with the 1st and 3rd Battalions. These units are trained to be highly mobile and can be rapidly deployed into various operational environments, including behind enemy lines or in support of peacekeeping and humanitarian missions.
To know more about car here
https://brainly.com/question/30094730
#SPJ2
I've been making a cake
Answer:
Explanation:
What kind of cake?
Answer:
How's it taste? Did you do it right?
What type of sentence is below?
Aimee didn't eat popcorn or drink soda.
O complex
O compound
O simple
How does social media play a part in cyber bullying?
Answer:
Social media plays a big part in cyber bullying. For example, in social media, you can post pictures of your face, and usually jealous people can pick apart your body and tell you what they think is "ugly" about it. In other cases, on social media, you could simply be stating some of your opinions about things. While it's ok for people to disagree with your opinions, they can be extremely rude and hate on you just for speaking out and stating how you feel about something.
Hope this helped with whatever your doing. Completely original I promise.
What are the parts of speech for this sentence
This is an unbelievably giant cat everyone should be afraid of it
Answer:
This - pronoun
is - verb
unbelievably giant - adjective
cat - noun
everyone - pronoun
should be - verb
afraid - adjective
of - preposition
it - pronoun
Explanation:
Parts of speech are defined as the different types of words that are linked together to give meaning to the sentence. Nouns are defined as the referral words to denote a person, place, or thing while the pronouns function to replace the noun. The nouns and pronouns primarily function as the subjects or objects in the sentence. The verb functions to denote the being or action performed by the subject in the sentence. Adjectives are defined as the words that qualify a noun or pronoun. While prepositions function to connect the words of phrases or show relationship between them.
Help “How important is it to live a moral life if you want your personal relationships to last? Give examples to support your thoughts and ideas”.
Answer:
It is important to live a moral life if you'd want a personal relationship, because a person's morality can benefit us in some way. Moral traits have social value and signal to us whether we should approach or avoid and whether we should affiliate with that person. An example a moral life is always telling the truth, keeping your promises, and another is to treat your partner how you'd like to be treated. My thought on living in a moral life is a bit frustrating, but fair because you wouldn't like it if your partner, or anyone in general were to break their promises or even lie to you, whether if it's constant or not. Anyone would be upset if someone lied to them, but I think it's fair because I'd appreciate it if my partner or anyone would tell me the truth at all times, and they'd appreciate it if I did the same to them.
I hope this helped you!
This shows that money does not always benefit society because of why
Answer: Hope this helps
Explanation: 1. Economic inequality can give wealthier people an unacceptable degree of control over the lives of others.
If wealth is very unevenly distributed in a society, wealthy people often end up in control of many aspects of the lives of poorer citizens: over where and how they can work, what they can buy, and in general what their lives will be like. As an example, ownership of a public media outlet, such as a newspaper or a television channel, can give control over how others in the society view themselves and their lives, and how they understand their society.
2. Economic inequality can undermine the fairness of political institutions.
If those who hold political offices must depend on large contributions for their campaigns, they will be more responsive to the interests and demands of wealthy contributors, and those who are not rich will not be fairly represented.
3. Economic inequality undermines the fairness of the economic system itself.
Economic inequality makes it difficult, if not impossible, to create equality of opportunity. Income inequality means that some children will enter the workforce much better prepared than others. And people with few assets find it harder to access the first small steps to larger opportunities, such as a loan to start a business or pay for an advanced degree.
None of these objections is an expression of mere envy. They are objections to inequality based on the effects of some being much better off than others. In principle, these effects could avoided, without reducing economic inequality, through such means as the public financing of political campaigns and making high-quality public education available to all children (however difficult this would be in practice).
A fourth kind of objection to inequality is more direct. In Paul Krugman’s review of Capital in the 21st Century by Thomas Piketty, he mentions these stats from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics: “Real wages for most U.S. workers have increased little if at all since the early 1970s, but wages for the top 1 percent of earners have risen 165 percent, and wages for the top 0.1 percent have risen 362 percent.” (Krugman calls those “supersalaries.”) Again, the idea that this is objectionable is not mere envy. It rests, I believe, on this idea, my fourth point:
4. Workers, as participants in a scheme of cooperation that produces national income, have a claim to a fair share of what they have helped to produce.
What constitutes a fair share is of course controversial. One answer is provided by John Rawls’ Difference Principle, according to which inequalities in wealth and income are permissible if and only if these inequalities could not be reduced without worsening the position of those who are worst-off. You don’t have to accept this exact principle, though, in order to believe that if an economy is producing an increasing level of goods and services, then all those who participate in producing these benefits — workers as well as others — should share in the result.
No one has reason to accept a scheme of cooperation that places their lives under the control of others.
Peter Singer’s powerful argument for altruistic giving draws on one moral relation we can stand in to others: the relation of being able to benefit them in some important way. With respect to this relation, to “matter morally” is to be someone whose welfare there is reason to increase.
But the objections to inequality that I have listed rest on a different moral relation. It’s the relation between individuals who are participants in a cooperative scheme. Those who are related to us in this way matter morally in a further sense: they are fellow participants to whom the terms of our cooperation must be justifiable.
In our current environment of growing inequality, can such a justification be given? No one has reason to accept a scheme of cooperation that places their lives under the control of others, that deprives them of meaningful political participation, that deprives their children of the opportunity to qualify for better jobs, and that deprives them of a share in the wealth they help to produce.
These are not just objections to inequality and its consequences: they are at the same time challenges to the legitimacy of the system itself. The holdings of the rich are not legitimate if they are acquired through competition from which others are excluded, and made possible by laws that are shaped by the rich for the benefit of the rich. In these ways, economic inequality can undermine the conditions of its own legitimacy.
As Singer shows, the possibility of improving the lot of the poor is a powerful reason for redistribution. But it is important to see that the case for equality is powerful in a different way.
would a charitable person be celebrated by a community in need?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
If you are charitable you give your stuff to people willingly because you a selfless. If a community is in need and this person is willing to give a lot it is very kind and helpful to the people in that community! Hope this helps!! :)
Read the passage from an argumentative essay. (1) Bernie Sanders has argued that no one should have to pay tuition to go to college. (2) This will only increase the tax burden on the middle classes. To improve the relationship between ideas, the writer should revise sentence 2 by explaining the concept of a tax burden. adding "however" to the beginning of the sentence. placing "therefore" at the beginning of the sentence. connecting it to the preceding sentence with "and."
Answer:
Answer: by adding "however" to the beginning of a sentence.
Explanation:
:)
The best way to revise the passage from the argumentative sentence is by adding "however" to the beginning of the second sentence, as expressed in option B.
Why should we add "however"?The word "however" is used to create contrast between the ideas expressed in different sentences. It is usually placed at the beginning of the second sentence to show that its idea will differ from the previous one.
Here, we have two contrasting ideas. The first one is that going to college should be free, which is good. The second one is that the middle classes would end up paying for that, which is bad.
Therefore, to show that one idea is good and the other is bad, that is, that they are contrasting, we should add "however" to the beginning of the second sentence.
Learn more about revising sentences here:
https://brainly.com/question/8823021
#SPJ5
Describe a time when you showed unexpected courage.
Answer:
When someone told me recently that they thought I was very brave, I dismissed the comment. To me, having courage means overcoming extraordinary challenges, like climbing Mount Everest or running with the bulls. It never dawned on me that I demonstrate bravery every day, yet we all do. In fact, even though we aren’t necessarily facing tough physical challenges like climbing a mountain, we deal with a variety of obstacles and a multitude of fears as a part of our daily lives. And for the most part, we dismiss our ability to overcome these as not worthy of acknowledgement.
How does society Affect the individuals thoughts ?
Can you write a story about a dog having a fun day at the beach
please be serious
It was a warm summer day and a family with a dog were planning to go to the beach. the dog didn't know where they were going ta first but once the family got there the dog was so excited. They got settled in a warm, sandy spot. They let the dog off of his leash to go play. The dog ran into the cool water and jumped around. A family member got out the gods favorite green ball and threw it, the dog went after it instantly and brought it back, this repeated until they got tired. They had lunch and spent the rest of the day at the beach. This was the dogs best day ever.
Is there any one who read Tom's Miserable Morning story is there any one who tell me break mu old heart explain the phase and tell me please
Answer:
i havent but lemme help you cause not lots of ppl answer these types of questions
Explanation:
go to spark notes its a site where it summarizes books you can even read the summarys paragraph by paragraph just search up your book :)
hope this helps!
`brianna/edgumacation
Can someone tell me the word lll
Answer:
match
Explanation:
the boys are matching and the second pic is a ligit match
Answer:
Fire Sweater (design)/Match (matching clothes/match)
Pls, give me Brainlist if I'm correct! :3
Match the parts of an argument with their examples.
conclusion
We should not close the library on
Saturdays.
counterclaim and rebuttal
evidence
Some people cannot get to the library
on any other day.
If we cannot afford to keep the library
open, a small tax can pay for it.
A survey from last year showed that
Saturday is the library's busiest day.
claim
reason
Therefore, I urge you to vote to keep the
library open on Saturday
Answer: look at attached -
Explanation:
relating to the character of an early stage in the
evolutionary or historical development of
something.
dddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
What keeps Darry from being a Soc?
A. madras
B. mustangs
C. football
D. the boys
Answer:
D
Explanation:
True or False.
During your lifetime, you will produce enough saliva to fill two swimming pools ♀️.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The average human produces 25,000 quarts of saliva or spit in a lifetime. That's enough saliva to fill 2 swimming pools