BRAINILIEST
A large bowl holds 5⅔ cups of punch. Some more punch is added to the bowl to make a total of 10 cups of punch. Let c represent the number of cups of punch that are added to the bowl. Write and solve an equation to find the number of cups of punch that are added to the bowl.

Answer:

234

Step-by-step explanation:

65              x

---    =        ---

5                18

Answer:

x ≈ 4.3

General Formulas and Concepts:

Pre-Algebra

Order of Operations: BPEMDAS

Equality Properties

Trigonometry

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Identify Variables

Angle = 35°

Opposite Leg = 3

Adjacent Leg = x

Step 2: Solve for x

Answer:

here:

you can make an equation

x + ( x + 2) + (x + 4) = 30

then by combining like items you get

3x + 6 = 30

then solve

3x = 30 - 6 ; then 3x = 24 , and x = 8

so the three numbers are 8 ; 10 and 12.

Answer:

5.) 13,841,287,201 x 2,401. 6.) 64⁴.

Step-by-step explanation:

PEMDAS requires parenthesis first, then exponents, then multiplication/division, and then addition/subtraction. For 5, lets find 7¹². According to my calculations, that is 13,841,287,201. Now for 7⁴. According to my calculations, that is 2,401. Now, we have 13,841,287,201 x 2,401. In math, an expression is a problem. If I solve it, it wouldn't be an expression, so I'll just leave it at that. For 6, we do the parenthesis first. 8² is 64. 64 to the fourth power is 16,777,216. If I solved it, it wouldn't be an expression, so we have to leave it at 64⁴. If you are wondering, 64⁴ is equal to 16,777,216. I hope this helps!

Answer:

48.8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]given \: x = - \frac{1}{7} [/tex]

[tex]x {}^{2} + \frac{1}{x {}^{2} } [/tex]

[tex]( - \frac{1}{7} ) {}^{2} + \frac{1}{ ( - \frac{1}{7} ) {}^{2} } [/tex]

[tex] \frac{1}{49} + \frac{1}{ \frac{1}{49} } [/tex]

[tex] \frac{1}{49} + \frac{1 \times 49}{1} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{1}{49} + 49[/tex]

[tex] \frac{2402}{49} \: or \: 49.02[/tex]

Given:

Consider the pentagon MVEDR is dilated with the origin as the center of dilation using the rule [tex](x,y)\to(\dfrac{2}{3}x,\dfrac{2}{3}y)[/tex] to create pentagon M'V'E'D'R'.

To find:

The correct statement.

Solution:

If a figure dilated by factor k, then the rule of dilation is

[tex](x,y)\to (kx,ky)[/tex]

Here,

If k>1, then the image is larger than the original figure.

If k<1, then the image is smaller than the original figure.

We have,

[tex](x,y)\to(\dfrac{2}{3}x,\dfrac{2}{3}y)[/tex]

Here, M'V'E'D'R' is image and MVEDR is original figure. The scale factor is

[tex]k=\dfrac{2}{3}<1[/tex]

Pentagon M'V'E'D'R' is smaller than pentagon MVEDR because the scale factor is less than 1.

Therefore, the correct option is B.

  Option (B). Pentagon M'V'E'D'R' is smaller than pentagon MVDER because the scale factor is less than 1.

           image point formed will follow the rule,

           (x, y) → (kx, ky)

            If k < 1, image will be smaller than the preimage.

Given in the question,

Rule for the transformation → [tex](x,y)\rightarrow (\frac{2}{3}x,\frac{2}{3}y)[/tex]

Here, [tex]k=\frac{2}{3}[/tex] which is less than 1.

      Therefore, image pentagon M'V'E'D'R' will be smaller than the original pentagon MVDER.

      Option (B) will be the correct option.

Learn more about the transformation of a figure here,

https://brainly.com/question/2298651?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

If you are trying to simplify the expression, the answer is -14x^2+8x-37

Step-by-step explanation:

First, keep removing the parentheses.

(x-1)(2-x)+(x^2+5)(x-7) -x^2(x+6)

Next, try expanding the expression.

3x - x^2 - 2+ (x^2+5)(x-7)-x^2(x+6

3x-x^2-2+x^3-7x^2+5x-35-x^2(x+6

3x-x^2-2x^3-7x^2+5x-35-x^3-6x^2

Finally, simplify the expression.

-14x^2 8x-37

I hope this helped to answer your question.

Answer:

A. [tex]8x^{6}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

8x6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Y=1/2x+2

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope is always rise/run and the Y intercept is 2.

Answer:

Bro its right

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\triangle KLM \sim \triangle GFH[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

In similar triangles, the corresponding angles must be congruent. We see from the diagram that [tex]\angle K \cong \angle G[/tex], [tex]\angle L \cong \angle F[/tex], and [tex]\angle M \cong \angle H[/tex]. Therefore, [tex]\triangle KLM \sim \triangle GFH[/tex].

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

C

The theorem that applies is Similar SAS.

The correct option is C.

Those triangles look the same but are different in size.

And in similar triangles,

the corresponding sides are in proportion to each other and the corresponding angles are equal to each other.

Given information:

SM = 27, angle SMA = 31 degrees, MA = 15, DL = 9, LE = 5 and Angle DLE = 31 degrees.

From the given information, we know that angle SMA is congruent to angle DLE because they both have a measure of 31 degrees. However, we do not have any information about the other angles in the two triangles.

To check if the corresponding sides are proportional, we can compare the ratios of the corresponding side lengths:

SM/ DL = 27/9 = 3

MA/LE = 15/5 = 3

Since the ratio of SM to DL is equal to the ratio of MA to LE, we know that the corresponding sides are proportional.

Therefore, we can use the Similarity-SAS (Side-Angle-Side) postulate to conclude that the triangles are similar. The postulate states that if two pairs of corresponding sides are proportional and the included angles are congruent, then the triangles are similar.

The answer is (C) Similar - SAS.

To learn more about similar triangles;

https://brainly.com/question/14926756

#SPJ7

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

x - 6 = 0

x = 6

f(x) = 2x⁴  + x² - 8x - 1

     =2(6)⁴+ 6² - 8*6 - 1

     = 2*1296 + 36 - 48 - 1

     = 2592 + 36 - 48 - 1

     = 2628 - 49

     = 2579

Answer:

[tex]Sea\ of\ Galilee = -690ft[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]Lowest\ Elevation = 23ft[/tex] below sea level

Sea of Galilee = 30 times Lowest in Lammefjord, Denmark

Required

Determine the elevation of the Sea of Galilee

We have that the lowest elevation in Lammefjord is:

[tex]Lowest\ Elevation = -23ft[/tex]

It is negative because, the elevation is below sea level.

Calculating the elevation of Sea of Galilee, we have:

Sea of Galilee = 30 times Lowest in Lammefjord, Denmark

[tex]Sea\ of\ Galilee = 30 * -23ft[/tex]

[tex]Sea\ of\ Galilee = -690ft[/tex]

Hence, the elevation of Sea of Galilee is -690ft or 690ft below sea level

Answer:

i dont understand the question

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x=10.001

Step-by-step explanation:

110.10+4x=150.104

4x=40.004

x=10.001

Hope it helped!

Answer: of each shape? 3 & 4?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

26

Step-by-step explanation:

a sabeeeer

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

16.495

Step-by-step explanation:

plz mark B R A I N L I E S T

Answer:

16.405

Step-by-step explanation:

since you need to find more add 12.34 + 4.065= 16.405

Answer:

Store B

Step-by-step explanation:

To figure out which store has the better deal, we need to figure out the price per unit. We can do this by dividing the price by the number of the shirts. Store A sells their t-shirts for 8.33 or 8 1/3 dollars per shirt, while Store B sells their shirts for 8 dollars a shirt. 8 < 8 1/3, therefore Store B has the better deal.

Answer:

B.

Step-by-step explanation:

If you do 3/25=5/x. You would get $41.6. Another way to show it is to divide 25/3 and 40/5, which would give us $8.3 and $8.

Answer:

28

Step-by-step explanation:

because he spent half of 28 which is 14 and 7x4=28 BOOM

Answer:

20x+45x+50 = 180

65x= 130

x = 2

so,

A = 20x = 20×2 = 40

hope u got it.

Answer:

The equation y = -0.24137931034483x – 8.6896551724138, assuming you meant (-36,0).

Step-by-step explanation:

explain:

Estimating Differences of Fractions and Mixed Numbers

Estimating Differences of Fractions and Mixed NumbersRecall that estimation is a method for finding an approximate solution to a problem. Even when you are asked to find an exact ko, estimation is a useful way to get an idea of a reasonable solution to a problem. Once you have found an exact answer, you can check your answer against the estimate.

, estimation is a useful way to get an idea of a reasonable solution to a problem. Once you have found an exact answer, you can check your answer against the estimate.When working with fractions and mixed numbers, you can use the fraction benchmarks of 0,

, estimation is a useful way to get an idea of a reasonable solution to a problem. Once you have found an exact answer, you can check your answer against the estimate.When working with fractions and mixed numbers, you can use the fraction benchmarks of 0, 12

, estimation is a useful way to get an idea of a reasonable solution to a problem. Once you have found an exact answer, you can check your answer against the estimate.When working with fractions and mixed numbers, you can use the fraction benchmarks of 0, 12, and 1 to help you to estimate differences.

, estimation is a useful way to get an idea of a reasonable solution to a problem. Once you have found an exact answer, you can check your answer against the estimate.When working with fractions and mixed numbers, you can use the fraction benchmarks of 0, 12, and 1 to help you to estimate differences.Here are the steps for estimating the differences of fractions and mixed numbers using benchmarks.