Answer:
A process used to manage time, space, and visibility to reduce the risk of situations.
What is the difference between being polite and being passive? Give some example
Answer:
- Polite Is having or showing behavior that is respectful and considerate of other people.
- Passive accepting or allowing what happens or what others do, without active response or resistance.
Example: Jack is liked by other for being respectful and considerate. Mark is a person who accepts everyone but also negative vibes.
Zwane died intestate on 26 November 2021 and is survived by his wife Dudu to whom he was married according to Customary Law in 2011. They did not enter into an antenuptial contract and were married in community of property. At the time of Zwane’s death, Dudu was seven months pregnant with Zwane’s child, who they planned to call Bongani. Zwane is also survived by the following relatives:
(i) His son Joshua who renounced his rights to inherit;
(ii) His father Solly;
(iii) His younger sister Rose.
The joint estate is worth R900 000.00 (Nine Hundred Thousand Rand). How will Zwane’s estate devolve?
The way and manner that Zwane's estate would devolve under the Community of Property are that Dudu has the right to dispose of the joint estate as she wished.
What is the community of property work in South Africa?in South Africa, when a couple is married in a community of property and did not enter into an antenuptial or prenuptial agreement to exclude the community of property clause regarding their joint estate, each spouse can dispose of the assets as they wished.
By the time that Zwane died intestate, and applying the Community of Property clause, Dudu has the exclusive right to the devolution of the estate.
Thus, the manner that Zwane's estate would devolve under the Community of Property is that Dudu has the right to dispose of the joint estate as she wished.
Learn more about the community of property in South Africa at https://brainly.com/question/3669648
Which of the following is an example of a cyberattack? A. An employee attacking a coworker OB. A virus attacking a computer OC. A cashier stealing money D. An employee using another employee's login
Answer: B. A virus attacking a computer
Explanation: it makes the most sense
what is health and safety
safety and health are different things but they both can be good together at the same time. health is to make sure your body is healthy. to be healthy is to eat good foods like vegetables and fruit and other goods. you can still have sweet foods just not as much. to be safety is to be safe. its when something bad is happening and try to make it so it doesnt happen so your safe.
i hope it helps
Discuss the sources of inner conflict in correctional environment in South Africa?
Answer:
National Council for Correctional Services
The NCCS is a statutory body that guides the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services in developing policy relating to the correctional system and the sentence-management process.
Judicial Inspectorate of Correctional Services
The JICS was established in 1998 with the statutory objective to facilitate the inspection of correctional centres so that the inspecting judge may report on the treatment of inmates and on conditions in correctional centres. The JICS is an independent office.
Explanation:
Answer:
National Council for Correctional Services
The NCCS is a statutory body that guides the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services in developing policy relating to the correctional system and the sentence-management process.
Explanation:
what is globalization
Answer:
✨REAL ANSWER✨Globalization is a global system that describes the interactions and changes that bind people, companies, governments, and nations around the world. It refers to the way information, products, services and capital flow between global societies.
In this type of plea, a defendant pleads guilty or nolo contendere to a lesser included charge. Group of answer choices horizontal plea avoidance of stigma plea vertical plea reduced sentenced plea
In this type of vertical plea, a defendant pleads guilty or nolo contendere to a lesser included charge.
What is vertical plea?Vertical plea can be defined as the type of plead that help to reduce the punishment of a defendant.
In the court of law a defendant may tend to plead guilty for a lesser offense he/she committed which can result in a lesser or lower punishment.
Therefore In this type of vertical plea, a defendant pleads guilty or nolo contendere to a lesser included charge.
Learn more about vertical plea here:https://brainly.com/question/9031208
#SPJ1
According to Maryland law, how far does a
driver need to
be from a cyclist
Why was the department of homeland security formed?.
Answer:
They were formed for terriostic attacks against the U.S.A.
Explanation:
They are public security for terrorist attacks.
Deneen sweeting was a defendant in the third circuit in 2000. what aspect of criminal law is his case about
Embezzlement. A jail guard is working on the night shift all alone. He locks himself out of his office, leaving all the jail keys in the office. He remembers an inmate brought in earlier in the day who had lock-picking devices in his possession when he was booked. He goes to the evidence locker, retrieves the lock-picking devices, opens the locked door, and returns the devices to the locker. The lock-picking devices were gone for less than five minutes. Answer the following questions:
a. Has he embezzled the devices?
b. Does it make a difference that he put the property back within five minutes?
c. If you were his supervisor, how would you handle this situation?
Answer:
I think the answer is C
but if I am wrong please don't report me just send me a message that I was wrong and I will try to return the points
any person violating illinois preium finance laws if convicted , may be imposed a civil fine of up to
If no one wins the electoral college, who chooses the next president?.
Answer:
Under the 12th ademendment they have the vice president run it.
Explanation:
They put the vice president in charge of things.
What is the part of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that relates specifically to employee rights? A. Title Vu B. Title VIII C. Title V D. Title X
Answer:
the answer is B.
Explanation:
This is because it was under that title.
40. A contract which can either be refused or ratified is;
a) Formal Contract
b) Executed Contract
c) Unilateral Contract
d) Implied Contract
e) Voidable Contract
A Contract which can either be refused or ratified is called voidable contract.
Contract is defined as a legally enforceable agreement that creates and obligations among parties. A contract involves transfer of goods, services, money or promise to transfer any of those for future dates.
What are voidable contract?A voidable contract is a contract which can be either affirmed or rejected at the option of one of the parties. Once the contract is repudiated by one party, it becomes Void contract.
Grounds for voidable contract are - Coercion, Undue Influence, Mental Incompetence, Intoxication, Fraud or Misrepresentation.
When a contract is entered into without the free consent of the party, it is considered a voidable contract. A voidable contract may be considered valid if it is not cancelled by the aggrieved party within a reasonable time.
Under USA legal system, Contract law regulates the obligation established by agreement, whether expressed or implied, between the private parties. Law of contract varies from state to state but also there is a presence of nationwide federal contract law.
Under Indian Legal System, Contract is defined under Indian Contract Act 1872 under which Voidable Contract is defined under Section 2(i) of the Act.
There are certain difference between USA Contract Act and Indian Contract Act based on:
-Presence of statute of fraud in USA which is not present in India
-India does not have separate legislation for sale of goods or services.
-American common law has imposed a good faith dealing requirement on parties entering a contract with each other
-Monetary damages in the United States can be classified into three types- expectation interest, reliance interest, and restitution of interest
Neither the Indian courts nor the Contract Act have classified damages as is done in the USA
To learn more about the Voidable Contract here
https://brainly.com/question/4272013
#SPJ3
The proper legal terms to describe the finding in wickard v. Filburn.
Answer:
Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111, is a United States Supreme Court decision that dramatically increased the regulatory power of the federal government. It remains as one of the most important and far-reaching cases concerning the New Deal, and it set a precedent for an expansive reading of the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Claus…
Wickard v. Filburn suggests that commerce jurisdiction can be used to restrict activities as long as they have a significant, financial consequences on interstate trade.
What is legal terms?A condition or activity is lawful if it is permitted or mandated by law. A biological or non-human organization that is considered as a people for specific legal reasons is referred as a legal adult. A juridical typical person has the right to be challenged and sued, possess possessions, and negotiate agreements.
The United States Supreme Court judgement in Result of ineffective v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111, significantly strengthened the federal administration's ability to regulate.
It continues to be among the most significant and very far issues involving the Stimulus Package, and it established a foundation for a broad interpretation of the Constitutional Provision of the U.S. Constitution.
Learn more about legal terms, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13283420
#SPJ2
Describe the impeachment process. Why are public officials impeached? What is the 25th Amendment? How is it used? Why is it used? To whom does it apply?
Answer:
1. As adopted by the framers of the Constitution, this congressional power is a fundamental component of the system of “checks and balances.” Through the impeachment process, Congress charges and then tries an official of the federal government for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
2. The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
3. The Twenty-fifth Amendment (Amendment XXV) to the United States Constitution says that if the President becomes unable to do his job, the Vice President becomes the President (Section 1) or Acting President (Sections 3 or 4)
4. Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.
5. It clarifies that the vice president becomes president if the president dies, resigns, or is removed from office, and establishes how a vacancy in the office of the vice president can be filled.
6. Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.
Explanation:
The action of swimmers using their arms to propel themselves through the water is an example of what law?.
Answer:
The answer is Newtons third law
Explanation:
When you are accelerating you use your arms to push the water you can also accelerate by kicking.
12) The Declaration of Independence says that all Americans have unalienable rights. This means that these rights
A) cannot be taken away from individuals.
B) must be paid for through federal taxes.
are granted only to citizens born in the United States.
D) will not be given to citizens until they are eighteen years old.
Answer:
A ( cannot be taken away from individuals )
Explanation:
I DID THE USA TEST PREP AND GOT IT CORRECT!!
what does Dooyeweerd, Van Zyl regard as the essence of education law
For Dooyeweerd Van Zyl, the essence of education law is to provide the required legal guide and framework to ensure that educational institutions are administered for the benefit of society as a whole.
What is education law?Education law is the legal framework followed by educational institutions to ensure:
Equal access to quality education for all learners.Educational institutions are devoid of social discrimination.Compulsory schooling for children under a certain age.The existence of independent and public schools.Education law deals with the legal problems and issues that confront school administrators and policymakers, especially about the rights of learners.
Who is Dooyeweerd, Van Zyl?Dooyeweerd Van Zyl was one of the South African legal philosophers who advocated that law should be regarded as science.
Thus, for Dooyeweerd Van Zyl, the essence of education law is to provide the required legal guide or framework that ensures that educational institutions are administered for the benefit of society as a whole.
Learn more about education laws at https://brainly.com/question/26904257
Select ALL the correct answers.
Which two cases would the Supreme Court be most likely to review?
a case concerning a motor vehicle accident
✓
a case concerning presidential actions
a case involving two members of Congress
✓
a case in which a federal law is challenged
Answer is 2&4
Answer:
a case concerning presidential actions
Explanation:
What is the most accurate description of the criminal justice system?
Answer:
The criminal justice system is a network of government and private agencies intended to manage accused and convicted criminals. The criminal justice system is comprised of multiple interrelated pillars, consisting of academia, law enforcement, forensic services, the judiciary, and corrections.
Hope I helped
Many terrorism analysts believe terrorism can only exist in a democracy and cannot function in a totalitarian state. What do
you believe is the relationship between the conditions in the places where terrorist organizations usually take hold and the
conditions of democracy?
Answer:
it's a real life example of afganistan. The things which need to operate whole world is the knowledge of particular section and department. So if someone operate democracy without knowledge of democracy the country will suffer from different crises
What can a person face for refusing to help another if they caused the specific harm?
Answer:
The person will have
1:a guilty conscience
2:the person will be rejected
4. A branch manager of WR has received a request from a corporate customer, Acme Pty Ltd, which wishes to increase its overdraft. The bank is prepared to do so provided the company provides appropriate security in view of the fact that the current overdraft has exceeded its limit. Acme’s directors, John and Wisteria, suggest that Wisteria’s parents might be prepared to mortgage their home to the bank.
Required:
The manager seeks your legal advice about the pitfalls of accepting security from such people, and what precautions the bank would need to take if it decided to do so. ( See Amadio’s case).
The advice that should be provided to the bank manager about the pitfalls of accepting security from Wisteria's parents, including the necessary precautions the bank should take, include:
The bank should ensure that it provides adequate explanations to Wisteria's parents about the nature of the overdraft and the financial state of Acme Pty Ltd.The bank should further explain the limitations of the guarantee involved with respect to the mortgage of the home.The bank should discover if Wisteria's parents' home is under another mortgage.The bank should take precautions that it does not fall into the pits that the classical case of Commercial Bank of Australia v. Amadio by not indulging itself in unconscionable conduct with the parents of Wisteria.What is unconscionable conduct?Unconscionable conduct is harsh conduct that goes against good conscience.
Unconscionable conduct is usually described as oppressive without considering its unfairness.
Thus, in seeking Wisteria's parents to mortgage their home to the bank, the bank manager should be careful not to mingle its business dealings with persons who lack the capacity to enter into a valid guarantee for Acme Pty Ltd.
Learn more about unconscionable conduct at https://brainly.com/question/13720902
1
If you decide to propose a new law in your state, what might be the first step you take?
O Send your idea to a committee to review it.
O Write a text of the law to submit to the legislature.
O Work with your state representative to write a new statute.
O Work with the governor to create a bill.
Answer:
Work with the governor to create a bill.
Explanation:
The legislative process in a nutshell
First, a Representative sponsors a bill.The bill is then assigned to a committee for study.If released by the committee, the bill is put on a calendar to be voted on, debated or amended.If the bill passes by simple majority (218 of 435), the bill moves to the Senate.What is it called when a licensed surgeon calls an unlicensed surgeon to perform surgery on a patient in Business Law?
Are federal agencies required to have rcr policies
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
State University provides housing on campus and in some adjacent off-campus neighborhoods. To lease a university house or apartment, a person must be a student at State. This requirement is a. an operation of law. b. a breach of contract. c. a novation. d. a condition.
This requirement that is ised by this school before they lease a house out is known as a condition precedent.
What is a condition precedent?This is a legal term that helps to describe all the events and fact that must first be established before a specific contract can be put into consideration.
The precedent is what is set here before anyone can be leased the properties.
Read more on lease here: https://brainly.com/question/24460932
#SPJ1
Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 gives the President the power of appointment, but the guidelines for removal come from which two Supreme Court cases?
One of the guidelines for removal come from which the Supreme Court cases of Myers v. United States.
What is the ruling in Myers case?The Supreme Court ruled that the restrictions on presidential removal power requiring Senate consent to remove postmasters were unconstitutional.
The judges explains further that the power to remove appointed officials rests solely with the president and does not require congressional approval.
Therefore, the case of Myers v. United States serves as a guideline for removal of appointed officials.
Read more about Myers case
brainly.com/question/26214126