Find the equation of the exponential function represented by the table below:

0
2
1
4
2
8
3
16

Answer:

104

Step-by-step explanation:

10th square number is 100, 2nd square number is 4. 100+4=104

Answer:

35

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the definition of n[tex]C_{r}[/tex]

with n = 7 and r = 3

7[tex]C_{3}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{7!}{(7-3)!3!}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{7!}{4!(3!)}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{7(6)(5)(4)(3)(2)(1)}{4(3)(2)(1)3(2)(1)\\}[/tex] ← cancel 4(3)(2)(1) on numerator/denominator

= [tex]\frac{7(6))(5)}{3)2)(1)}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{210}{6}[/tex]

= 35

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

4/5 = ?/10

4/5 * (2/2) = ?/10

8/10 = ?/10

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

multiply the denominator and numerator, you get 8/10

44% discount

(2200 is 44% of 5000)

Answer:

2880

1950

3960

2240

920

5220

4320

3760

6650

1080

32980 is the sum of all combined

Please allow me to know if this helped you by clicking thank you, rating or brainly!

Miss Hawaii

Answer:

1. 2880

2. 1950

3. 3960

4. 2240

5. 920

6. 5220

7. 5760

8. 3760

9. 6650

10. 1080

Answer:

15 years and 8 months

Step-by-step explanation:

I used the formula for compound interest as shown below and solved for the unknown, time.

Since our interest is compounded annually (So once a year) our m value is 1.

Answer:

The answer is reciprocal

Answer:

Absolute value

Step-by-step explanation:

Parent function: y = |x|

Answer:

-1= -1/1

1 to 1 = 1/1

2:3 = 2/3

3 to 2 = 3/2

-2 = -2/1

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-3 < z < 3

Step-by-step explanation:

×4

10 < 2z + 16 < 22. -16

-6 < 2z < 6. ÷2

-3 < z < 3

Testing the hypothesis, we have that:

At the null hypothesis, we test if the mean is of 5.670g, that is:

[tex]H_0: \mu = 5.67[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if the mean is different of 5.670g, that is:

[tex]H_1: \mu \neq 5.67[/tex]

The test statistic is t = -3.276, with the number of degrees of freedom given by:

[tex]df = n - 1 = 39 - 1 = 38[/tex]

The p-value is found using a t-distribution calculator, using a two-tailed test(as the alternative hypothesis is that the mean is different from the value), with t = -3.276 and 38 df. This p-value is of 0.002252.

The p-value is 0.002252 < 0.01, which means that the final conclusion is that the mean weight of quarts made after 1960 is different than 5.67g.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/24146681

Answer:

For question 3 its definitely 5^15 and I searched 4 so I thinks its 71 or 161? sorry I don't know angles but 3 is correct

Answer:

[tex] {5}^{4 + 8 + 3} = {5}^{15} \\ \\ 90 - 19 = 71[/tex]

Answer:

22.41

Step-by-step explanation:

Set up a proportion where x is the time to fly 174798 miles

Cross multiply and solve for x:

118404x = 2653433.64

x = 22.41

So, it would take 22.41 hours to fly 174798 miles

Answer:

Answer is invalid. You cannot solve it.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y=4.8 X=34.2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

If we translated the triangle 4 units right and 3 units down, then our new points would be J' (3,0)  K' (3,-2)  L' (0,-2).  Hope this helped ..

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

21/32 gal

Step-by-step explanation:

1 gallon equals 16 cups, so we first need to convert the rate from cups to gallons

1.5cup/1 x 1/16 gal

can be simplified to 3/32 gal

so we now multiply this rate by 7 for a week

so in total it leaks

3/32 x 7/1 = 21/32

Answer:

Total amount:

Total amount:

As we see the second method is a better choice

Answer:

SHERRIE

- Princible P= 200

- Interest rate R= 4% or 0.04

-  Number of compounds N= 12

- Time T= 2

HARRISON 

- Princible P= 200

- Interest rate R= 2% or 0.02

- Number of compounds N= 4

-  Time T= 2

Formula: A= P(1+r/n)^nt

Now plug in values for each person: 

200(1+0.02/4)^4*2= 208.14

200(1+0.04/12)^12*2= 216.63

And as you can see, the second method (Sherrie's) is the best choice.

Step-by-step explanation:

please mark this answer as brainlist

The value of the numerical expression {[(20 – 32) ÷ (–6)]² – 11} ÷ (–7) will be 1.

When the relevant factors and natural laws of a mathematical model are given values, the outcome of the calculation it describes is the expression's outcome.

The expression is given below.

⇒ {[(20 – 32) ÷ (–6)]² – 11} ÷ (–7)

Parenthesis, Exponent, Multiplication, Division, Addition, and Subtraction are all part of the PEMDAS formula. To answer the problem properly and accurately, this rule must be followed.

⇒ {[(20 – 32) ÷ (–6)]² – 11} ÷ (–7)

⇒ {[(–12) ÷ (–6)]² – 11} ÷ (–7)

⇒ {[2]² – 11} ÷ (–7)

⇒ {4 – 11} ÷ (–7)

⇒ (– 7) ÷ (–7)

⇒ 1

The value of the numerical expression {[(20 – 32) ÷ (–6)]² – 11} ÷ (–7) will be 1.

More about the value of the expression link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/23671908

#SPJ5

Answer:

10 is answer if your question.

Step-by-step explanation:

mark me as a brainlist plz.

Answer:

C. 4.00 per person

Step-by-step explanation:

I say its 4.00 per person because in each row you mutiply the players and 4.00 you get the other side of the row. Ex 11 players multiplied by 4 dollars per person equals 44.00 dollars in total which the graph shows.

Answer:

5+3*(5-2*2)

5+3*(5-4)

5+3*1

5+3

=8

Step-by-step explanation: i think

hjdjenenenwnwnwmemkwksksjsj

Answer:

Isolate the variable by dividing each side by factors that don't contain the variable.

y=3

Step-by-step explanation:

if you are to put this on a graph the would be Linear

The distance traveled by the echo is used to determine the player's distance from the wall

The player's distance from the wall is 66 m.

Reason:

Known parameter;

The time after which the tennis player hears the echo of the ball, t = 0.4 s

The speed of sound in air, v = 330 m/s

The distance of the player from the wall = Required

Solution:

Let d, represent the distance of the player from the wall

An echo is the reflection the wave of the sound of hitting the ball that

travels to the wall and back

The distance traveled by the sound to the wall, d, and back, (d again), is 2·d

[tex]Speed = \dfrac{Distance}{Time}[/tex]

Therefore;

Therefore;

[tex]330 = \dfrac{2 \cdot d}{0.4}[/tex]

330 × 0.4 = 2·d

[tex]d = \dfrac{330 \times 0.4}{2} = 66[/tex]

Learn more here:

https://brainly.com/question/14754705

Answer:

four hundred thirty-five thousand : 435,000

two hundred two : 202

Answer:

the first one is equivalent and the second one is not equivalent

Step-by-step explanation:

In the first one do the distributive property first by distributing the the -2.

[tex]3x - 4.6x - 5 = 1.6x - 5[/tex]

collect like terms on the left side

[tex] - 1.6x - 5 = - 1.6x - 5[/tex]

they are equivalent.

The second equation do the distributive property first by multiplying by -3.

[tex]5 + 4.8x + 6.3 = 4.8x - 1.3[/tex]

collect like terms on the left.

[tex]4.8x + 11.3 = 4.8x - 1.3[/tex]

not equivalent

Using the expected value, it is found that a price of $6 should be charged to make it a fair game.

--------------------------

In a standard deck, there are 52 cards.

The cost of x.

There are 4 Aces in a standard deck, thus [tex]\frac{4}{52}[/tex] probability of earning 26 - x.

There is 1 King of Hearts in a standard deck, thus [tex]\frac{1}{52}[/tex] probability of earning 204 - x.

There are 4 Jacks and 4 Queens in a standard deck, thus [tex]\frac{8}{52}[/tex] probability of winning 13 - x.

The other 39 cards you lose, thus [tex]\frac{39}{52}[/tex] probability of losing x.

Considering we want the expected value to be 0.

[tex]\frac{4}{52}(26 - x) + \frac{1}{52}(204 - x) + \frac{8}{52}(13 - x) - \frac{39}{52}x = 0[/tex]

[tex]\frac{4(26 - x) + 204 - x + 8(13 - x) - 39x}{52} = 0[/tex]

[tex]104 - 4x + 204 - x + 104 - 8x - 39x = 0[/tex]

[tex]52x = 312[/tex]

[tex]x = \frac{312}{52}[/tex]

[tex]x = 6[/tex]

$6 should be charged.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/24905256