Could someone answer this I am a bit confused I will give a brainlist for the right answer I promise :)

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{\sf No}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

These triangles are not similar because their angles are not equal.

Conditions for two or more triangles to be similar:

1) Their angles are congruent or equal.

2) Their sides are proportional.

[tex]\rule[225]{225}{2}[/tex]

Hope this helped!

Answer: 20% of the time.

Step-by-step explanation: 5+3+2 = 10 There are 2 blue so 2/10=1/5=20%

Answer:

A (no because the graph is not a straight line)

Step-by-step explanation:

The rate of change is not consistent, and therefor is not proportional.

Answer:

(D) No, because the graph does not pass through the origin.

Step-by-step explanation:

because its the correct answer (im smart)

Answer:

w= -5/6

Step-by-step explanation:

That the right answer

Answer:

I think 32% (Let me know if I am wrong)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C) 32%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

D.

Step-by-step explanation:   {y1=mx1+b}

x1      l      y1

------------------

8       l    104   <------------Answer

12      l    146

        l

        l

m = 10.5    

b = 20

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

Average rate of change from x = -3 to x = 5.

When x = -3, y = -1. That is f(-3) = -1

When x = 5, y = -1, That is f(5) = -1

Average rate of change = [tex] \frac{f(b) - f(a)}{b - a} [/tex]

Where,

[tex] a = -3, f(a) = -1 [/tex]

[tex] b = 5, f(b) = -1 [/tex]

Plug in the values into the equation:

[tex] = \frac{-1 - (-1)}{6 -(-3)} [/tex]

[tex] = \frac{0}{8}  [/tex]

[tex] = 0 [/tex]

Average rate of change = 0

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Because they took the correct steps to answer the equation.They also got the right answer (-2).

At the begining they added 4 to both sides (to cancel out the 4)

C would be wrong because they subtracted 4 from a negative four and this does NOT cancel it out.

Have a Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious day, I hope you like my explination. If you do please give rating or brainliest :)

Answer:

$667.80

Step-by-step explanation:

30% of 900 is 270, so the price of the TV would be 630 without the tax. 6% of 630 is 37.8, so in total, the price would be $667.80

Answer:

10

Step-by-step explanation:

See the picture attached.

Answer:

810 min

Step-by-step explanation:

5+6+7=18

18x45=810

Given:

[tex](g\circ f)(a)=|a|-2[/tex]

To find:

The functions f(x) and g(x).

Solution:

We know that,

[tex](g\circ f)(a)=g[f(a)][/tex]

If [tex]f(a)=a^2-4[/tex] and [tex]g(a)=\sqrt{a}[/tex], then

[tex](g\circ f)(a)=g[a^2-4][/tex]

[tex](g\circ f)(a)=\sqrt{a^2-4}\neq |a|-2[/tex]

Option A is incorrect.

If [tex]f(a)=\dfrac{1}{2}a-1[/tex] and [tex]g(a)=2a-2[/tex], then

[tex](g\circ f)(a)=g[\dfrac{1}{2}a-1][/tex]

[tex](g\circ f)(a)=2(\dfrac{1}{2}a-1)-2[/tex]

[tex](g\circ f)(a)=a-2-2[/tex]

[tex](g\circ f)(a)=a-4\neq |a|-2[/tex]

Option B is incorrect.

If [tex]f(a)=5+a^2[/tex] and [tex]g(a)=\sqrt{a-5}-2[/tex], then

[tex](g\circ f)(a)=g[5+a^2][/tex]

[tex](g\circ f)(a)=\sqrt{5+a^2-5}-2[/tex]

[tex](g\circ f)(a)=\sqrt{a^2}-2[/tex]

[tex](g\circ f)(a)=|a|-2[/tex]

Option C is correct.

If [tex]f(a)=3-3a[/tex] and [tex]g(a)=4a-5[/tex], then

[tex](g\circ f)(a)=g[3-3a][/tex]

[tex](g\circ f)(a)=4(3-3a)-5[/tex]

[tex](g\circ f)(a)=12-12a-5[/tex]

[tex](g\circ f)(a)=7-12x\neq |a|-2[/tex]

Option D is incorrect.

Therefore, the correct option is C.

Answer:

qwsedfgh

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Please check the explanation below.

Step-by-step explanation:

In other words, in order for relation to be a function, we must make sure there must be no repetition of 'x' coordinate values, as it would violate the fundamental definition of a function.

A) (2, 5), (5, 7), (7, 9)

Here, the x-coordinates are: 2, 5, and 7

At x = 2, y = 5

At x = 5, y = 7

At x = 7, y = 9

Thus, the coordinate pairs (2, 5), (5, 7), (7, 9) represent the function.

B) (2, 3), (1, 4), (2, 8),(0, 1)

Here, the x-coordinates are: 2, 1, 2 and 0

At x = 2, y = 3

At x = 1, y = 4

At x = 2, y = 8

At x = 0, y = 1

Please observe that the x-coordinate values i.e. x=2 are repeated.

Thus, the coordinate pairs (2, 3), (1, 4), (2, 8),(0, 1) does not represent the function.

C) (4, 8), (5, 8), (6, 8)

Here, the x-coordinates are: 4,5 and 6

At x = 4, y = 8

At x = 5, y = 8

At x = 6, y = 8

Thus, the coordinate pairs (4, 8), (5, 8), (6, 8) represent the function.

D) (-1, 4), (0, -1), (8, 3)

Here, the x-coordinates are: -1, 0, and 8

At x = -1, y = 4

At x = 0, y = -1

At x = 8, y = 3

Thus, the coordinate pairs (-1, 4), (0, -1), (8, 3) represent the function.

E) (1, 8), (8, 1), (1, 3)

Here, the x-coordinates are: 1, 8, and 1

At x = 1, y = 8

At x = 8, y = 1

At x = 1, y = 3

Please observe that the x-coordinate values i.e. x=1 are repeated.

Thus, the coordinate pairs (1, 8), (8, 1), (1, 3) does not represent the function.

F) (9, 0), (9, 1), (9, 2), (9, 3)

Here, the x-coordinates are: 9, 9,9 and 9

At x = 9, y = 0

At x = 9, y = 1

At x = 9, y = 2

At x = 9, y = 3

Please observe that the x-coordinate values i.e. x=9are repeated.

Thus, the coordinate pairs (9, 0), (9, 1), (9, 2), (9, 3) does not represent the function.

Answer:

c 7 mins

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y=[tex]x^{2}[/tex]-4

Answer:

=90m+5

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps

Answer:  0.4016

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x be a random variable that represents the height of women in a country.

Mean : [tex]\mu=64.3[/tex] inches

Sample size : n= 65

Standard deviation: [tex]\sigma=2.81[/tex]

The probability that the mean height for the sample is greater than 65 inches = [tex]P(x>65)=1-P(x<65)[/tex]

[tex]=1-P(\dfrac{x-\mu}{\sigma}<\dfrac{65-64.3}{2.81})\\\\= 1-P(z<0.2491)\\\\=1-0.5984\ \ \ \text{[By p-value table]}\\\\=0.4016[/tex]

Hence, the probability that the mean height for the sample is greater than 65 inches = 0.4016

Answer:

D, 48 inches.

Step-by-step explanation:

The scale is 2 inches to 9 feet, so we need to divide the feet by 9. That equals 24 so then we multiply that by two which gives us 48 inches.

Answer: 2.5

Step-by-step explanation:

For this problem, we see that 4km is 1/2 of 8km.

So, we will have to find 1/2 of 5km.

1/2 of 5km = 2.5km

Your answer is 2.5km

Answer:

2.48548 Miles or simplified 2.5

Step-by-step explanation:

You Divide by 1.609 to find the answer.  

Answer:

1 time

Step-by-step explanation:

This is the answer because:

1) 22 x 1 = 22

2) If we do 22 x 2, the number will become larger than 30

3) Therefore, 22 can only go one time into 30 because 30/22 = 1 R8 

Hope this helps!

Answer:

x

Step-by-step explit can only be a function if every input has its own output

Answer:

5.44 gallons of paint

Step-by-step explanation:

First, we calculate the total area of the walls we need to paint. To do this, we use the formula for the area of a rectangle and we multiply our answer by 4, since there are 4 walls.

Area=(length*width)4

Area=(12*8.5)4

Area=(102ft^2)4

Area=408ft^2

Therefore, the total area of the walls is 408ft^2.

Now, we need to calculate the number of gallons we need to paint 408ft^2 worth of wall. Because we know that one gallon of paint covers 75ft^2, we can calculate this by dividing 408 by 75.

408/75

=5.44 gallons

Therefore, we would need 5.44 gallons of paint to paint the four walls.

I hope this helps!

Answer:

5:8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

8 to 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-12, -3, 5, 9

Step-by-step explanation:

ok. So the numbers are 5, -3, -12, and 9.

In these numbers, there are 2 negatives. They are -12 and -3.

In negatives, the bigger the number is, the number is smaller.

So we first put

-12, -3 as our 2 first. Then the other ones are 5 and 9.

and you obviously know that 5 is less than 9. try it out. 9-5 =4 which is positive

So then you put 5, 9

And our full answer is

-12, -3, 5, 9

Answer:

As the x=-2 does not satisfy the inequality.

Therefore, the solution is False!

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the expression

[tex]x-10x+1<\:20+\:5x\:[/tex]

substituting the value x = -2

[tex]\left(-2\right)-10\left(-2\right)+1<20+5\left(-2\right)[/tex]

[tex]-2+20+1 < 20-10[/tex]

[tex]19 < 10[/tex]

As the x=-2 does not satisfy the inequality.

Therefore, the solution is False!