ASAP please help me I need this quick
The question and answers are in the picture

Answer:

the probability that the mean weight of the sample babies would differ from the population mean by less than 45 grams is 0.7284

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that

mean weight = 3831 grams,

variance = 108,900

sample size n = 65

the probability that the mean weight of the sample babies would differ from the population mean by less than 45 grams = ?

Now standard error of mean = √( 108900 / 65 ) = 40.9314

z = +/- (45/40.9314)

z = +/-1.0994

so

P( -1.0994 <z< 1.0994 ) = P( z<1.0994 ) - (p<-1.0994 )

= 0.8642 - 0.1358

= 0.7284

Therefore the probability that the mean weight of the sample babies would differ from the population mean by less than 45 grams is 0.7284

Answer:

y=[tex]x^{2}[/tex]-4

Answer:

Reduced/depressed

courageously/daringly

Boost/inflate

Explanation:

The following statement displays the recommendation of National Football League's(NFL) rule to wear new and lighter helmets by the players to diminish the chances of head injury during collisions between players. However, it has led the players to play more brazenly and fearlessly that eventually may cause the expansion of the number of collisions suffered by NFL players due to the valiant behavior of the players. This equates the ratio and leading to no improvement in the reduction of injuries among them even after this rule.

Answer:

D, 48 inches.

Step-by-step explanation:

The scale is 2 inches to 9 feet, so we need to divide the feet by 9. That equals 24 so then we multiply that by two which gives us 48 inches.

Answer: 2.5

Step-by-step explanation:

For this problem, we see that 4km is 1/2 of 8km.

So, we will have to find 1/2 of 5km.

1/2 of 5km = 2.5km

Your answer is 2.5km

Answer:

2.48548 Miles or simplified 2.5

Step-by-step explanation:

You Divide by 1.609 to find the answer.  

Answer:

5:8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

8 to 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

34.28 percent of the items in the bag are DVDs

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that he had following items

DVDs 12

MArbles 12

Books 11

Total items are: 11+12+12 = 35

In order to find the percentage of DVDs we have to divide the quantity of DVDs by total and multiply by 100

So,

Percentage of DVDs is:

[tex]=\frac{12}{35} *100\\= 0.3428*100\\= 34.28\%[/tex]

Hence,

34.28 percent of the items in the bag are DVDs

Answer:

=90m+5

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps

Answer:

As the x=-2 does not satisfy the inequality.

Therefore, the solution is False!

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the expression

[tex]x-10x+1<\:20+\:5x\:[/tex]

substituting the value x = -2

[tex]\left(-2\right)-10\left(-2\right)+1<20+5\left(-2\right)[/tex]

[tex]-2+20+1 < 20-10[/tex]

[tex]19 < 10[/tex]

As the x=-2 does not satisfy the inequality.

Therefore, the solution is False!

Answer:

0.045 or 9/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I think 32% (Let me know if I am wrong)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C) 32%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

810 min

Step-by-step explanation:

5+6+7=18

18x45=810

Answer:

w= -5/6

Step-by-step explanation:

That the right answer

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

Average rate of change from x = -3 to x = 5.

When x = -3, y = -1. That is f(-3) = -1

When x = 5, y = -1, That is f(5) = -1

Average rate of change = [tex] \frac{f(b) - f(a)}{b - a} [/tex]

Where,

[tex] a = -3, f(a) = -1 [/tex]

[tex] b = 5, f(b) = -1 [/tex]

Plug in the values into the equation:

[tex] = \frac{-1 - (-1)}{6 -(-3)} [/tex]

[tex] = \frac{0}{8}  [/tex]

[tex] = 0 [/tex]

Average rate of change = 0

Answer:

Please check the explanation below.

Step-by-step explanation:

In other words, in order for relation to be a function, we must make sure there must be no repetition of 'x' coordinate values, as it would violate the fundamental definition of a function.

A) (2, 5), (5, 7), (7, 9)

Here, the x-coordinates are: 2, 5, and 7

At x = 2, y = 5

At x = 5, y = 7

At x = 7, y = 9

Thus, the coordinate pairs (2, 5), (5, 7), (7, 9) represent the function.

B) (2, 3), (1, 4), (2, 8),(0, 1)

Here, the x-coordinates are: 2, 1, 2 and 0

At x = 2, y = 3

At x = 1, y = 4

At x = 2, y = 8

At x = 0, y = 1

Please observe that the x-coordinate values i.e. x=2 are repeated.

Thus, the coordinate pairs (2, 3), (1, 4), (2, 8),(0, 1) does not represent the function.

C) (4, 8), (5, 8), (6, 8)

Here, the x-coordinates are: 4,5 and 6

At x = 4, y = 8

At x = 5, y = 8

At x = 6, y = 8

Thus, the coordinate pairs (4, 8), (5, 8), (6, 8) represent the function.

D) (-1, 4), (0, -1), (8, 3)

Here, the x-coordinates are: -1, 0, and 8

At x = -1, y = 4

At x = 0, y = -1

At x = 8, y = 3

Thus, the coordinate pairs (-1, 4), (0, -1), (8, 3) represent the function.

E) (1, 8), (8, 1), (1, 3)

Here, the x-coordinates are: 1, 8, and 1

At x = 1, y = 8

At x = 8, y = 1

At x = 1, y = 3

Please observe that the x-coordinate values i.e. x=1 are repeated.

Thus, the coordinate pairs (1, 8), (8, 1), (1, 3) does not represent the function.

F) (9, 0), (9, 1), (9, 2), (9, 3)

Here, the x-coordinates are: 9, 9,9 and 9

At x = 9, y = 0

At x = 9, y = 1

At x = 9, y = 2

At x = 9, y = 3

Please observe that the x-coordinate values i.e. x=9are repeated.

Thus, the coordinate pairs (9, 0), (9, 1), (9, 2), (9, 3) does not represent the function.

Answer:

10

Step-by-step explanation:

See the picture attached.

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{\sf No}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

These triangles are not similar because their angles are not equal.

Conditions for two or more triangles to be similar:

1) Their angles are congruent or equal.

2) Their sides are proportional.

[tex]\rule[225]{225}{2}[/tex]

Hope this helped!

Answer:

c 7 mins

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:  0.4016

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x be a random variable that represents the height of women in a country.

Mean : [tex]\mu=64.3[/tex] inches

Sample size : n= 65

Standard deviation: [tex]\sigma=2.81[/tex]

The probability that the mean height for the sample is greater than 65 inches = [tex]P(x>65)=1-P(x<65)[/tex]

[tex]=1-P(\dfrac{x-\mu}{\sigma}<\dfrac{65-64.3}{2.81})\\\\= 1-P(z<0.2491)\\\\=1-0.5984\ \ \ \text{[By p-value table]}\\\\=0.4016[/tex]

Hence, the probability that the mean height for the sample is greater than 65 inches = 0.4016

Answer:

A (no because the graph is not a straight line)

Step-by-step explanation:

The rate of change is not consistent, and therefor is not proportional.

Answer:

(D) No, because the graph does not pass through the origin.

Step-by-step explanation:

because its the correct answer (im smart)

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Because they took the correct steps to answer the equation.They also got the right answer (-2).

At the begining they added 4 to both sides (to cancel out the 4)

C would be wrong because they subtracted 4 from a negative four and this does NOT cancel it out.

Have a Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious day, I hope you like my explination. If you do please give rating or brainliest :)

Answer:

x

Step-by-step explit can only be a function if every input has its own output

Answer:

$667.80

Step-by-step explanation:

30% of 900 is 270, so the price of the TV would be 630 without the tax. 6% of 630 is 37.8, so in total, the price would be $667.80

Answer: 20% of the time.

Step-by-step explanation: 5+3+2 = 10 There are 2 blue so 2/10=1/5=20%

Answer:

The appropriate response is "(26.03, 33.97)".

Step-by-step explanation:

The given values are:

Average maternal age,

[tex]\bar{x} = 30[/tex]

Standard deviation,

s = 6.2

Random sample,

n = 20

Now,

The degree of freedom will be:

⇒ [tex]df=n-1[/tex]

        [tex]=20-1[/tex]

        [tex]=19[/tex]

"t" at confidence level 99%, will be:

⇒ [tex]\alpha=1-99 \ percent[/tex]

       [tex]=1-0.99[/tex]

       [tex]=0.01[/tex]

⇒ [tex]\frac{\alpha}{2}=\frac{0.01}{2}[/tex]

       [tex]=0.005[/tex]

⇒ [tex]t\frac{\alpha}{2} \ df=t \ 0.005,19[/tex]

By using the student table, we get

             [tex]=2.86 1[/tex]

The margin of error will be:

⇒ [tex]E=\frac{t \alpha}{2,df\times (\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}})}[/tex]

On substituting the estimated values, we get

⇒     [tex]=2.861\times (\frac{6.2}{\sqrt{20}})[/tex]

⇒     [tex]=3.97[/tex]

At 99%, the confidence level will be:

⇒ [tex]\bar{x}-E< \mu <\bar{x}+E[/tex]

⇒ [tex]30-3.97< \mu < 30+3.97[/tex]

⇒ [tex](26.03,33.97)[/tex]

Thus the above is the correct approach.

Answer:

-12, -3, 5, 9

Step-by-step explanation:

ok. So the numbers are 5, -3, -12, and 9.

In these numbers, there are 2 negatives. They are -12 and -3.

In negatives, the bigger the number is, the number is smaller.

So we first put

-12, -3 as our 2 first. Then the other ones are 5 and 9.

and you obviously know that 5 is less than 9. try it out. 9-5 =4 which is positive

So then you put 5, 9

And our full answer is

-12, -3, 5, 9